Two-fragment Segond fracture validates historical descriptions of independent soft tissue attachments.

This is a case report of a 26-year-old male who sustained a Segond fracture in the context of an acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture incurred while downhill skiing. Further work-up revealed that the Segond fracture consisted of two distinct fragments with separate soft tissue attachments, including the capsule-osseous layer of the iliotibial band and the short arm of the biceps femoris. Imaging showed interval healing of the Segond fracture between initial presentation and the performance of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction approximately 4 months later. As intraoperative evaluation demonstrated that anatomic ACL reconstruction restored translational and rotatory knee stability, surgical repair of the Segond fracture, or the anterolateral complex of the knee more broadly, was not required. Maintenance of translational and rotatory knee stability was confirmed at serial post-operative appointments up through final follow-up.Level of evidence Level V.

Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication that may require revision ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Non-anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is thought to be a frequent cause of graft failure; however, there is a lack of evidence to support this belief. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-anatomic femoral tunnel placement is associated with increased risk of revision ACL-R. METHODS: After screening all 315 consecutive patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL-R by a single senior orthopedic surgeon between January 2012 and January 2017, 58 patients were found to have both strict lateral radiographs and a minimum of 24 months follow-up without revision. From a group of 456 consecutive revision ACL-R, patients were screened for strictly lateral radiographs and 59 patients were included in the revision group. Femoral tunnel placement for each patient was determined using a strict lateral radiograph taken after the primary ACL-R using the quadrant method. The center of the femoral tunnel was measured in both the posterior-anterior (PA) and proximal-distal (PD) dimensions and represented as a percentage of the total distance (normal center of anatomic footprint: PA 25% and PD 29%). RESULTS: In the PA dimension, the revision group had significantly more anterior femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (38% ± 11% vs. 28% ± 6%, p < 0.01). Among patients who underwent revision; those with non-traumatic chronic failure had statistically significant more anterior femoral tunnel placement than those who experienced traumatic failure (41% ± 13% vs. 35% ± 8%, p < 0.03). In the PD dimension, the revision group had significantly more proximal femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (30% ± 9% vs 38% ± 9%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study of 58 patients with successful primary ACL-R compared with 59 patients with failed ACL-R, anterior and proximal (high) femoral tunnels for ACL-R were shown to be independent risk factors for ACL revision surgery. As revision ACL-R is associated with patient- and economic burden, particular attention should be given to achieving an individualized, anatomic primary ACL-R. Surgeons may reduce the risk of revision ACL-R by placing the center of the femoral tunnel within the anatomic ACL footprint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Editorial Commentary: Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Are Defined by Individual Anatomy, Including Both Soft Tissue and Bone Morphology: It's All Important.

Well-designed studies add to our understanding of the anatomy, biology, biomechanics, and outcomes of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) following injury. Despite improvements in ACL treatment, we are still unable to exactly restore the individually unique function of the native ACL due to the complexity of knee physiology. The ACL is a dynamic structure with a rich neurovascular supply, distinct bundles, and 3-dimensional architecture that function in synergy with the bony morphology to facilitate healthy knee kinematics. Furthermore, the ACL exhibits a wide range of natural, anatomic variation. Since anatomic ACL reconstruction has been defined as functional restoration of the ACL to its native dimensions and collagen orientation, in addition to restoring the native footprint, it is important to restore the native size of the ACL, as the size of the tibial insertion site can vary by a factor of 3 from patient to patient. Moreover, variations in ACL soft tissue reflect differences in bony morphology. Bony morphology influences the static and dynamic biomechanics of the knee. Several bony morphologic factors influence the outcomes following ACL reconstruction, including posterior tibial slope, femoral condylar offset ratio, and notch shape. Morphologic differences that reflect pathologic states, such as the lateral notch sign and posterolateral plateau fracture, have been shown to be associated with greater grade instability. To respect the unique nature of each patient during surgical treatment, it is necessary to perform an individualized, anatomic, and value-based ACL reconstruction.

Editorial Commentary: Remember the Risk Factors During Individualized, Anatomic, Value-Based Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Understanding the etiology behind anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction failure is a complex topic still being investigated heavily. The 3 classes of failure are technical, traumatic, and biologic. Technical errors are most common and most frequently reflect tunnel malposition. In addition, tibial slope has long been understood to be a risk factor for failed ACL reconstruction. Although not routinely performed at time of primary ACL reconstruction, osteotomy may be considered in the setting of failed ACL reconstruction. Relative quadriceps weakness is a risk factor, and we recommend sport-specific return-to-play testing as well as benchmarks for relative quadriceps strength before full return to activity. Revision ACL reconstruction is associated with both increased costs and worse patient outcomes, so every effort should be made to give patients the best chance of success after the index surgery. Whereas this begins with understanding the patient's history and risk factors for failure, it crescendos with careful attention to the individually variable factors that make each case unique, tailoring one's management to ensure that each patient receives an anatomic, individualized, and value-based ACL reconstruction.