Effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of adhesive systems.

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of three adhesive systems: a one-step self-etching, a two-step self-etching, and an etch-and-rinse system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Box-shaped Class V cavity preparations were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 84 extracted human molars. The molars were randomly assigned into 6 groups (n = 14) according to the irradiation and adhesive system as follows: G1, Clearfil S3 Bond (irradiated); G2, Clearfil SE Bond (irradiated); G3, Prime & Bond NT (irradiated); G4, Clearfil S3 Bond (nonirradiated); G5, Clearfil SE Bond (nonirradiated); and G6, Prime & Bond NT (nonirradiated). The cavities were restored with composite resin (Filtek Z 250). After restoration of the samples, a total dose of 60 Gy was delivered in 2 Gy/d fractions for 5 days per week for 6 weeks for the related groups. All specimens were thermocycled for 200 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C using a dwell time of 60 s in each bath and then placed in 0.5% basic fuchsin solution for 24 h at room temperature. Specimens were then rinsed and sectioned; the dye penetration at the enamel and dentin margins was examined using a stereomicroscope, and a score of 0 to 3 was assigned. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference existed between the irradiated and nonirradiated groups (p > 0.05). Significant differences in microleakage were observed between enamel and dentin (p < 0.01). The microleakage at the dentin margins was greater than at the enamel margins. Prime & Bond NT revealed statistically significantly (p < 0.05) higher leakage scores in dentin than did ClearfilS3 Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, irradiation application did not affect the microleakage of dental adhesive systems.

Effect of different surface treatments on the push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a fiber post to dentin. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty extracted human maxillary incisor teeth were manually shaped with K-files using the step-back technique. ISO size 45 files were used as master apical files. Post spaces were prepared and then the root canals were subjected to one of the following 5 surface treatments: irrigation with 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); treatment with ethanol, ethyl acetate, and acetone-based cleansing agent (Sikko Tim); irrigation with 17% EDTA; etching with 37% orthophosphoric acid for 15 seconds; and etching with 10% citric acid for 15 seconds. Fiber posts were luted using self-etching/self-priming dual polymerized resin cement. From the coronal part of each root, 3 slides of 0.6-mm thickness were obtained. A push-out bond strength test was performed by a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Dentin surfaces were examined under scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after different surface treatments. Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD test. RESULTS: ANOVA revealed that canal surface treatment affected the bond strength (P < .001). The highest bond strength was obtained in the Sikko Tim group. The results also showed that surface treatment methods increased the bond strength to dentin when compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Sikko Tim group was the more effective surface treatment agent compared with EDTA, orthophosphoric acid, citric acid, and control groups; however, it could not remove the smear layer and sealer remnants effectively on radicular dentin surfaces. Removal of the smear layer and opening of dentinal tubules are not recommended when a self-etching/self-priming adhesive system is used.

The effect of different light sources on microleakage of bleached enamel.

This study evaluated the immediate effects of halogen, LED (light-emitting diode), and plasma are curing units on microleakage of bleached enamel. The buccal and lingual enamel surfaces of experimental groups (n=30) were bleached with 16% carbamide peroxide for a period of 10 days, with a daily contact time of 90 minutes. Box-shaped Class V cavities were also prepared on 60 extracted molar teeth (n=30, control group). For all groups, a composite resin (Grandio) was bonded with one of the two employed adhesive systems, Single Bond 2 or Prime & Bond NT. After restoration, all specimens were thermocycled for 200 cycles between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C with a dwell time of 60 seconds in each bath, and then exposed to a dye. In the control groups, microleakage was statistically lower than the bleached groups (p<0.01). Groups cured with QTH and PAC showed no statistical differences (p>0.05). However, groups cured with LED system showed statistically significant differences (p<0.01) in microleakage.

Comparison of shaping ability of RaCe and Hero Shaper instruments in simulated curved canals.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the shaping ability of Hero Shaper and RaCe instruments in simulated curved canals. STUDY DESIGN: Forty simulated canals in resin blocks were divided into 2 experimental groups, each comprising 20 resin blocks, and prepared with Hero Shaper and RaCe using the crown-down technique. Preoperative and postoperative photographs, recorded using a digital camera, were superimposed and aberrations were recorded. Material removal was measured at 10 points beginning 1 mm from the end point of the canal. Mean total widths, outer and inner width measurements, were determined on each central canal path and differences were statistically analyzed using Student t test. RESULTS: The Hero Shaper and RaCe instruments removed almost the same amount of material from the inner side of the simulated canals. On the outer canal wall, the RaCe instruments removed significantly more material from the first 3 mm (P < .05). However, Hero Shaper removed more material from the middle and coronal aspects of the canal and the differences were statistically significant (P < .01). CONCLUSION: RaCe instruments removed more resin from the outside of the curvature at the apical thirds, while Hero Shaper removed more material from the middle and coronal thirds on the outer canal wall. Hero Shaper instruments showed better centering ability and fewer aberrations. No instrument fractures but some deformations were observed for both systems.

Influence of radiation on bond strength.

PURPOSE: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems--Prime & Bond NT (PBNT) and Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB)--to dentin irradiated before or after adhesive application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted molars were sectioned mesiodistally with a diamond bur. The inner surface of each tooth's dentin was ground flat with SiC abrasive papers. The roots of the sectioned teeth were mounted in a cylindrical mold using chemically cured acrylic resin. In groups A1 and B1, a radiation dose of 60 Gy (R) was applied to the dentin surfaces at this point. In all groups, adhesives were applied according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. Cylindrical composite resin restorations (CRR; internal diameter 3 mm, height 4 mm) were then placed on the center of the flattened dentin surfaces. At this point, groups A2 and B2 received 60 Gy of radiation, and groups C1 and C2 remained as nonirradiated controls. Thus, the test groups were: A1: R + PBNT (Primed Bond NT) + CRR; A2: PBNT + CRR + R; B1: R + CSEB (Clearfil SE Bond) + CRR; B2: CSEB + CRR + R; C1: PBNT+ CRR; C2: CSEB+ CRR. Specimens were mounted in a universal testing machine and shear load was applied at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min until failure. Bond strength values were calculated as MPa and the results were evaluated statistically using repeated measures of two-way ANOVA, with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Irradiation significantly affected adhesion of composite to dentin in groups A1 and A2 (p = 0.002). Group A1 showed statistically lower bond strength than group A2 (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found among the other groups (p = 0.49). CONCLUSION: The time point of irradiation can have an adverse effect on bond strength, depending on the type of adhesive material.