Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with BRCA1/2 mutations and variants of uncertain significance.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is associated with improved cosmesis and is being performed increasingly. Its role in BRCA mutation carriers has not been well described. This was a study of the indications for, and outcomes of, NSM in BRCA mutation carriers. METHODS: BRCA mutation carriers who underwent NSM were identified. Details of patient demographics, surgical procedures, complications, and relevant disease stage and follow-up were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 177 NSMs were performed in 89 BRCA mutation carriers between September 2005 and December 2013. Twenty-six patients of median age 41 years had NSM for early-stage breast cancer and a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Mean tumour size was 1·4 (range 0·1-3·5) cm. Sixty-three patients of median age 39 years had prophylactic NSM, eight of whom had an incidental diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. There were no local or regional recurrences in the 26 patients with breast cancer at a median follow-up of 28 (i.q.r. 15-43) months. There were no newly diagnosed breast cancers in the 63 patients undergoing prophylactic NSM at a median follow-up of 26 (11-42) months. All patients had immediate breast reconstruction. Five patients (6 per cent) required subsequent excision of the nipple-areola complex for oncological or other reasons. Skin desquamation occurred in 68 (38·4 per cent) of the 177 breasts, and most resolved without intervention. Debridement was required in 13 (7·3 per cent) of the 177 breasts, and tissue-expander or implant removal was necessary in six instances (3·4 per cent). CONCLUSION: NSM is an acceptable choice for patients with BRCA mutations, with no evidence of compromise to oncological safety at short-term follow-up. Complication rates were acceptable, and subsequent excision of the nipple-areola complex was rarely required.

Follow-up in colorectal cancer patients: a cost-benefit analysis.

BACKGROUND: No conclusive evidence exists concerning the effectiveness of follow-up programs after curative surgery for colorectal cancer, and presently cost-benefit analyses have not indicated that follow-up strategies increase survival or quality of life. METHODS: Five hundred five patients who survived curative surgery for stage I-III colorectal adenocarcinoma were closely followed for at least 4 years. RESULTS: One hundred forty-one (28%) patients had recurrence. Of these, 32 underwent one or more surgical procedures for cure, whereas 109 could only benefit from palliation. Eighteen were cured. The mean survival of all recurrent cases was 44.4 months. Of those operated on with curative intent, the mean survival was 69.3 months compared with 37.1 months in those operated on with palliative intent. Of those 18 patients who were cured by reoperative surgery, the average survival was 81.4 months. The overall follow-up cost was $1,914,900 (U.S.) for the 505 patients; $13,580 (U.S.) for each recurrence, $59,841 (U.S.) for each case treated for cure, and $136,779 (U.S.) for those effectively cured. CONCLUSIONS: Careful postoperative monitoring is expensive yet effective when one considers that one-quarter of the detected recurrences were suitable for potentially curative second surgery; however, only 3.6% of the original group were effectively cured. Follow-up programs should be tailored according to the stage and site of the primary to reduce costs.