Enhancing Oil Solubility of BCS Class II Drug Phenytoin Through Hydrophobic Ion Pairing to Enable High Drug Load in Injectable Nanoemulsion to Prevent Precipitation at Physiological pH With a Potential to Prevent Phlebitis.

This work investigates the micellar titration of phenytoin (a weakly acidic drug) with cetyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (CTAH) to form a hydrophobic ion-pair to enhance oil solubility of phenytoin, followed by an effort to formulate nanoemulsion that could potentially prevent precipitation of phenytoin at physiological pH. The ion-pair formulated in nanoemulsion was evaluated for in vitro precipitation during serial dilution at physiological pH. The formation of ion-pair during titration was explained in context of pH-solubility data. The mathematical model successfully integrated ionization and micellization equilibria to reflect on dominant mechanisms for solubilization. The micellar phenomenon during titration was confirmed using Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS). The phase changes of the excess undissolved solids during titration were evident from X-Ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). This analysis confirmed the conversion of phenytoin into ionized state and its subsequent ionic interaction with CTAH forming hydrophobic ion-pair complex (HIP). The complete ion pair formation was evident at pHmax (8.8 to 9.2), and its 1:1 stoichiometry was confirmed using HPLC (Phenytoin and CTAH) and H1 NMR, hence could also be called as a lipophilic salt. The ion-pair (salt) was insoluble in water and showed remarkably high partition coefficient (log P) in octanol/water. As characterized by Hot Stage Microscopy (HSM), the melting point of the ion-pair complex was lowered to 150.8°C compared to the free acid (> 300οC), this was even further lowered to 81.1 °C when evaluated in castor oil. This led to approximately eight-fold higher solubility of hydrophobic ion pair (HIP) in castor oil compared to the free acid form. The high miscibility in castor oil was suitable to formulate a high drug load injectable dispersed system. This was successfully achieved with lecithin and polysorbate as emulsifiers without leaching drug into continuous phase at pH 7.4. This nanoemulsion (<300 nm, and > +30 mV zeta potential) remain stable when evaluated over a period of one month. A serial dilution study of the nanoemulsion was performed in PBS buffer, microscopic observations suggested no birefringence despite incubation at 25°C for several hours. This result indicated that Phenytoin remained strongly partitioned within dispersed oily phase with a higher drug loading when ion-paired phenytoin was used. The higher drug load could enable a small volume slow bolus injection to meet 50 mg/min or lower delivery rate criteria for Phenytoin in the clinical set up. This provided a pathway to further explore potential injectable nano-emulsion formulations that could alleviate typical phlebitis issue associated with the injectable phenytoin solution administration at physiological pH.

Manufacturing-dependent change in biological activity of the TLR4 agonist GSK1795091 and implications for lipid A analog development.

A phase I trial (NCT03447314; 204686) evaluated the safety and efficacy of GSK1795091, a Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist, in combination with immunotherapy (GSK3174998 [anti-OX40 monoclonal antibody], GSK3359609 [anti-ICOS monoclonal antibody], or pembrolizumab) in patients with solid tumors. The primary endpoint was safety; other endpoints included efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics (PD). Manufacturing of GSK1795091 formulation was modified during the trial to streamline production and administration, resulting in reduced PD (cytokine) activity. Fifty-four patients received GSK1795091 with a combination partner; 32 received only the modified GSK1795091 formulation, 15 received only the original formulation, and seven switched mid-study from the original to the modified formulation. Despite the modified formulation demonstrating higher systemic GSK1795091 exposure compared with the original formulation, the transient, dose-dependent elevations in cytokine and chemokine concentrations were no longer observed (e.g., IP-10, IL10, IL1-RA). Most patients (51/54; 94%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the study. Safety profiles were similar between formulations, but a higher incidence of TEAEs associated with immune responses (chills, fatigue, pyrexia, nausea, and vomiting) were observed with the original formulation. No conclusions can be made regarding GSK1795091 anti-tumor activity due to the limited data collected. Manufacturing changes were hypothesized to have caused the change in biological activity in this study. Structural characterization revealed GSK1795091 aggregate size in the modified formulation to be twice that in the original formulation, suggesting a negative correlation between GSK1795091 aggregate size and PD activity. This may have important clinical implications for future development of structurally similar compounds.