Locoregional Flap Reconstruction of the Distal Third of the Leg - What Role Does it Have in a Modern Reconstructive Algorithm?

ABSTRACT: Reconstruction of traumatic defects of the lower third of the leg poses a challenge due to limited locoregional options. Failed coverage can be associated with prolonged hospital stay, infection, loss of function, and unplanned return to surgery. Over the last few decades, free tissue transfer has dominated reconstructive algorithms for such defects; however, locoregional flaps may provide equally effective coverage in select patients. In the wake of the CODID-19 pandemic, locoregional flaps gained more consideration due to limited resources. We present a literature review and discussion of locoregional flaps, with emphasis on the quality and efficacy of these reconstructive modalities compared with free tissue transfer and surgical indications.Soleus flaps, reverse sural flaps, and cutaneous perforator-based flaps are workhorses for small to medium size defects of the distal third of the leg, even in the setting of concomitant orthopedic trauma and exposed vital structures. It is important to consider such alternatives an integral part of the reconstructive algorithm as they can provide durable coverage with a favorable complication profile with less resource utilization. Appropriate patient selection requires consideration of the character of the defect, smoking status, preexisting vascular disease, and the zone of injury.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol for Cranial Vault Remodeling Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been implemented across surgical disciplines, including cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. The authors aim to describe the implementation of an ERAS protocol for cranial vault remodeling procedures performed for patients with craniosynostosis at a tertiary care hospital. DESCRIPTION: Institutional review board approval was received. All patients undergoing a cranial remodeling procedure for craniosynostosis at the authors' institution over a 10-year period were collected (n = 168). Patient and craniosynostosis demographics were collected as well as operative details. Primary outcome measures were intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) and narcotic usage. Chi squared and independent t-tests were employed to determine significance. A significance value of 0.05 was utilized. RESULTS: During the time examined, there were 168 primary cranial vault remodeling procedures performed at the authors' institution - all of which were included in the analysis. Use of the ERAS protocol was associated with decreased initial 24-hour morphine equivalent usage (p < 0.01) and decreased total morphine equivalent usage (p < 0.01). Patients using the ERAS protocol experienced a shorter ICU LOS (p < 0.01), but the total hospital length of stay was unchanged. CONCLUSION: This study reiterates the benefit of developing and implementing an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing cranial vault remodeling procedures. The protocol resulted in an overall decreased ICU LOS and a decrease in narcotic use. This has implications for ways to maximize hospital reimbursement for these procedures, as well as potentially improve outcomes.