Differences in knowledge among patients with atrial fibrillation receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists.

BACKGROUND: Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) worldwide. Few articles have compared current understanding of AF patients about the disease and anticoagulant therapy in relation to the medications used. AIM: We sought to compare the knowledge of AF and anticoagulation between AF patients treated with NOACs and those on vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). METHODS: We used the Jessa AF Knowledge Questionnaire (JAKQ), developed and validated in Belgium. Patients were re-cruited at a tertiary centre in Kraków, Poland. RESULTS: A total of 479 AF patients completed the JAKQ. Patients on NOACs (n = 276, 57.6%) compared with those on VKAs (n = 175, 36.5%) did not differ regarding demographic and clinical variables. The mean score of the JAKQ was very similar in the NOAC and VKA group (60.7 ± 17.0% vs. 61.6 ± 17.1%; p = 0.4, respectively). The differences in the proportion of correct responses referred to three questions. Consequences of AF, such as blood clots and cerebral infarction, were more obvious for patients on NOACs compared with those on VKAs (81.5% vs. 70.9%; p = 0.01). The patients on NOACs (78.7% vs. 67.6%; p = 0.009) more frequently considered consulting a physician for advice concerning anticoagulant treatment before surgery, while fewer patients on NOACs were aware of the need to take their medication even if they did not feel AF (76.1% vs. 89.7%; p = 0.0004). Only 25.9% of the VKA patients and 49.3% of the NOAC users knew what to do if they missed a dose of the anticoagulant. CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of arrhythmia and anticoagulation is better regarding the safety issues among subjects on NOACs compared with those on VKAs. Irrespective of the type of oral anticoagulation therapy, education of AF patients should be improved.

Prediction of unstable anticoagulation with acenocoumarol versus warfarin in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The SAMe-TT2R2 (sex female, age, medical history, treatment, tobacco use, race) score was developed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) on warfarin. The present study aimed to 1) compare the anticoagulation quality and management of AF patients treated with warfarin with those on acenocoumarol and 2) optimize the SAMe-TT2R2 score to detect AF patients at high risk of unstable anticoagulation with acenocoumarol and warfarin. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, 320 patients with AF, including 15 (5%) after valve replacement, aged 40-82 (median 70) years, including 203 (63%) receiving acenocoumarol and 117 (37%) treated with warfarin, were studied. The SAMe-TT2R2 score was modified based on the candidate factors retrieved from univariate regression and assessed using the receiver operating curves (ROC). RESULTS: A median SAMe-TT2R2 score was 2 (1-3). Proportions of patients with ≥ 2 points and 0-1 points in the SAMe-TT2R2 score who had the time in therapeutic range (TTR) ≤ 70% were similar (61 [67%] vs. 63 [56%], p = 0.11). A modified score, involving medical history (myocardial infarction [MI] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], 1 point), statin treatment (1 point) and tobacco use (2 points) had a higher area under the curve (AUC) in patients on acenocoumarol compared to SAMe- TT2R2 (0.66; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.73 vs. 0.56; 0.48-0.64, p = 0.042); ≥ 1 point indicated TTR > 70% with a sensitivity and specificity of 61% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SAMe-TT2R2 score is less effective in predicting unstable anticoagulation with acenocoumarol versus warfarin. Adding statin use and highlighting COPD and previous MI increases a predictive value of this score for acenocoumarol.

Single-agent MOR208 salvage and maintenance therapy in a patient with refractory/relapsing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Standard first-line treatment for this aggressive subtype comprises the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone. If patients receiving such treatment have an early relapse, or their disease is initially refractory to such treatment, standard salvage regimens may not be effective. There is therefore a high unmet clinical need for new targeted agents that might improve the outcome for such patients. CD19 is a B-lymphocyte lineage-specific cell surface antigen that is expressed by most B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. MOR208 is an fragment-crystallizable engineered humanized monoclonal antibody with enhanced antitumor activity that targets CD19 and that may consequently have clinical utility in this setting. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 33-year-old Caucasian man who presented with a 3-month history of general symptoms and who was admitted to our pulmonology ward with dyspnea due to pneumonia and severe anemia. A histopathological examination of an enlarged right suprasternal lymph node confirmed a diagnosis of T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma, an uncommon morphological variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Our patient had a complete response to first-line rituximab combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone, but had an early relapse 5 months after the end of treatment. After intensive salvage therapy consolidated with an autologous stem-cell transplant, our patient again had an early relapse and was subsequently enrolled in a phase IIa trial of single-agent MOR208. Following a scheduled 3 months of weekly treatment, a partial response was confirmed and MOR208 was continued as maintenance therapy, with administration every second week. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography confirmed a complete response 9 months later. This response is ongoing, with a duration of 24 months. MOR208 was well-tolerated by our patient and his quality of life and performance status remain high. No hospitalizations were required and our patient engaged in full-time work and physical activities. CONCLUSION: Third-line single-agent therapy with the CD19 antibody MOR208 was highly effective in this patient, despite a history of early relapse after standard first-line and second-line treatment regimens. These data provide support for future randomized studies of MOR208.

Repeatedly administered antidepressant drugs modulate humoral and cellular immune response in mice through action on macrophages.

Depression is associated with an altered immune response, which could be normalized by antidepressant drugs. However, little is known about the influence of antidepressants on the peripheral immune response and function of macrophages in individuals not suffering from depression. Our studies were aimed at determining the influence of antidepressant drugs on the humoral and cellular immune response in mice. Mice were treated intraperitoneally with imipramine, fluoxetine, venlafaxine, or moclobemide and contact immunized with trinitrophenyl hapten followed by elicitation and measurement of contact sensitivity by ear swelling response. Peritoneal macrophages from drug-treated mice were either pulsed with sheep erythrocytes or conjugated with trinitrophenyl and transferred into naive recipients to induce humoral or contact sensitivity response, respectively. Secretion of reactive oxygen intermediates, nitric oxide, and cytokines by macrophages from drug-treated mice was assessed, respectively, in chemiluminometry, Griess-based colorimetry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and the expression of macrophage surface markers was analyzed cytometrically. Treatment of mice with fluoxetine, venlafaxine, and moclobemide results in suppression of humoral and cell-mediated immunity with a reduction of the release of macrophage proinflammatory mediators and the expression of antigen-presentation markers. In contrast, treatment with imipramine enhanced the humoral immune response and macrophage secretory activity but slightly suppressed active contact sensitivity. Our studies demonstrated that systemically delivered antidepressant drugs modulate the peripheral humoral and cell-mediated immune responses, mostly through their action on macrophages. Imipramine was rather proinflammatory, whereas other tested drugs expressed immunosuppressive potential. Current observations may be applied to new therapeutic strategies dedicated to various disorders associated with excessive inflammation.

Warfarin Metabolites in Patients Following Cardiac Valve Implantation: A Contribution of Clinical and Genetic Factors.

INTRODUCTION: Warfarin, a racemic mixture of S- and R-enantiomers, is the cornerstone of therapy in patients following cardiac valve replacement. S-warfarin is metabolized to 7-S-hydroxywarfarin by the cytochrome P450 isoform 2C9 encoded by CYP2C9 gene. R-warfarin is metabolized by multiple cytochromes P450. We sought to assess the impact of clinical and genetic factors on circulating warfarin metabolites following valve implantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Venous blood was collected from 120 patients after 3 months since elective mitral and/or aortic valve replacement. Plasma S-warfarin, R-warfarin, S-7-hydroxywarfarin, and R-7-hydroxywarfarin were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. The S-7-hydroxywarfarin/S-warfarin and S-warfarin/R-warfarin (S/R) ratios, along with warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), defined as INR/S-warfarin ratio, were calculated. Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) c.-1639A, CYP2C9*3 and CYP2C9*2 alleles were determined using real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The S-warfarin was higher in former smokers (p = 0.047) and the VKORC1 c.-1639A allele carriers (p < 0.0001). The S-7-hydroxywarfarin was lower in carriers of the VKORC1 c.-1639A allele (p = 0.0005) and CYP2C9*3 (p = 0.047). The S-7-hydroxywarfarin/S-warfarin ratio was lower in the carriers of CYP2C9*3 (p = 0.008), but not in those with VKORC1 -c.1639A allele. The S/R ratio was higher in patients with hypertension (p = 0.01). The independent predictors of elevated S/R ratio defined as the upper quartile were diabetes (p = 0.045), CYP2C9*3 (p < 0.0001) and CYP2C9*2 (p = 0.0002). The independent predictors of elevated WSI were current smoking (p = 0.049), implantation of mechanical valve (p = 0.006) and VKORC1c.-1639A allele (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: We conclude that not only genetic, but also several clinical factors affect warfarin metabolites in patients following cardiac valve implantation.