RESUMO
BACKGROUND: For palliative care settings, little is known about the benefits of specific methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus containment regimens and the burdens patient isolation imposes on affected patients, their families, and professional caregivers. AIM: To explore the current practice of MRSA management and its impact on inpatients' quality of life as perceived by professional caregivers. DESIGN: Survey of inpatient palliative care institutions using 23-item questionnaires (infrastructural data: six items, management process: 14, clinical significance: three). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: All palliative care units (179) and hospices (181) listed in Germany's directory of palliative care services. The χ(2) test was used to test for differences; significance level: p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: 229 of 360 questionnaires were returned. More than 90% of the responding institutions employed specific MRSA protocols. Lack of resources was a more important issue for palliative care units than for hospices regarding availability of single rooms (p = 0.002) and staffing (p = 0.004). Compared to hospices, palliative care units more frequently isolated MRSA patients (p = 0.000), actively treated colonization (p = 0.026), assessed the efficacy of eradication (p = 0.000), provided information on MRSA management to patients (p = 0.014) and relatives (p = 0.001), more often restricted patients' activities (p = 0.000), and reported a negative impact on quality of life (p = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Rigorously applied MRSA protocols impose significant burdens at the end of life. Research on clinical outcomes including quality of life may identify interventions of questionable benefit. The issue of handling MRSA should be studied as a model for the management of other highly complex conditions and special needs such as patient isolation.