Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Proc ; 55(10): 2259-2261, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37973526

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes and renal failure. The use of pancreas grafts from donation after circulatory death (DCD), using normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), is still marginal worldwide, mainly due to possible additional risks of graft dysfunction and complications compared with grafts from donors after brain death. METHODS: Case series of patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation after DCD-NRP between January 2018 and September 2022. This study evaluated early postoperative grafts and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Four patients were included. One patient lost the pancreatic graft due to arterial thrombosis requiring transplantectomy. Another patient required a laparotomy due to hemoperitoneum. Overall, 1-year pancreas and kidney graft survival was 75% and 100%, respectively. One patient developed a lymphoma during the follow-up. CONCLUSION: The use of pancreas grafts from DCD after NRP preservation is safe and feasible. Comparative studies with donors after brain death grafts and larger series are required to confirm the feasibility of DCD-NRP pancreas transplantation.


Assuntos
Transplante de Rim , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Humanos , Morte Encefálica , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Preservação de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Perfusão , Doadores de Tecidos , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Pâncreas , Morte , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Transplant Proc ; 54(9): 2467-2470, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36328814

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation is the treatment of choice in patients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease, because it improves survival and quality of life. Currently, enteric exocrine drainage is the most commonly used method. Intestinal complications continue to be a major cause of posttransplant morbidity despite improvements in surgical technique. This study analyzed early and late intestinal complications related to SPK transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 100 adult patients undergoing SPK transplantation between January 2009 and December 2019. We performed systemic venous drainage and exocrine enteric drainage with duodenojejunostomy. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v2. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Istanbul and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. RESULTS: Intestinal complications were reported in 18 patients. Ten patients (10%) had the following early intestinal complications including: ileus (n = 4), intestinal obstruction (n = 2), graft volvulus (n = 1), duodenal graft fistula (n = 1), and jejunal fistula after pancreas transplantation (n = 1). Two cases required relaparotomy: graft repositioning with Roux-en-Y conversion (n = 1) and Y-roux conversion (n = 1). Eight patients had repeated episodes of intestinal obstruction (8%), of whom 2 required surgery for resolution with 100% postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: SPK transplantation with enteric drainage via duodenojejunostomy has a low rate of short- and long-term postoperative intestinal complications. Surgery in patients with recurrent intestinal obstruction has a high mortality risk and should be performed in reference transplant centers.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Fístula , Obstrução Intestinal , Transplante de Rim , Transplante de Pâncreas , Adulto , Humanos , Transplante de Pâncreas/métodos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Pâncreas , Drenagem/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirurgia , Rim
4.
World J Hepatol ; 14(1): 224-233, 2022 Jan 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35126850

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few centers currently perform robotic liver surgery and experiences in robot-assisted surgical procedures continue to be limited compared to the laparoscopic approach. AIM: To analyze the outcomes and feasibility of an initial robotic liver program implemented in an experienced laparoscopic hepatobiliary center. METHODS: A total of forty consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection (da Vinci Xi, intuitive.com, United States) between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.55 years, of which 18 (45%) were female. The mean body mass index was 29.41 kg/m². Nine patients (22.5%) were cirrhotic. Patients were divided by type of resection as follows: Ten segmentectomies, three wedge resections, ten left lateral sectionectomies, six bisegmentectomies (two V-VI bisegmentectomies and four IVb-V bisegmentectomies), two right anterior sectionectomies, five left hepatectomies and two right hepatectomies. Malignant lesions occurred in twenty-nine (72.5%) of the patients. The mean operative time was 258.11 min and two patients were transfused intraoperatively (5%). Inflow occlusion was used in thirty cases (75%) and the mean total clamping time was 32.62 min. There was a single conversion due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo > IIIb) occurred in three patients (7.5%) and mortality in one (2.5%). No patient required readmission to the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 d. CONCLUSION: Although robotic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with favorable short-term outcomes, it involves a demanding learning curve that requires a high level of training, skill and dexterity.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA