Ceftaroline for Central Nervous System Infections: Case Report of a Young Infant, and Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Managing health care acquired and device-associated intracranial infections in young children can be challenging given adverse antibiotic side effects and difficulties in achieving adequate central nervous system (CNS) antibiotic concentrations. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with a favorable safety profile and activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and several Gram-negative organisms. Published data on the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections in children and adults are limited. METHODS: We describe a 2-month-old infant with ventriculo-subgaleal shunt-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ventriculitis, which was successfully treated with ceftaroline, in addition to vancomycin and rifampin. We conducted a scoping review of English-language literature retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science that assessed the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections. RESULTS: We identified 22 articles for inclusion in our review, which described 92 unique patients, of whom 2 were <21 years old. Ceftaroline was commonly used in conjunction with other antibiotics to treat infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus , coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Most case reports described clinical success with ceftaroline, though small case series and cohort studies yielded mixed efficacy assessments. Adverse effects attributed to ceftaroline were rare and included reversible myelosuppression, eosinophilia, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies suggested similar CNS penetration through inflamed meninges as other beta lactam antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a growing body of published evidence supporting the use of ceftaroline in combination with other agents for the treatment of CNS infections. In absence of clinical trials, additional real-world data are needed to define the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline for children and adults with CNS infections.

MRSA septic pulmonary emboli presenting as isolated focal chest pain in an adolescent.

This case demonstrates the importance of considering septic pulmonary embolism (SPE) on the differential for chest pain in the pediatric population, especially in patients with a history of skin and soft tissue infection. The adolescent patient in this report, with a history of axillary hidradenitis suppurativa complicated by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) superinfection and recent completion of a 3-month course of doxycycline, presented with isolated focal chest pain in the absence of other infectious or respiratory signs or symptoms. Initial pulmonary imaging revealed multiple bilateral wedge-shaped nodules. Three specialty teams were consulted in the patient's evaluation, resulting in biopsy of a suspicious lesion that confirmed the diagnosis of MRSA SPE. Following a course of targeted antibiotic therapy, the patient's chest pain resolved and imaging findings improved. Insights gleaned from the workup of this patient are useful in formulating a framework for recognition of SPE in children presenting with chest pain, and also highlight the importance of considering insidious SPE presentation in the setting of antibiotic pretreatment.

A Primary Care-Based Quality Improvement Initiative to Increase Identification of Pediatric International Travelers.

Children who travel internationally to visit friends and relatives (VFRs) are at risk for travel-related illness, but underuse pretravel health services. Although primary care clinics can identify travelers and address pretravel health needs, to date, there are few published reports on effective primary care-based pretravel interventions. We developed a quality improvement initiative to increase traveler identification at a primary care clinic serving families that frequently travel to VFRs. Interventions included a screening question asked at all clinic visits, provider and staff training, travel fliers, and health recommendation sheets for families. Interventions were implemented during 2017 and 2018 peak travel seasons. Travel visit rates and characteristics during the intervention period were compared with pre-intervention baseline periods (April-August, 2015-16). Surveys with providers were conducted to assess disruptiveness of the interventions, and rates of duplicate travel visits were assessed. A total of 738 unique travel events were identified during peak travel seasons from 2015 to 2018, encompassing travel to 29 countries across five continents. Overall, there were 428 unique travel events (3.0% of all clinic visits) during peak seasons 2017-18, compared with 310 unique travel events (2.2% of all clinic visits) during peak seasons 2015-16 (rate ratio 1.34 [95% CI: 1.16-1.56], P < 0.001). None of the 18 healthcare providers or staff surveyed found new travel screening processes to be disruptive or bothersome. Implementation of a primary care-based multimodal travel screening and education initiative was associated with a significantly increased rate of travel visits.

Comparison of residual cancer burden, American Joint Committee on Cancer staging and pathologic complete response in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657).

PURPOSE: Several pathologic staging systems characterize residual tumor in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) is now accepted by the Food and Drug Administration as an endpoint for granting accelerated drug approval. Two other systems of post-neoadjuvant pathologic tumor staging-residual cancer burden (RCB) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer post-neoadjuvant therapy staging system (yAJCC)-have been developed to characterize residual tumors when patients do not achieve pCR. The optimal system and the ways in which these systems complement each other have not been fully determined. METHODS: Using data from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL, we compared pCR, RCB, and yAJCC as predictors of early recurrence-free survival (RFS) to identify ways to improve post-neoadjuvant pathologic evaluation. RESULTS: Among 162 patients assessed, pCR identified patients at lowest risk of recurrence, while RCB and yAJCC identified patients at highest risk. Hormone-receptor (HR) and HER2 subtypes further improved risk prediction. Recursive partitioning indicated that triple-negative or HER2+ patients with yAJCC III or RCB 3 have the highest recurrence risk, with an RFS of 27%. Our analysis also highlighted discrepancies between RCB and yAJCC stratification: 31% of patients had discrepant RCB and yAJCC scores. We identified differential treatment of lymph node involvement and tumor cellularity as drivers of these discrepancies. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that there is benefit to reporting both RCB and yAJCC for patients in order to identify those at highest risk of relapse.