Microbiologic and Clinical Description of Postoperative Central Nervous System Infection After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES) have not been developed. The study objective was to define the microbiologic and clinical characteristics of post-EES central nervous system (CNS) infections. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients >18 years of age who underwent EES between January 2010 and July 2021 at a high-volume skull base center. Patients with confirmed CNS infection within 30 days of EES were included. During the study period, the standard prophylaxis regimen was ceftriaxone 2 g every 12 hours for 48 hours. For patients with a documented penicillin allergy, vancomycin plus aztreonam was recommended. RESULTS: In total, 2440 EES procedures were performed on 2005 patients; the CNS infection rate was 1.8% (37/2005). CNS infections were more common among patients with a history of previous EES (6.5%; 20/307) compared with those who did not (1%; 17/1698; P < 0.001). The median time from EES to CNS infection was 12 (6-19) days. Thirty-two percent (12/37) of CNS infections were polymicrobic, which was more common among patients without previous EES (52.9%; 9/17) compared with those with previous EES (15%; 3/20; P = 0.03). Across all cases, Staphylococcus aureus (n = 10) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 8) were commonly isolated pathogens. Among those with confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization before EES, 75% (3/4) developed MRSA CNS infections compared with 6.1% (2/33) of noncolonized patients (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CNS infection after EES is rare and causative pathogens vary. Further studies are needed to identify the impact of MRSA nares screening on antimicrobial prophylaxis before EES.

Malignant Otitis Externa: Evolving Pathogens and Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Malignant otitis externa (MOE) is an invasive infection of the temporal bone that is classically caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Increasingly, however, nonpseudomonal cases are being reported. The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical presentation and outcomes of cases of MOE caused by Pseudomonas versus non-Pseudomonas organisms. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series with chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care institution. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with diagnoses of MOE between 1995 and 2012 were identified. Charts were reviewed for history, clinical presentation, laboratory data, treatment, and outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty patients diagnosed with and treated for MOE at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 1995 and 2012 were identified. Nine patients (45%) had cultures that grew P aeruginosa. Three patients (15%) had cultures that grew methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Signs and symptoms at presentation were similar across groups. However, all of the patients with Pseudomonas had diabetes, compared with 33% of MRSA-infected patients (P = .046) and 55% of all non-Pseudomonas-infected patients (P = .04). Patients infected with MRSA were treated for an average total of 4.7 more weeks of antibiotic therapy than Pseudomonas-infected patients (P = .10). Overall, patients with non-Pseudomonas infections were treated for a total of 2.4 more weeks than Pseudomonas-infected patients (P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion for nonpseudomonal organisms should be maintained in patients with signs and symptoms of MOE, especially in those without diabetes. MRSA is an increasingly implicated organism in MOE.

One thousand endoscopic skull base surgical procedures demystifying the infection potential: incidence and description of postoperative meningitis and brain abscesses.

BACKGROUND: Endonasal endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) is perceived as having a high risk of infection because it is performed through the sinuses, which are not sterile. OBJECTIVE: To identify the bacteriological characteristics, incidence, mortality, and risk factors for intracranial infection after ESBS. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the first 1,000 ESBS procedures performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center from 1998 to 2008. RESULTS: In 18 cases (1.8%), the patient developed meningitis. In 2 cases, the patient died within 2 months after surgery, of noninfectious causes. In 11 cases, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures had positive results. There were no predominant pathogens. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.97 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.21-13.03]; P = .02), history of a craniotomy or endonasal surgery (OR, 4.77 [95% CI, 1.68-13.56]; P = .02), surgery with higher levels of complexity (OR, 6.60 [95% CI, 1.77-24.70]; P = .003), the presence of an external ventricular drain or ventriculoperitoneal shunt at the time of surgery (OR, 6.38 [95% CI, 1.07-38.09]; P = .005), and postoperative CSF leak (OR, 12.99 [95% CI, 4.24-39.82]; P < .001) were risk factors for infection. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection of 1.8% in ESBS is comparable to that in open craniotomy. The most important risk factor was a postoperative CSF leak. All patients recovered from their infection.