Epilepsy surgery in adults older than 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the general safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery, there is evidence that epilepsy surgery remains underutilized. Although there are an increasing number of studies reporting epilepsy surgery in older adults, there is no consensus on whether epilepsy surgery is efficacious or safe for this population. Our objective was to systematically assess the efficacy as well as safety of resective surgery in people aged 50 years or older with drug-resistant epilepsy. METHODS: We considered studies that examine the efficacy and safety of epilepsy surgery in adults aged 50 years and older. Study eligibility was limited to studies carried out after 1990, with a minimum of 10 participants and 6 months of follow-up. We searched the following databases for published studies: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo, and Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. The risk of bias of each included study was independently assessed by two reviewers using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) instrument. RESULTS: Eleven case series and 14 cohort studies met the criteria for inclusion, for a total of 1111 older adults who underwent epilepsy surgery along with 4111 adults younger than 50 years as control groups. The pooled cumulative incidence of older adults achieving seizure freedom after resective surgery was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.3-74.7). There was no evident difference in the incidence of seizure freedom among older adults as compared to younger adults (risk ratio [RR] = 1.05, 95% CI = .97-1.14) in cohort studies. The pooled cumulative incidence of perioperative complications in older adults was 26.2% (95% CI = 21.3-31.7). Among them, 7.5% (95% CI = 5.8-9.5) experienced major complications. Older adults were significantly more at risk of experiencing any complication than younger adults (RR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.5-5.4). SIGNIFICANCE: Despite important considerations, epilepsy surgery may be considered appropriate among carefully selected individuals older than 50 years.

Evaluating the Current State of Epilepsy Care in the Province of Ontario.

There are numerous challenges pertaining to epilepsy care across Ontario, including Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) bed pressures, surgical access and community supports. We sampled the current clinical, community and operational state of Ontario epilepsy centres and community epilepsy agencies post COVID-19 pandemic. A 44-item survey was distributed to all 11 district and regional adult and paediatric Ontario epilepsy centres. Qualitative responses were collected from community epilepsy agencies. Results revealed ongoing gaps in epilepsy care across Ontario, with EMU bed pressures and labour shortages being limiting factors. A clinical network advising the Ontario Ministry of Health will improve access to epilepsy care.

Incidence of First-Episode Status Epilepticus and Risk Factors in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency characterized by prolonged seizures. However, the incidence of first-episode SE is unclear, as estimates vary greatly among studies. Additionally, SE risk factors have been insufficiently explored. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to estimate the incidence of first-episode SE in Ontario, Canada, and estimate the associations between potential sociodemographic and health-related risk factors and first-episode SE. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative datasets. We included individuals who completed Canada's 2006 Census long-form questionnaire, lived in Ontario, were between 18 and 105, and had no history of SE. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratios for SE within three years associated with each potential risk factor. RESULTS: The final sample included 1,301,700 participants, 140 of whom were hospitalized or had an emergency department visit for first-episode SE during follow-up (3.5 per 100,000 person-years). Older age was the only significant sociodemographic SE risk factor (HR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.33, 1.37), while health-related risk factors included alcohol or drug abuse (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.02, 1.08), brain tumour or cancer (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.12, 1.15), chronic kidney disease (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.29, 1.36), dementia (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.36, 1.48), diabetes (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.09, 1.12), epilepsy or seizures (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.09) and stroke (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.11). CONCLUSION: The estimated incidence of SE in a sample of Ontario residents was 3.5 per 100,000 person-years. Older age and several comorbid conditions were associated with higher first-episode SE risk.

Lack of spontaneous typical seizures during intracranial monitoring with stereo-electroencephalography.

OBJECTIVE: In the presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), occasionally, patients do not experience spontaneous typical seizures (STS) during a stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) study, which limits its effectiveness. We sought to identify risk factors for patients who did not have STS during SEEG and to analyze the clinical outcomes for this particular set of patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with DRE who underwent depth electrode implantation and SEEG recordings between January 2013 and December 2018. RESULTS: SEEG was performed in 155 cases during this period. 11 (7.2%) did not experience any clinical seizures (non-STS group), while 143 experienced at least one patient-typical seizure during admission (STS group). No significant differences were found between STS and non-STS groups in terms of patient demographics, lesional/non-lesional epilepsy ratio, pre-SEEG seizure frequency, number of ASMs used, electrographic seizures or postoperative seizure outcome in those who underwent resective surgery. Statistically significant differences were found in the average number of electrodes implanted (7.0 in the non-STS group vs. 10.2 in STS), days in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (21.8 vs. 12.8 days) and the number of cases that underwent resective surgery following SEEG (27.3% vs. 60.8%), respectively. The three non-STS patients (30%) who underwent surgery, all had their typical seizures triggered during ECS studies. Three cases were found to have psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. None of the patients in the non-STS group were offered neurostimulation devices. Five of the non-STS patients experienced transient seizure improvement following SEEG. SIGNIFICANCE: We were unable to identify any factors that predicted lack of seizures during SEEG recordings. Resective surgery was only offered in cases where ECS studies replicated patient-typical seizures. Larger datasets are required to be able to identify factors that predict which patients will fail to develop seizures during SEEG.

Epilepsy Surgery in Adult Stroke Survivors with New-Onset Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Despite its effectiveness, surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy is underutilized. However, whether epilepsy surgery is also underutilized among patients with stroke-related drug-resistant epilepsy is unclear. Therefore, our objectives were to estimate the rates of epilepsy surgery assessment and receipt among patients with stroke-related drug-resistant epilepsy and to identify factors associated with these outcomes. METHODS: We used linked health administrative databases to conduct a population-based retrospective cohort study of adult Ontario, Canada residents discharged from an Ontario acute care institution following the treatment of a stroke between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2020, without prior evidence of seizures. We excluded patients who did not subsequently develop drug-resistant epilepsy and those with other epilepsy risk factors. We estimated the rates of epilepsy surgery assessment and receipt by March 31, 2021. We planned to use Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to identify covariates independently associated with our outcomes, controlling for the competing risk of death. RESULTS: We identified 265,081 patients who survived until discharge following inpatient stroke treatment, 1,902 (0.7%) of whom subsequently developed drug-resistant epilepsy (805 women; mean age: 67.0 ± 13.1 years). Fewer than six (≤0.3%) of these patients were assessed for or received epilepsy surgery before the end of follow-up (≤55.5 per 100,000 person-years). Given that few outcomes were identified, we could not proceed with the multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stroke-related drug-resistant epilepsy are infrequently considered for epilepsy surgery that could reduce morbidity and mortality.

Pearls & Oy-sters: Salt and Pepper Sign, PLNTY for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Drug-resistant epilepsy, defined as the failure of 2 or more antiseizure medications to achieve seizure freedom, is responsible for 2/3 of epilepsy cases. Tumors are responsible for up to 15% of all adult onset and up to 6% of childhood onset epilepsies. Among these tumors, commonly known subtypes DNET, ganglioglioma, and low-grade astrocytoma are often suspected. New advances in tumor classification have been made, with genetics playing a key role in tumor classification. Polymorphic low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young (PLNTY) is a highly epileptogenic subtype of tumors that may mimic low-grade gliomas but offer pathologic and genetic clues: oligodendroglioma-like cellular components and infiltration patterns and strong CD34-immunopositive stain. In addition, a key finding is radiologic: a unifocal abnormality best seen on MRI brain in FLAIR sequence as the "salt and pepper sign" and calcifications appreciated on CT head.

Long-term outcomes after NORSE: Treatment with vagus nerve stimulation.

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is associated with high mortality, therapy-resistant epilepsy (TRE), and poor cognitive and functional outcomes. Some patients develop multifocal TRE, for whom surgery with a curative intention, is not an option. In these patients, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is performed as a palliative treatment. We report the long-term outcomes regarding seizure frequency, functional and cognitive outcome, and effectiveness of VNS in two patients with TRE as a consequence of NORSE. In the first patient with cryptogenic NORSE, VNS implantation occurred during the acute stage, probably contributing to the cessation of her status epilepticus. However, in the long-term follow-up, the patient persisted with daily multifocal seizures. In the second patient, VNS implantation was delayed to manage his epilepsy when the NORSE, ultimately due to autoimmune encephalitis, had resolved. During long-term follow-up, no reduction in seizure frequency was achieved. This evidence supporting the use of VNS in patients with TRE after NORSE warrants further investigation.

Epilepsy Risk Following Bariatric Surgery for Weight Loss.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A previous study reported finding that epilepsy risk is elevated after bariatric surgery for weight loss; however, this association has not been adequately explored. Our objectives were to (1) estimate the risk of epilepsy after bariatric surgery for weight loss relative to a nonsurgical cohort of patients with an obesity diagnosis and (2) identify epilepsy risk factors among bariatric surgery recipients. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using linked health administrative databases in Ontario, Canada. Participants were accrued between July 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, and followed until December 31, 2019. All Ontario residents aged 18 years and older who had bariatric surgery during the accrual period were eligible for inclusion in our exposed cohort. Patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of obesity and who did not have bariatric surgery during the accrual period were eligible for inclusion in our unexposed cohort. We excluded patients with a history of seizures, epilepsy, various seizure or epilepsy risk factors, psychiatric disorders, or drug or alcohol abuse/dependence. In our primary analysis, we used inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for confounding. A marginal Cox proportional hazards model was then used to estimate the risk of epilepsy associated with bariatric surgery. A Cox model was also used to identify epilepsy risk factors among exposed participants. RESULTS: The final sample included 16,958 exposed participants and 622,514 unexposed participants. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the estimated rates of epilepsy were 50.1 and 34.1 per 100,000 person-years among those who did and did not have bariatric surgery, respectively. The hazard ratio for developing epilepsy after bariatric surgery was 1.45 (95% CI = 1.35, 1.56). Among participants who received bariatric surgery, stroke during follow-up increased epilepsy risk (HR = 14.03, 95% CI = 4.26, 46.25). DISCUSSION: In this study, we found that patients with a history of bariatric surgery were at increased risk of developing epilepsy. These findings suggest that epilepsy is a long-term risk associated with bariatric surgery for weight loss.

Depression and suicide after temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: A systematic review.

Psychiatric comorbidities, including depression and suicide, contribute substantially to the illness burden of patients with refractory temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing literature assessing the effect of TLE surgery on (1) depression prevalence and (2) severity, and estimating the incidence of (3) de novo depression and (4) attempted and completed suicide following TLE surgery. A literature search was performed using Ovid Medline, Embase, Clarivate Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Studies of patients with TLE who underwent TLE surgery and reported estimates of at least one of the following outcomes were included: pre- and postoperative depression prevalence or severity, the incidence of postoperative de novo depression, or attempted or completed suicide. The search yielded 2,127 citations related to TLE surgery and postoperative depression or suicide. After a full-text review of 98 articles, 18 met the final eligibility criteria. Most studies reported a reduced or similar prevalence (n = 12) and severity of depression (n = 5) postoperatively, compared with the preoperative period. Eleven studies reported the incidence of postoperative de novo depression, which ranged from 0 % to 38 % over follow-up periods of three months to nine years. Four studies assessed the incidence of postoperative attempted or completed suicide, with completed suicide incidence ranging from 0 % to 3 % over follow-up periods of one to four years. Overall, the effect of TLE surgery on depression and suicide remains unclear, as many studies did not assess the statistical significance of depression prevalence or severity changes following TLE surgery. Therefore, timely psychosocial follow-up for patients after TLE surgery should be considered. Future longitudinal studies with consistent measures are needed to elucidate the effect of TLE surgery on the prevalence and severity of depression and estimate the incidence of de novo depression and suicide following surgery.

Timing of referral to evaluate for epilepsy surgery: Expert Consensus Recommendations from the Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy.

Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with drug-resistant seizures. A timely evaluation for surgical candidacy can be life-saving for patients who are identified as appropriate surgical candidates, and may also enhance the care of nonsurgical candidates through improvement in diagnosis, optimization of therapy, and treatment of comorbidities. Yet, referral for surgical evaluations is often delayed while palliative options are pursued, with significant adverse consequences due to increased morbidity and mortality associated with intractable epilepsy. The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) sought to address these clinical gaps and clarify when to initiate a surgical evaluation. We conducted a Delphi consensus process with 61 epileptologists, epilepsy neurosurgeons, neurologists, neuropsychiatrists, and neuropsychologists with a median of 22 years in practice, from 28 countries in all six ILAE world regions. After three rounds of Delphi surveys, evaluating 51 unique scenarios, we reached the following Expert Consensus Recommendations: (1) Referral for a surgical evaluation should be offered to every patient with drug-resistant epilepsy (up to 70 years of age), as soon as drug resistance is ascertained, regardless of epilepsy duration, sex, socioeconomic status, seizure type, epilepsy type (including epileptic encephalopathies), localization, and comorbidities (including severe psychiatric comorbidity like psychogenic nonepileptic seizures [PNES] or substance abuse) if patients are cooperative with management; (2) A surgical referral should be considered for older patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who have no surgical contraindication, and for patients (adults and children) who are seizure-free on 1-2 antiseizure medications (ASMs) but have a brain lesion in noneloquent cortex; and (3) referral for surgery should not be offered to patients with active substance abuse who are noncooperative with management. We present the Delphi consensus results leading up to these Expert Consensus Recommendations and discuss the data supporting our conclusions. High level evidence will be required to permit creation of clinical practice guidelines.

An international consortium in epilepsy surgery education: Clinical case-based discussions between Latin-American and Canadian Epilepsy Centers.

An international consortium with a focus on Epilepsy Surgery Education was established with members from different centers in Latin America and Canada. All members of the consortium and attendees from different centers in Latin America and Canada have been meeting to discuss epilepsy surgery cases in a virtual manner. We surveyed all to assess the value of the meetings. The results and description of these meetings are being presented.

Inteligencia artificial en la evaluación y manejo de pacientes con epilepsia / Artificial intelligence in the evaluation and management of patients with epilepsy

RESUMEN La epilepsia es una enfermedad que frecuentemente conlleva significativos niveles de morbi-mortalidad, afecta seriamente la calidad de vida y, en cerca de un tercio de los pacientes, es refractaria a diversos tratamientos. La inteligencia artificial (IA) ha beneficiado el estudio, tratamiento y pronóstico de los pacientes con epilepsia a través de los años. Estos logros abarcan diagnóstico, predicción de crisis automatizada, monitoreo avanzado de crisis epilépticas y electroencefalograma, uso de recursos genéticos en manejo y diagnóstico, algoritmos en imagen y tratamiento, neuromodulación y cirugía robótica. La presente revisión explica de forma práctica los avances actuales y futuros de la inteligencia artificial, rama de la ciencia que ha mostrado resultados prometedores en el diagnóstico y tratamiento de pacientes con epilepsia.

SUMMARY Epilepsy is a condition that frequently coexists with significant morbi-mortality levels, seriously affects the quality of life and, in up to one third of patients, is refractory to a variety of treatment approaches. Artificial intelligence (AI) has largely benefitted the study, treatment, and prognosis of patients with epilepsy through the course of recent years. These achievements applied the fields of diagnosis, automated seizure prediction, advanced seizure monitoring and electroencephalogram, use of genetics in diagnosis and management, imaging algorithms in the treatment, neuromodulation, and robotic surgery. This review conveys the actual and future directions of AI. a branch of science that has shown promising results in the treatment and diagnosis of patients with epilepsy.

Extraoperative electrical stimulation mapping in epilepsy presurgical evaluation: a proposal and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation mapping (ESM) is an important tool for the localization of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) in patients with medically resistant epilepsy (MRE). ESM is the gold standard for the identification of eloquent cortex in epilepsy surgery candidates. However, there is no standard protocol outlining how to perform ESM, to obtain the most useful information possible. The objective of this study, after reviewing the literature concerning ESM, is to propose a unifying technique to validate reliable data across different centers. METHODS: In this manuscript we summarize this technique from its origin to present, and review protocols used in other centers. We also describe a protocol that has been used in our institution, which utilizes depth electrodes. RESULTS: The most common type of ESM uses a "close-loop" system, bipolar and high frequency stimulation (50 Hz). We propose to use a pulse width of 300 µs, current spanning 1-6 mA in depth electrodes and 1-11 mA in subdural-grids. Stimulation time of 5 s maximum and at least 10 s break in between the stimulations. CONCLUSIONS: ESM is a useful tool for understanding eloquent cortex as well as the epilepsy network, although there is no clear consensus regarding how it should be performed.

Ultra-High Field 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalography Findings in Epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Assessment of patients for temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery requires multimodality input, including EEG recordings to ensure optimal surgical planning. Often EEG demonstrates abnormal foci not detected on 1.5T MRI. Ultra-high field MRI at 7T provides improved resolution of the brain. We investigated the utility of 7T MRI to detect potential anatomical abnormalities associated with EEG changes. METHODS: Ultra-high field data were acquired on a 7T MRI scanner for 13 patients with history of drug resistant TLE who had had EEG telemetry recordings. Qualitative evaluation of 7T imaging for presence of focal abnormalities detected on EEG was performed. Correlation of 7T MRI findings with EEG recordings of focal slowing or interictal epileptic spikes (IEDs), and seizures was performed. RESULTS: Assessment of 7T MRI demonstrated concordance with TLE as determined by the multidisciplinary team in 61.5% of cases (n = 8). Among these, 3 patients exhibited supportive abnormal 7T MRI abnormalities not detected by 1.5T MRI. In patients who underwent surgery, 72.7% had concordant histopathology findings with 7T MRI findings (n = 8). However, qualitative assessment of 7T images revealed focal anatomical abnormalities to account for EEG findings in only 15.4% of patients (n = 2). Other regions that were found to have localized IEDs in addition to the lesional temporal lobe, included the contralateral temporal lobe (n = 5), frontal lobe (n = 3), and parieto-occipital lobe (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Ultra-high field 7T MRI findings show concordance with clinical data. However, 7T MRI did not reveal anatomical findings to account for abnormalities detected by EEG.

Role of resective surgery in patients older than 60 years with therapy-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy surgery for older adults is controversial owing to their longer duration of epilepsy and perceived higher surgical risk. However, because of an aging population and documented benefit of epilepsy surgery, surgery is considered more frequently for these patients. The authors' objective was to analyze the role of resective surgery in patients older than 60 years and to assess outcomes and safety. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 595 patients who underwent resective epilepsy surgery at their center from 1999 to 2018. Thirty-one patients aged 60 years or older were identified. Sixty patients younger than 60 years were randomly selected as controls. Population characteristics, results of presurgical evaluations, outcomes, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of hemisphere dominance, side of surgery, presence of a lesion, and incidence of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy duration was greater in the older cohort (p = 0.019), and invasive EEG was more commonly employed in younger patients (p = 0.030). The rates of Engel class I outcome at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 89.7%, 96.2%, and 94.7% for the older group and 75% (p = 0.159), 67.3% (p = 0.004), and 75.8% (p = 0.130) for the younger group, respectively. The proportion of seizure-free patients was greatest among those with temporal lobe epilepsy, particularly in the older group. Neurological complication rates did not differ significantly between groups, however medical and other minor complications occurred more frequently in the older group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 60 years had equal or better outcomes at 1 year after epilepsy surgery than younger patients. A trend toward a greater proportion of patients with lesional temporal lobe epilepsy was found in the older group. These results suggest that good seizure outcomes can be obtained in older patients despite longer duration of epilepsy.

Epilepsy surgery in stroke-related epilepsy.

PURPOSE: To provide a descriptive analysis on the presurgical evaluation and surgical management of a cohort of patients with stroke related epilepsy (SRE). METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical characteristics, results of non-invasive and invasive presurgical evaluation, surgical management and outcome of consecutive patients with drug-resistant SRE in our institution from January 1, 2013 to January 1, 2020. RESULTS: Twenty-one of 420 patients (5%) who underwent intracranial EEG (iEEG), resective epilepsy surgery and/or vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) placement, had SRE. Of 13 patients who had iEEG, the ictal onset (IO) was exclusively within the stroke lesion in only one patient. In five patients the IO was extra-lesional and in the remaining seven patients it included the stroke lesion as well as extra-lesional structures. The IO included the mesial temporal region in 11 of the 13 patients (85%). The posterior margin of the stroke lesion was always involved. Five patients underwent surgery without iEEG. In total, 10 patients underwent resective surgery, four VNS placement and two had both corpus callosotomy and VNS placement. Of the patients who had resective surgery, nine were Engel I or II at last follow up. CONCLUSION: We found that seizures in patients with drug resistant SRE were more frequently originated in the mesial temporal region than in the stroke lesion itself. Despite the complex epileptic network underlying drug-resistant SRE, a thorough presurgical assessment and adequate use of surgical options can lead to excellent surgical outcomes.

Prevalence and incidence of epilepsy in Latin America and the Caribbean: A systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to perform an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the pooled prevalence and incidence of epilepsy in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), describing trends over time, and exploring potential clinical and epidemiological factors explaining the heterogeneity in the region. METHODS: Observational studies assessing the incidence or prevalence of epilepsy in LAC countries up to March 2020 were systematically reviewed according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Meta-analyses and cumulative analyses were performed using random-effects models. We assessed between-study heterogeneity with sensitivity, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. Moreover, the quality of the included studies and the certainty of evidence were evaluated using the GRADE (grading of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation) approach. RESULTS: Overall, 40 studies (from 42 records) were included, 37 for prevalence analyses and six for incidence (312 387 inhabitants; 410 178 person-years). The lifetime prevalence was 14.09 per 1000 inhabitants (95% confidence interval [CI] = 11.72-16.67), for active epilepsy prevalence was 9.06 per 1000 individuals (95% CI = 6.94-11.44), and the incidence rate was 1.11 per 1000 person-years (95% CI = .65-1.70). These high estimates have been constant in the region since 1990. However, substantial statistical heterogeneity between studies and publication bias were found. The overall certainty of evidence was low. Methodological aspects (sample size) and countries' epidemiological characteristics such as access to sanitation services and child and adult mortality rates explained the high heterogeneity. Finally, the prevalence of epilepsy associated with neurocysticercosis (NCC) in the general population was high, and the proportion of NCC diagnosis among people living with epilepsy was 17.37%. SIGNIFICANCE: The epilepsy prevalence and incidence in LAC are higher than worldwide estimates, being constant since 1990 and strongly influenced by NCC. We identified high between-study heterogeneity and significant methodological limitations (e.g., heterogeneous definitions, lack of longitudinal studies). The region needs upgraded research using standardized definitions and diagnostic methods, and urgent action against preventable causes.

All that glitters: Contribution of stereo-EEG in patients with lesional epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of stereo-EEG for localization purpose in patients with a visible lesion on MRI. BACKGROUND: Intracranial EEG is often used to localize the epileptogenic focus in patients with non-lesional focal epilepsy. Its role in cases where a lesion is visible on MRI can be even more complex and the relationship between the lesion and the seizure onset has rarely been addressed. METHODS: All consecutive patients between February 2013 and May 2018 who underwent stereo-EEG and had a lesion visible on MRI were included. We assessed the localization of the seizure onset and its relationship with the lesion. Clinical, radiological, and electrographic analyses were performed. RESULTS: Stereo-EEG revealed a seizure onset with either partial or no overlap with the lesion seen on MRI in 42 (56 %) of the 75 lesions included. Mesial temporal sclerosis was the only lesion type associated with an exclusively lesional seizure onset (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Epilepsy surgery in MRI-positive cases should rely not only the results of lesions seen on MRI, which might be potentially misleading; SEEG is a gold standard method in these cases to define resective borders.

Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy: A Canadian Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the experience with Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus-Deep Brain Stimulation (ANT-DBS) for the treatment of epilepsy at a Canadian Center. METHODS: All patients who underwent ANT-DBS implantation between 2013 (first patient implanted at our center) and 2020 were included. These patients had therapy-resistant epilepsy (TRE), were not candidates for resective surgery, and failed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) treatment. Baseline of monthly seizure frequency was calculated within 3 months prior to VNS placement. Monthly seizure frequency was assessed at different points along the timeline: 3 months before ANT-DBS implantation as well as 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 months after ANT-DBS device placement. At each time point, seizure frequency was compared to baseline. RESULTS: Six patients were implanted with ANT-DBS. Three (50%) patients had multifocal epilepsy, one (16.6%) had focal epilepsy, and two (33.4%) had combined generalized and focal epilepsy. Two patients with multifocal epilepsy experienced a seizure reduction >50% in the long-term follow-up. Three (50%) patients did not showed improvement: two with combined generalized and focal epilepsy and one with focal epilepsy. There were not surgical or device-related side effects. Two (33.3%) patients presented mild and transient headaches as a stimulation-related side effect. CONCLUSION: ANT-DBS is an effective and safe treatment for focal TRE. Our experience suggests that patients with multifocal epilepsy due to regional lesion may benefit from ANT-DBS the most. Further investigations are required to determine optimal parameters of stimulation.