RESUMO
This phase-3 randomized multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of subcutaneous azacitidine (AZA) post-remission therapy vs. best supportive care (BSC) in elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. The primary endpoint was the difference in disease-free survival (DFS) from complete remission (CR) to relapse/death. Patients with newly diagnosed AML aged ≥61 years received two courses of induction chemotherapy ("3+7" daunorubicin and cytarabine) followed by consolidation (cytarabine). At CR, 54 patients were randomized (1:1) to receive BSC (N = 27) or AZA (N = 27) at a dose of 50 mg/m2 for 7 days every 28 days and the dose increased after the 1st cycle to 75 mg/m2 for a further 5 cycles, followed by cycles every 56 days for 4.5 years. At 2 years, median DFS was 6.0 (95% CI: 0.2-11.7) months for patients receiving BSC vs. 10.8 months (95% CI: 1.9-19.6, p = 0.20) months for AZA. At 5 years, DFS was 6.0 (95% CI: 0.2-11.7) months in the BSC arm vs. 10.8 (95% CI: 1.9-19.6, p = 0.23) months in the AZA arm. Significant benefit was afforded by AZA on DFS at 2 and 5 years in patients aged >68 years (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.13-0.90, p = 0.030 and HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.15-0.93, p = 0.034, respectively). No deaths occurred prior to leukemic relapse. Neutropenia was the most frequent adverse event. There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures between study arms. In conclusion, AZA post-remission therapy was found to provide benefit in AML patients aged >68 years.
RESUMO
TP53 gene mutations are common in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) with del5q and have a clinical and prognostic significance. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is an accurate, but expensive, technique, and not commonly available. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for TP53 expression has been recently used as a surrogate to assess TP53 mutations. To compare the concordance between TP53 expression in IHC and TP53 mutations by NGS, 30 cases with MDS harbouring a del5q abnormality were evaluated. Overall, 10/30 patients (33.3%) had TP53 mutations by NGS, while 16/29 (55.1%) had TP53 overexpression in IHC. TP53 expression by IHC had a 70% sensitivity to identify patients with TP53 mutation by NGS, but its specificity was low (52.6%, kappa = 0.198; P = 0.24). In addition, ROC curve analyses showed that the overall diagnostic value (accuracy) of TP53 expression in IHC to identify patients with TP53 mutation by NGS was 68% in the whole study sample and 67% in patients with isolated del5q-. In both cases, the areas under the curves did not attain the statistical significance (P = 0.11 and P = 0.29, respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the cut-off of 2.3% TP53 expression in IHC was shown to be the best cut-off to identify TP53 mutations: using this cut-off, the agreement between TP53 expression and TP53 mutation by NGS reached statistical significance (kappa = 0.42; P = 0.023). In conclusion, the agreement between TP53 expression in IHC and TP53 mutation analysis by NGS is rather unsatisfactory in MDS patients with del5q at the standard cut-off. Thus, the IHC technique cannot be considered a valid alternative to NGS evaluation of TP53 mutational status in these patients.