Role of anticardiolipin antibodies in the pathogenesis of prosthetic valve thrombosis: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is serious complication of valvular replacement surgery, and increased levels of anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are associated with thrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of aCL in the development of PVT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied the aCL IgM and IgG levels in 114 patients with PVT and 80 healthy patients with prosthetic valves without PVT or a history of thrombosis. All patients underwent detailed transthoracic, transesophageal echocardiographic and clinical examinations. Blood samples were obtained after transesophageal echocardiography. Tests were repeated 12 weeks apart in patients with aCL IgM or IgG positivity. RESULTS: The mean age, sex, presence of atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular risk factors, elapsed time after surgery, and prosthetic valve type and location were similar between patients with PVT and those without. Ineffective anticoagulation was significantly higher among patients with PVT (p < 0.001). The aCL IgM values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 MPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (10.58 ± 15.90 MPL to 3.70 ± 2.30 MPL, p < 0.001; 7.0 to 0 %, p = 0.016, respectively). The aCL IgG values were significantly higher and positive (> 40 GPL) in the PVT group compared with the control group (12.04 ± 17.58 GPL to 3.83 ± 2.56 GPL, p < 0.001 and 7.9 to 0 %, p = 0.01, respectively). According to international consensus documents, 16 patients had antiphospholipid syndrome. Ineffective anticoagulation and aCL IgM and IgG positivity were independent predictors of PVT in logistic regression analysis (multivariate r(2)= 0.648; p < 0.001, OR= 21.405, 95 %CI= 8.201-55.872; p = 0.008, OR= 1.322, % 95CI= 1.076-1.626; p = 0.005, OR= 1.288, 95 %CI= 1.079-1.538). CONCLUSION: Since the presence of aCL IgM and IgG positivity may cause a tendency toward PVT, these values should be examined in all patients with PVT.

Acute therapy with intravenous omeprazole on caustic esophageal injury: a prospective case series.

The ingestion of caustic substances may result in significant esophageal injury. There is no standard treatment protocol for esophageal injury and most patients are treated with a proton pump inhibitor or H2 antagonist. However, there is no clinical study evaluating the efficacy of omeprazole for caustic esophageal injury. A prospective study of 13 adult patients (>18 years of age) who were admitted to our hospital for caustic ingestion between May 2010 and June 2010 was conducted. Mucosal damage was graded using a modified endoscopic classification described by Zargar et al. Patients were treated with a proton pump inhibitor and maintained without oral intake until their condition was considered stable. Patients received omeprazole 80 mg in bolus IV, followed by continuous infusion of 8 mg/hour for 72 hours. A control endoscopy was performed 72 hours after admission. There was significant difference regarding endoscopic healing between the before and after omeprazole infusion (P = 0.004). There was no hospital mortality at the follow-up. Omeprazole may effectively be used in the acute phase treatment of caustic esophagus injuries.