The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-acquired infections at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Robust infection prevention and control (IPC) measures were deployed across health care institutions at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in increased use of personal protective equipment, enhanced contact precautions, and an emphasis on hand hygiene. Here, we evaluate the effect of enhanced IPC practices on the occurrence of various hospital-associated infections (HAIs) in a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: From September 2016 through March 2022, we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) of HAIs for C. difficile infection, multidrug-resistant organisms, respiratory viral infections (RVIs), and device-related infections. We analyzed the incidence rate ratios for all HAIs during the periods before the pandemic, during the pandemic, at the time of the surges, and in COVID-19-designated wards. RESULTS: When comparing the prepandemic to the pandemic period, the IR across all MRDOs was similar. We observed a decrease in the IR of central line-associated bloodstream infections and a stable IR of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. A significant decrease was observed in the IR of C. difficile infection. The total IR of nosocomial RVIs decreased, as did for each respiratory virus. A similar IR of nosocomial RVIs between COVID-19 community surge versus nonsurge periods was observed except for SARS-CoV-2, RSV, and influenza. multidrug resistant organisms were 5 times more likely to occur on the COVID-19 wards compared with the non-COVID-19 wards. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing strict IPC measures during the COVID-19 pandemic in a cancer hospital led to a significant decrease in many HAIs and a reduction in nosocomial RVIs.

Nosocomial COVID-19 at a comprehensive cancer center during the first year of the pandemic: Lessons learned.

BACKGROUND: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in health care settings endangers patients with cancer. As knowledge of the transmission of COVID-19 emerged, strategies for preventing nosocomial COVID-19 were updated. We describe our early experience with nosocomial respiratory viral infections (RVIs) at a cancer center in the first year of the pandemic (March 2020-March 2021). METHODS: Nosocomial RVIs were identified through our infection control prospective surveillance program, which conducted epidemiologic investigations of all microbiologically documented RVIs. Data was presented as frequencies and percentages or medians and ranges. RESULTS: A total of 35 of 3944 (0.9%) documented RVIs were determined to have been nosocomial acquired. Majority of RVIs were due to SARS CoV-2 (13/35; 37%) or by rhinovirus/enterovirus (12/35; 34%). A cluster investigation of the first 3 patients with nosocomial COVID-19 determined that transmission most likely occurred from employees to patients. Five patients (38%) required mechanical ventilation and 4 (31%) died during the same hospital encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of the cluster led to enhancement of our infection control measures. The implications of COVID-19 vaccination on infection control policies is still unclear and further studies are needed to delineate its impact on the transmission of COVID-19 in a hospital setting.

Surveillance and identification of clusters of healthcare workers with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Multidimensional interventions at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Cases of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) were first reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. In this report, we describe 3 clusters of COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers (HCWs), not associated with patient exposure, and the interventions undertaken to halt ongoing exposure and transmission at our cancer center. METHODS: A cluster of cases was defined as 2 or more cases of severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-positive COVID-19 among HCWs who work in the same unit area at the same time. Cases were identified by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction testing. Contact tracing, facility observations, and infection prevention assessments were performed to investigate the 3 clusters between March 1 and April 30, 2020, with subsequent implementation of containment strategies. RESULTS: The initial cluster involved HCWs from an ancillary services unit, with contacts traced back to a gathering in a break room in which 1 employee was symptomatic, although not yet diagnosed with COVID-19, with subsequent transmission to 7 employees. The second cluster involved 4 employees and was community related. The third cluster involved only 2 employees with possible transmission while working in the same office at the same time. A step-up approach was implemented to control the spread of infection among employees, including universal masking, enhanced cleaning, increase awareness, and surveillance testing. No nosocomial transmission to patients transpired. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of a hospital-based cluster of COVID-19 infections among HCWs in a cancer hospital describing our steps to mitigate further transmission.

Diagnosis of Yersinia enterocolitica Infection in Cancer Patients With Diarrhea in the Era of Molecular Diagnostics for Gastrointestinal Infections.

BACKGROUND: Yersinia enterocolitica is an uncommon cause of diarrhea, mesenteric adenitis and bacteremia in the United States. There is limited information regarding the clinical course in immunocompromised patients. We describe the clinical presentations and outcomes in patients with cancer with Y. enterocolitica diagnosed at a US cancer center before and after introduction of gastrointestinal multiplex panel (GIMP) nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs). METHODS: We reviewed medical records of all patients with Y. enterocolitica isolated from cultures or identified by means of NAATs from 2000 to 2018. We then extracted demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatment, and overall mortality rate at 30 days after the diagnosis of yersiniosis. RESULTS: We identified 17 cases: 6 cases by culture before April 2016 and 11 cases by NAATs after that; 4 of the latter were confirmed by means of culture (36%). This represented an 8-fold increase for overall detection and a 3-fold increase in culture-proved infections when adjusted per 1000 admissions. The most common presenting symptom was diarrhea (11 of 14 [79%]), followed by abdominal pain (9 of 14 [64%]) and nausea and vomiting (6 of 14 [43%]). In 1 patient, the infection resolved spontaneously; the other patients received antibiotic treatment, the majority with a fluoroquinolone. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.1%, and the cause of death was a complication of advanced cancer. CONCLUSION: Since implementing use of the GIMP, we observed an increase in Y. enterocolitica cases, possibly related to increasing number of patients with cancer at our institution who are receiving intensive immunosuppression, increased testing due to ease and availability, and increased sensitivity of NAATs. GIMP NAATs are redefining the epidemiology of Y. enterocolitica infection in patients with cancer.

Artificial Differences in Clostridium difficile Infection Rates Associated with Disparity in Testing.

In 2015, Clostridium difficile testing rates among 30 US community, multispecialty, and cancer hospitals were 14.0, 16.3, and 33.9/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Pooled hospital onset rates were 0.56, 0.84, and 1.57/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Higher testing rates may artificially inflate reported rates of C. difficile infection. C. difficile surveillance should consider testing frequency.

Non-inferiority of pulsed xenon UV light versus bleach for reducing environmental Clostridium difficile contamination on high-touch surfaces in Clostridium difficile infection isolation rooms.

The standard for Clostridium difficile surface decontamination is bleach solution at a concentration of 10 % of sodium hypochlorite. Pulsed xenon UV light (PX-UV) is a means of quickly producing germicidal UV that has been shown to be effective in reducing environmental contamination by C. difficile spores. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether PX-UV was equivalent to bleach for decontamination of surfaces in C. difficile infection isolation rooms. High-touch surfaces in rooms previously occupied by C. difficile infected patients were sampled after discharge but before and after cleaning using either bleach or non-bleach cleaning followed by 15 min of PX-UV treatment. A total of 298 samples were collected by using a moistened wipe specifically designed for the removal of spores. Prior to disinfection, the mean contamination level was 2.39 c.f.u. for bleach rooms and 22.97 for UV rooms. After disinfection, the mean level of contamination for bleach was 0.71 c.f.u. (P = 0.1380), and 1.19 c.f.u. (P = 0.0017) for PX-UV disinfected rooms. The difference in final contamination levels between the two cleaning protocols was not significantly different (P = 0.9838). PX-UV disinfection appears to be at least equivalent to bleach in the ability to decrease environmental contamination with C. difficile spores. Larger studies are needed to validate this conclusion.

Hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection rates in persons with cancer or hematopoietic stem cell transplant: a C3IC network report.

A multicenter survey of 11 cancer centers was performed to determine the rate of hospital-onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI) and surveillance practices. Pooled rates of HO-CDI in patients with cancer were twice the rates reported for all US patients (15.8 vs 7.4 per 10,000 patient-days). Rates were elevated regardless of diagnostic test used.