Balloon-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated Mitroflow bioprostheses: clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to analyse the risks associated with valve-in-valve procedures for treating structural valve deterioration in Mitroflow bioprostheses, as well as to determine the impact of the original Mitroflow size on the patients' long-term outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2012 and September 2019, 21 patients (61.9% males; mean age 82.4 ± 5.4 years) were treated for Mitroflow deterioration with valve-in-valve procedures (12 transapical and 9 transfemoral). RESULTS: Mean EuroSCORE I and EuroSCORE II were 28.2% ± 13.6% and 10.5% ± 6.1%, respectively. Six patients presented an indexed aortic root diameter <14 mm/m2 and 7 patients a diameter of sinus of Valsalva <30 mm. Implanted transcatheter valve sizes were 20 mm in 6 cases, 23 mm in 14 cases and 26 mm in 1 patient. A Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 complication occurred in 23.8% of cases, including 3 coronary occlusions. In-hospital mortality was 9.5%. The 20 mm transcatheter valves presented significantly higher postoperative peak and mean aortic gradients than other sizes (54.1 ± 11.3 mmHg vs 29.9 ± 9.6 mmHg, P = 0.003; and 29.3 ± 7.7 mmHg vs 17.4 ± 5.9 mmHg, P = 0.015, respectively). There were 12 cases of patient-prosthesis mismatch (57.1%) and 3 cases (14.3%) of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch. Cumulative survival was 85.7% ± 7.6% at 1 year, 74.3% ± 10% at 2 years and 37.1% ± 14.1% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Valve-in-valve procedures with balloon-expandable transcatheter valves associate a high risk of coronary occlusion in patients with indexed aortic root diameter <14 mm/m2 and low coronary ostia <12 mm. Valve-in valve procedures with 20 mm balloon-expandable transcatheter valves in ≤21 mm Mitroflow bioprosthesis leave significant residual transvalvular gradients that might obscure patients' long-term outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement for Mitroflow bioprosthetic valve dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Bioprostheses with pericardial leaflets mounted externally on the stent pose a high risk for valve-in-valve (ViV) procedures. This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of ViV procedures for treating structural valve deterioration (SVD) in Mitroflow bioprostheses. METHODS: Between January 2012 and August 2017, 11 patients (mean age 80.3 ± 5.6 years) were treated for SVD of Mitroflow bioprostheses with transcatheter ViV procedures (six transapical [TA] and five transfemoral [TF]) using balloon expandable bioprostheses. RESULTS: All patients but one were in NYHA class III-IV. Mean STS PROM, euroSCORE I, and euroSCORE II were 8 ± 6.5%, 27.8 ± 11.5%, and 12 ± 5.9%, respectively. Two patients had a "porcelain aorta." The size of implanted valves were 23 mm in 10 cases and 26 mm in one case. One patient suffered a coronary occlusion during a TF approach. The mean volume of contrast used in TF implants was 163 ± 69.8 mL. No contrast media were used in TA procedures. There was one in-hospital death (10%). At 1 year of follow-up, peak and mean aortic gradients were 25.5 ± 5.8 mmHg and 15.5 ± 5.7 mmHg, respectively. One patient had mild paravalvular regurgitation. Cumulative survival was 90.9% at 1 year, 70.7% at 2 years, and 53% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: ViV procedures with balloon-expandable aortic valves provide good hemodynamic and clinical mid-term results for treating patients with a degenerated Mitroflow aortic bioprosthesis. Special care must be taken in small aortic roots, when the stented valve is in the supra-annular position to avoid coronary ostial obstruction.

Gene expression profiles following intracoronary injection of mesenchymal stromal cells using a porcine model of chronic myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND AIMS: We evaluated the therapeutic potential of injection of in vitro differentiated bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) using a swine model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocardial infarction was induced by coronary occlusion. Three groups (n = 5 each) were analyzed: one group received an injection of 17.8 ± 9.3 × 10(6) 5-azacytidine-treated allogeneic MSC 1 month after infarction; a placebo group received an injection of medium; and controls were kept untreated. After 4 weeks, heart samples were taken from three infarcted areas, interventricular septa, ventricles and atria. Gene expression profiles of genes related to contractility (Serca2a), fibrosis (Col1a1), cardiomyogenesis (Mef2c, Gata4 and Nkx2.5) and mobilization of stem cells (Sdf1, Cxcr4 and c-kit) were compared by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). Gene expression profiles varied in different heart areas. Thus Serca2a expression was reduced in infarcted groups in all heart regions except for the left ventricles, where Col1a1 was overexpressed. The expression of genes related to cardiomyogenesis decreased in the infarcted zones and left atria compared with healthy hearts. Interestingly, increased expression of Cxcr4 was detected in infarcted regions of MSC-treated pigs compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Infarction induced changes in expression of genes involved in various biologic processes. Genes involved in cardiomyogenesis were downregulated in the left atrium. The intracoronary injection of MSC resulted in localized changes in the expression of Cxcr4.

Late-presenting left internal mammary to great cardiac vein fistula treated with a vascular plug.

A 73-year-old patient, who underwent triple bypass surgery in another hospital in 1991 after suffering an acute myocardial infarction, was admitted to our institution after an episode of unstable angina. Evidence of a left internal mammary artery grafted to the great cardiac anterior interventricular vein (GCV), with Qp:Qs > 1.5:1, was demonstrated by angiography. We report the closure of said fistula using a percutaneous left radial artery access and the deployment of an Amplatzer vascular occlusion device via the antegrade approach.

Effect of stent thrombosis on the risk-benefit balance of drug-eluting stents and bare metal stents.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the difference in the risk of stent thrombosis between drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) and to assess the clinical implications. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of two cohorts of patients treated at our center with either > or =1 paclitaxeleluting stents (PES) (n=430) or > or =1 BMSs (n=1230) during 2003-2004 was carried out using propensity score methods to compare the adjusted risks of stent thrombosis, instent restenosis, cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and target-lesion revascularization with the two stent types. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 46 months, there was a higher risk of stent thrombosis in PESs (hazard ratio [HR]=3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-7.1] though the risk of in-stent restenosis was lower (HR=0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7]. There was no difference in the risk of cardiovascular death, AMI or target-lesion revascularization. With PESs, the risks of target-lesion revascularization (HR=0.33; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) and in-stent restenosis (HR=0.32; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) were reduced during the first year of follow-up. After this time, the risks of target-lesion revascularization (HR=1.8; 95% CI, 1-3.2) and very late stent thrombosis (HR=12.8; 95% CI, 3-55.1) both increased. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the balance of risks and benefits of PESs compared with BMSs is different in the early and late periods after stent implantation. The greatly increased risk of very late stent thrombosis in PESs could cancel out the clinical benefits associated with the reduction in in-stent restenosis observed in PESs relative to BMSs.

Natural history of a giant coronary aneurysm with spontaneous dissection.

Primary spontaneous coronary artery dissection may appear in young women during the peripartum period or as a result of atherosclerosis. We present a patient with familial hypercholesterolemia who developed a giant aneurysm of the right coronary artery in the setting of atherosclerotic spontaneous coronary dissection over an 8 year period. This report illustrates the association between spontaneous coronary artery dissection and subsequent coronary aneurysm formation.

Statin therapy and contrast-induced nephropathy after primary angioplasty.

A recent study suggested that statin therapy may prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) following primary angioplasty. Our aim was to assess the effect of statins in this setting in a larger population. We evaluated 589 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who underwent primary angioplasty at our institution. Contrast-induced nephropathy was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by > or =0.5 mg/dL within 72 h following the procedure. Overall, 69 patients (11.9%) developed CIN. The incidence of CIN in the group on statins was 15.9%, as compared with 10.8% in the group not taking statins (p=0.2). Thus, we did not observe a protective effect of statin therapy on CIN development after primary angioplasty.

[Transradial approach to coronary angiography and angioplasty: initial experience and learning curve]. / Coronariografía y angioplastia coronaria por vía radial: experiencia incial curva de aprendizaje.

INTRODUCTION: The transradial approach has emerged as an attractive alternative to the femoral approach for coronary angiography and interventions. We describe our experience with the transradial approach and analyze the influence of the learning curve. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The transradial approach was attempted in patients with a good radial pulse and normal Allen test. When feasible and clinically indicated, we attempted ad hoc intervention. We divided the study population into two groups: Group A (the first 200 cases) and B (all other patients). We compared the radial group with a matched femoral control group. RESULTS: We attempted the transradial approach in 526 patients (77.6% male; age 63.5 +/- 11.51), and obtained a success rate of 93.7%. We found differences between group A and B in the success rate (91.0 vs 95.4%, p = 0,04), duration of procedure [23 (16-29) vs. 19 (15-24) minutes; p < 0.001], and fluoroscopy time [6.4 (4.2-10) vs. 5.0 (3.0-7.7) minutes; p < 0,001]. At 24 h of follow-up, we found small hematomas in 9.4%, bleeding in 4.9%, and radial artery obstruction in 2.8%, with no cases of arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysm, or need for vascular surgery. We attempted intervention in 169 patients with 258 lesions, achieving angiographic success in 96.1%. We found no differences in the characteristics of the lesions and patients, or in the angiographic success rate of the radial and femoral PTCA groups. CONCLUSIONS: The transradial approach is a safe and effective alternative to femoral catheterization. There is a significant learning curve associated with the successful performance of transradial procedures.