Navigating Improper Care Settings: Nurses' Experiences Assisting Oncological Patients at the End of Life in Surgical Departments.

BACKGROUND: Despite the growing preference for end-of-life care at home, numerous oncological patients continue to spend their final moments in surgical wards. This incongruity in settings may contribute to "dysthanasia," unnecessarily prolonging futile treatments and resulting in undue suffering. As frontline caregivers, nurses frequently bear the brunt of these challenging situations for patients and their families. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the experiences of nurses providing care to terminally ill oncological patients inappropriately admitted to surgical departments. METHODS: We adopted a phenomenological descriptive study. Nurses purposefully selected from 7 distinct surgical units at a University Hospital in Northeast Italy were recruited. Data collection took place through open-ended semistructured interviews. The interview content was analyzed using Colaizzi's framework. RESULTS: The study with 26 participants revealed emotional challenges, especially for less-experienced nurses. Diverse perspectives among nurses emphasized the need for better palliative care knowledge. Despite the commitment to quality care, collaboration challenges and discordant goals with physicians impacted comprehensive care delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Dysthanasia relates to participants' challenges in caring for oncological patients in inappropriate settings, hindering transparent communication and exacerbating discordance with doctors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals, particularly nurses, and surgeons are crucial. Ongoing education in end-of-life care, coupled with advance care planning, empowers patients, aligns treatment choices, and prevents dysthanasia across diverse healthcare settings.

Cancer nurses' experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Multicenter mixed-methods study on coping and resilience strategies.

BACKGROUND: In early 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic created severe difficulties in clinical and organizational fields. Healthcare workers needed to protect their health and avoid infecting their family members, but also limit the virus's spread among vulnerable oncology patients undergoing hospital treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the resilience and coping strategies of nurses working in the oncology setting. METHODS: A mixed-methods study was conducted. First, two questionnaires (CD-RISK and COPE- NVI-25) were used to assess nurses' resilience strategies and coping mechanisms quantitatively. Second, qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted to explore the personal experiences of nurses who cared for patients during the pandemic, and Colaizzi's framework was used for content analysis. RESULTS: The 164 participants, the majority of whom were women (88.4%), reported high resilience. The CD-RISK score varied according to education. With respect to COPE-NIV-25, transcendent orientation and avoidance strategies had the lowest mean scores, while problem orientation was higher in nurses aged ≥ 40. Five themes emerged: (1) changes in work and personal areas; (2) feelings/emotions, such as fear of infection of themselves or their loved ones, difficulty in using the face mask, relational repercussions with patients or their families; (3) personal and working group strategies used to counteract the suffering attributable to COVID-19; (4) professionalism/nursing responsibilities in developing new rules and protocols, and (5) metaphors to describe their experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic led to major changes in the nurses' roles, but they showed resilience and generated a positive working climate. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Even in emergency situations, nursing administrations and policymakers ought to ensure that nurses receive adequate training and support to develop resilience and coping strategies.

Outcomes of patient education in adult oncologic patients receiving oral anticancer agents: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: A large variety of oral anticancer agents have become available and while at first glance these therapies appear to provide only benefits, patients have expressed their need for educational interventions and raised safety issues. Although both patients and providers have recognized patient education's importance, and an interplay with safety has been acknowledged, no systematic reviews of the literature that summarize all of the current evidence related to patient education's outcomes for patients who receive oral anticancer agents have been performed to date. Accordingly, this systematic review will attempt to fill the gap in the literature as well as to map (1) contents, (2) methodologies, (3) settings, (4) timing/duration, and (5) healthcare professionals involved. METHODS: This protocol is being reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A systematic review will be performed. Studies that targeted eligible adult patients (≥ 18 years old) in hospital, outpatient, and home settings, and reported patient education's outcomes for those taking oral anticancer agents will be included. Searches will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus, and gray literature will be also sought. Two researchers will screen the search results independently and blindly in two phases: (1) title/abstract screening and (2) full-text screening using the Rayyan AI platform. An electronic data extraction form will be implemented and piloted, and then, two trained data extractors will extract the data cooperatively. Thereafter, a quality appraisal will be conducted using the Critical Appraisal Tools from The Joanna Briggs Institute. The results will be analyzed, grouped, clustered into categories, and discussed until a consensus is reached. Emerging evidence will be synthesized narratively and reported in accordance with the synthesis without meta-analysis guidelines. DISCUSSION: The systematic review's results will be relevant to (1) policymakers and management at an institutional level, and (2) for clinical practice, in an evidence-based paradigm, potentially leading to a quality improvement with respect to safety and patient satisfaction. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022341797.

The power of informal cancer caregivers' writings: results from a thematic and narrative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is a disease that disrupts not only the patient's life, but that of the entire family as well, from a care, organizational, and emotional perspective. Patients share their experience of illness frequently with their informal caregiver (IC), a partner, son/daughter, friend, volunteer, or any other person in the family or social network who offers to support them during their clinical journey. The purpose of this study was to investigate ICs' still unknown cancer experiences through the stories of IC participants in a Literary Artistic Competition the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCSS organized, and understand the themes that emerged from their texts and hence, the power of expressive writing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out on literary texts using Mishler's three levels of narrative analysis: thematic (to detect themes and subthemes); structural (to support the thematic level), and performative (to understand the narratives' meaning). In addition, the narratives were classified based on Kleinman and Frank's models. A particular focus was placed on the language of the narratives to identify figures of speech, e.g., metaphors related to cancer. RESULTS: Seven main themes emerged from the 40 stories' thematic analysis: perceptions of the disease; biographical breakdown; relationships; transformation of the sick body; IC's role; encounter with death; and strength of memory. The ICs' stories also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the patient's clinical pathway. ICs are a resource not only for the patient, who, thanks to them, is assured of continuous assistance but also for the healthcare organization, above all because they serve a relational role as a "bridge" between patients and healthcare workers. ICs have important messages to offer to healthcare organizations. If involved adequately, they can provide a strategic strength in supporting patients and healthcare workers themselves. The in-depth analysis of the themes and subthemes in this study led the authors to hypothesize that expressive writing benefit ICs with respect to the possibility of sharing their experiences with others and giving evidence of their role. Their stories are a testimony that can help those who face a similar experience.

Rehabilitation strategies for low anterior resection syndrome. A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence in the literature about rehabilitative treatments that reduce low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms in patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We have search in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health and Scopus databases. Studies selected were limited to those including only patient undergone low rectal resection with sphincter preservation and with pre-post assessment with a LARS score. Five articles fit the criteria. RESULTS: The percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation demonstrated moderate results and sacral nerve stimulation was found to be the best treatment with greater symptom improvement. Only one study considered sexual and urinary problems in the outcomes assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice patients should evaluate with the LARS and other score for evaluation of urinary and sexual problems. Future research must be implemented with higher quality studies to identify the least invasive and most effective treatment/s.

Priorities for Cancer Research From the Viewpoints of Cancer Nurses and Cancer Patients: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Setting priorities in oncology is a useful way to produce a robust set of research questions that researchers can address. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to describe cancer nurses and patients' main research priorities and describe their development over time. METHODS: A mixed-method systematic review was conducted for the period from 2000 to 2018 through a search of multiple databases. The methodological quality of the studies included was assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool, and the process of setting the health research priorities was assessed using Viergever's tool. Each study's top research priorities were extracted and summarized in categories. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included: 13 addressed nurses' research priorities, and 2 focused on those of patients. The majority were Delphi and quantitative studies that were conducted in the United States and United Kingdom. The quality criteria score and the quality of the process were considered sufficiently good. The most important research priorities were categorized as disease control and management, patient-related issues, and professional dimensions and issues. Management of symptoms and pain, education, information, and communication were research priorities always present in the articles during the study period. CONCLUSION: Priorities change over time and depend on several factors; however, some have remained consistent for the last 18 years. Although there is increasing emphasis on including patients in establishing research priorities that inform cancer care, this involvement is still lacking. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Future studies should describe the primary cancer research priorities of nurses in collaboration with patients.

Providing care to a family member affected by head and neck cancer: a phenomenological study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer is recognized as a family illness as many head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after treatment require assistance from a family caregiver throughout the rest of their life. The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experience of primary family caregivers of HNC patients dealing with laryngectomy regarding their complex supportive role. METHODS: Phenomenological study based on individual interviews of twelve primary caregivers of HNC patients, recruited by purposeful sampling. Interview contents were analyzed in depth, in accordance with Colaizzi's descriptive analysis framework, to explore and identify significant themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Analysis evidenced three main topics and subthemes embracing various aspects of the caregiver's lived experiences: (1) experiencing disease and the pathway of care, (2) handling changes to everyday life, and (3) support received by others. CONCLUSION: Given the essential role the caregiver has in the patient's post-treatment recovery, future planning of HNC patient care must consider the caregivers' needs. In order to guarantee an appropriate and effective health professional care, it is important to consider caregivers' issues and needs as part of HNC patient care planning from the diagnosis to the follow-up.

Correction to: providing care to a family member affected by head and neck cancer: a phenomenological study.

The name of Luca Ghirotto was incorrectly captured in the original manuscript.

Bedside shift handover implementation quantitative evidence: Findings from a scoping review.

AIM: To map the research methods, frameworks, structures, processes and outcomes investigated to date when implementing nursing bedside shift reports (BSRs). BACKGROUND: BSRs have become an area of increased interest among nurse managers (NMs) with several projects aiming at implementing bedside reports also as a strategy to increase nursing surveillance and reduce adverse events. However, to date, no summary of the available evidence has been provided with regard to research methods, theoretical frameworks underpinning BSR implementation and outcomes aiming at supporting NM decision-making in this field. EVALUATION: A scoping review including quantitative studies written in English and retrieved from five databases was performed in 2018. KEY ISSUES: Twenty-two studies originating from USA, Australia, Finland and Sweden, largely monocentric in nature and involving mainly medical/surgery units, have been performed to date. BSR implementation has been conducted mainly under organisational change theories, patient safety and nursing conceptual models. The BSR outcomes have been measured at the patient, nurse and organisational levels and reported positive trends. CONCLUSION: Professional reports-describing success transitions from traditional methods of handover to BSRs, and scientific studies aimed at improving evidence in the field, have been conducted to date, in order to document BSR implementation processes and outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: BSRs should be designed and conducted under a theory of organisational change; moreover, clinical nurses should be trained and supported in the transition from the traditional shift report to the BSR; while implementing this transition, outcomes should be set at the patient, nurses and organisational levels with the aim of tracing the comprehensive effects of the change.

Listening to the voice of patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.

The aim was to conduct a systematic review and a meta-synthesis of primary qualitative studies exploring experiences of head and neck cancer patients (HNC) undergoing radio and/or chemotherapy, in order to provide a better understanding of this phenomenon and supply new directions for care and clinical practice. Six databases were systematically searched, and 13 studies were included. The meta-synthesis methodology was adopted to conceptualise the way in which patients lived their cancer journey and the impact of treatments on their daily life. Four themes embracing various aspects of HNC patients' experiences were identified: (a) self-body image and perceived quality of life; (b) experiences and treatment of symptoms; (c) cancer journey; and (d) the relationship with health professionals. The finding demonstrates the importance of acknowledging that treatment sequelae and patients' daily issues do not appear, develop and affect people's lives in isolation and should be considered and analysed as a whole within the social and cultural context of patients' lives. Further research is needed to explore the treatment experience of HNC patients throughout their cancer journey with a more holistic approach that involves health professionals, caregivers and other family members and peers in the community.