In vitro evaluation of the protective role of human antibodies to West Nile virus (WNV) produced during natural WNV infection.

BACKGROUND: West Nile virus (WNV) is endemic in the United States and transmissible by transfusion. Since 2003, the US blood supply has been screened by nucleic-acid tests (NAT) for WNV in minipools (MP-NAT) of 6 or 16 specimens. WNV infection begins with low-level viremia detectable only by individual testing (ID-NAT) and no detectable WNV antibodies. Viremia then increases to levels detectable by MP-NAT, and antibodies become detectable; later, viremia decays to levels detectable only by ID-NAT before becoming undetectable. All but 1 documented WNV transmission by transfusion involved blood components negative for WNV antibodies, raising the question whether WNV antibody-positive blood components with low levels of WNV RNA are infectious. METHODS: Specimens from 102 viremic donors with and without WNV antibodies were used to investigate infectivity in cultures of Vero cells and human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs). RESULTS: In Vero cell culture, 54 (74%) of 73 WNV antibody-negative specimens and 10 (36%) of 28 WNV antibody-positive specimens were infectious. In a random subset of 20 specimens tested in MDM culture, 7 (88%) of 8 WNV antibody-positive specimens and 12 (100%) of 12 WNV antibody-negative specimens were infectious. CONCLUSION: WNV antibodies do not always protect susceptible cells from WNV infection in vitro. RNA positivity in the presence of antibody cannot be ignored as a theoretical risk for blood recipients and needs further investigation.

Analytical and clinical sensitivity of West Nile virus RNA screening and supplemental assays available in 2003.

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems. RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range, < 50-690,000), 13 to 24 percent of units had viral loads below the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays run in MP-NAT format. CONCLUSION: WNV screening and supplemental assays had generally excellent analytical sensitivity, comparable to human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus NAT assays. The presence of low-level viremic units during epidemic periods and the impact of MP dilutions on sensitivity, however, suggest the need for further improvements in sensitivity as well as a role for targeted individual-donation NAT in epidemic regions.