Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10years.

PURPOSE: To report on the oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in low-grade prostate cancer (PCa) patients using the French SurACaP protocol, with a focus on long-term outcomes. METHODS: This multicenter study recruited patients with low-grade PCa between 2007 and 2013 in four referral centers in France. The cohort included patients meeting the SurACaP inclusion criteria, i.e., aged ≤75years, with low-grade PCa (i.e., ISUP 1), clinical stage T1c/T2a, PSA ≤10ng/mL and ≤3 positive cores and tumor length ≤3mm per core. The SurACaP protocol included a digital rectal examination every six months, PSA level measurement every three months for the first two years after inclusion and twice a year thereafter, a confirmatory biopsy in the first year after inclusion, and then follow-up biopsy every two years or if disease progression was suspected. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) was progressively included over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 86 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 10.6 years. Only one patient developed metastases and died of PCa. The estimated rates of grade reclassification and treatment-free survival at 15 years were 53.4% and 21.2%, respectively. A negative mpMRI at baseline and a negative confirmatory biopsy were significantly associated with a lower risk of disease progression (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: AS using the French SurACaP protocol is a safe and valuable strategy for patients with low-risk PCa, with excellent oncological outcomes after more than 10 years' follow-up. Future studies are crucial to broaden the inclusion criteria and develop a personalized, risk based AS protocol with the aim of de-escalating follow-up examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Grade 4.

Active surveillance in favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term oncological outcomes of active surveillance (AS) in selected patients with favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: A retrospective database review of two academic centers was conducted to identify favorable IR PCa patients initially managed by AS between 2014 and 2022. Favorable IR PCa was defined by the presence of one single element of IR disease (i.e., PSA 10-20ng/mL, Gleason Grade Group [GG] 2, or cT2b). All patients were diagnosed and followed up according to a contemporary scheme, including MRI and image-guided biopsies. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients met our inclusion criteria and the median follow-up was 56months. During follow-up, there were no cases of metastasis or death due to PCa, but 6 deaths due to competing causes. A total of 25 (44%) and 6 patients (11%) had definitive treatment and GG 3 reclassification during follow-up, respectively. In multivariable Cox hazard regression analysis, the risk of undergoing definitive treatment was significantly associated with PSA density>0.15 (HR: 4.82, 95% CI: 1.47 to 15; P=0.01) and PI-RADS 4-5 lesions on mpMRI (HR: 2.48, 95% CI: 1.06 to 5.19; P=0.006). Interestingly, tumor burden (P=0.3) and GG (P=0.7) on biopsy were not associated with definitive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: AS is a safe and valuable strategy for well-selected patients with favorable IR prostate cancer, with excellent oncological outcomes after five years' follow-up.

[Does the announcement of cancer at the time of Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer diagnosis affect quality of life and adherence of patients? Data from the French prospective cohort VICAN]. / L'annonce du cancer au diagnostic de Tumeur de vessie non infiltrant le muscle modifie-t-elle la qualité de vie et l'observance des patients ? Données de la cohorte prospective française VICAN.

INTRODUCTION: The information provided at the time of diagnosis of Non Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) is highly variable. Well-informed patient are more involved in shared decisions. The objective of our study was to assess the information perceived by the patient at the time of NMIBC diagnosis and its impact on quality of life. METHODS: The VICAN french cohort involved a representative sample of 4174 cancer patients and 5 years survivors. Patients reported outcomes (PROs) were collected by phone and self-questionnaire. Among the 118 NMIBC patients, the term used to define the pathology at diagnosis was prospectively evaluated. The impact on quality of life (using SF-12, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and HAD scale) and on adherence to the care protocol (endoscopic monitoring) has been assessed. RESULTS: Only 26.8% of patients reported hearing the word « Cancer ¼ at the time of NMIBC diagnosis. Conversely, 73.2% of them reported others terms, including « Tumor ¼ (22%), « Polyp ¼ (24%), and « Carcinoma ¼ (17.1%). There was no difference in terms of physical, mental quality of life and anxiety, regardless of the term used. Adherence to the follow-up endoscopic protocol was better in the group of patients hearing the word "Cancer". CONCLUSION: Three quarters of patients treated for NMIBC did not integrate the concept of « Cancer ¼ at the time of diagnosis. Quality of life and anxiety did not differ significantly depending on the term used at diagnosis. However, adherence to care protocol appears to be higher when using the word "Cancer". LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Control of intraocular pressure elevations after argon laser trabeculoplasty: comparison of brimonidine 0.2% to apraclonidine 1.0%.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether brimonidine 0.2% can control intraocular pressure (IOP) spikes as well as apraclonidine 1.0% can in those patients undergoing argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 56 eyes of 41 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were entered in the study; 46 eyes of 41 patients were eventually used for the final analysis. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive either brimonidine 0.2% or apraclonidine 1.0% before and after 360 degrees ALT. Both patient and physician were masked as to which agent each patient received. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraocular pressure measurements were recorded before surgery and at 1, 2, and 4 hours after surgery. The difference between the preoperative IOP (baseline) and the highest recorded postoperative IOP was recorded as the maximum IOP change. The mean of the maximum IOP change for each group was analyzed using a two-sample, one-tailed t test. RESULTS: The mean of the maximum IOP change in the brimonidine 0.2% group was -2.6+/-3.6 mmHg, and the mean for the apraclonidine 1.0% group was -2.3+/-3.7 mmHg (P = 0.8). No patient had a pressure spike greater than 10 mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: Brimonidine 0.2% appears to be as effective as apraclonidine 1.0% in preventing IOP spikes after argon laser trabeculoplasty.

Tenon's cyst formation after trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.

One hundred eyes of 100 patients in whom Tenon's cysts (TCs) developed in the early postoperative period following trabeculectomy with mitomycin C were retrospectively studied to determine their incidence, possible risk factors associated with their development, and the clinical course of the patients in whom they occurred. The incidence of TC formation was 29/100 (29%). Significantly more cysts developed in the men than in the women. There were no significant differences between those patients in whom TCs developed and those in whom they did not in terms of age, race, type of preoperative medications, mean preoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), prior argon laser trabeculoplasty, prior trabeculectomy, prior Tenon's cyst formation, or prior cataract surgery. The 29 patients in whom a Tenon's cyst developed had a mean follow up of 22.0 +/- 12.9 weeks, with a mean IOP at the last examination of 14.2 +/- 6.3 mm Hg (as compared with 20.7 +/- 8.3 mm Hg at the time of diagnosis). One patient required a repeat trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Two patients required bleb needling, subsequent TC excision, and eventual seton placement. Of the remaining 26, 14 (54%) required no glaucoma medication for IOP control, 11 (42%) required one, and 1 (4%) required two.