Is detrusor underactivity associated with voiding dysfunction after single incision sling surgery?

BACKGROUND: Some women experience voiding dysfunction after stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery. We explore if detrusor underactivity (DU) found in urodynamic study (UDS) prior to SUI surgery using an adjustable single incision sling (SIS) may be related to voiding dysfunction after surgery. METHODS: This is a prospective, diagnostic, transversal, single center study comparing voiding dysfunction after SUI surgery with a SIS (Altis®; Coloplast, Humlebæk, Denmark) between women with DU (cases) or normal detrusor (controls). Inclusion criterium was women ≥18 years with SUI/mixed UI (stress predominant) operated between June 2013 and December 2020. Exclusion criteria were: women without UDS prior to surgery or without voiding phase in the P/Q, previous incontinence surgery, POP stage ≥2, neurogenic conditions, other pelvic floor surgery. Urinary symptoms were assessed using structured questions evaluating storage/voiding symptoms. Patients were divided into two groups according to projected Isovolumetric Pressure Index (PIP1) with 30-75 cmH2O indicating normal contractility. RESULTS: A total of 139 women were included, 29 (20.9%) in DU group and 110 (79.1%) in control group. Control and DU groups have shown similar objective (75.5% vs. 71.4% P=0.66) and subjective (85.4% vs. 96.1% P=0.22) success rates, respectively, without statistical differences. Voiding symptoms increased after surgery in both groups (+20.7% DU group vs. +8.1% normal group, P=0.29). More voiding symptoms (persistent/de novo) were found in DU group vs. normal group, but without statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the presence of DU previous to SUI surgery with a SIS (Altis®, Coloplast) has no impact on objective and subjective success rates. On the other hand, patients with preoperative DU showed higher proportion of voiding dysfunction but no statistical difference.

International Alliance of Urolithiasis Guideline on Shockwave Lithotripsy.

Different international associations have proposed their own guidelines on urolithiasis. However, the focus is primarily on an overview of the principles of urolithiasis management rather than step-by-step technical details for the procedure. The International Alliance of Urolithiasis (IAU) is releasing a series of guidelines on the management of urolithiasis. The current guideline on shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is the third in the IAU guidelines series and provides a clinical framework for urologists and technicians performing SWL. A total of 49 recommendations are summarized and graded, covering the following aspects: indications and contraindications; preoperative patient evaluation; preoperative medication; prestenting; intraoperative analgesia or anesthesia; intraoperative position; stone localization and monitoring; machine and energy settings; intraoperative lithotripsy strategies; auxiliary therapy following SWL; evaluation of stone clearance; complications; and quality of life. The recommendations, tips, and tricks regarding SWL procedures summarized here provide important and necessary guidance for urologists along with technicians performing SWL. PATIENT SUMMARY: For kidney and urinary stones of less than 20 mm in size, shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) is an approach in which the stone is treated with shockwaves applied to the skin, without the need for surgery. Our recommendations on technical aspects of the procedure provide guidance for urologists and technicians performing SWL.

Assessment of a Coated Mitomycin-Releasing Biodegradable Ureteral Stent as an Adjuvant Therapy in Upper Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

A major limitation of the treatment of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma is the difficulty of intracavitary instillation of adjuvant therapy. Therefore, the aim of this in vitro study was to develop and to assess a new design of biodegradable ureteral stent coated with a silk fibroin matrix for the controlled release of mitomycin C as a chemotherapeutic drug. For this purpose, we assessed the coating of a biodegradable ureteral stent, BraidStent®, with silk fibroin and subsequently loaded the polymeric matrix with two formulations of mitomycin to evaluate its degradation rate, the concentration of mitomycin released, and changes in the pH and the weight of the stent. Our results confirm that the silk fibroin matrix is able to coat the biodegradable stent and release mitomycin for between 6 and 12 h in the urinary environment. There was a significant delay in the degradation rate of silk fibroin and mitomycin-coated stents compared to bare biodegradable stents, from 6-7 weeks to 13-14 weeks. The present study has shown the feasibility of using mitomycin C-loaded silk fibroin for the coating of biodegradable urinary stents. The addition of mitomycin C to the coating of silk fibroin biodegradable stents could be an attractive approach for intracavitary instillation in the upper urinary tract.

Comparing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy laser lithotripsy for treatment of urinary stones smaller than 2 cm: a cost-utility analysis in the Spanish clinical setting.

PURPOSE: To analyze the efficiency and cost-utility profile of ureteroscopy versus shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of reno-ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm. METHODS: Patients treated for urinary stones smaller than 2 cm were included in this study (n = 750) and divided into two groups based on technique of treatment. To assess the cost-utility profile a sample of 48 patients (50% of each group) was evaluated. Quality of life survey (Euroqol 5QD-3L) before-after treatment was applied, Markov model was designed to calculate quality of life in each status of the patients (stone or stone-free with and without double-J stent) and to estimate the incremental cost-utility. Monte carlo simulation was conducted for a probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Chi-square was used for comparing qualitative variables and T student's for continuous variables. RESULTS: Shock wave lithotripsy group had 408 (54.4%) and ureteroscopy group had 342 (45.6%) patients. Of them, 56.3% were treated for renal stones and 43.7% for ureteral stones. Ureteroscopy produced slightly higher overall quality of patients' life, but produced a significant higher overall cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) than shock wave lithotripsy, exceeding the cost-utility threshold (20,000€/QALY). Sensitivity analysis confirmed results in 93.65% of cases. Difference was maintained in subgroup analysis (ureteral vs renal stones). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that in our clinical setting shock wave lithotripsy has better cost-utility profile than ureteroscopy for treatment of reno-ureteral stones less than 2 cm, but excluding waiting times, in ideal clinical setting, ureteroscopy would have better cost-utility profile than shock wave lithotripsy.

Reduction of ureteral stent encrustation by modulating the urine pH and inhibiting the crystal film with a new oral composition: a multicenter, placebo controlled, double blind, randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Encrustation of ureteral double J stents is a common complication that may affect its removal. The aim of the proposed study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new oral composition to prevent double J stent encrustation in indwelling times up to 8 weeks. METHODS: A double-blinded, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 105 patients with indwelling double J stents enrolled across 9 public hospitals in Spain. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) into intervention (53 patients) or placebo (52 patients) groups for 3 to 8 weeks and both groups self-monitored daily their morning urine pH levels. The primary outcome of analysis was the degree of stent ends encrustation, defined by a 4-point score (0 - none; 3 - global encrustation) using macroscopic and electron microscopy analysis of crystals, after 3 to 8-w indwelling period. Score was exponentially transformed according to calcium levels. Secondary endpoints included urine pH decrease, stent removal, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: The intervention group benefits from a lower global encrustation rate of stent ends than placebo group (1% vs 8.2%; p < 0.018). Mean encrustation score was 85.12 (274.5) in the placebo group and 18.91 (102.27) in the intervention group (p < 0.025). Considering the secondary end points, treated patients reported greater urine pH decreases (p = 0.002). No differences in the incidence of adverse events were identified between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the use of this new oral composition is beneficial in the context of ureteral double J indwelling by decreasing mean, as well as global encrustation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov under the name "Combined Use of a Medical Device and a Dietary Complement in Patient Urinary pH Control in Patients With an Implanted Double J Stent" with date 2nd November 2017, code NCT03343275, and URL.

[Strategies and recommendations for urolithiasis treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemia.] / Estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de la patología litiásica en el periodo de la pandemia COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The health crisis caused by COVID-19 pandemic has led to a restructuring of urological activity in order not to delay priority situations. An important part to prioritize within Urologyis Urolithiasis. The objective of this article is to establish strategies and recommendations for the treatment and follow-up in COVID-19 pandemic in phases I, II and III, based on available scientific evidence and the consensus of a group of experts in these pathologies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The document is based on the evidence available in the literature so far on SARSCoV-2 and the experience of the authors in the management of COVID-19 in their institutions. A narrative review of the literature was conducted, and a modified nominal group technique was used due to the extraordinary restrictions of assembly and mobility during the pandemic. RESULTS: Recommendations are made regarding the epidemiological evaluation of patients before surgery ,the management of positive patients, the epidemiological measures for healthcare personnel, the management of renal colic, the type of anesthesia, endourological surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, hospitalization, clinicalt ests, out-patient service and priorities on the surgical waiting list. CONCLUSION: Treatment of Urolithiasis in COVID-19 pandemic calls for prioritization of patients, maximum efficiency in treatments, adequate protection of healthcare personnel, and the implementation of telemedicine as a measure to reduce patient attendance to the hospital.

INTRODUCCIÓN: La crisis sanitaria provocada por la pandemia COVID-19 ha obligado a reestructurar la actividad urológica para no demorar situaciones que requieran preferencia. Una parte importante para priorizar dentro de la Urología es la patología litiásica. El objetivo de este artículo es establecer estrategias y recomendaciones para el tratamiento y seguimiento de esta en el periodo de pandemia COVID-19 en las fases I II y III, basadas en la evidencia científica publicada y el consenso de un grupo de expertos en esta patología. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: El documento se basa en la escasa evidencia en la literatura sobre SARS-CoV-2 y la experiencia de los autores en el manejo de COVID-19 en sus instituciones. Se realizó una revisión narrativa de la literatura y se utilizó una técnica de grupo nominal modificada debido a las restricciones extraordinarias de reunión y movilidad durante la pandemia. RESULTADOS: Se establecen recomendaciones sobre la evaluación epidemiológica de los pacientes antes de la cirugía, el manejo de los pacientes positivos, las medidas epidemiológicas para los profesionales, el manejo del cólico renal, el tipo de anestesia, la cirugía endourológica, la litotricia extracorpórea por ondas de choque, la hospitalización, las pruebas complementarias, la consulta y las prioridades en la lista de espera quirúrgica. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento de la patología litiásica durante la pandemia COVID-19 hace necesaria la priorización de pacientes, la máxima eficiencia en los tratamientos, una protección adecuada del personal sanitario y la implementación de la telemedicina como medida para reducir la asistencia de los pacientes al medio hospitalario.

Experimental Assessment of New Generation of Ureteral Stents: Biodegradable and Antireflux Properties.

Objective: The aim was to assess a new biodegradable and antireflux intraureteral stent (BraidStent®) design in a swine model after ureteral laparoscopic operation. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 female pigs underwent initial endoscopic, nephrosonographic, and contrast fluoroscopy assessment of the urinary tract. Afterward, unilateral ureteropelvic junction obstruction was performed by laparoscopic approach. Six weeks later, the animals underwent laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty, and were randomly assigned to Group-I, in which a double-pigtail ureteral stent was inserted for 6 weeks, or Group-II, in which a BraidStent®, a biodegradable intraureteral stent design, was placed. Follow-up assessments were performed at 3 and 6 weeks and 5 months. Results: In terms of therapeutic success, complete resolution was observed in 91.6% of Group-I animals and 88.8% in Group-II. No evidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was observed in Group-II animals and statistical significance in VUR and ureteral orifice damage were observed between groups. BraidStent® degradation occurred in a controlled manner between 3 and 6 weeks, without obstructive fragments. Distal ureteral peristalsis was maintained in 66.6% and 83.3% in Group-II at 3 and 6 weeks of follow-up, respectively. In Group-II, the positive bacteriuria rate was 41.6% and the migration rate 25%. Pathological assessment showed a significant improvement in ureteral healing in Group-II vs Group-I. Conclusions: The results of this comparative study in a porcine model indicate that the intraureteral BraidStent performed similarly to conventional ureteral stents. It avoids complete ureteral length intubation, the adverse effects associated with conventional ureteral stents, and maintains a high level of distal ureteral peristalsis. Moreover, the BraidStent® exhibited a predictable and controlled degradation rate and did not cause any obstructive fragments. However, further studies are needed to improve the anchoring system and reduce the risk of bacterial colonization.