Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Liver-Related Outcome After Bilio-Pancreatic Diversion in Patients with Initial, Significant Liver Damage.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with NAFLD, and bariatric surgery has significant impact on this liver disease, with reported improvement in hepatic fibrosis. AIMS: To investigate the effects of bariatric surgery on long-term liver disease-related outcome in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and significant liver damage. METHODS: This study included 56 NAFLD patients who underwent bilio-pancreatic diversion for morbid obesity and who had significant fibrosis at intraoperative liver biopsy. Data were analyzed at 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up, and at the latest available visit in patients who had longer follow-up. We assessed the incidence of clinically relevant liver events (ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, portal hypertension-related bleeding, and jaundice) as well as modifications of a validated biochemical index such as the NAFLD score. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 78 months, median weight decreased from 119 to 78 kg (P < 0.0001), and median body mass index decreased from 45.2 to 29.0 kg/m2 (P < 0.0001). None of the patients developed clinical complications of liver disease, and none died due to liver-related causes. Median NAFLD score significantly decreased (P = 0.0005) during follow-up from - 0.929 (- 1.543 to - 0.561) to - 1.609 (- 2.056 to - 1.102). The NAFLD score category was unchanged in 32 patients (57%), improved in 18 (32%), and worsened in 6 (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NAFLD and proven histological liver damage at surgery do not develop complications of liver disease in long term after bilio-pancreatic diversion. Moreover, noninvasive parameters of liver damage improve. Thus, preexisting liver damage does not seem to be a contraindication to bilio-pancreatic diversion.

Management of malabsorptive bariatric surgery after cancer surgery for malignancies of the digestive apparatus.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding management of former bariatric operations after onset of a malignancy are still lacking and there is no consensus whether bariatric surgery negatively influences the oncologic management of patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the strategy by which patients previously submitted to bariatric surgery were managed after diagnosis of malignancy of the digestive apparatus, whether a revision was performed or not, to assess the incidence of nutritional complications, and the effect of revision versus no revision of bariatric surgery on the outcome of cancer treatment. SETTING: University Hospital, Italy. METHODS: Occurrence of a malignancy of the digestive apparatus in patients submitted to biliopancreatic diversion was investigated retrospectively. Patients' data were collected preoperatively, at 2 and 3 years after the operation, at oncologic diagnosis, and at the longest available postoncologic follow-up. RESULTS: From May 1976 to January 2017, 3341 morbidly obese patients were submitted to biliopancreatic diversion. Sixteen patients were diagnosed with a malignancy involving the digestive apparatus 5 to 28 years after bariatric surgery. Of 10 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer, 6 were revised. At 2 years after biliopancreatic diversion, body mass index, hemoglobin, and iron levels were significantly lower than preoperatively. Serum transferrin and total protein were unchanged. There was no difference between body mass index, hemoglobin, transferrin, and total protein levels at 2 years and at oncologic diagnosis, or between revised and unrevised patients. CONCLUSION: Revision of a preexisting bariatric operation after digestive cancer surgery is common, although selected, unrevised cases do not seem to be associated with worse outcome.

The long-term impact of biliopancreatic diversion on glycemic control in the severely obese with type 2 diabetes mellitus in relation to preoperative duration of diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be effective in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the long-term efficacy of biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) for the treatment of T2DM depending on the preoperative duration of T2DM. SETTING: University Hospital. METHODS: Retrospective analysis investigating 2 subsets of severely obese patients who had undergone BPD from 1984 to 1995. The first included 52 patients with a preoperative T2DM duration of ~1 year (SD group - 49 on oral agents and 3 on insulin), and the second included 68 patients who had been diabetic for>5 years before BPD (LD group - 52 on oral agents and 16 on insulin). Postoperatively, T2DM was regarded as in remission when fasting serum glucose (FSG) was lower than 100 mg/dL on regular diet and without antidiabetic therapy. RESULTS: In the SD patients, the number of individuals without T2DM remission were lower both at 5-10 (0/31, 0% of patients, versus 8/54, 15% of patients, p<.04) and at>15 years (1/28, 3% of patients, versus 10/41, 24% of patients, p<.0012). Furthermore, after BPD, the number of patients with dyslipidemia strongly reduced (p<.001) in both groups, values at 5-10 years remaining very similar to those observed at>15 years. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that severely obese patients with longer T2DM duration have a worse metabolic outcome maintained at long and very long term following BPD.

Does biliopancreatic diversion carry increased risk for colorectal cancer? A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Because of the rearrangement of the gastrointestinal tract, biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) could lead to an increased risk of colorectal cancer caused by possible carcinogenetic action of the unabsorbed food and bile acid on colonic mucosa. METHODS: The incidence of colorectal cancer in 1,898 obese subjects submitted to BPD from May 76 to July 2002 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years was retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Among 28,811 person-years, seven cases of colorectal cancer were detected, for an overall incidence of 29.4 per 100,000, which is not different from that observed in the general Italian population, and lower than that reported for obese and type 2 diabetes patients. Logistic regression model suggests that occurrence of colorectal cancer is positively related to the time elapsed from BPD. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that BPD does not carry any increased risk for colorectal cancer. The complete postoperative restoration of insulin sensibility could exert a valuable protective action.

Changes in serum ghrelin concentration following biliopancreatic diversion for obesity.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin is a recently discovered hormone that is produced mainly by the stomach and that increases food intake in rodents and humans. It has been postulated that the weight loss after gastric bypass surgery for obesity might be related to changes in serum ghrelin concentration. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Serum leptin and ghrelin concentrations were measured in a group of obese patients before biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and 2 and 12 months postoperatively. Insulin sensitivity was determined from serum glucose and insulin levels according to the homeostatic model of assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA IR). RESULTS: A sharp drop was observed in body weight, in BMI values, in HOMA IR data, and in serum leptin concentration at 2 and 12 months after BPD, whereas a significant increase of serum ghrelin level was observed at 12 months, when food intake had returned to preoperative levels. A negative correlation between the postoperative changes of serum ghrelin concentration and those of HOMA IR values was observed at 2 and 12 months after BPD. DISCUSSION: No evidence upholding a relationship between serum ghrelin concentration and food intake after BPD was seen; the postoperative changes likely reflected the achievement of a new state of energy balance. The negative relationship observed between post-BPD changes in HOMA IR values and changes in serum ghrelin concentration supported the role of insulin in the modulation of ghrelin production.