Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 10(2): e14, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28438759

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine palliative care clinicians' level of knowledge of the law regarding the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). METHODS: Regional postal survey of palliative care clinicians working in hospices in the East of England, undertaken in April 2015. Clinicians' level of knowledge was assessed by their response to 7 factual questions. Data regarding self-reported levels of confidence in applying the Safeguards was collected, alongside information regarding the number of times they had used DoLS in practice. A free-text section invited additional comments from participants. RESULTS: There were 47 responses from 14 different organisations; a response rate of 68%. Respondents included consultants, specialty and associate specialists, registrars, nurses and social workers. Higher self-reported confidence and training in the use of DoLS was associated with higher factual knowledge. Consultants had the highest level of knowledge, training and experience. Doctors of other grades, nurses and social workers recorded less knowledge and experience and scored lower in the knowledge sections. The free-text comments revealed difficulty applying the Safeguards in practice, particularly among the consultant responses, based around several themes: insufficient guidance on how to use the Safeguards, process after death, uncertainty as to relevance to palliative care and delays in assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians working in palliative care have good levels of knowledge of the DoLS. Despite this concerns were raised, particularly by consultants; uncertainty as to when they should be used and the relevance of the Safeguards in clinical practice. Further guidance should be given to clinicians working in this specialty to ensure that clinical practice is both lawful and in the patients' best interests.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/psicologia , Cuidados Paliativos/psicologia , Direitos do Paciente/legislação & jurisprudência , Médicos/psicologia , Adulto , Inglaterra , Feminino , Cuidados Paliativos na Terminalidade da Vida/legislação & jurisprudência , Hospitais para Doentes Terminais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Paliativos/legislação & jurisprudência , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Int J Palliat Nurs ; 21(7): 319-27, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26203951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The involvement of two nurses to dispense and administer controlled drugs is routine practice in most clinical areas despite there being no legal or evidence-based rationale. Indeed, evidence suggests this practice enhances neither safety nor care. Registered nurses at two hospices agreed to change practice to single nurse dispensing and administration of controlled drugs (SNAD). Participants' views on SNAD were evaluated before and after implementation. The aim of this study was to explore the views and experiences of nurses who had implemented SNAD and to identify the views and concerns of those who had not yet experienced SNAD. METHOD: Data was obtained through semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Qualitative thematic analysis of interview transcripts identified three key themes: practice to enhance patient benefit and care; practice to enhance nursing care and satisfaction; and practice to enhance organisational safety. CONCLUSION: The findings have implications for the understanding of influences on medicines safety in clinical practice and for hospice policy makers.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Cuidados Paliativos , Padrões de Prática em Enfermagem , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Reino Unido
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA