Micafungin twice-a-week for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: A controlled cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Invasive Aspergillus infections during the early phase of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment come with morbidity and mortality. The interaction with vincristine hampers first-line azole prophylaxis. We describe the efficacy of an alternative twice-a-week micafungin regimen for Aspergillus prophylaxis. METHODS: Newly diagnosed paediatric patients with ALL treated according to the ALL-11 protocol received micafungin twice-a-week (9 mg/kg/dose [max. 300 mg]) during the induction course (first 35 days of treatment) as part of routine care. A historical control cohort without Aspergillus prophylaxis was used. During the first consolidation course (day 36-79), standard itraconazole prophylaxis was used in both groups. The percentage of proven/probable Aspergillus infections during the induction/first consolidation course was compared between the cohorts. The cumulative incidence of proven/probable Aspergillus infections was estimated using a competing risk model. For safety evaluation, liver laboratory chemistry values were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 169 and 643 paediatric patients with ALL were treated in the micafungin cohort (median age: 4 years [range 1-17]) and historical cohort (median age: 5 years [range 1-17]). The percentage of proven/probable Aspergillus infections was 1·2% (2/169) in the micafungin cohort versus 5·8% (37/643) in the historical cohort (p=0.013; Fisher's exact test). The differences in estimated cumulative incidence were assessed (p=0·014; Gray's test). Although significantly higher ALT/AST values were reported in the micafungin cohort, no clinically relevant side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-a-week micafungin prophylaxis during the induction course significantly reduced the occurrence of proven/probable Aspergillus infections in the early phase of childhood ALL treatment.

An analysis of health-related quality of life in the phase III PROSELICA and FIRSTANA studies assessing cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are living longer, therefore optimizing health-related quality of life (HRQL), as well as survival outcomes, is important for optimal patient care. The aim of this study was to assess the HRQL in patients with mCRPC receiving docetaxel or cabazitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PROSELICA (NCT01308580) assessed the non-inferiority of cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 (C20) versus 25 mg/m2 (C25) in patients with mCRPC after docetaxel. FIRSTANA (NCT01308567) assessed the superiority of C25 or C20 versus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (D75) in patients with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. HRQL and pain were analyzed using protocol-defined, prospectively collected, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and McGill-Melzack questionnaires. Analyses included definitive improvements in HRQL, maintained or improved HRQL, and HRQL over time. RESULTS: In total, 2131 patients were evaluable for HRQL across the two studies. In PROSELICA, 38.8% and 40.5% of patients receiving C20 and C25, respectively, had definitive FACT-P total score (TS) improvements. In FIRSTANA, 43.4%, 49.7%, and 44.9% of patients receiving D75, C20, and C25, respectively, had definitive FACT-P TS improvements. In both trials, definitive improvements started after cycle 1 and were maintained for the majority of subsequent treatment cycles. More than two-thirds of patients maintained or improved their FACT-P TS. CONCLUSIONS: In PROSELICA and FIRSTANA, >40% of the 2131 evaluable patients with mCRPC had definitive FACT-P TS improvements; improvements occurred early and were maintained. More than 75% of patients maintained or improved their FACT-P TS.

Toxicity of aliphatic amines: structure-activity relationship.

SARs may enable the evaluation of the toxic potential of chemicals by drawing conclusions from available data on structurally-related chemicals, thus reducing the need for further testing. The Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals of Environmental Relevance (BUA) [1,2] of the German Chemical Society (Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker [GDCh]) has compiled data on the toxicity and ecological impact for several groups of chemicals [3, 4]. In the present review, some common toxicological properties for aliphatic amines were revealed after evaluation and comparison of the toxicity data.