Particulated juvenile cartilage allograft for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus is associated with a high complication rate and a high failure rate at short-term follow-up: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes together with the complication rates and failure rates at short-term follow-up following particulated juvenile cartilage allograft (PJCA) for the management of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). METHODS: During October 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following PJCA for the management of OLTs. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, lesion characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, radiological outcomes, complications and failures were extracted and analysed. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. In total, 241 patients underwent PJCA for the treatment of OLT at a weighted mean follow-up of 29.0 ± 24.9 months. The weighted mean lesion size was 138.3 ± 59.6 mm2 . Prior surgical intervention was recorded in seven studies, the most common of which was microfracture (65.9%). The weighted mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score improved from a preoperative score of 58.5 ± 3.2 to a postoperative score of 83.9 ± 5.3. The weighted mean postoperative magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was 48.2 ± 3.3. The complication rate was 25.2%, the most common of which was allograft hypertrophy (13.2%). Thirty failures (12.4%) were observed at a weighted mean time of 9.8 ± 9.6 months following the index procedure. CONCLUSION: This systematic review demonstrated a moderate improvement in subjective clinical outcomes following PJCA for the treatment of OLT at short term follow-up. However, postoperative MOCART scores were reported as poor. In addition, a high complication rate (25.2%) and a high failure rate (12.4%) at short-term follow-up was observed, calling into question the efficacy of PJCA for the treatment of large OLTs. In light of the available evidence, PJCA for the treatment of large OLTs cannot be currently recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Intermediate-Term Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in Patients With Global Versus Isolated Lateral Acetabular Overcoverage.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies evaluating the outcomes of hip arthroscopy for patients with global acetabular overcoverage and focal superolateral acetabular overcoverage suffer from short-term follow-up and inconsistent radiographic criteria when defining these subpopulations of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). PURPOSE: To evaluate the intermediate-term postoperative outcomes for patients with FAIS in the setting of global acetabular overcoverage, lateral acetabular overcoverage, and normal acetabular coverage. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS were enrolled in a prospective cohort study, and those with a minimum follow-up of 5 years were included in this analysis. Patients were grouped based on type of acetabular coverage: global overcoverage (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] ≥40°, with coxa profunda), lateral overcoverage (LCEA ≥40°, without coxa profunda), and no overcoverage (LCEA <40°). Functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score and Nonarthritic Hip Score) and failure of primary hip arthroscopy were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 94 patients (mean age, 41.9 ± 14.2 years) were included with a mean follow-up duration of 6.1 ± 0.9 years. Of these patients, 40.4% had no acetabular overcoverage, 36.2% had lateral overcoverage, and 23.4% had global overcoverage. There was no difference between groups with respect to percentage of patients who underwent reoperation for either revision arthroscopy or conversion to total hip arthroplasty (28.9% for the normal acetabular coverage group, 29.4% for the lateral overcoverage group, and 31.8% for the global overcoverage group; P = .971). Among patients for whom primary hip arthroscopy did not fail, there was no difference in 5-year functional outcomes between groups. Postoperative LCEA >40° (ß = -13.3; 95% CI, -24.1 to -2.6; P = .016), female sex (ß = -14.5; 95% CI, -22.7 to -6.2; P = .001), and higher body mass index (ß = -1.9; 95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0; P < .001) were associated with worse intermediate-term hip function in terms of modified Harris Hip Score. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in functional outcomes or rate of reoperation at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively between those with global acetabular overcoverage, those with regional lateral overcoverage, and those with normal acetabular coverage. Provided that an appropriate acetabuloplasty is performed, there is no evidence to suggest that global acetabular overcoverage portends a worse prognosis than other FAIS subtypes.

Understanding Perioperative Nutrition in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery.

The consequences of malnutrition in spine surgery have been studied to a lesser degree compared to other orthopedic subspecialties. However, there is growing interest in understanding the effects of preoperative malnutrition on spine surgery outcomes. Literature on the relationship between malnutrition and spine surgery outcomes appeared sporadically in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Over the last decade, however, there has been a push to understand the sequelae of malnutrition on patients undergoing spine surgery. The aims of this review are to highlight: 1. the different parameters by which malnutrition has been defined and measured in spine surgery; 2. the prevalence of malnutrition in spine surgery; 3. the outcomes of spine surgery in malnourished patients; and 4. the effects of nutritional supplementation or interventions on spine surgery outcomes. Malnutrition has often been defined utilizing specific serological laboratory values or nutritional indices. Serologic values of malnutrition include an albumin < 3.5 g/dL, transferrin < 150 mg/ dL, or a total lymphocyte count of < 1,500 cells/mm3 . The available literature reports that the prevalence of malnutrition in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery ranges from 5% to 50%, with most literature supporting a value toward the higher end of this spectrum. Malnourished patients undergoing spine surgery have higher rates of surgical site infections, medical complications, lengths of stay, ICU admissions, 30-day and 1-year mortalities, reoperations, 30-day readmissions, and costs of care. Given the plethora of spine surgeries performed in the country annually and the prevalence of malnutrition in up to 50% of our patients, we recommend performing preoperative nutritional assessments on all patients to ensure their optimization prior to surgery.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip From Birth to Adolescence: Clear Indications and New Controversies.

It is important to be knowledgeable about the latest information on the diagnosis and the evidence-based management of developmental hip dysplasia and dislocation from birth through adolescence. The focus should be on the effect of the problem; normal growth and development of the hip joint; and the pathoanatomy, natural history, and long-term outcomes of developmental dysplasia of the hip, hip subluxation, and dysplasia. Many controversies exist in the management of this complex spectrum of disorders.

Perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing otologic surgery: An evidence-based review.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Opioid misuse and diversion is a major concern, with a negative impact on both the individual and society. The objective of this study was to perform an evidence-based systematic review of the efficacy of perioperative analgesic regimens following otologic surgery. METHODS: Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed/MEDLINE databases (January 1, 1947 to June 30, 2018) were searched for studies investigating pain management in otologic surgeries. All studies were assessed for quality and bias using the Cochrane bias tool. Patient demographics, type of surgery, medication class, dose, administration characteristics, pain scores, and adverse events were reported. RESULTS: Twenty-three studies encompassing 1,842 patients met inclusion criteria. In 21.4% of studies, an overall reduction in pain scores was reported when the treatment group included more than one analgesic. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events across all medication types (10.2%), with local anesthetic patients experiencing these side effects most frequently (38.0%). Perioperative acetaminophen was reported to have the fewest adverse drug reactions overall (6.1%), but did not reduce pain scores as much as other modalities, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or combination analgesics. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that combination analgesics, such as acetaminophen plus codeine, provide superior pain relief to monotherapy analgesics in the perioperative pain management of otologic surgeries. NSAIDs, α-agonists, and nerve blocks may also be viable single-therapy options. Further prospective randomized controlled trials into perioperative analgesia for patients undergoing otologic surgery may be helpful in establishing a definitive consensus. Laryngoscope, 130:190-199, 2020.