Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Residual Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Growing evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the implications of residual UTUC at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) after NAC are not well characterized. Our objective was to compare oncologic outcomes for pathologic risk-matched patients who underwent RNU for UTUC who either received NAC or were chemotherapy-naïve. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 1993 patients (including 112 NAC recipients) who underwent RNU for nonmetastatic, high-grade UTUC between 1985 and 2022 in a large, international, multicenter cohort. We divided the cohort into low-risk and high-risk groups defined according to pathologic findings of muscle invasion and lymph node involvement at RNU. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine clinical and demographic factors associated with these outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Among patients with low-risk pathology at RNU, RFS, OS, and CSS were similar between the NAC and chemotherapy-naïve groups. Among patients with high-risk pathology at RNU, the NAC group had poorer RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-4.48), OS (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33-3.20), and CSS (subdistribution HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.37-4.69) in comparison to the pathologic risk-matched, chemotherapy-naïve group. Limitations include the lack of centralized pathologic review. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with residual invasive disease at RNU after NAC represent a uniquely high-risk population with respect to oncologic outcomes. There is a critical need to determine an optimal adjuvant approach for these patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: We studied a large, international group of patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract who underwent surgery either with or without receiving chemotherapy beforehand. We identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with residual aggressive cancer after chemotherapy and surgery who should be prioritized for clinical trials and drug development.

Every decade counts: a narrative review of functional recovery after partial nephrectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a narrative review of the major advances regarding ischaemia and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy (PN), along with the ongoing controversies. METHODS: Key articles reflecting major advances regarding ischaemia and functional recovery after PN were identified. Special emphasis was placed on contributions that changed perspectives about surgical management. Priority was also placed on randomized trials of off-clamp vs on-clamp cohorts. RESULTS: A decade ago, 'Every minute counts' was published, showing strong correlations between duration of ischaemia and development of acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease after clamped PN. This reinforced perspectives that ischaemia was the main modifiable factor that could be addressed to improve functional outcomes and helped spur efforts towards reduced or zero ischaemia PN. These approaches were associated with strong functional recovery and some peri-operative risk, although they were generally safe in experienced hands. Further research demonstrated that, when parenchymal volume changes were incorporated into the analyses, ischaemia lost statistical significance, and percent parenchymal volume saved proved to be the main determinant. Cold ischaemia was confirmed to be highly protective, and limited warm ischaemia also proved to be safe. The reconstructive phase of PN, with avoidance of parenchymal devascularization, appears to be most important for functional outcomes. Randomized trials of on-clamp vs off-clamp PN have shown minimal impact of ischaemia on functional recovery. CONCLUSIONS: The past decade has witnessed great progress regarding functional recovery after PN, with many lessons learned. However, there are still unanswered questions, including: What is the threshold of warm ischaemia at which irreversible ischaemic injury begins to develop? Are some cohorts at increased risk for AKI or irreversible ischaemic injury? and Which patients should be prioritized for zero-ischaemia PN?

What Happens to the Preserved Renal Parenchyma After Clamped Partial Nephrectomy?

BACKGROUND: Most partial nephrectomies (PNs) are performed with hilar occlusion to reduce blood loss and optimize visualization. However, the histologic status of the preserved renal parenchyma years after PN is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the histologic chronic kidney disease (CKD) score of renal parenchyma before and years after PN, and to explore factors associated with CKD-score increase and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective review of 147 renal cell carcinoma patients who underwent PN and subsequent radical nephrectomy (RN) due to tumor recurrence was performed in 19 Chinese centers and Cleveland Clinic. Macroscopic normal renal parenchyma was evaluated at least 5 mm away from the tumor in PN specimens and at remote sites in RN specimens. INTERVENTION: PN/RN and ischemia. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Histologic CKD score (0-12) represents a summary of glomerular/tubular/interstitial/vascular status. Predictive factors for a substantial increase of CKD score (≥3) were evaluated by logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Sixty-five patients with all necessary data were analyzed. The median interval between PN and RN was 2.4 yr. Median durations of warm ischemia (n = 42) and hypothermia (n = 23) were both 23 min. The histologic CKD score was increased after RN in 47 (72%) patients, with 29 (45%) experiencing more substantial increase (≥3). There was no significant difference in the change of CKD score related to the type and duration of ischemia (p = 0.7 and p = 0.4, respectively) or interval from PN to RN (p > 0.9). However, patients with comorbidities of hypertension, diabetes, and/or pre-existing CKD (hypertension [HTN]/diabetes mellitus [DM]/CKD) demonstrated increased rate and extent of CKD-score increase. On univariate analysis, HTN/DM/CKD was the only predictor of a substantial CKD-score increase (odds ratio: 3.53 [1.12-11.1]). Decline of GFR was modest and similar between patients with/without a substantial CKD-score increase. CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of conventional, limited durations of ischemia, histologic deterioration of preserved parenchyma after PN appears to be primarily due to pre-existing medical comorbidities rather than ischemia. A subsequent decline in renal function was mild and independent of histologic changes. PATIENT SUMMARY: After clamped PN, the preserved renal parenchyma demonstrated histologic deterioration in many cases, which correlated with the presence of comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or chronic kidney disease. In contrast, the type and duration of ischemia did not correlate with histologic changes after PN, suggesting that ischemia insult had only limited impact on parenchyma deterioration.

Refractive accuracy in eyes undergoing combined cataract extraction and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive accuracy of current intraocular lens (IOL) formulas and propose a modification in calculation of corneal power in eyes undergoing combined cataract extraction and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy undergoing uncomplicated combined cataract surgery and DMEK at a single institution were included. The Hoffer Q, SRK/T, Holladay I, Barrett Universal II and Haigis formulas were compared. A modified corneal power was calculated using a thick lens equation based on anterior and posterior corneal radii and corneal thickness from Pentacam imaging. Error calculations were adjusted based on the difference in optical biometry and the modified corneal power. Mean absolute error (MAE) for each formula was compared between the corneal power modification and optical biometry corneal power. RESULTS: In 86 eyes, the mean error ranged from 0.90 D for the Barrett Universal II formula to -0.10 D for the Haigis formula, with 4 of 5 formulas resulting in a mean hyperopic error. The corneal power modification resulted in a significantly lower MAE for the Hoffer Q (0.82 D), Holladay I (0.85 D), SRK/T (0.85 D) and Barrett Universal II (0.90 D) formulas compared with optical biometry corneal power for the Hoffer Q (1.02 D; p<0.005), Holladay I (0.97 D; p<0.005), SRK/T (0.93 D; p<0.01) and Barrett Universal II (1.16 D; p<0.005) formulas. CONCLUSIONS: All formulas except the Haigis formula resulted in a hyperopic error. The corneal power modification significantly reduced error in four out of five IOL formulas.