Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global CVD risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-Cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (Step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After Step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of Step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year CVD risk, lifetime CVD risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm-SCORE2, SCORE-OP- is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (< 50, 50-69, ≥70 years). Different flow charts of CVD risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.

Polypill in cardiovascular disease prevention: recent advances.

Triple therapy with lipid­lowering, antihypertensive, and antiplatelet agents reduces the risk of recurrent cardiovascular fatal and nonfatal events, cardiovascular mortality, and total mortality in secondary prevention. In real life, however, effective implementation of these optimal treatments both in primary and secondary prevention is low, and thus their contribution to cardiovascular prevention is much lower than it could be, based on research data. One of the main barriers to the adequate implementation of these strategies is low adherence to the elevated number of pills, as adherence is adversely affected by the complexity of the prescribed treatment regimen, and can be considerably improved by treatment simplification. This review updates the findings provided by recent epidemiological and clinical studies favoring a polypill­based approach to cardiovascular prevention. The increased prevalence of patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities provides the rationale for a therapeutic strategy based on a combination of drugs against different risk factors in a single pill. Pharmacologic studies have demonstrated that different cardiovascular drugs can be combined in a single pill with no loss of their individual efficacy, and this favors adherence to and persistence of treatment, as well as multiple risk factor control. Recently, a randomized clinical trial SECURE (Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in the Elderly) has shown a significant, 30% reduction in cardiovascular events, and a 33% reduction in cardiovascular death in patients after myocardial infarction treated with a polypill, as compared with usual care, thus supporting the polypill use as an integral part of any cardiovascular prevention strategy.

Lifestyle Modification in Heart Failure Management: Are We Using Evidence-Based Recommendations in Real World Practice?

The heart failure (HF) guideline's purpose is to assist medical professionals while treating patients with HF in accordance with the best current research. Many cases of HF are both, avoidable and treatable thanks to scientific trials. Management is, therefore, based on lifestyle changes, also called non-pharmacological treatment. These, based on lifestyle changes, should be recommended in every patient at risk for HF or with diagnosed of HF, but evidence in itself is scarce. DASH Diet could be clearly beneficial while Mediterranean diet doesn't have enough evidence at the present moment. Smoking should be stopped, and excessive amounts of alcohol drinking avoided, but there is no clinical trial nor registry performed on these aspects. A moderate salt restriction is better than a strict reduction. Exercise and cardiac rehabilitation are beneficial but there are no clear recommendations about type, duration, etc. Most of the evidence that we have in HF patients with obesity is contradictory. Finally, due to the high number of aged frail patients in HF lifestyle changes should be individualized, but again available data is scant. Therefore, due to the lack of current evidence, these gaps need to be considered and need new efforts on investigation in the next future.

Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. / Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021.

We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global cardiovascular disease risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (steps 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year cardiovascular disease risk, lifetime cardiovascular disease risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm ?SCORE2, SCORE2-OP? is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according to different age groups (<50, 50-69, ≥70 years). Different flow charts of cardiovascular disease risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.

[Statement of the Spanish Interdisciplinary Vascular Prevention Committee on the updated European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.] / Comentario del CEIPV a las nuevas Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021.

We present the Spanish adaptation of the 2021 European Guidelines on Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) prevention in clinical practice. The current guidelines besides the individual approach greatly emphasize on the importance of population level approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Systematic global CVD risk assessment is recommended in individuals with any major vascular risk factor. Regarding LDL-Cholesterol, blood pressure, and glycemic control in patients with diabetes mellitus, goals and targets remain as recommended in previous guidelines. However, it is proposed a new, stepwise approach (Step 1 and 2) to treatment intensification as a tool to help physicians and patients pursue these targets in a way that fits patient profile. After Step 1, considering proceeding to the intensified goals of Step 2 is mandatory, and this intensification will be based on 10-year CVD risk, lifetime CVD risk and treatment benefit, comorbidities and patient preferences. The updated SCORE algorithm (SCORE2, SCORE-OP) is recommended in these guidelines, which estimates an individual's 10-year risk of fatal and non-fatal CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke) in healthy men and women aged 40-89 years. Another new and important recommendation is the use of different categories of risk according different age groups (<50, 50-69, >70 years). Different flow charts of CVD risk and risk factor treatment in apparently healthy persons, in patients with established atherosclerotic CVD, and in diabetic patients are recommended. Patients with chronic kidney disease are considered high risk or very high-risk patients according to the levels of glomerular filtration rate and albumin-to-creatinine ratio. New lifestyle recommendations adapted to the ones published by the Spanish Ministry of Health as well as recommendations focused on the management of lipids, blood pressure, diabetes and chronic renal failure are included.

Presentamos la adaptación española de las Guías Europeas de Prevención Cardiovascular 2021. En esta actualización además del abordaje individual, se pone mucho más énfasis en las políticas sanitarias como estrategia de prevención poblacional. Se recomienda el cálculo del riesgo vascular de manera sistemática a todas las personas adultas con algún factor de riesgo vascular. Los objetivos terapéuticos para el colesterol LDL, la presión arterial y la glucemia no han cambiado respecto a las anteriores guías, pero se recomienda alcanzar estos objetivos de forma escalonada (etapas 1 y 2). Se recomienda llegar siempre hasta la etapa 2, y la intensificación del tratamiento dependerá del riesgo a los 10 años y de por vida, del beneficio del tratamiento, de las comorbilidades, de la fragilidad y de las preferencias de los pacientes. Las guías presentan por primera vez un nuevo modelo para calcular el riesgo (SCORE2 y SCORE2 OP) de morbimortalidad vascular en los próximos 10 años (infarto de miocardio, ictus y mortalidad vascular) en hombres y mujeres entre 40 y 89 años. Otra de las novedades sustanciales es el establecimiento de diferentes umbrales de riesgo dependiendo de la edad (<50, 50-69, >70 años). Se presentan diferentes algoritmos de cálculo del riesgo vascular y tratamiento de los factores de riesgo vascular para personas aparentemente sanas, pacientes con diabetes y pacientes con enfermedad vascular aterosclerótica. Los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica se considerarán de riesgo alto o muy alto según la tasa del filtrado glomerular y el cociente albúmina/creatinina. Se incluyen innovaciones en las recomendaciones sobre los estilos de vida, adaptadas a las recomendaciones del Ministerio de Sanidad, así como aspectos novedosos relacionados con el control de los lípidos, la presión arterial, la diabetes y la insuficiencia renal crónica.

High blood pressure, Alzheimer disease and antihypertensive treatment.

Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia, is a complex disease, the mechanisms of which are poorly understood. AD represents 70% of all dementia cases, affecting up to 50% of elderly persons aged 85 or older, with functional dependence, poor quality of life, institutionalization and mortality. Advanced age is the main risk factor of AD, that is why population ageing, due to life expectancy improvements, increases AD incidence and prevalence, as well as the economic, social, and emotional costs associated with this illness. Existing anti-AD drugs present some limitations, as they target specific downstream neurochemical abnormalities while the upstream underlying pathology continues unchecked. Chronic hypertension has been suggested as one of the largest modifiable risk factors for developing AD. At least 25% of all adults and more than 50% of those over 60 years of age have hypertension. Epidemiological studies have shown that hypertension is a risk factor for dementia and AD, but the association is complex. Some studies have demonstrated that antihypertensive drugs can reduce the risk of AD. This review focuses on current knowledge about the relationship between chronic hypertension and AD as well as antihypertensive treatment effect on AD pathogenesis and its clinical outcomes.

Prevalence of masked hypertension and associated factors in normotensive healthcare workers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Evidence on the elevated cardiovascular risk associated with masked hypertension (MHT) is becoming stronger. Determining the prevalence of MHT in apparently healthy individuals may enable better risk stratification and management. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of normotensive healthcare workers recruited from 52 hypertension units. We included individuals aged at least 18 years with no known history of hypertension and office blood pressure (BP) less than 140/90 mmHg. MHT was defined as mean daytime ambulatory BP of at least 135/85 mmHg. RESULTS: Overall, 485 individuals (mean age 43.1 years, 55% women) were included. The prevalence of MHT was 23.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20.1-27.7]. The most prevalent associated cardiovascular risk factors in the total population were smoking (24.9%), dyslipidemia (16.4%), a family history of premature cardiovascular disease (15.9%), and obesity (7.4%). A total of 45.4% of individuals had a family history of hypertension. MHT was associated with male sex [odds ratio (OR) 1.722, 95% CI: 1.091-2.718] and prehypertension (OR 4.561, 95% CI: 2.880-7.222). In univariate analysis, the OR of the diagnosis of MHT increased by 2.3% per year of age. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MHT in normotensive healthcare workers in Spain is almost 25%. Therefore, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring should be routine in occupational health checks in health workers, especially men.

[Prevalence of masked hypertension in a cohort of controlled hypertensive patients in Spain]. / Prevalencia de hipertensión arterial enmascarada en una cohorte de pacientes hipertensos controlados en España.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: In recent years the evidence that masked hypertension is associated with a highest cardiovascular risk is well established. Knowing the prevalence of masked hypertension in our country will allow a better cardiovascular risk stratification and management of hypertensive patients, although the information is scant and heterogeneous. For this reason, the working group for the study of masked hypertension (ESTHEN) in Spain developed the present study with the objective to know the prevalence of masked hypertension in a cohort of hypertensive patients follows in several Hypertension Units in Spain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of a cohort of hypertensive patients followed in 75 Hypertension Units in Spain. Eligible patients were hypertensive cases aged ≥ 18 years receiving antihypertensive drug treatment and showing an adequate BP control at the clinic (BP < 140/90 mmHg). Masked hypertension was defined when mean daytime BP ≥ 135/85 mmHg. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 302 patients. Mean age was 56.2 years and 56% were male. Prevalence of masked hypertension was 48% (95%CI 42-53). The most prevalent accompanying risk factors were abdominal obesity (39.7%), smoking (24.2%), family with premature cardiovascular disease (22.5%), and diabetes (11.6%). Prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy was 23.8%, and 22.2% of patients had established cardiovascular disease, and 6.3% had renal disease. Masked hypertension was related to the absence of established cardiovascular disease (OR 0.306, 95%CI 0.139-0.676) and to the proximity of the clinic BP levels to the control thresholds (0.901, 95%CI 0.842-0.963). The OR of masked hypertension diminished 10% for each mmHg below the threshold of control. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of masked hypertension was approximately 50% in treated hypertensive patients. ABPM constitutes a basic tool for detection of this abnormality.