Indocyanine Green (ICG): A Versatile Tool in Enhancing Precision in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery.

Intraoperative fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) is an innovative and safe tool in minimally invasive thoracic surgery. It provides real-time imaging capabilities that can enhance surgical precision. We describe several clinical uses of ICG including intersegmental plane identification, thoracic duct injury localisation, anomalous systemic artery identification in pulmonary sequestration, phrenic nerve identification, and sentinel lymph node mapping. Successful visualisation of ICG was achieved to identify intra-thoracic anatomical structures and boundaries, allowing for safe and precise dissection.

Predictors of surgical intervention in first episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax requiring chest drain insertion.

BACKGROUND: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax occurs in patients with no underlying lung disease and guidelines recommend chest tube drainage for the first episode, with surgical intervention reserved for recurrent episodes, persistent air leak or failure of lung re-expansion. Modern surgical management is associated with reduced length of hospital stay and superior freedom from recurrence compared with chest tube drainage alone. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for failed chest tube drainage in patients who present with first episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who presented to Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Australia with first episode PSP and underwent chest tube insertion was performed. Patient demographics and size of pneumothorax were examined in relation to the primary outcome, a composite of failed chest tube drainage and recurrent ipsilateral pneumothorax. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients underwent chest tube drainage for first episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax between 1st January 2017 and 31st December 2020. Complete lung collapse on admission chest x-ray was associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (63% versus 19%, OR 7.3 [96% CI 2.0-27.4), P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This small retrospective study found that patients that undergo chest drain insertion for first episode primary spontaneous pneumothorax who present with complete lung collapse on admission are at high risk of requiring pleurodesis and therefore may benefit from early surgical referral.

Coincidence of antibodies against Hwp1 and ASCA, two distinct molecular targets of Candida albicans, reinforces the link between this fungal species and coeliac disease.

Candida albicans is an immunogen for anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), a serological marker of Crohn's disease. ASCA has also been reported in other autoimmune diseases, including coeliac disease (CeD). A strong antibody response against Hwp1, a protein associated with invasive hyphal form of C. albicans which presents peptide sequence homologies with gliadin, has also been described in CeD. This observation supports the hypothesis that C. albicans hyphal transition in C. albicans may trigger CeD onset through a mechanism of molecular/antigenic mimicry. In this study, we assessed whether the anti-C. albicans oligomannose and anti-Hwp1 protein responses may be linked despite their different pathophysiological significance. The measurement of ASCA levels in a cohort of patients involved in our previous Hwp1 study showed a significant correlation between the two biomarkers. This new observation further reinforces the link between C. albicans and CeD.

Robotic Anatomical Pulmonary Resections: An Australian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Robotic thoracic surgery is a minimally invasive technique that allows the surgeon to perform delicate, accurate surgical manoeuvres within the chest cavity without rib spreading. Previous studies have suggested potential benefits of the robotic platform in nodal upstaging due to its versatility, seven degrees of freedom of movement, and superior vision. However, there is currently a paucity of robust clinical data from Australia. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the perioperative safety and oncological efficacy of anatomical pulmonary resections performed using the robotic platform. Endpoints included mortality and major morbidity outcomes according to Clavien-Dindo classification and rate of pathological nodal upstaging compared with preoperative imaging using positron emission tomography. METHODS: A single-surgeon retrospective analysis was performed using data collected from two institutions from July 2021 to May 2022, after ethics committee approval. Consecutive patients who underwent anatomical robotic resections were included in the study, with subsequent analysis of patients who had confirmed primary lung cancer. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resection during the study period. Safety was demonstrated by 0% mortality and a 9.6% major complication rate, which was related to chest tube insertion for prolonged air leak or intensive care unit monitoring during treatment of atrial arrhythmia. After excluding patients who did not have primary lung cancer, 48 patients remained for further analysis; pathological nodal upstaging was observed in nine (18.8%) of these patients. On multivariate analysis, the total number of lymph nodes harvested was found to be a statistically significant predictor of nodal upstaging. Complete microscopic resection (R0) was achieved in 100% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the most extensive documentation of robotic thoracic procedures in Australia in the existing literature. It demonstrated a satisfactory safety profile with a relatively high rate of nodal upstaging, possibly reflecting the ability of the robotic instruments to perform comprehensive and complete nodal resection at the time of anatomical pulmonary resection.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in the United States: Outcomes after resection for first primary lung cancer and treatment patterns for second primary lung cancers.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to identify whether the results of JCOG0802 could be generalized to US clinical settings. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with clinical stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy versus lobectomy (2004-2017) in the National Cancer Database were identified. Overall survival of patients in the National Cancer Database was assessed using propensity score-matched analysis. A separate analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results database was conducted to evaluate treatment patterns of second primary lung cancers among patients who underwent segmentectomy versus lobectomy for a first primary lung cancer. RESULTS: Of the 23,286 patients in the National Cancer Database meeting inclusion criteria, 1397 (6.0%) underwent segmentectomy and 21,889 (94.0%) underwent lobectomy. In a propensity score-matched analysis of all patients in the study cohort, there were no significant differences in overall survival between patients undergoing segmentectomy versus lobectomy (5-year overall survival: 79.9% [95% CI, 76.7%-82.0%] vs 81.8% [95% CI, 78.7%-84.4%], log-rank: P = .72). In subgroup analyses by tumor grade and histologic subtype, segmentectomy was associated with similar overall survival compared with lobectomy in all subgroups evaluated. In a propensity score-matched analysis of patients in the Surveillance Epidemiology End Results database, there were no significant differences in treatment patterns of second primary lung cancers between patients who underwent segmentectomy and patients who underwent lobectomy for their first primary lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this national analysis of US patients diagnosed with stage IA (≤2 cm) non-small cell lung cancer, there were no significant differences in overall survival between segmentectomy and lobectomy in the overall cohort or in subgroup analyses by tumor grade or histologic subtype.

Treatment of Severe Swallowing Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis with IVIG: Role of Antimuscarinic Antibodies.

Oropharyngeal and esophageal dysmotility can cause serious clinical complications such as aspiration pneumonia, cachexia, and sarcopenia, with a resulting increase in mortality and disability. The current standard of care for the treatment of SSc-associated swallowing dysfunction is mainly supportive, although severe cases are usually refractory to conventional management. Recent studies have shown that the abnormal production of functional autoantibodies such as anti-cholinergic muscarinic receptor III antibodies may participate in the pathogenesis of SSc-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility and may provide a novel target for therapeutic intervention. We describe two patients with severe and rapid onset of SSc-associated severe swallowing dysfunction and esophageal dysmotility who had failed standard of care therapy, requiring complete enteral and parenteral nutrition. Both patients were positive for the presence of circulating antimuscarinic III receptor antibodies. They were treated with IVIG at a dose of 2 g/Kg/month divided in two consecutive days, for six months. Following IVIG therapy, both patients markedly improved their symptoms as shown by a reduction in their UCLA2.0 score, and achieved an improvement of esophageal motility documented radiologically. Both patients resumed oral feeding and had their feeding tubes removed within the treatment period. None of the patients developed severe adverse events attributable to IVIG, except for low-grade fever during IVIG infusion in one of the cases. These results provide support for the role of functional autoantibodies in the development of SSc-associated gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Complications of Robotic Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Compared to Open Thoracotomy for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

(1) Background: Conventional open thoracotomy has been the accepted surgical treatment for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. However, newer, minimally invasive approaches, such as robotic surgery, have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy with potentially superior peri-operative outcomes. The present study aimed to quantitatively assess these outcomes through a meta-analysis. (2) Methods: A systematic review was performed using electronic databases to identify all of the relevant studies that compared robotic surgery with open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Pooled data on the peri-operative outcomes were then meta-analyzed. (3) Results: Twenty-two studies involving 12,061 patients who underwent robotic lung resection and 92,411 patients who underwent open thoracotomy were included for analysis. Mortality rates and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in patients who underwent robotic resection. Compared to open thoracotomy, robotic surgery was also associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications, including atrial arrhythmia, post-operative blood transfusions, pneumonia and atelectasis. However, the operative times were significantly longer with robotic lung resection. (4) Conclusions: The present meta-analysis demonstrated superior post-operative morbidity and mortality outcomes with robotic lung resection compared to open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer.

Perioperative Outcomes and Survival After Preoperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although preoperative immunotherapy is increasingly utilized for non-small cell lung cancer, there remains a paucity of robust clinical data on its safety and long-term survival. Our objective was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes and survival associated with immunotherapy followed by surgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung resection after preoperative chemotherapy with or without radiation or immunotherapy (with or without chemotherapy or chemoradiation) in the National Cancer Database (2010 to 2017) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, multivariable logistic regression, multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, and propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, 236 patients (2.2%) received immunotherapy and 10 715 patients received preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. There were no significant differences between the immunotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy groups with regard to margin positivity (8.5% [n = 20] vs 7.5% [n = 715], P = .98), 30-day readmission (4.2% [n = 10] vs 4.1% [n = 440], P = .87), and 30-day mortality (0.4% [n = 1] vs 2.4% [n = 253], P = .25). The immunotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy groups had similar overall survival (5-year survival 63% [95% confidence interval, 50% to 74%] vs 51% [95% confidence interval, 50% to 52%], log rank P = .06; multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 1.41; P = .90). A propensity score matched analysis of 344 patients, well matched by preoperative characteristics, showed no significant differences in short-term outcomes and overall survival (log rank P = 1.00) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this national analysis, preoperative immunotherapy followed by surgery for non-small cell lung cancer was found to be safe and feasible with similar short-term outcomes and overall survival when compared with preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients with Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has created a paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), overcoming the therapeutic plateau previously achieved by systemic chemotherapy. There is growing interest in the utility of immunotherapy for patients with resectable NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aim to provide an overview of the existing evidence, with a focus on pathological and radiological response, perioperative clinical outcomes, and long-term survival. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases from their dates of inception to August 2021. Pooled data on pathological response, radiological response, and perioperative outcomes were meta-analyzed where possible. RESULTS: Eighteen publications from sixteen studies were identified, involving 548 enrolled patients who underwent neoadjuvant immunotherapy, of whom 507 underwent surgery. Pathologically, 52% achieved a major pathological response, 24% a complete pathological response, and 20% reported a complete pathological response of both the primary lesion as well as the sampled lymph nodes. Radiologically, 84% of patients had stable disease or partial response. Mortality within 30 days was 0.6%, and morbidities were reported according to grade and frequency. CONCLUSION: The present meta-analysis demonstrated that neoadjuvant immunotherapy was feasible and safe based on perioperative clinical data and completion rates of surgery within their intended timeframe. The pathological response after neoadjuvant immunotherapy was superior to historical data for patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, whilst surgical and treatment-related adverse events were comparable. The limitations of the study included the heterogenous treatment regimens, lack of long-term follow-up, variations in the reporting of potential prognostic factors, and potential publication bias.

Survival outcomes for surgical resection versus CT-guided percutaneous ablation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple cohort studies have compared surgical resection with CT-guided percutaneous ablation for patients with stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the results have been heterogeneous. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare surgery with ablation for stage 1 NSCLC. METHOD: A search of five databases was performed from inception to 5 July 2020. Studies were included if overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and/or disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients treated with surgical resection versus ablation (radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA)) for stage 1 NSCLC. Pooled odds ratios (OR) were calculated. RESULTS: A total of eight studies were included (total 792 patients: 460 resection and 332 ablation). There were no significant differences in 1- to 5-year OS or CSS between surgery versus ablation. There were significantly better 1- and 2-year DFS for surgery over ablation (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14-4.34; OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.21-5.57 respectively), but not 3- to 5-year DFS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no significant OS difference between lobectomy and MWA, but there were significantly better 1- and 2-year OS with sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) versus RFA (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.33-6.10; OR 4.54, 95% CI 2.51-8.21, respectively). In the two studies which only included patients with stage 1A NSCLC, pooled outcomes demonstrated no significant differences in 1- to 3-year OS or DFS between surgery versus ablation. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection of stage 1 NSCLC remains the optimal choice. However, for non-surgical patients with stage 1A, ablation offers promising DFS, CSS, and OS. Future prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted. KEY POINTS: • Surgical resection of stage 1 NSCLC remains the optimal choice. • In patients with stage 1A NSCLC who are not surgical candidates, CT-guided microwave or radiofrequency ablation may be an alternative which offers promising disease-free survival and overall survival.

Systematic Review of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

There is a paucity of robust clinical evidence for the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer. The primary aim of the study was to identify the available data on the feasibility, safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases. Relevant studies were identified according to predefined selection criteria. Five relevant publications on 4 completed trials were identified. In most studies, >90% of patients were able to undergo surgery within the planned timeframe after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. There was a high incidence of open thoracotomy procedures, either planned or converted from a planned minimally invasive approach. Mortality ranged from 0 to 5%, but none of the reported deaths were considered directly treatment-related. Morbidities were reported according to adverse events related to neoadjuvant systemic therapy, and postoperative surgical complications. Survival outcomes were limited due to short follow-up periods. Major pathologic response ranged from 40.5 to 56.7%, whilst complete pathologic response of the primary tumor ranged from 15 to 33%. Radiological responses were reported according to RECIST criteria and fluorodeoxyglucose-avidity. This systematic review reported safe perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent resection following neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, there was a relatively high incidence of open thoracotomy procedures, partly due to the technical challenges associated with increased fibrosis and inflammation of tissue, as well as the more advanced stages of disease in patients enrolled in the studies. Future studies should focus on identifying predictors of pathological response.