Validation of the Airway-Dyspnoea-Voice-Swallow (ADVS) scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) as disease-specific instruments in paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the Airway-Dyspnoea-Voice-Swallow (ADVS) instrument as a disease-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: A quaternary referral centre for complex airway disease. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients (30 males) with a mean age of 49 ± 49 months who underwent laryngotracheal surgery or microlaryngoscopy and bronchoscopy (MLB) following laryngotracheal surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Airway-Dyspnoea-Voice-Swallow summary scale and Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM), Paediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) scale, Paediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) and Lansky performance scale were administered to patients before and 6-8 weeks following airway examination/surgery. RESULTS: Most patients (73%) had intubation-related subglottic stenosis, and 60% of patients had prior airway treatments. The majority of patients (77%) had more than one major chronic morbidity, and the commonest procedures were diagnostic MLB (49%), followed by airway dilation (29%). Cronbach-α value for the ADVS PROM was 0.71 overall and 0.85, 0.86 and 0.64 for the dyspnoea, voice and swallow domains, respectively. Rank correlations between Dyspnoea, Voice and Swallow summary scale and PROM scores were 0.83, 0.71 and 0.81, respectively (P < 0.0001). For those patients undergoing diagnostic MLB, pre- and post-examination scores were highly correlated (intraclass correlations >0.75). There was a significant rank correlation between ADVS PROM score and Lansky performance score (r = -0.68; P < 0.0001). There were significant correlations between PROM score and PedsQL (r = -0.57; P < 0.0001) and between voice domain of the PROM and pVHI (r = 0.78; P < 0.0001). There were strong correlations between Myer-Cotton stenosis severity and dyspnoea scale and PROM score (r = 0.68; P < 0.0001). There were significant differences in voice and swallow ADVS scales and PROM scores between patients with and without concomitant laryngeal/oesophageal pathology. Patient age and presence of high dyspnoea and swallowing PROM scores were independently associated with poorer quality of life and performance status. CONCLUSIONS: These series of observations validate the ADVS instrument as a disease-specific outcome measure for paediatric laryngotracheal stenosis. Dyspnoea and swallowing dysfunction appear to have the greatest impact on quality of life. More widespread adoption of the ADVS instrument could help create a shared language for outcomes communication and benchmarking for children with this complex condition.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the tonsil: case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: We present the first reported case in the English language literature of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the right tonsil in a young, pregnant woman, and we report a management strategy for this enigmatic entity. CASE REPORT: A 28-year-old, pregnant woman presented with a 10-day history of odynophagia despite a course of antibiotics. Examination revealed a grade II, erythematous right tonsil with ulceration on the upper pole. A biopsy was arranged, and initial evaluation was suggestive of spindle cell carcinoma. However, this diagnosis was reviewed after immunohistochemical staining confirmed an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. Subsequent complete excision was undertaken using CO2 laser. CONCLUSION: Clinically, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the tonsil is known to be locally aggressive and can present in a manner not dissimilar to a high grade carcinoma of the tonsil. As a result, the recommended treatment is complete local excision with careful follow up.

Validation of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire as a psychophysical outcome measure in adult laryngotracheal stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the Clinical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Questionnaire (CCQ), a patient-administered instrument developed for bronchopulmonary disease as a disease-specific psychophysical outcome measure for adult laryngotracheal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTINGS: Tertiary/National referral airway reconstruction centre. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three tracheostomy-free patients undergoing endoscopic laryngotracheoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CCQ and the Medical Research Council (MRC) Dyspnoea scale, a previously validated but more limited scale, were administered to patients 2 weeks before surgery, preoperatively, and 2 weeks after endoscopic laryngotracheoplasty. Pulmonary function was assessed preoperatively. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach alpha statistics and test-retest reliability was determined using intraclass correlation. Correlations between CCQ and MRC scale, and pulmonary function were used to assess convergent and divergent validity respectively. Instrument responsiveness was assessed by correlating total and domain-specific CCQ scores with anatomical disease severity and post-treatment effect size. RESULTS: There were 12 males and 21 females. Mean age was 44 +/- 15 years. Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient were 0.88 and 0.95 respectively. Total and domain-specific CCQ scores significantly correlated with the MRC scores (P < 0.001) and significant correlations between CCQ and peak expiratory flow rate and FEV(1) were identified (P < 0.03). There were statistically significant changes in total and domain-specific CCQ scores when different stenosis severities were compared. Clinical COPD Questionnaire scores also changed significantly and congruently following surgery (P < 0.05 in both cases). DISCUSSION: Clinical COPD Questionnaire is a valid and sensitive instrument for assessing symptom severity and levels of function and well-being in adult patients with laryngotracheal stenosis and can be used as a patient-centred disease-specific outcome measure for this condition.

A multidisciplinary audit of clinical coding accuracy in otolaryngology: financial, managerial and clinical governance considerations under payment-by-results.

OBJECTIVES: To audit the accuracy of otolaryngology clinical coding and identify ways of improving it. DESIGN: Prospective multidisciplinary audit, using the 'national standard clinical coding audit' methodology supplemented by 'double-reading and arbitration'. SETTINGS: Teaching-hospital otolaryngology and clinical coding departments. PARTICIPANTS: Otolaryngology inpatient and day-surgery cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Concordance between initial coding performed by a coder (first cycle) and final coding by a clinician-coder multidisciplinary team (MDT; second cycle) for primary and secondary diagnoses and procedures, and Health Resource Groupings (HRG) assignment. RESULTS: 1250 randomly-selected cases were studied. Coding errors occurred in 24.1% of cases (301/1250). The clinician-coder MDT reassigned 48 primary diagnoses and 186 primary procedures and identified a further 209 initially-missed secondary diagnoses and procedures. In 203 cases, patient's initial HRG changed. Incorrect coding caused an average revenue loss of 174.90 pounds per patient (14.7%) of which 60% of the total income variance was due to miscoding of a eight highly-complex head and neck cancer cases. The 'HRG drift' created the appearance of disproportionate resource utilisation when treating 'simple' cases. At our institution the total cost of maintaining a clinician-coder MDT was 4.8 times lower than the income regained through the double-reading process. CONCLUSIONS: This large audit of otolaryngology practice identifies a large degree of error in coding on discharge. This leads to significant loss of departmental revenue, and given that the same data is used for benchmarking and for making decisions about resource allocation, it distorts the picture of clinical practice. These can be rectified through implementing a cost-effective clinician-coder double-reading multidisciplinary team as part of a data-assurance clinical governance framework which we recommend should be established in hospitals.

Sensitivity and responsiveness of the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale to the presence and treatment of adult laryngotracheal stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the sensitivity and responsiveness of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, a psychophysical dyspnoea assessment instrument to the presence and treatment of adult laryngotracheal stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTINGS: Tertiary/National referral airway reconstruction centre. PARTICIPANTS: Fourty tracheostomy-free patients undergoing endoscopic airway examination/laryngotracheoplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic and clinical information, obtained from patient records, lesion severity, which was recorded intraoperatively, standard spirometry, which was measured preoperatively, and the MRC dyspnoea scale, which was administered preoperatively and at the first outpatient visit 4-6 weeks later. RESULTS: There were 16 males and 24 females. Mean age at presentation was 44 +/- 14 years (+/- SD). Postintubation stenosis was the commonest aetiology (73%) followed by idiopathic subglottic stenosis and Wegener's Granulomatosis. Six patients were examined post-treatment and had minimal residual stenosis and the remaining patients had glottic stenosis (n = 11) or Myer-Cotton Grade I (n = 8), II (n = 7) or III (n = 8) tracheal stenoses. Pre-treatment MRC dyspnoea scores and the degree of change in the MRC score following treatment strongly correlated with pre-treatment stenosis severity (r = 0.75 and r = -0.71 respectively; P < .001). Moreover statistically significant correlations existed between preoperative peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 s and preoperative MRC dyspnoea scores (r = -0.34 and r = -0.35 respectively; P < 0.05). DISCUSSION: Exertional dyspnoea is the hallmark symptom of laryngotracheal stenosis and for many patients it is the primary cause of disability. These findings confirm that the MRC dyspnoea scale is an appropriate outcome instrument for assessing dyspnoea associated with this condition.

Evidence for direct learning curve for technique on change of cervical sampling device.

The recommended sampling device within the NHS Cervical Screening Programme is the Aylesbury spatula. A local decision was taken to decrease brush usage (either alone or in combination) by 50% from an initial level of 41.8%, with an initial inadequate smear rate of 9.93%. This was managed by controlling smear taking equipment through provision of smear taking kits. The monthly inadequate rate unexpectedly rose to 17.8% before dropping back to previous levels. Brush usage overall fell to 35.2%, with a corresponding increase in spatula use. The possible reasons for this are discussed. The facts suggest that these changes were directly linked, and that there is a learning curve with change of sampling device and that a rise in the inadequate rate should be expected under these circumstances.