Healed ORIF in a fibula fracture - Hardware removal or hardware retention for the fibula in a patient with minor symptoms?

HISTORY: - A 31yo female is involved in a fall while climbing on some wet rocks. She was brought into the emergency department and was found to have suffered a closed fracture of the right fibula with a deltoid ligament injury. Distal neurovascular exam was normal. She is otherwise unhurt. She had ORIF of her ankle injury and it has gone onto heal with good results. She comes back at 6 months and complains of vague pain over her lateral ankle and hardware with a normal physical exam. She wonders about hardware removal, (Figs. 1 and 2). PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: - previous history of breast reduction surgery and she has delivered one child vaginally. No chronic diseases and she takes no pills except the birth control pill. SOCIAL HISTORY: - married with one child and works as an administrative assistant for a manufacturing company; she is a social drinker and nonsmoker. Has a history of using some recreational drugs but none for 10 years. She is moderately active.

Midshaft humeral fracture - Operative or nonoperative treatment?

HISTORY: A 49yo male is involved in a fall while skiing. He was brought off the ski hill and was found to have suffered a closed fracture of the left midshaft humerus. Distal neurovascular exam was normal. He is otherwise unhurt (Figs. 1 and 2). PAST MEDICAL HISTORY: previous history of back surgery for a disc problem when he was 35yo. Has been told that he has high blood pressure but does nothing for this. He is Right hand dominant. SOCIAL HISTORY: married with one child and works as an equipment operator for a crane company; he is a social drinker and smokes 1pack per day for 30 years. Has a history of using some recreational drugs but none for 10 years.

Is there a time when we should treat a fresh hip fracture in a physiologically elder patient with palliative care?

HISTORY - A 92-year-old female patient presents to the Emergency Room with a displaced intertrochanteric hip fracture after a fall from bed. She lives in a full care nursing home with severe dementia and wears an adult diaper. She does not walk anymore (for 3 months) and the family decision makers (they have power of attorney) have decided that she is not a surgical candidate except under extreme circumstance. Medically, she has moderate aortic regurgitation and a long history of chronic pulmonary fibrosis that has required occasional oxygen supplementation. She has Type 2 diabetes and takes oral meds for this. She has swallowing difficulties and eats mostly pureed food. She only communicates when she has pain and does not recognize her family when they visit. Her hemoglobin and electrolytes are within normal limits. Her vitals are stable, and she is mildly hypertensive.

Digital clock drawing test metrics in older patients before and after endoscopy with sedation: An exploratory analysis.

BACKGROUND: In the postoperative period, clinically feasible instruments to monitor elderly patients' neurocognitive recovery and discharge-readiness, especially after short-stay procedures, are limited. Cognitive monitoring may be improved by a novel digital clock drawing test (dCDT). We screened for cognitive impairment with the 4 A Test (4AT) and then administered the dCDT pre and post short-stay procedure (endoscopy). The primary aim was to investigate whether the dCDT was sensitive to a change in cognitive status postendoscopy. We also investigated if preoperative cognitive status impacted postendoscopy dCDT variables. METHODS: We recruited 100 patients ≥65 years presenting for endoscopy day procedures at a single metropolitan hospital. Participants were assessed after admission and immediately before discharge from the hospital. We administered the 4AT, followed by both command and copy clock conditions of the dCDT. We analysed the total drawing time (dCDT time), as well as scored the drawn clock against the established Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) criteria both before and after endoscopy. RESULTS: Linear regression showed higher 4AT test scores (poorer performance) were associated with longer postoperative dCDT time (ß = 5.6, p = 0.012) for the command condition after adjusting for preoperative baseline dCDT metrics, sex, age, and years of education. CONCLUSION: Postoperative dCDT time-based variables slowed in those with baseline cognitive impairment detected by the 4AT, but not for those without cognitive impairment. Our results suggest the dCDT, using the command mode, may help detect cognitive impairment in patients aged >65 years after elective endoscopy.

Identification of hypercoagulability with thrombelastography in patients with hip fracture receiving thromboprophylaxis.

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the second most common complication after hip fracture surgery. We used thrombelastography (TEG), a whole-blood, point-of-care test that can provide an overview of the clotting process, to determine the duration of hypercoagulability after hip fracture surgery. Methods: In this prospective study, consecutive patients aged 51 years or more with hip fractures (trochanteric region or neck) amenable to surgical treatment who presented to the emergency department were eligible for enrolment. Thrombelastography, including calculation of the coagulation index (CI) (combination of 4 TEG parameters for an overall assessment of coagulation) was performed daily from admission until 5 days postoperatively, and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. All patients received 28 days of thromboprophylaxis. We used single-sample t tests to compare mean maximal amplitude (MA) values (a measure of clot strength) to the hypercoagulable threshold of greater than 65 mm, a predictor of in-hospital VTE. Results: Of the 35 patients enrolled, 11 (31%) were hypercoagulable on admission based on an MA value greater than 65 mm, and 29 (83%) were hypercoagulable based on a CI value greater than 3.0; the corresponding values at 6 weeks were 23 (66%) and 34 (97%). All patients had an MA value greater than 65 mm at 2 weeks. Patients demonstrated normal coagulation on admission (mean MA value 62.2 mm [standard deviation (SD) 6.3 mm], p = 0.01) but became significantly hypercoagulable at 2 weeks (mean 71.6 mm [SD 2.6 mm], p < 0.001). There was a trend toward persistent hypercoagulability at 6 weeks (mean MA value 66.2 mm [SD 3.8 mm], p = 0.06). Conclusion: More than 50% of patients remained hypercoagulable 6 weeks after fracture despite thromboprophylaxis. Thrombelastography MA thresholds or a change in MA over time may help predict VTE risk; however, further study is needed.

Contexte: La thromboembolie veineuse (TEV) est la deuxième complication la plus courante après une chirurgie pour fracture de la hanche. Nous avons eu recours à la thromboélastographie, un test de sang total effectué au point d'intervention et donnant une idée du processus de coagulation, pour évaluer la durée de l'hypercoagulabilité à la suite d'une chirurgie pour fracture de la hanche. Méthodes: Cette étude prospective a été menée auprès de patients consécutifs admissibles de 51 ans et plus qui se sont présentés à l'urgence pour une fracture de la hanche (région trochantérienne ou col du fémur) pouvant faire l'objet d'un traitement chirurgical. Une thromboélastographie (TEG), qui comprenait le calcul de l'indice de coagulation (IC) [combinaison de 4 paramètres du TEG permettant une évaluation globale de la coagulation], a été réalisée chaque jour, de l'admission au cinquième jour postopératoire, de même qu'à 2 et à 6 semaines postopératoires. Tous les patients ont suivi une thromboprophylaxie de 28 jours. Nous avons réalisé des tests t pour échantillon unique afin de comparer l'amplitude maximale (AM) moyenne (une mesure de la résistance d'un caillot) au seuil d'hypercoagulabilité de plus de 65 mm, un prédicteur de TEV à l'hôpital. Résultats: Des 35 patients recrutés, 11 (31 %) présentaient une hypercoagulabilité à l'admission selon une AM supérieure à 65 mm, et 29 (83 %) présentaient une hypercoagulabilité selon un IC supérieur à 3,0; les valeurs correspondantes à 6 semaines étaient de 23 (66 %) et de 34 (97 %), respectivement. Tous les patients avaient une AM de plus de 65 mm à 2 semaines. Dans l'ensemble, les patients avaient une coagulation normale à l'admission (AM moyenne 62,2 mm [écart type (E.T.) 6,3 mm], p = 0,01), mais présentaient une hypercoagulabilité importante à 2 semaines (moyenne 71,6 mm [E.T. 2,6 mm], p < 0,001). L'hypercoagulabilité avait tendance à persister à 6 semaines (AM moyenne 66,2 mm [E.T. 3,8 mm], p = 0,06). Conclusion: Malgré la thromboprophylaxie, plus de 50 % des patients présentaient toujours une hypercoagulabilité 6 semaines après leur fracture. Les seuils d'AM à la thromboélastographie et les changements de l'AM au fil du temps pourraient aider à prédire le risque de TEV, mais d'autres études sur le sujet sont nécessaires.

The AO trauma CPP bone infection registry: Epidemiology and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bone infection.

Bone infection represents a serious complication of orthopedic surgery and Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen. To improve the understanding of host-pathogen interaction, we developed a biospecimen registry (AO Trauma CPP Bone Infection Registry) to collect clinical data, bacterial isolates, and serum from patients with S. aureus bone infection. A prospective multinational registry with a 12-month follow-up was created to include adult patients (18 years or older) with culture-confirmed S. aureus infection in long bones after fracture fixation or arthroplasty. Baseline patient attributes and details on infections and treatments were recorded. Blood and serum samples were obtained at baseline, 6, and 12 months. Patient-reported outcomes were collected at 1, 6, and 12 months. Clinical outcomes were recorded. Two hundred and ninety-two patients with fracture-related infection (n = 157, 53.8%), prosthetic joint infection (n = 86, 29.5%), and osteomyelitis (n = 49, 16.8%) were enrolled. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus was detected in 82 patients (28.4%), with the highest proportion found among patients from North American sites (n = 39, 48.8%) and the lowest from Central European sites (n = 18, 12.2%). Patient outcomes improved at 6 and 12 months in comparison to baseline. The SF-36 physical component summary mean (95% confidence interval) score, however, did not reach 50 at 12 months. The cure rate at the end of the study period was 62.1%. Although patients improved with treatment, less than two-thirds were cured in 1 year. At 12-month follow-up, patient-reported outcome scores were worse for patients with methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections.

A novel digital clock drawing test as a screening tool for perioperative neurocognitive disorders: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND: We developed a digital clock drawing test (dCDT), an adaptation of the original pen and paper clock test, that may be advantageous over previous dCDTs in the perioperative environment. We trialed our dCDT on a tablet device in the preoperative period to determine the feasibility of administration in this setting. To assess the clinical utility of this test, we examined the relationship between the performance on the test and compared derived digital clock measures with the 4 A's Test (4AT), a delirium and cognition screening tool. METHODS: We recruited a sample of 102 adults aged 65 years and over presenting for elective surgery in a single tertiary hospital. Participants completed the 4AT, followed by both command and copy clock conditions of the dCDT. We recorded time-based clock-drawing metrics, alongside clock replications scored using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) clock scoring criteria. RESULTS: The dCDT had an acceptance rate of 99%. After controlling for demographic variables and prior tablet use, regression analyses showed higher 4AT scores were associated with greater dCDT time (seconds) for both command (ß = 8.2, P = .020) and copy clocks (ß = 12, P = .005) and lower MoCA-based clock scores in both command (OR = 0.19, P = .001) and copy conditions (OR = 0.14, P = .012). CONCLUSION: The digital clock drawing test is feasible to administer and is highly acceptable to older adults in a preoperative setting. We demonstrated a significant association between both the dCDT time and clock score metrics, with the established 4AT. Our results provide convergent validity of the dCDT in the preoperative setting.

Does 3D CT reconstruction help the surgeon to preoperatively assess calcaneal fractures?

BACKGROUND: With the advent of 3D volume rendered CT scans, more information is potentially available to aid the surgeon in complex calcaneal fractures. The primary aim was to determine if there is a difference in inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of 3D CT reconstructions compared to 2D CTs of calcaneus fractures based on classification, identification of specific fracture characteristics and proposed treatment. It is hypothesized that the correlation will be greater between experienced surgeons and trainees when using 3D CT. As a secondary aim, the authors wished to investigate the surgeons' satisfaction with 3D CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: There were six raters, split into 2 groups: high and low surgical experience. Both 2D and 3D scans (10 patients) were reviewed by each rater by filling out a validated questionnaire. This sitting was over a period of six months and all scans were sent separately and randomly by our research coordinator. This process was repeated after a four-week break. RESULTS: The overall evaluation and satisfaction of CT scans of calcaneal fractures was improved by the additional use of volume rendered 3D images. Inexperienced surgeons benefited more than experienced surgeons in terms of reliabilities with fracture configuration. 3D CTs were more likely to change the surgeons' operative strategy. The consistency of deciding on the fracture classification and satisfaction was more uniform between all the raters when 3D CT was used. CONCLUSION: Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of 3D CT reconstructions compared to 2D CTs of calcaneus fractures was greater based on classification, identification of specific fracture characteristics and proposed treatment. Inexperienced surgeons were more consistent when interpreting the scans using 3D CTs (improved inter-observer reliability) and were always more satisfied using the 3D CTs. As there is no extra cost or radiation exposure, we propose that 3D CTs may be valuable with preoperative teaching and planning.

VIS-IT: Visualizing the Injured Tibia-A Cadaveric Study of Limb Positioning for Posterolateral Tibial Plateau Fracture Visualization.

Posterolateral tibial plateau (PLTP) fractures are often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) incompetence, such as tibial eminence fractures. Both occur from a pivot shift like mechanism. Malreductions of the tibial plateau most frequently occur in the posterolateral quadrant. Acquiring adequate intraoperative visualization of the PLTP poses a challenge. We hypothesized that visualization of PLTP could be improved by positioning the knee at 110 degrees of flexion with the addition of a varus anterolateral rotatory vector. This position and maneuver take advantage of both the nonisometric nature of the lateral soft tissues and, when present, ACL incompetence. In this cadaveric study, we digitally quantified the percentage of the lateral tibial plateau visualized under different conditions after performing an anterolateral surgical approach with submeniscal arthrotomy. Four conditions were assessed for articular visualization: (1) 30 degrees of knee flexion, (2) 110 degrees of knee flexion, (3) 110-degrees of knee flexion plus varus anterolateral rotatory vector, (4) 110-degrees of knee flexion plus varus anterolateral rotatory vector with ACL sacrifice (ACL incompetence model). In the ACL competent models, maximal lateral tibial plateau exposure was obtained with the knee positioned at 110 degrees of flexion with a varus anterolateral rotatory vector (58.2%, range: 52.9-63.4%). Articular visualization was further improved with the ACL incompetent model (82.4%, range: 77.1-87.7%), modeling a tibial eminence fracture.

A sub-meniscal arthrotomy improves the medium-term patient outcome of tibial plateau fractures.

PURPOSE: This trial was conducted to determine the medium-term functional outcome of displaced tibial plateau fracture patients treated with closed fluoroscopic assisted reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) versus patients treated with standard open reduction with sub-meniscal arthrotomy and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted in adult patients with displaced AO/OTA 41 B and 41 C tibial plateau fractures. Patients were assigned to treatment based upon the standard treatment of the surgeon involved following the call schedule for the day, either CRIF or ORIF. Postoperative radiographs and CT were performed on all patients and patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. Primary outcome measures were the KOOS, SMFA and SF-36. RESULTS: Seventy patients were recruited with 2 year follow-up on 35 patients in the CRIF group and 27 patients in the ORIF group. Postoperative CT scans showed that reductions were better with the ORIF group especially in the posterolateral quadrant as compared to the CRIF group. The frequency of mal-reductions was higher in the CRIF group. The KOOS, at two years, showed that the CRIF had significantly less good outcomes in the subcategories of SPORT (p = 0.03) and QOL (p = 0.01) measurements. CONCLUSIONS: ORIF with a sub-meniscal arthrotomy provides better quality reductions and better medium-term results as compared to CRIF for tibial plateau fractures. This may provide more long-term benefit from osteoarthritic symptoms in this patient group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level 2.

An evaluation of the Herscovici classification for fractures of the medial malleolus.

BACKGROUND: Despite its use in the literature, the application of the Herscovici classification system for medial malleolus fractures has not been evaluated. METHODS: We aimed to determine the reliability and accuracy of the Herscovici classification. The blinded radiographs of 130 patients were independently classified by four orthopaedic trauma surgeons. We held a consensus meeting where observers agreed on a final classification and this served as our reference standard. We used weighted kappa (κ) coefficients of agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-four fractures (18%) were deemed unclassifiable. The classification system demonstrated moderate inter-observer reliability (κ=0.54, 95% CI 0.40-0.68) but substantial reproducibility (κ=0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.79). Accuracy, when compared with the reference standard, was κ=0.54 (95% CI 0.40-0.66). CONCLUSIONS: The obliquity of the fracture line, and fracture extension, created difficulty in classification in 26% of cases. 18% of our cases could not be classified by majority decision. Our results emphasise the challenges faced in classifying these fractures. Future work should focus on refining the Herscovici classification.

Outcomes after orthopedic trauma.

BACKGROUND: Clinical orthopedic research needs better ability to assess patient expectations with regard to orthopedic trauma surgery outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate to which extent patient expectations prior to surgery could be met after surgery. METHODS: Patients (≥18 years) with surgical ankle fractures were prospectively recruited at 5 orthopedic trauma clinics in the United States (USA), Canada, and Brazil and followed up for 12 months. Patients were asked to complete a previously validated trauma expectation factor (TEF) questionnaire prior to surgery and a trauma outcome measure (TOM) 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: At 1 year, 155 patients had provided complete records. Almost half (49%; 76/155) had a 1-year TOM score equaling or exceeding their preoperative TEF score (95% CI: 41-57%). The remaining scores failed to meet patient expectations. TOM scores matched or exceeded patient expectations for 33% of patients in the USA and 47% in Canada, but for 69% in Brazil ( p = 0.001 (USA); p = 0.024 (Canada)). This geographical effect was attributable to higher patient expectations in North America as compared to Brazil (average TEF scores: 36 (North America) versus 31 (Brazil); p < 0.001). Patients with lower household income or smokers were more likely to be satisfied with their treatment ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). Furthermore, patients with severe type C fractures had better rates of satisfaction (62%) than patients with simpler B (50%) or type A fractures (33%) ( p = 0.01 [C type versus A type]). CONCLUSIONS: Orthopedic surgeons have difficulty in meeting or exceeding presurgical patient expectations of long-term outcomes for ankle fracture surgery. This study provides evidence that culture, geography, and surgeon-patient communication have considerable influence on patient expectations.

Factors Associated With Development of Nonunion or Delayed Healing After an Open Long Bone Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study of 736 Subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with developing nonunion or delayed healing after open fracture. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2001 and 2009. SETTING: Three level 1 Canadian trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred thirty-six (791 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Six hundred eighty-nine (94%) subjects (739 fractures) provided adequate outcome data. INTERVENTION: Subjects were followed until fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were conducted 1 year after fracture. Patient, fracture, and injury information, and time to surgery and antibiotics were recorded during hospitalization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunion defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing at 1 year and delayed healing defined as 2 consecutive clinical assessments showing no radiographic progression or incomplete radiographic healing between 6 months and 1 year. RESULTS: There were 413 (52%) tibia/fibular, 285 (36%) upper extremity, and 93 (13%) femoral fractures. Nonunion developed in 124 (17%) and delayed healing in 63 (8%) fractures. The median time to surgery was not different for fractures that developed nonunion compared with those who did not (P = 0.36). Deep infection [Odd ratio (OR) 12.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.07-26.8], grade 3A fractures (OR 2.49; 95% CI, 1.30-4.78), and smoking (OR 1.73; 95% CI, 1.09-2.76) were significantly associated with developing a nonunion. Delayed healing was also significantly associated with deep infection (OR 4.34; 95% CI, 1.22-15.48) and grade 3B/C fractures (OR 3.69; 95% CI, 1.44-9.44). Multivariate regression found no association between nonunion and time to surgery (P = 0.15) or antibiotics (P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Deep infection and higher Gustilo grade fractures were associated with nonunion and delayed healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Time to initial operative treatment following open fracture does not impact development of deep infection: a prospective cohort study of 736 subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between time to surgery, antibiotic administration, Gustilo grade, fracture location, and development of deep infection in open fractures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort between 2001 and 2009. SETTING: Three Level 1 Canadian trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 736 (791 fractures) subjects were enrolled and 686 subjects (93%; 737 fractures) provided adequate follow-up data (1-year interview and/or clinical follow-up >90 days). INTERVENTION: Demographics, injury information, time to surgery, and antibiotics were recorded. Subjects were evaluated using standardized data forms until the fracture(s) healed. Phone interviews were undertaken 1 year after the fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: Tibia/fibula fractures were most common (n = 413, 52%), followed by upper extremity (UE) (n = 285, 36%), and femoral (n = 93, 12%) fractures. Infection developed in 46 fractures (6%). The median time to surgery was 9 hours 4 minutes (interquartile range, 6 hours 39 minutes to 12 hours 33 minutes) and 7 hours 39 minutes (interquartile range, 6 hours 10 minutes to 9 hours 54 minutes) for those without and with infection, respectively (P = 0.04). Gustilo grade 3B/3C fractures accounted for 17 of 46 infections (37%) (P < 0.001). Four UE (1.5%), 7 femoral (8%), and 35 tibia/fibula (9%) fractures developed infections (P = 0.001). Multivariate regression found no association between infection and time to surgery [odds ratio (OR), 0.97; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.90-1.06] or antibiotics (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.90-1.05). Grades 3A (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 1.37-29.56) and 3B/3C (OR, 12.87; 95% CI, 2.72-60.95) relative to grade 1 injuries and tibia/fibula (OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.33-11.53) relative to UE fractures were significantly associated with infection. CONCLUSION: Infection after open fracture was associated with increasing Gustilo grade or tibia/fibula fractures but not time to surgery or antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level I. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.