Second- or third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in general population: Is there a real benefit?

INTRODUCTION: Since 2009, multiple randomized trials have shown faster and deeper responses in CML patients treated with new-generation TKI (NG-TKI) compared to those treated with imatinib (IM). Are the same results observed in the general population? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were identified from the three French hematological malignancies population-based registries. All CML patients (ICD-O-3: 9875/3) diagnosed between 2006 and 2016 and resided in registries areas were included. The TKI generation effect on achievement of MMR in first-line therapy was assessed through a multivariate competitive risk analysis. An alluvial plot described the pathways leading to death. RESULTS: In total, 507 CML patients received TKI in first-line treatment, 22% were enrolled in a clinical trial. After adjustment, NG-TKI patients were significantly more likely to achieve MMR during first-line therapy than IM patients (HR: 1.88 CI95% [1.35-2.61]). At the end of follow-up, 212 patients were still in first-line therapy (46 of them died), 203 switched to second-line (43 subsequently died), 26 were on TFR from first-line (4 subsequently died), and 20 stopped their treatment (16 subsequently died). DISCUSSION: In this comprehensive real-life setting, the results were consistent with clinical trials. The results are not sufficient to conclude that a NG-TKI treatment is superior with regard to these patients, despite indications regarding differences between the TKI generation effect on survival and tolerance.

Correction: Protein biomarkers predictive for response to anti-EGFR treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Supplementary Table 1 and the Supplementary Figure legends were not included when this manuscript was first published. The files are now available here.

Protein biomarkers predictive for response to anti-EGFR treatment in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with mutant KRAS or NRAS are ineligible for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) therapy, as RAS mutations activate downstream pathways independently of EGFR and induce primary resistance. However, even among RAS wild-type (WT) patients, only a fraction responds to anti-EGFR therapy, suggesting that other mechanisms of resistance exist. We hypothesise that different (epi)genetic alterations can lead to primary anti-EGFR resistance and that the crucial end point is the activation of protein signalling pathways. METHODS: We analysed the expression and activation of proteins involved in cell signalling, using reverse phase protein arrays, on a multicentre French cohort of RAS WT mCRC treated with anti-EGFR treatment. RESULTS: We identify activated EGFR and HER3 as protein biomarkers predictive for better overall survival. Active EGFR signalling and downstream PI3K, but not MAPK, pathway activation are associated with response to anti-EGFR treatment. Left-sided mCRC displays active ErbB2/3 and Wnt pathways and a better response to anti-EGFR therapy compared to right-sided mCRC. CONCLUSIONS: We identify active EGFR and PI3K signalling as a key factor for response to anti-EGFR treatment in mCRC and highlight the importance of developing these biomarkers in clinical practice for the selection of RAS WT mCRC patients that would benefit from anti-EGFR treatment.