Filgotinib Demonstrates Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Independent of Smoking Status: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials and Claims-Based Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess cigarette smoking's effects on efficacy of the preferential Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor filgotinib and drug persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Efficacy in non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers from phase 3 filgotinib trials was analyzed, including patients with inadequate response (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) or who were MTX-naïve. Proportions achieving Disease Activity Score in 28 joints with C-reactive protein (DAS28[CRP]) ≤ 3.2 were compared using logistic regression. Retrospective claims-based switching data were reviewed. RESULTS: Week 12 (W12) DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 was achieved by 50, 61, and 62% of MTX-IR non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers taking filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) + MTX vs. 23, 16, and 32% taking placebo + MTX (p < 0.001, < 0.001, and 0.001) and 50, 34, and 33% taking adalimumab + MTX (p = 0.97, 0.013, and 0.006 vs. FIL200 + MTX). W12 DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 was achieved by 46, 48, and 32% of bDMARD-IR non-smokers, former smokers, and current smokers taking FIL200 + conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) vs. 16, 23, and 5% taking placebo + csDMARD (p < 0.001, 0.077, and 0.051); 57, 58, and 59% of respective MTX-naïve smoking groups achieved W12 DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 with FIL200 + MTX vs. 28, 37, and 18% with MTX (p < 0.001, 0.026, and < 0.001). Claims data showed former/current smokers were likelier than non-smokers to switch from adalimumab to other biologics or JAK inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Greater proportions of MTX-IR current/former smokers responded to FIL200 + MTX vs. adalimumab + MTX. In non-smoking MTX-IR, bDMARD-IR, and MTX-naïve patients with RA, FIL200 + MTX demonstrated increased response vs. controls. Current/former smokers were likelier to discontinue adalimumab vs. non-smokers in real-world clinical settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02889796, NCT02873936, NCT02886728.

[Therapeutic antibodies in rheumatology]. / Therapeutische Antikörper in der Rheumatologie.

Emil von Behring's serum therapy for diphtheria was the first therapeutic use of antibodies. More than 100 years later, a new era in the treatment of rheumatic diseases began in 1998 with the approval of infliximab, an antibody directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha). The special feature of antibody therapy is the ability to bind and neutralize antigens in a highly specific manner. In addition, target cells can be eliminated by activation of the immune system. These properties of the immune system are exploited in rheumatology to eliminate inflammatory cytokines or antibody-producing B lymphocytes. The tolerability is usually good but potential side effects, such as reactivation of tuberculosis with anti-TNF alpha treatment must be considered. Currently, 20 different antibodies and fusion proteins have been approved in Germany for the treatment of various inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Biosimilars can contribute to a price reduction after the patent protection expires. Many additional target antigens are being investigated and further structural innovations (e.g., bispecific antibodies, nanobodies or coupling with small molecules) are being developed.

Consensus statement on blocking interleukin-6 receptor and interleukin-6 in inflammatory conditions: an update.

BACKGROUND: Targeting interleukin (IL)-6 has become a major therapeutic strategy in the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory disease. Interference with the IL-6 pathway can be directed at the specific receptor using anti-IL-6Rα antibodies or by directly inhibiting the IL-6 cytokine. This paper is an update of a previous consensus document, based on most recent evidence and expert opinion, that aims to inform on the medical use of interfering with the IL-6 pathway. METHODS: A systematic literature research was performed that focused on IL-6-pathway inhibitors in inflammatory diseases. Evidence was put in context by a large group of international experts and patients in a subsequent consensus process. All were involved in formulating the consensus statements, and in the preparation of this document. RESULTS: The consensus process covered relevant aspects of dosing and populations for different indications of IL-6 pathway inhibitors that are approved across the world, including rheumatoid arthritis, polyarticular-course and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, giant cell arteritis, Takayasu arteritis, adult-onset Still's disease, Castleman's disease, chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell-induced cytokine release syndrome, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and severe COVID-19. Also addressed were other clinical aspects of the use of IL-6 pathway inhibitors, including pretreatment screening, safety, contraindications and monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: The document provides a comprehensive consensus on the use of IL-6 inhibition to treat inflammatory disorders to inform healthcare professionals (including researchers), patients, administrators and payers.

Evaluation of the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) with a quick quantitative C reactive protein assay (Q-DAPSA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) based on a quick quantitative C reactive protein (qCRP) assay (Q-DAPSA) in a multicentre, prospective, cross-sectional study in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: The assessment of prospectively recruited study patients included joint examination and patient reported outcome (PRO) measures (patient global assessment, patient pain assessment). Following, the DAPSA based on a routine laboratory CRP measurement, Q-DAPSA and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA) were calculated. Cross-tabulations and weighted Cohen's kappa were performed to analyse the agreement of disease activity categories. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to determine the agreement of numerical values regarding CRP and qCRP as well as different disease activity scores. RESULTS: Altogether, 104 patients with PsA could be included in the statistical analysis. With Q-DAPSA, 102 of 104 (98.1%) patients achieved identical disease activity categories in comparison to DAPSA with a weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.980 (95% CI: 0.952 to 1.000). The agreement between DAPSA and cDAPSA was slightly lower with identical disease activity categories seen in 97 of 104 (93.3%) of patients and with a weighted Cohen's kappa of 0.932 (95% CI 0.885 to 0.980). CONCLUSIONS: The Q-DAPSA showed an almost perfect agreement with the conventional DAPSA regarding identical disease activity categories. Thus, the Q-DAPSA can be used as a timely available disease activity score in patients with PsA with the additional benefit of CRP involvement. Consequently, the Q-DAPSA could facilitate the implementation of the treat-to-target concept in clinical routine and clinical trials.

Follow-Up Comparison of Fluorescence Optical Imaging With Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Early Detection of Psoriatic Arthritis.

Objectives: Early diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is crucial for a patient outcome but hampered by heterogenous manifestation and a lack of specific biomarkers. We recently showed that fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) can differentiate between patients with confirmed and suspected PsA. This study aims to follow-up (FU) patients with confirmed and suspected PsA focusing on patients with a change from suspected to confirmed PsA by the use of FOI in comparison with musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS). Methods: Follow-up examination of patients included in the study performed by Erdmann-Keding et al. in which FOI of both hands was performed in a standardized manner using three predefined phases (p1-p3) and PrimaVista Mode (PVM). The comparison was drawn to grayscale-power Doppler (GS/PD) MSUS of the clinically dominant hand (wrist, MCP, PIP, DIP 2-5) from dorsal or palmar. Results: Patients with a change from suspected to diagnosed PsA showed an increased prevalence of joints with pathological enhancement in FOI (p = 0.046) with an unchanged joint distribution pattern, especially with a dominant involvement of DIP joints. Compared to the baseline, these patients were three times more common to show enhancement in FOI p3 at FU. Newly detected pathologic joints by FOI (PVM, p2) and MSUS at FU were positively associated with the change of diagnosis from suspected to confirmed PsA (FOI: AUC 0.78; GSUS: AUC 0.77). Conclusion: Fluorescence optical imaging appears to be a helpful tool to detect early PsA and to distinguish between acute and chronic disease stages. It could thereby become a suitable tool as a screening method to select psoriasis patients with an indication for further rheumatological evaluation.

Safety of ixekizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis: data from four clinical trials with over 2000 patient-years of exposure.

OBJECTIVES: Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin 17A (IL-17A), has shown significant efficacy in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and sustained long-term clinical response without unexpected new safety outcome for an IL-17A inhibitor. Here, we report the updated safety profile of ixekizumab up to 3 years in patients with PsA. METHODS: This is an integrated safety analysis from four clinical trials in patients with PsA who received at least one dose of ixekizumab. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and selected adverse events (AEs) exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) per 100 patient-years up to 3 years of exposure are reported. RESULTS: A total of 1401 patients with a cumulative ixekizumab exposure of 2247.7 patient-years were included in this analysis. The EAIR of patients with ≥1 TEAE was 50.3 per 100 patient-years and most TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. Serious AEs were reported by 134 patients (EAIR=6.0). The most reported TEAEs were nasopharyngitis (EAIR=9.0) and upper respiratory tract infection (EAIR=8.3). Infections in general and injection site reactions were the most common TEAEs; the incidence rates of serious cases were low (EAIR ≤1.2). The EAIRs of malignancies (EAIR=0.7), inflammatory bowel disease (EAIR=0.1) including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, depression (EAIR=1.6), and major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (EAIR=0.5) were low. As assessed, based on year of exposure, incidence rates were decreasing or constant over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, the overall safety profile and tolerability of ixekizumab are consistent with the known safety profile in patients with PsA. No new or unexpected safety events were detected. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01695239, NCT02349295, NCT02584855, NCT03151551.

Risk of herpes zoster (shingles) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under biologic, targeted synthetic and conventional synthetic DMARD treatment: data from the German RABBIT register.

OBJECTIVE: To compare event and incidence rates of herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with conventional synthetic (cs), targeted synthetic (ts) or biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). METHODS: Patients were prospectively enrolled from 2007 until October 2020. Reported HZ events were assigned to ongoing treatments or those terminated within 1 month prior to the HZ event. Exposure-adjusted event rates (EAERs) of HZ were calculated per 1000 patient years (py) and adjusted HRs with 95% CIs computed. Inverse probability weights (IPW) were used to adjust for confounding by indication. RESULTS: Data of 13 991 patients (62 958 py) were analysed, with 559 HZ events reported in 533 patients. The EAER of HZ was highest for tsDMARDs (21.5, 95% CI 16.4 to 27.9), followed by B cell targeted therapy (10.3, 95% CI 8.0 to 13.0), monoclonal antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) antibodies (9.3, 95% CI 7.7 to 11.2), interleukin 6 inhibitors (8.8, 95% CI 6.9 to 11.0), soluble TNF receptor fusion protein (8.6, 95% CI 6.8 to 10.8), T cell costimulation modulator (8.4, 95% CI 5.9 to 11.8) and csDMARDs (7.1, 95% CI 6.0 to 8.3). Adjusted for age, sex and glucocorticoids and weighted with IPW, tsDMARDs (HR 3.66, 95% CI 2.38 to 5.63), monoclonal anti-TNF antibodies (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.28) and B cell targeted therapy (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.40) showed a significantly higher risk compared with csDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Our results provide evidence for a 3.6-fold increased risk of HZ associated with tsDMARDs and an increased risk of HZ under bDMARDs compared with csDMARDs.

The Safety of Antirheumatic Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Drug therapy for rheumatic diseases has changed fundamentally in recent decades with the introduction of many new agents. As these drugs may have to be taken for many years, and many of them are of similar efficacy, their safety profiles play an important role in therapeutic decisionmaking. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search on the safety profiles of selected antirheumatic drugs. RESULTS: Non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticoids, conventional disease-modifying drugs such as methotrexate, biological agents, and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are all used to treat rheumatic diseases. Register and trial data show that antirheumatic treatments are relatively safe. Infections, in particular, are much less common than initially expected. Cortisone administration is an exception because of its severe long-term sequelae. Biological agents are associated with severe infectious events at a rate of 4-5 events per 100 patient years. Screening before treatment with biological agents has been shown to lower the rate of tuberculosis from 564 to 95 cases per 100 000 patient years. JAK inhibitors have a good safety profile, with respect to infections as well, but there is evidence of their association with cardiovascular problems, malignancies, and thrombosis. CONCLUSION: A suitable, safe antirheumatic drug can be chosen for each patient in consideration of individual risk profiles. Regular monitoring enables the early detection of adverse effects. The risk profile of JAK inhibitors, in particular, will be studied in further trials.

[What is confirmed in the treatment of autoinflammatory fever diseases?] / Was ist gesichert in der Therapie von autoinflammatorischen Fiebererkrankungen?

In the last 20 years the clarification of monogenic periodic febrile diseases has led to the independent concept of autoinflammation. In this heterogeneous group polygenic complex diseases are also now included. The spectrum of symptoms is continuously growing. The main difference to autoimmunity is an excessive activation of the innate immune system without formation of autoantibodies or antigen-specific T­cells. The cardinal symptom is recurrent fever episodes accompanied by signs of inflammation, which in the periodic manifestations alternate with intervals of general well-being. The classical monogenic diseases are also known as hereditary recurrent fever (HRF). Examples are familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS), tumor necrosis factor receptor 1­associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), adenosine deaminase 2 (ADA2) deficiency and mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD, hyper-IgD syndrome). The polygenic diseases are also known as nonhereditary fever syndromes. These include adult-onset Still's disease (AoSD), Adamantiades-Behçet disease, the PFAPA syndrome (periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and cervical adenitis) and gouty arthritis. All autoinflammatory fever syndromes are accompanied by a long-term risk of development of amyloid A amyloidosis, depending on the individual severity and treatment success. In some diseases severe complications can sometimes occur.

The Effect of TNF-α Inhibitors on Nail Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis-Real-World Data from Dermatology Practice.

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) often develop joint symptoms years after their initial diagnosis of psoriasis disease; therefore, dermatologists should test for and detect PsA early. In this study, we focused on patients with psoriasis with both nail and joint disease being treated with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors by dermatologists. We performed a noninterventional, prospective, multicenter, and open-label study to evaluate the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab over 24 months of continuous therapy in patients with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis (Pso) and PsA. Disease assessments with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI), joint assessment, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) instruments were performed every 3 months for the first year and twice annually thereafter. The cohort included 100 patients with Pso, nail psoriasis, and PsA. A significant reduction of NAPSI was observed 3 months after therapy initiation compared with the baseline (mean ± SD, 22.9 ± 17.8 vs. 33.8 ± 21.4; p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean ± SD number of both tender and swollen joints decreased significantly within the first 3 months of treatment, from 10.8 ± 11.5 to 6.4 ± 10.3 (p < 0.001) and from 6.4 ± 9.5 to 3.1 ± 7.2 (p < 0.001), respectively. Additionally, the distal interphalangeal joint involvement improved throughout the observation time, and DLQI and HAQ scores decreased. Improvements in control of skin, nail, and joint symptoms were seen, as well as in patients' quality of life and functionality. Dermatologists have an important role not only in PsA diagnosis but also in PsA long-term care.

Early phase studies of JAK1 selective inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis.

The first approved Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors for treatment of RA targeted more than one JAK molecule. Although this brings an advantage of simultaneous blocking of more cytokines involved in RA, it may also carry an increased risk of toxicity. Subsequently, more selective JAK inhibitors were developed with the aim of improving the safety-efficacy profile and to further increase drug maintenance. With this proposal, early phase trials of selective JAK1 inhibitors, namely upadacitinib, filgotinib and itacitinib, were initiated in recent years to identify the efficacy and adverse effects of these agents and to define their potential role in treatment of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Early phase (Phase I-II) studies of upadacitinib and filgotinib provided evidence for efficacy and safety of the selective JAK1 inhibitors in refractory populations of RA patients and allowed informed selection of the appropriate dose by balancing the optimal benefit-risk profile for further evaluation in the later successfully performed Phase III trials. Although itacitinib also demonstrated a good efficacy and safety in a Phase II trial in RA patients, it is mainly in development for haematologic and oncologic conditions.

A Human Osteochondral Tissue Model Mimicking Cytokine-Induced Key Features of Arthritis In Vitro.

Adequate tissue engineered models are required to further understand the (patho)physiological mechanism involved in the destructive processes of cartilage and subchondral bone during rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, we developed a human in vitro 3D osteochondral tissue model (OTM), mimicking cytokine-induced cellular and matrix-related changes leading to cartilage degradation and bone destruction in order to ultimately provide a preclinical drug screening tool. To this end, the OTM was engineered by co-cultivation of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC)-derived bone and cartilage components in a 3D environment. It was comprehensively characterized on cell, protein, and mRNA level. Stimulating the OTM with pro-inflammatory cytokines, relevant in RA (tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin-6, macrophage migration inhibitory factor), caused cell- and matrix-related changes, resulting in a significantly induced gene expression of lactate dehydrogenase A, interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor α in both, cartilage and bone, while the matrix metalloproteases 1 and 3 were only induced in cartilage. Finally, application of target-specific drugs prevented the induction of inflammation and matrix-degradation. Thus, we here provide evidence that our human in vitro 3D OTM mimics cytokine-induced cell- and matrix-related changes-key features of RA-and may serve as a preclinical tool for the evaluation of both new targets and potential drugs in a more translational setup.

Golimumab improves socio economic and health economic parameters in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Golimumab (GLM) has shown its efficacy and safety in various clinical trials. We aimed to assess the effect of GLM on socio economic and health economic parameters in daily clinical practice. SETTING: Rheumatology offices in Germany. METHOD: Analysis of socio economic and health economic parameters of the non-interventional, multicentre, prospective study GO-NICE. Analyses were performed in an exploratory manner using descriptive statistical methods. Further, p-values on socio economic variables were calculated based on one-sample t-test on the differences between baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: A total of 1458 patients were evaluable, of whom a total of 664 patients completed the 24-month observation period. The proportions of hospitalizations decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .05) from 10.4/7.6/14.0% at baseline (BL) to 1.7/2.2/0.8%, and the in-patient rehabilitations decreased from 3.3/3.7/7.5% at BL to 0.6/1.8/2.1% at month 24 in patients with RA, PsA, and AS. When considering a 30-day period, the mean number of sick leave days decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .005) from 4.0 at BL to 0.9 at month 24 (greatest improvement in RA), and the mean number of days with impaired capability decreased statistically significantly (p ≤ .001) from 14.9 at BL to 4.5 at month 24 (greatest improvement in patients with AS). There was also a reduction in the number of consultations and remedies. CONCLUSION: This evaluation shows improvements in socio economic and health economic parameters on GLM treatment.

Golimumab as the First-, Second-, or at Least Third-Line Biologic Agent in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, or Ankylosing Spondylitis: Post Hoc Analysis of a Noninterventional Study in Germany.

INTRODUCTION: While golimumab (GLM) has demonstrated efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in several randomized clinical trials with biologic-naïve patients, observational data from biologic-experienced patients are sparse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of GLM used as the first-, second-, or at least third-line biologic agent in RA, PsA, and AS patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the noninterventional, prospective, 24-month GO-NICE study of RA, PsA, and AS patients who initiated GLM 50 mg subcutaneously once monthly in a real-world setting in Germany. RESULTS: In 1454 patients with RA, PsA, or AS, GLM was administered as the first-line (n = 305, 286, 292, respectively), second-line (n = 104, 136, 130, respectively), or at least third-line (n = 64, 79, 58, respectively) biologic agent. In RA patients (n = 473), the time since first diagnosis was 9.7, 10.1, and 14.3 years, respectively. The DAS28 score at BL was 5.0, 4.9, and 5.1 in patients using GLM as a first-, second-, and third-line biologic agent, respectively, and dropped significantly in all groups. After 3 months of treatment, 27.5%, 19.5%, and 14.5% of patients were in remission; the corresponding values after 24 months were 45.3%, 50.0%, and 33.3%, respectively. In PsA patients (n = 501), time since fist diagnosis was 12.4, 13.7, and 13.8 years, respectively. Based on PsARC, a response was achieved at 24 months in the first-, second-, and third-line use of GLM in 76.4%, 51.0%, and 50.0% of the patients. In AS patients (n = 480), the time since first diagnosis was 9.4, 9.8, and 12.4 years in patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line biologic agent, respectively. After 24 months of treatment, the mean BASDAI scores decreased significantly (p < 0.001 vs. BL) to 2.1, 2.9, and 2.9 in the patients using GLM as the first-, second-, and at least third-line treatment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Golimumab is an effective treatment in patients with RA, PsA, and AS, irrespective of any pretreatment with biologic agents. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01313858.

Impact of Janus Kinase Inhibition with Tofacitinib on Fundamental Processes of Bone Healing.

Both inflammatory diseases like rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and anti-inflammatory treatment of RA with glucocorticoids (GCs) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) negatively influence bone metabolism and fracture healing. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition with tofacitinib has been demonstrated to act as a potent anti-inflammatory therapeutic agent in the treatment of RA, but its impact on the fundamental processes of bone regeneration is currently controversially discussed and at least in part elusive. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to examine the effects of tofacitinib on processes of bone healing focusing on recruitment of human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) into the inflammatory microenvironment of the fracture gap, chondrogenesis, osteogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. We performed our analyses under conditions of reduced oxygen availability in order to mimic the in vivo situation of the fracture gap most optimal. We demonstrate that tofacitinib dose-dependently promotes the recruitment of hMSCs under hypoxia but inhibits recruitment of hMSCs under normoxia. With regard to the chondrogenic differentiation of hMSCs, we demonstrate that tofacitinib does not inhibit survival at therapeutically relevant doses of 10-100 nM. Moreover, tofacitinib dose-dependently enhances osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs and reduces osteoclast differentiation and activity. We conclude from our data that tofacitinib may influence bone healing by promotion of hMSC recruitment into the hypoxic microenvironment of the fracture gap but does not interfere with the cartilaginous phase of the soft callus phase of fracture healing process. We assume that tofacitinib may promote bone formation and reduce bone resorption, which could in part explain the positive impact of tofacitinib on bone erosions in RA. Thus, we hypothesize that it will be unnecessary to stop this medication in case of fracture and suggest that positive effects on osteoporosis are likely.

Fluorescence optical imaging for the detection of potential psoriatic arthritis in comparison to musculoskeletal ultrasound.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) with grayscale (GS) and power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) to detect joint inflammation in patients with confirmed or suspected psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Patients (n = 60) with psoriasis and tenderness and/or swelling of joints were separated into two groups: diagnosis confirmed by the treating dermatologist before the start of the study (n = 26), and suspected PsA (n = 34). GS/PDUS of the hand most clinically affected was performed with a dorsal/palmar view (wrist, MCP, PIP, DIP2-5). FOI examination was carried out in a standardized manner by analyzing the predefined Phases 1-3. RESULTS: FOI was found to be more sensitive than ultrasound (US) for detection of inflammation in PIP/DIP joints (p = 0.035). Confirmed PsA patients showed more findings in FOI P2 and P3, while suspected PsA patients showed more findings in P1. In the confirmed PsA group, most involved joints were MCP joints, while in the suspected PsA group, more involved wrist joints and DIP joints (p = 0.006) were detected with FOI. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between the confirmed and suspected groups indicate that FOI is helpful in the detection of early PsA since P1 may correspond to acute inflammation, whereas P2 and P3 enhancement reflect chronic inflammation. Fluorescence optical imaging might therefore be a novel diagnostic tool for early PsA diagnosis.

Are prognostic factors adequately selected to guide treatment decisions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis? A collaborative analysis from three observational cohorts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of indicators of unfavorable prognosis ("poor prognostic factors") on the achievement of low disease activity (LDA)/remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Biologic DMARD-naïve patients with RA from three observational cohorts were examined. N = 713 patients started their 1st csDMARD, n = 1613 switched to the 2nd csDMARD and n = 388 to the 1st TNF-inhibitor. High disease activity (DAS28 > 5.1), autoantibodies (RF/ACPA positive), prevalent erosions, functional limitation (HAQ ≥ 1.2), comorbidities, obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2), and smoking were evaluated as prognostic factors. Generalized regression analyses were applied to investigate prognostic factors regarding the achievement of LDA (DAS28 < 3.2) or remission (DAS28 < 2.6) within six months. RESULTS: At baseline, RF/ACPA positivity was most frequent in all cohorts (60.3-75.3%), followed by DAS28 > 5.1 (35-57.7%), HAQ ≥ 1.2 (40.5-52.5%), ≥ 2 comorbidities (31.4-54.1%) and erosions (17.1-46.1%). Remission was achieved by 39% (1st-csDMARD), 26% (2nd-csDMARD) and 30% (1st-TNFi). In adjusted regression models DAS28 > 5.1 (OR: 0.41 [0.30;0.56]), HAQ ≥ 1.2 (0.56 [0.42;0.74]), current smoking (0.72 [0.53;0.97], obesity (0.66 [0.49;0.89] and ≥ 2 comorbidities (0.57 [0.40;0.80]) were independently associated with a lower chance to achieve remission within six months (ORs for 2nd-csDMARD). The proportion of patients in LDA/remission declined by 6-12%-points if DAS28 > 5.1 was present at baseline and by 15-27%-points if functional limitation, comorbidities and obesity were additionally present. In all cohorts RF/ACPA positivity and erosions were not associated with achieving LDA/remission. CONCLUSIONS: While RF/ACPA status and erosions do not affect the achievement of LDA/remission, high disease activity, functional limitation, comorbidities and obesity should be considered as unfavorable prognostic factors in patients starting the 1st or 2nd DMARD strategy.

Safety of Ixekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Pooled Analysis of Three Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ixekizumab safety in adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Safety data from 2 integrated data sets are presented: 1) 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2; and 2) all ixekizumab-treated patients of SPIRIT-P1 and SPIRIT-P2 plus SPIRIT-P3 open-label period. We report adverse event (AE) frequency and exposure-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years at 12-week intervals to week 96. RESULTS: The placebo-controlled period had 678 patients (safety population): 224 placebo, 229 ixekizumab every 4 weeks, and 225 ixekizumab every 2 weeks. Overall, 1,118 patients received ixekizumab (total exposure 1,373.4 patient-years). In the placebo-controlled period, the frequencies of ixekizumab-treated patients experiencing ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) and those experiencing serious AEs were 68.1% (56.7% placebo) and 4.4% (2.7% placebo), respectively. Injection site reactions (ISRs) were very common (21.4% ixekizumab [4.5% placebo]), with ISR discontinuation rates of 1.1% (ixekizumab) and 0.4% (placebo). Through week 96, the incidence rates of ISRs decreased with increasing ixekizumab exposure. The frequencies of AEs of special interest were 32.8% (ixekizumab) and 27.7% (placebo); for serious infections, the frequencies were 1.3% and 0%, respectively; Candida infections, 2.6% and 0.4%; confirmed major adverse cardiac events, 0% and 0%; malignancy, 0.4% and 0%; hypersensitivities, 5.3% and 1.8%; and depression-related, 1.8% and 1.3%. The frequency of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (investigator-reported) was 0% in both groups, and the frequencies of sponsor-determined inflammatory bowel disease were 0.2% in the ixekizumab group and 0% in the placebo group. Overall, no active tuberculosis, invasive Candida infections, anaphylaxis, or suicide/self-injury behaviors were reported. CONCLUSION: The PsA ixekizumab safety integrated data set reached 1,373.4 patient-years total exposure. Ixekizumab-treated patients had higher rates of overall TEAEs, serious infections, mucocutaneous Candida, hypersensitivities (non-anaphylactic), and ISRs than placebo-treated patients. No unexpected safety outcomes were reported.

Targeting IL-6 or IL-6 Receptor in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What's the Difference?

Interleukin-6 (IL-6) signaling is a critical target in inflammatory pathways. Today, tocilizumab (TCZ) and sarilumab (SAR), two IL-6 receptor-inhibiting monoclonal antibodies, are widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with a favorable efficacy/safety profile. Successful introduction of such agents in the treatment of RA has encouraged the development of other agents targeting different points of the pathway. Sirukumab (SRK), a human anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody, has been evaluated in clinical trials and showed largely similar clinical efficacy compared with TCZ and other IL-6 pathway-targeting agents. Furthermore, the drug safety profile seemed to reflect the profile of adverse effects and laboratory abnormalities seen in other inhibitors of the IL-6 pathway. However, increased death rates under SRK treatment compared with placebo raised safety concerns, which led to the decision by the FDA to decline the approval of SRK in August 2017. However, during the 18-week true placebo-controlled period, mortality rates were identical in the placebo- and SRK-treated patients. Comparisons after week 18 may be confounded by some factors, and also the 'crossover' design resulted in various treatment groups with varying drug exposure periods. The limited placebo exposure relative to SRK exposure makes interpretation of mortality rates difficult. We do not know whether the imbalance in mortality rates seen for SRK is a true safety signal or a result of bias due to the study design. Therefore, further long-term clinical data as well as basic research is needed to allow deeper insight into IL-6 signaling.