Indicators to evaluate quality of care in head and neck cancer in Spain.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a set of criteria and indicators to evaluate the quality of care of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify valuable criteria/indicators for the assessment of the quality of care in HNC. With the aid of a technical group, a scientific committee of oncologists specialised in HNC used selected criteria to propose indicators that were evaluated with a two-round Delphi method. Indicators on which consensus was achieved were then prioritised by the scientific committee to develop a final set of indicators. RESULTS: We proposed a list of 50 indicators used in the literature or developed by us to be evaluated with a Delphi method. There was consensus on the appropriateness of 47 indicators in the first round; the remaining 3 achieved consensus in the second round. The 50 indicators were scored to prioritise them, leading to a final selection of 29 indicators related to structure (3), process (22), or outcome (4) and covering diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and health outcomes in patients with HNC. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for each indicator, with their criterion, definition, formula for use in real-world clinical practice, rationale, and acceptable level of attainment. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a set of 29 evidence-based and expert-supported indicators for evaluating the quality of care in HNC, covering diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and health outcomes.

Health state perception of people close to retirement age: Relationship with lifestyle habits and subjects' characteristics.

Aim: Societal ageing increases the need for correct and healthy ageing to ensure the well-being of older adults. Practical strategies are needed to acquire healthy habits for the ageing process. This study aims to analyse the lifestyle habits of subjects who are retired or close to retirement and identify factors that could influence their perceived health and that could be related to these habits. Methods: A Spanish observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study of subjects close to retirement-age. Socio-demographic, family, work, leisure, social, and clinical-psychological indicators were evaluated. Results: 1,700 participants (581 employed; 714 retirees; 405 other-status) were included, average age 63 years, 52% women. Most reported a satisfactory social life (90%), were in live-in relationships (74%), non-smoking (80%), followed a Mediterranean diet (73%), and took medicines daily (70%). Perceived health (EQ-VAS) was 75.9/100, with low disability (12-WHODAS) (7.4/100) and moderate/severe depression. Women reported higher disability (p < 0.001) and depression (p < 0.001), a better social life, and healthier lifestyle, but lower physical/work activity. Retirees reported less depression, better social life, healthier lifestyle, higher physical/work activity, and better sleeping habits. The multivariate model showed a significant association of health-status with disability level, number of chronic diseases, sleep habits, exercise, diet, and alcohol consumption. When depression level was introduced, age and being a woman were also related. Conclusions: Retirement does not mean worse health but rather an opportunity to reinforce favourable health activities and improve lifestyle factors. Incorporating the differences related to gender and employment status in health-perception will facilitate the design of healthy ageing strategies.

Analyzing Differences in Perception between Oncologists and Patients to Adapt Pharmacological Treatment for Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Observational ADAPTATE Study.

Background: Transmucosal fentanyl (TF), used for breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) treatment, has different formulations with distinctive attributes. The hypothesis is that, in shared decision making for the prevention of certain therapeutic problems, doctors and patients assign different value to the characteristics of treatment options. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the discordance between the oncologists' opinion of attributes of TF and patients' expectations in BTcP treatment. Methods: This is a multicenter, cross-sectional observational study using simultaneous written surveys of doctors and patients suffering from BTcP episodes. The opinion of Spanish oncologists and patients regarding the importance of 14 different attributes of TF treatment (start of action, potency, duration, presentations and doses available, ease of use, titration, administration time, need for saliva, oral mucositis, rhinitis, adverse events, risk of abuse, evidence available, and need for instructions or health personnel to handle the medication), using two surveys, one for each group. Results: Sixty-three clinical oncologists and 272 patients participated in the study. The patients' satisfaction with and knowledge of BTcP treatment was 6.4 and 6.8 points, respectively (scale 1-9). The attributes with the highest relevance were shared by both groups, although their priority differed. Significant differences were observed in the greater importance given by oncologists (onset and duration of analgesia, need for saliva, presence of mucositis, and time required for patient education) and patients (risk of opioid abuse/aberrant behavior). Conclusion: Our results confirm that some aspects that most concern patients about the treatment of BTcP differ from those to which oncologists attach most importance. Increased patient awareness and education about BTcP and its treatment could lead to greater satisfaction and better patient involvement in therapeutic decisions. Certain barriers need to be overcome, such as lack of time in consultations and poor communication skills of oncologists that hinder patient health education.

Measures to evaluate quality of care in renal cancer: results of a Delphi study in Spain.

PURPOSE: To review current measures for renal cancer care and develop a comprehensive and updated list of measures for their practical use in Spain. METHODS: The study was developed by Fundación ECO, a Spanish foundation aiming to improve oncology quality of care. A systematic literature review was carried out to identify measures and knowledge gaps. A scientific committee composed of nine experts reviewed the literature findings and added measures. A preliminary list of 42 measures was evaluated with the Delphi method to gather feedback from 47 medical oncology experts in Spain. Experts scored the appropriateness of the measures and ranked their priority in two consecutive online surveys. The scientific committee reviewed the Delphi results and developed the measures. A technical group from Universidad Francisco de Vitoria conducted and oversaw the Delphi method. RESULTS: The Delphi method led to consensus on all 42 measures. The scientific committee used a prioritisation matrix to select 25 of these measures for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer. These measures regarded structure, process, and outcome and covered general management, diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and evaluation of health outcomes. Easy-to-use index cards were developed for all 25 measures, including their definition, formula, acceptable level of attainment, and rationale. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript aims to provide healthcare professionals with expert- and evidence-based measures that are useful for evaluating quality of care in renal cancer in Spain and cover all aspects and stages.

Consenso Ibero-americano sobre Habilidades Comunicacionais para Estudantes de Graduação em Enfermagem / Ibero-American Consensus on Communication Skills for Nursing Degree students / Consenso Iberoamericano sobre Habilidades de Comunicación para Estudiantes de Grado de Enfermería

Resumo Objetivo: como profissão orientada à atenção da saúde, focada no cuidado às pessoas, a Enfermagem precisa desenvolver habilidades de comunicação sólidas. Com base em um consenso internacional de especialistas, apresenta-se uma proposta sobre os resultados de aprendizagem na comunicação clínica para planos de estudos em cursos de Enfermagem em países hispanofalantes. Método: um comitê orientador, composto por 5 enfermeiros e especialistas em comunicação em ciências de atenção à saúde, elaborou a primeira lista de habilidades comunicacionais específicas para o curso de Enfermagem. Outro comitê de 7 assessores científicos internacionais revisou e melhorou a referida proposta. Foram selecionados 70 especialistas de 14 países pelo procedimento de amostragem "bola de neve", sendo convidados para participar em um processo de consenso Delphi modificado a distância em duas rodadas de pesquisa. Foi realizada a análise estatística para estabelecer o nível de consenso final correspondente a cada item. Resultados: foi apresentado um questionário com 68 resultados de aprendizagem em comunicações clínicas para serem avaliados pelo painel. Na primeira rodada Delphi, o painel chegou a um consenso estatístico em todos os itens avaliados. Não foi necessária uma segunda rodada para conciliar posições. Conclusão: apresenta-se uma proposta acadêmica aprovada com um elevado nível de consenso internacional a fim de orientar e unificar os resultados de aprendizagem nos planos de estudo sobre comunicação clínica para cursos de Enfermagem em países hispanofalantes.

Abstract Objective: as a health care profession focused on caring for people, Nursing requires sound communication skills. Based on an international expert consensus, a proposal on learning outcomes in clinical communication for undergraduate Nursing education curricula in Spanish speaking countries is presented. Method: a steering committee, consisting of 5 nurses and experts in communication in health care sciences, drew up the first list of communication skills specific to the Nursing degree. Their proposal was reviewed and improved by a committee of 7 international scientific advisers. 70 experts from 14 countries were selected using a snowball sampling procedure and invited to participate in a distance modified Delphi consensus process in two survey rounds. Statistical analysis was carried out to establish the final consensus level for each item. Results: a questionnaire with 68 learning outcomes in clinical communications was submitted for panel assessment. In the first Delphi round, the panel reached a statistical consensus on all the items assessed. There was no need for a second round to reconcile positions. Conclusion: an academic proposal, approved by a high level of international consensus, is presented to guide and unify the learning outcomes on the clinical communication curriculum for undergraduate Nursing studies in Spanish speaking countries.

Resumen Objetivo: en su carácter de profesión de atención de la salud enfocada en cuidar a las personas, la Enfermería requiere habilidades de comunicación sólidas. Sobre la base de un consenso internacional de expertos, se presenta una propuesta sobre resultados de aprendizaje en la comunicación clínica para planes de estudio de las carreras de grado de Enfermería en países de habla hispana. Método: un comité orientador, compuesto por 5 enfermeros y expertos en comunicación en ciencias de atención de la salud, elaboró la primera lista de habilidades de comunicación específicas para la carrera de Enfermería. Un comité de 7 asesores científicos internacionales revisó y mejoró dicha propuesta. Se seleccionó a 70 expertos de 14 países a través del procedimiento de muestreo "bola de nieve", y se los invitó a participar en un proceso de consenso Delphi modificado a distancia en dos rondas de encuesta. Se realizó un análisis estadístico para establecer el nivel de consenso final correspondiente a cada ítem. Resultados: se presentó un cuestionario con 68 resultados de aprendizaje en comunicaciones clínicas para que lo evaluara el panel. En la primera ronda Delphi, el panel llegó a un consenso estadístico en todos los ítems evaluados. No fue necesaria una segunda ronda para conciliar posiciones. Conclusión: se presenta una propuesta académica, aprobada con un elevado nivel de consenso internacional, a fin de orientar y unificar los resultados de aprendizaje en los planes de estudio sobre comunicación clínica para carreras de grado de Enfermería en países de habla hispana.

Patient Perspective on the Management of Cancer Pain in Spain.

Pain in cancer is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. Breakthrough pain, in particular, severely impacts the quality of life of patients. In this study, we evaluated management and care of pain in Spain from the patient perspective by assessing the experience of 275 patients who had suffered breakthrough pain. Although most patients had suffered moderate-to-severe pain in the last 24 hours, pain relief was achieved in the majority of cases. The body areas with a higher pain intensity was felt varied based on primary cancer. Adherence to treatment was subpar, and patients were moderately concerned about addiction to treatment and adverse events. Doctors did not assess pain in every visit and there is room for improvement in its classification. Education strategies directed toward patients and health care personnel are needed to improve pain assessment, follow-up, and compliance. These could guide shared decision-making and improve communication about cancer pain to improve its care.

Professional survey on knowledge and clinical patterns of pain management in Spanish medical oncology.

Cancer pain is still not treated adequately. The barriers impeding its appropriate treatment include lack of knowledge, erroneous beliefs and inappropriate attitudes with regard to pain, which are sustained by some or all of those involved in the problem. The present study shows the results of an exploratory survey using a large sample of specialists in clinical oncology. Its main objective is to evaluate daily analgesic practices and compliance with clinical guidelines in order to identify areas that should be improved in this particular therapeutic field. Information collection from the responders was in the form of a self-administered written questionnaire, structured in three thematic areas: clinical patterns and resources used in pain treatment in clinical practice, pain and pain-relief therapy, and theoretical knowledge and decision-making in clinical practice. The study identified those skills that most need improvement in the treatment of pain (scientific and technical knowledge and clinical decision-making capacity of professionals) in order to reduce the unjustified variability in current clinical practice.