Unveiling the importance of the endoscope in the sealing of the superior canal dehiscence syndrome, how we do it.

The superior canal dehiscence syndrome is a pathology that affects the arcuate eminence creating a "third window" between the inner ear and the middle fossa. This condition can lead to symptoms such as hearing loss, autophony, or sound-induced vertigo. Traditionally, surgical treatment has been performed by microscope-assisted temporal craniotomy, but when the dehiscence is in the medial part of the arcuate eminence the bone defect may not be seen. We present case series treated at our institution diagnosed of superior canal dehiscence syndrome involving the medial slope of the arcuate eminence. During surgery, the bone defect could not be visible with traditional microscopic techniques. Nonetheless, by introducing the endoscope with the 0º and 30º optics, the dehiscence could be clearly observed and treated correctly. Our results show a clinical improvement without side effects or complications in the patients undergoing this technique. Endoscope-assisted surgery is a safe procedure and provides a better visualization of medial defects.

IBRORS-MCL study: a Spanish retrospective and observational study of relapsed/refractory mantle-cell lymphoma treated with ibrutinib in routine clinical practice.

This retrospective study evaluated 66 patients diagnosed with relapsed and/or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL) treated with ibrutinib in Spain in routine clinical practice. At diagnosis, patients had a median age of 64.5 years, 63.6% presented with intermediate/high sMIPI (simplified prognostic index for advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma), 24.5% had the blastoid variant, and 55.6% had a Ki67 > 30%. Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1-2; min-max 1-7). Overall response rate was 63.5%, with 38.1% of patients achieving complete response (CR). With a median duration of ibrutinib exposure of 10.7 months (range 5.2-19.6; min-max 0.3-36), the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 20 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.8-31.1] and 32 months (95% CI 22.6-41.3), respectively, and were not reached in patients achieving CR. No grade ≥ 3 cardiovascular toxicity or bleeding was reported. This study supports that treatment with ibrutinib leads to high response rates and favorable survival outcomes in patients with R/R MCL.

Long-term follow-up of a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of extended treatment with rituximab in patients with B cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease and validation in real world patients.

The purpose of this report is to provide long-term follow-up of 38 patients diagnosed of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) included in a phase 2 clinical trial of first line therapy with rituximab and to evaluate the same therapy in a real world cohort of 21 consecutive patients treated once the trial was closed. Eligible patients were ≥ 18 years of age with a biopsy-proven CD20 positive B cell PTLD and treatment naive except for reduction of immunosuppression. Treatment consisted in four weekly infusions of rituximab at the standard dose of 375 mg/m2. Patients in complete remission (CR) were followed without further treatment, and those in partial remission (PR) were treated with another four cycles of weekly rituximab. Median follow-up in the clinical trial was 13.0 years. Disease-specific survival (DSS) at 10 years was 64.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48.2-81.2%]. For those patients who achieved CR (61%), DSS at 5 and 10 years was 94.4% (95% CI 83.8-100%) and 88.1% (95% CI 72.6-100%), respectively, and only 1 patient progressed beyond 5 years. The median follow-up of the real world patients was 6.5 years. DSS at 5 years was 75.2% (95% CI 56.4-94.0%). DSS at 5 years of patients who achieved CR (38%) was 87.5% (95% CI 64.6-100%). In conclusion, PTLD patients in CR after rituximab have an excellent long-term outcome. These results not only apply in the clinical trial setting but are also reproducible in the real world. However, those patients who do not respond represent an unmet clinical need and should be included in prospective clinical trials.

Response-adapted treatment with rituximab, bendamustine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone followed by rituximab maintenance in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma after first-line immunochemotherapy: Results of the RBMDGELTAMO08 phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Consensus is lacking regarding the optimal salvage therapy for patients with follicular lymphoma who relapse after or are refractory to immunochemotherapy. METHODS: This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of response-adapted therapy with rituximab, bendamustine, mitoxantrone, and dexamethasone (RBMD) in follicular lymphoma patients who relapsed after or were refractory to first-line immunochemotherapy. Sixty patients received three treatment cycles, and depending on their response received an additional one (complete/unconfirmed complete response) or three (partial response) cycles. Patients who responded to induction received rituximab maintenance therapy for 2 years. RESULTS: Thirty-three (55%) and 42 (70%) patients achieved complete/unconfirmed complete response after three cycles and on completing induction therapy (4-6 cycles), respectively (final overall response rate, 88.3%). Median progression-free survival was 56.4 months (median follow-up, 28.3 months; 95% CI, 15.6-51.2). Overall survival was not reached. Progression-free survival did not differ between patients who received four vs six cycles (P = .6665), nor between patients who did/did not receive rituximab maintenance after first-line therapy (P = .5790). Median progression-free survival in the 10 refractory patients was 25.5 months (95% CI, 0.6-N/A) and was longer in patients who had shown progression of disease after 24 months of first-line therapy (median, 56.4 months; 95% CI, 19.8-56.4) than in those who showed early progression (median, 42.31 months; 95% CI, 24.41-NA) (P = .4258). Thirty-six (60%) patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia and infection were recorded during induction (4/60 [6.7%] and 5/60 [8.3%] patients, respectively) and maintenance (2/43 [4.5%] and 4/43 [9.1%] patients, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This response-adapted treatment with RBMD followed by rituximab maintenance is an effective and well-tolerated salvage treatment for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma following first-line immunochemotherapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01133158.

Subcutaneous bortezomib in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma nontransplant eligible: Retrospective evaluation.

Bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone combination is one of the standards of care for nontransplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. However, bortezomib intravenous (twice weekly for 4 cycles then weekly for 5 cycles) results in ~13% of patients with grade 3-4 peripheral neuropathy. Bortezomib subcutaneous (SQ) and weekly delivery, improves tolerability without impairment of efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SQ bortezomib-based combinations in nontransplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed myeloma in a real-world setting. A total of 135 patients (median age [range] = 76 [58-89], International Staging System-III = 54%, median follow-up = 14.8 months [1-40], Intensive group [twice weekly bortezomib] = 65%, Optimized group [weekly bortezomib] = 35%) were included and evaluable for safety, whereas 121 were evaluable for effectiveness. Overall response rate (95% CI) was 61% (53%, 71%) (complete response = 27%, very good partial response = 13%, and partial response = 21%) and median progression-free survival was 22.2 months (95% CI: 16.1-not reached). The 3-year overall survival was 75%. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (18%), neutropenia (17%), and anemia (11%). Peripheral neuropathy of any grade was observed in 44% of patients (2% with grade 3). Comparison between regimens (Intensive vs Optimized) showed similar overall response rate (57% vs 70%) and PFS (25 vs 19 months). A similar safety profile was observed between regimens. Thus, SQ bortezomib showed similar effectiveness and better tolerability as compared with results from intravenous bortezomib studies, and showing no differences either in effectiveness or safety in different bortezomib-based combinations.

Prospective phase II trial of extended treatment with rituximab in patients with B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The elective treatment of patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders is controversial. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with extended doses of rituximab adapted to the response in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, phase II trial. Patients were treated with reduction of immunosuppression and four weekly infusions of rituximab. Those patients who did not achieve complete remission (CR) received a second course of four rituximab infusions. The primary end-point of the study was the CR rate. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were assesable. One episode of grade 4 neutropenia was the only severe adverse event observed. After the first course of rituximab, 13 (34.2%) patients achieved CR, 8 patients did not respond, and 17 patients achieved partial remission. Among those 17 patients, 12 could be treated with a second course of rituximab, and 10 (83.3%) achieved CR, yielding an intention-to-treat CR rate of 60.5%. Eight patients excluded from the trial because of absence of CR were treated with rituximab combined with chemotherapy, and six (75%) achieved CR. Event-free survival was 42% and overall survival was 47% at 27.5 months. Fourteen patients died, ten of progression of their post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm that extended treatment with rituximab can obtain a high rate of CR in patients with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders after solid organ transplantation without increasing toxicity, and should be recommended as initial therapy for these patients.