Rebalancing Work and Life for the Busy Physician.

Many argue that the concept of "work-life balance" is impossible to achieve for busy physicians. After spending years in medical training and building a career in health care, physicians often find their work encroaching upon other aspects of day-to-day life. Over the past decade, studies have shown that physician burnout, stress, depression, mental health, and general lack of well-being affect productivity, efficiency, and patient care. In this article, we will discuss the concept of "work-life balance" and recommend strategies to strive for a meaningful balance.

A second look at the mortality in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura score: An external validation study.

BACKGROUND: Despite high effectiveness of therapeutic plasma exchange as the first-line therapy, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) remains a life-threatening condition and may require utilization of adjunct modalities in certain patients. Mortality In TTP Score (MITS) is a prognostic risk stratified scoring tool designed to predict mortality in hospitalized patients with TTP. There has not been an external validation of MITS to date. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed an external validation of MITS in patients hospitalized with TTP using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2019. We identified 4589 patients who met the selection criteria. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were run based on the MITS parameters of arterial thrombosis, intracranial haemorrhage, age, renal failure, ischemic stroke, platelet transfusion, and myocardial infarction to evaluate prognostic performance and discriminatory power of this tool. RESULTS: All-cause mortality was reported more frequently in female subjects (57.8%), Caucasian race (58.9%), and ages 60 years, and above (52.3%). In a multivariable analysis, the variables included in the MITS criteria remained significant predictors of mortality. Moreover, MITS correlated with mortality risk. Our model's area under the receiving operator character curve was 71%, compared to 78.6% in the derivation cohort study. DISCUSSION: In this external validation cohort, performance of MITS was similar to the derivation cohort, validating it as a valuable clinical tool that may guide management of TTP patients.

A Contrast Frugal Approach to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now regarded as a viable treatment option for all cases of severe aortic stenosis (AS). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common and lowers the survival of patients after TAVR and iodine-based contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) plays a significant adverse role in AKI. Therefore, in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients requiring pre-operative evaluation for TAVR, the risk of CIN is of particular concern. METHODS: It was a single-center study including eight CKD patients who underwent pre-operative evaluation for TAVR with minimized contrast exposure by means of pre-operative contrast-sparing evaluation and intra-operative contrast minimization. All patients had glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated before TAVR and on a follow-up about one month and one year post-operatively to document the impact of this TAVR protocol on prognosis of kidney function in patients with advanced CKD. RESULTS: New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification demonstrated significant improvement of symptomatology (p = 0.0001) by one-year post-TAVR. Patients' mean AS gradient was significantly improved (p = 0.00004) after the TAVR procedure. No significant post-operative paravalvular aortic regurgitation was noted on follow up echocardiogram. eGFR data showed mean eGFR for the group was slightly better (27.38 ml/min/per 1.73 m2 BSA vs. 30.38 ml/min/per 1.73 m2 BSA) after TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: "Contrast frugal" approach is feasible and safe for pre-TAVR evaluation and the procedure itself. Our pilot study showed no significant paravalvular leak of the prosthetic valve following this proposed protocol. No statistically significant decrease in eGFR was noted on a one-year follow-up.

Bleeding in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer Compared With Nongastrointestinal Cancer Treated With Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, or Enoxaparin for Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the bleeding risk in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer with that in patients with non-GI cancer treated with anticoagulation for acute cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (Ca-VTE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with Ca-VTE seen at the Mayo Thrombophilia Clinic between March 1, 2013, and April 20, 2020, were observed prospectively to assess major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB). RESULTS: In the group of 1392 patients with Ca-VTE, 499 (35.8%) had GI cancer including 272 with luminal GI cancer (lower GI, 208; upper GI, 64), 176 with pancreatic cancer, and 51 with hepatobiliary cancer. The rate of major bleeding and CRNMB in patients with GI cancer was similar to that in 893 (64.2%) patients with non-GI cancer treated with apixaban, rivaroxaban, or enoxaparin. Apixaban had a higher rate of major bleeding in luminal GI cancer compared with the non-GI cancer group (15.59 vs 3.26 per 100 person-years; P=.004) and compared with enoxaparin in patients with luminal GI cancer (15.59 vs 3.17; P=.04). Apixaban had a lower rate of CRNMB compared with rivaroxaban in patients with GI cancer (3.83 vs 9.40 per 100 person-years; P=.03). Patients treated with rivaroxaban in the luminal GI cancer group had a major bleeding rate similar to that of patients with non-GI cancer (2.04 vs 4.91 per 100 person-years; P=.37). CONCLUSION: Apixaban has a higher rate of major bleeding in patients with luminal GI cancer compared with patients with non-GI cancer and compared with enoxaparin in patients with luminal GI cancer. Rivaroxaban shows no increased risk of major bleeding in patients with GI cancer or luminal GI cancer compared with patients with non-GI cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504007.

Delayed anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism: Reasons and associated outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the number of cases with delayed anticoagulation initiation, explored the reasons for the delay, and its impact on outcome in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) treated in an organized setting of treatment initiation and continuous, prospective follow-up. METHODS: Patients with anticoagulation initiation delay >24 hours were identified within the cohort of patients with acute VTE enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Venous Thromboembolism Registry between 2013 and 2020. The reasons for treatment delay were explored by reviewing the electronic database. VTE recurrence, all-cause mortality, major bleeding, and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNMB) were compared to those with no anticoagulation delay. RESULTS: Of 2378 patients with acute VTE, 100 (4.2%) experienced an anticoagulation delay. We identified seven reasons for treatment delays: deferring anticoagulation initiation to specialists (n = 38), thrombocytopenia (n = 10), planned or recent procedure (n = 16), active or recent bleeding (n = 12), missed diagnosis (n = 7), logistics (n = 6), and patient decision (n = 4). In seven cases, no reason was identified. We identified modifiable reasons for anticoagulation delay in 55%. At 90-day follow-up, patients with anticoagulation delay had a higher rate of mortality and major bleeding. VTE recurrence and CRNMB were not statistically different compared to those without anticoagulation delay. After adjustment for age, weight, and cancer, hazard ratios (HRs) for VTE recurrence and major bleeding remained elevated but not to a statistically significant level. CONCLUSION: In the setting of a highly organized system of anticoagulation initiation, the incidence of treatment delay is low. Yet most delays could be avoided. A low number of cases provide insufficient power to evaluate the clinical consequences of anticoagulation initiation delay; however, elevated HR for VTE recurrence and major bleeding suggest association and need for further investigation.