The comparative safety of abciximab versus eptifibatide in patients on dialysis undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2).

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the patterns of use and outcomes associated with eptifibatide and abciximab administration among dialysis patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Contraindicated medications are frequently administered to dialysis patients undergoing PCI often resulting in adverse outcomes. Eptifibatide is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor that is often used during PCI and is contraindicated in dialysis. METHODS: We included dialysis patients who underwent PCI from January 2010 to September 2015 at 47 hospitals in Michigan. We compared outcomes between patients who received eptifibatide compared with abciximab. Both groups required concurrent treatment with unfractionated heparin only. In-hospital outcomes included repeat PCI, bleeding, major bleeding, need for transfusion, and death. Optimal full matching was used to adjust for non-random drug administration. RESULTS: Of 177 963 patients who underwent PCI, 4303 (2.4%) were on dialysis. Among those, 384 (8.9%) received eptifibatide and 100 (2.3%) received abciximab. Prior to matching, patients who received eptifibatide had higher pre-procedural hemoglobin levels (11.3 g/dL vs. 10.7 g/dL; P < 0.001) and less frequently had a history of myocardial infarction (36.5% vs. 52.0%; P = 0.005). After matching, there were no significant differences in in-hospital outcomes between eptifibatide and abciximab including transfusion (aOR: 1.15; 95%CI: 0.55-2.40; P = 0.70), bleeding (1.47; 0.64-3.40; P = 0.36), major bleeding (4.68; 0.42-52.3; P = 0.21), repeat PCI (0.38; 0.03-4.23; P = 0.43), and death (1.53; 0.2-9.05; P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being contraindicated in dialysis, eptifibatide was used approximately 3.5 times more frequently than abciximab among dialysis patients undergoing PCI but was associated with similar in-hospital outcomes.

Safety and efficacy of cangrelor, an intravenous, short-acting platelet inhibitor in patients requiring coronary artery bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Oral P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitors are a cornerstone of reducing complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes or coronary stents. Guidelines advocate discontinuing treatment with P2Y12 platelet receptor inhibitors before surgery. Cangrelor, a short-acting, reversible, intravenously administered P2Y12 platelet inhibitor is effective in achieving appropriate platelet inhibition in patients who are awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and require P2Y12 inhibition. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of preoperative cangrelor on the incidence of perioperative complications, which are currently unknown. METHODS: Patients (n = 210) requiring preoperative clinical administration of thienopyridine therapy were randomized in a multicenter, double-blinded study to receive cangrelor or placebo while awaiting CABG after discontinuation of the thienopyridine. Optimal platelet reactivity, which was defined as <240 P2Y12 platelet reaction units, was measured with serial point-of-care testing (VerifyNow). Pre- and postoperative outcomes, bleeding values, and transfusion rates were compared. To quantify potential risk factors for bleeding, we developed a multivariate logistic model. RESULTS: The differences between the groups in bleeding and perioperative transfusion rates were not significantly different. The rate of CABG-related bleeding was 11.8% (12/102) in cangrelor-treated patients and 10.4% (10/96) in the placebo group (P = .763). Transfusion rates for the groups were similar. Serious postoperative adverse events for the cangrelor and placebo groups were 7.8% (8/102) and 5.2% (5/96), respectively (P = .454). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with placebo, bridging patients with cangrelor prior to CABG effectively maintains platelet inhibition without increasing post-CABG complications, including bleeding and the need for transfusions. These data suggest cangrelor treatment is a potential strategy for bridging patients requiring P2Y12 receptor inhibition while they await surgery.

TAXUS Liberté attenuates the risk of restenosis in patients with medically treated diabetes mellitus: results from the TAXUS ATLAS program.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and safety of the second-generation TAXUS Liberté paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients suffer from accelerated atherosclerosis and increased risk of restenosis after coronary interventions; however, prior data suggest that PES might blunt this effect, providing equal benefit in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. METHODS: A pooled analysis of all 4 TAXUS ATLAS studies was conducted that included 413 diabetic and 1,116 nondiabetic subjects treated with the TAXUS Liberté stent for de novo coronary lesions. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound outcomes at 9 months and clinical outcomes at 9 and 12 months were compared in patients with and without diabetes. Propensity score and multivariate adjustments were performed to correct for baseline differences. RESULTS: In-stent angiographic restenosis (13.0% vs. 9.6%, p = 0.12), late luminal loss (0.40 mm vs. 0.38 mm, p = 0.58), and intimal hyperplasia (14.8% vs. 13.4%, p = 0.29) were similar for diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. After propensity adjustment, 12-month target lesion revascularization rates were similar for diabetic and nondiabetic subjects (6.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.18), with no differences in mortality, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. However, the rate of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was higher for diabetic subjects due to increased TVR outside the target lesion (TVR Remote). CONCLUSIONS: Similar clinical, angiographic, and intravascular ultrasound outcomes were observed for both diabetic and nondiabetic subjects treated with TAXUS Liberté, suggesting that this PES attenuates the effect of diabetes on restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention, yielding comparable efficacy and safety in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. (TAXUS ATLAS; NCT00371709, NCT00371423, NCT00371748, and NCT00371475).

Effect of the polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent on vascular tissue responses: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound integrated analysis from the TAXUS IV, V, and VI trials.

AIMS: The TAXUS Express stent has been shown to reduce angiographic restenosis, repeat revascularizations, and neointimal hyperplasia when compared with bare metal stent (BMS) control (TAXUS IV, V, and VI) in individual TAXUS trials. Since intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) methodology and core laboratory were consistent among all three TAXUS trials, an integrated analysis of 956 patients across all IVUS cohorts can be performed providing superior power. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the TAXUS randomized trials, patients received an Express BMS or paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent. Volumetric analysis was performed on a selected subgroup at implantation and 9 months. Compared with BMS control, TAXUS increased 9-month lumen volumes (144 +/- 79 vs. 179 +/- 95 mm(3); P < 0.0001) due to reduced neointimal volume (66 +/- 49 vs. 27 +/- 30 mm(3); P < 0.0001). This corresponded to a 61% decrease in net lumen volume obstruction (31 +/- 15 vs. 12 +/- 12 mm(3); P < 0.0001). Lumen loss was similar between groups for the proximal 5 mm outside the stent but was reduced in TAXUS at the distal edge (P = 0.0056). Neointimal hyperplasia was significantly reduced in the double-strut region of overlapping TAXUS vs. BMS control and in high-risk patients with diabetes, long lesions, multiple stents, and multiple overlapping stents. Late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) was more common with moderate-release TAXUS stents. Importantly, there were no major adverse cardiac events or stent thromboses in any late-acquired ISA patient through 2 years. Univariate and multivariable analyses revealed that longer lesion length and previous myocardial infarction are risk factors for late-acquired ISA. CONCLUSION: Integrated analysis of the TAXUS trials shows that the paclitaxel-eluting TAXUS Express stent effectively inhibits in-stent neointimal proliferation, even in high-risk and overlapping stent patients.

Non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated coronary stents for the treatment of patients with de novo coronary lesions: angiographic follow-up of the DELIVER clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antitumor activity, has been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The DELIVER trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical evaluation of the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent compared with the stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1043 patients with focal de novo coronary lesions, <25 mm in length, in 2.5- to 4.0-mm vessels were randomized (ACHIEVE n=524; ML PENTA n=519). Angiographic follow-up was performed in a subset of 442 patients (ACHIEVE n=228; ML PENTA n=214). Prespecified end points were a 40% reduction in target-vessel failure at 9 months (primary clinical end point) and a 50% reduction in binary restenosis at 8 months (major secondary end point). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients in ACHIEVE had more type C lesions and a larger reference diameter. At follow-up, stent late loss was 0.81 versus 0.98 mm (P=0.003), stent binary restenosis was 14.9% versus 20.6% (P=0.076), and target-vessel failure was 11.9% versus 14.5% (P=0.12) for ACHIEVE and ML PENTA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent decreased neointimal proliferation compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent; however, this reduction was insufficient to meet the prespecified primary end point of target-vessel failure and the secondary end point of binary restenosis.