Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Fluted Tapered Stems: Long-Term Follow-up of 515 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Modular fluted tapered (MFT) femoral components are frequently utilized in aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs). However, long-term follow-up has been limited. The purpose of this study was to update our prior series at long-term follow-up, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic results, and complications in a large cohort of aseptic revision THAs using MFT stems. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 515 aseptic femoral revisions performed with 2 MFT stem designs in the total joint registry of a single tertiary care academic institution from 1999 to 2013. Serial radiographs were reviewed for subsidence of >5 mm. The mean follow-up (and standard deviation) was 10 ± 5 years (range, 2 to 21 years). A competing risk model accounting for death was utilized. RESULTS: The 15-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 12%. There were 57 revisions, 27 of which involved revision of the fluted tapered component (FTC). Dislocation (n = 19), periprosthetic joint infection (n = 15), and aseptic loosening of the FTC (n = 11) were the most common reasons for revision. The 15-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 16%. The 15-year cumulative incidences were 6% for any FTC revision and 2% for FTC revision for aseptic loosening. Stem subsidence of >5 mm occurred in 2% of unrevised cases, and all but 1 stem was stable at the most recent follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This large series of MFT stems used in aseptic revision THAs had a 2% incidence of subsequent revision of the FTC for aseptic loosening at 15 years. Dislocation and infection were the most common reasons for any revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Discordance in Published 30-Day Readmission Rates Following Primary Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Versus the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP).

Background: 30-day readmission is an important quality metric evaluated following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) that has implications for hospital performance and reimbursement. Differences in how 30-day readmissions are defined between Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other quality improvement programs (i.e., National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP]) may create discordance in published 30-day readmission rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 30-day readmission rates following primary TJA using two different temporal definitions. Methods: Patients undergoing primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution from 2015-2020 were identified via common procedural terminology (CPT) codes in the electronic medical record (EMR) and institutional NSQIP data. Readmissions that occurred within 30 days of surgery (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission in NSQIP) and readmissions that occurred within 30 days of hospital discharge (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission from CMS) were identified. Rates of 30-day readmission and the prevalence of readmission during immortal time were calculated. Results: In total, 4,202 primary TJA were included. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.79 days. 91% of patients were discharged to home. 30-day readmission rate using the CMS definition was 3.1% (130/4,202). 30-day readmission rate using the NSQIP definition was 2.7% (113/4,202). Eight readmissions captured by the CMS definition (6.1%) occurred during immortal time. Conclusion: Differences in temporal definitions of 30-day readmission following primary TJA between CMS and NSQIP results in discordant rates of 30-day readmission. Level of Evidence: III.

3D-Printed Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties: Excellent Survivorship of 740 Cones at 5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Porous metaphyseal cones are frequently utilized during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate 3D-printed metaphyseal cones used for revision TKA, with specific emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic appearance, and clinical outcomes after short-term follow-up. METHODS: We identified 740 cones (498 tibial, 242 femoral) that had been inserted during 533 revision TKA procedures that had been performed at a single tertiary care academic institution. Aseptic loosening (n = 199), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 183), and instability (n = 84) were the most common reasons for the index revision. Type-2B or 3 bone loss was present in 67% of the knees. The mean age was 66 years, the mean body mass index was 34 kg/m 2 , and 55% of the patients were female. Serial radiographs were reviewed. The mean duration of follow-up was 4 years. RESULTS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of cone revision for aseptic loosening was 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0% to 3%). The 5-year cumulative incidence of any cone revision or removal was 6% (95% CI, 4% to 9%). In total, 37 cones (19 femoral, 18 tibial) were revised, with PJI (n = 23; 14 recurrent), periprosthetic femoral fracture (n = 3), arthrofibrosis (n = 3), and aseptic loosening of the femoral component and femoral cone (n = 3) as the most common reasons for cone revision. The 5-year cumulative incidence of any TKA re-revision was 14% (95% CI, 11% to 18%). There were a total of 67 re-revisions, with PJI (n = 38), persistent drainage (n = 6), and extensor mechanism disruption (n = 3) being the most common reasons. Radiographically, 2 unrevised femoral cones and 1 unrevised tibial cone appeared to be possibly loose; all 3 cones were in knees with distal femoral replacements or hinged constructs. CONCLUSIONS: This large series showed that 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones were very durable at short-term follow-up, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of cone revision for aseptic loosening of 1%. PJI was the most common reason for cone revision and any revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Modular fluted tapered stems in two-stage reimplantation of previously infected total hip arthroplasties.

Aims: Uncemented implants are now commonly used at reimplantation of a two-stage revision total hip arthoplasty (THA) following periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is a paucity of data on the performance of the most commonly used uncemented femoral implants - modular fluted tapered (MFT) femoral components - in this setting. This study evaluated implant survival, radiological results, and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of reimplantation THAs using MFT components. Methods: We identified 236 reimplantation THAs from a single tertiary care academic institution from September 2000 to September 2020. Two designs of MFT femoral components were used as part of an established two-stage exchange protocol for the treatment of PJI. Mean age at reimplantation was 65 years (SD 11), mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 (SD 7), and 46% (n = 109) were female. Mean follow-up was seven years (SD 4). A competing risk model accounting for death was used. Results: The 15-year cumulative incidence of any revision was 24%. There were 48 revisions, with the most common reasons being dislocation (n = 25) and infection (n = 16). The 15-year cumulative incidence of any reoperation was 28%. Only 13 revisions involved the fluted tapered component (FTC), for a 15-year cumulative incidence of any FTC revision of 8%. Only two FTCs were revised for aseptic loosening, resulting in a 15-year cumulative incidence of FTC revision for aseptic loosening of 1%. Stem subsidence ≥ 5 mm occurred in 2% of unrevised cases. All stems were radiologically stable at most recent follow-up. Mean Harris Hip Score was 69 (SD 20) at most recent follow-up. Conclusion: This series demonstrated that MFT components were durable and reliable in the setting of two-stage reimplantation THA for infection. While the incidence of aseptic loosening was very low, the incidence of any revision was 24% at 15 years, primarily due to dislocation and recurrent PJI.

Contemporary Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients ≤50 Years of Age: Results of >500 Cases.

BACKGROUND: There has been a paucity of long-term outcomes data on aseptic revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in the young adult population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of contemporary aseptic revision THAs in patients ≤50 years of age at the time of the surgical procedure. METHODS: We identified 545 aseptic revision THAs performed at a single academic institution from 2000 to 2020 in patients who were 18 to 50 years of age. Patients who underwent conversion THAs and patients with a history of any ipsilateral hip infection were excluded. The mean age was 43 years, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 29 kg/m 2 , and 63% were female. The index indication for revision THA was aseptic loosening in 46% of cases, polyethylene wear or osteolysis in 28% of cases (all revisions of conventional polyethylene), and dislocation in 11% of cases. There were 126 hips (23%) that had undergone at least 1 previous revision (median, 1 revision [range, 1 to 5 revisions]). The mean follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, the 20-year survivorship free of any re-revision was 76% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 69% to 82%). There were 87 re-revisions, with 31 dislocations, 18 cases of aseptic loosening of the femoral component, and 16 periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) being the most common reasons for re-revision. Dislocation as the indication for the index revision was associated with an increased risk of re-revision (hazard ratio, 2.9; p < 0.001). The 20-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 73% (95% CI, 66% to 78%). There were 75 nonoperative complications (14%), including 32 dislocations. The mean Harris hip score significantly improved (p < 0.001) from 65 preoperatively to 81 at 10 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Contemporary aseptic revision THAs in patients ≤50 years of age demonstrated a re-revision risk of approximately 1 in 4 at 20 years. Dislocation, aseptic loosening of the femoral component, and PJI were the most common reasons for re-revision. Index revision THAs for dislocation had a 3 times higher risk of re-revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Obesity and Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Absolute versus Relative Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection at 15 Years.

BACKGROUND: To make an informed decision about total hip arthroplasty (THA), surgeons and patients need to understand the absolute and relative risks of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We sought to evaluate the long-term risk of PJI following primary THA stratified by body mass index (BMI) and PJI-related risk factors. METHODS: We identified 21,550 primary THAs performed from 2000 to 2021 at a single institution. Patients were stratified as having 0, 1, or ≥ 2 PJI risk factors (diabetes, chronic kidney disease, nonprimary osteoarthritis, immunosuppression, or active smoking) and into BMI categories. The 15-year cumulative risk of PJI was evaluated by BMI and PJI risk factors. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, the 15-year absolute risk of PJI was 2%. For patients who did not have PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 1% in normal weight, 2% in class III obesity, and 4% in class IV obesity. Patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times higher relative risk of PJI, respectively (P = .03, P < .001). Among patients who had ≥ 2 PJI risk factors, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2% in normal weight, 4% in class III obesity, and 18% in class IV obesity. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy patients who had class III and IV obesity had a 3-times and 9-times increased risk of PJI at 15 years relative to normal weight patients. However, the absolute risk of PJI at 15 years was 2 and 4%, respectively. Given emerging data questioning whether BMI modification decreases PJI risk, surgeons and patients must consider both a 3-times to 9-times increased relative risk of PJI and a 2 to 4% absolute risk of PJI at 15 years for healthy patients who had a BMI ≥ 40. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Marlex Mesh Reconstruction of the Extensor Mechanism: A Concise 5-Year Follow-up of 2 Previous Reports.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Projected Prevalence of Obesity in Aseptic Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop projections of the prevalence of obesity in aseptic revision THA and TKA patients through the year 2029. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) was queried for years 2011-2019. Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 27134, 27137, and 27138 were used to identify revision THA and CPT codes 27486 and 27487 were used to identify revision TKA. Revision THA/TKA for infectious, traumatic, or oncologic indications were excluded. Participant data were grouped according to body mass index (BMI) categories: underweight/normal weight, <25 kg/m2; overweight, 25-29.9 kg/m2; class I obesity, 30.034.9 kg/m2; class II obesity, 35.0-39.9 kg/m2; morbid obesity ≥ 40 kg/m2. Prevalence of each BMI category was estimated from year 2020 to year 2029 through multinomial regression analyses. Results: 38,325 cases were included (16,153 revision THA and 22,172 revision TKA). From 2011 to 2029, prevalence of class I obesity (24% to 25%), class II obesity (11% to 15%), and morbid obesity (7% to 9%) increased amongst aseptic revision THA patients. Similarly, prevalence of class I obesity (28% to 30%), class II obesity (17% to 29%), and morbid obesity (16% to 18%) increased in aseptic revision TKA patients. Conclusion: Prevalence of class II obesity and morbid obesity demonstrated the largest increases in revision TKA and THA patients. By 2029, we estimate that approximately 49% of aseptic revision THA and 77% of aseptic revision TKA will have obesity and/or morbid obesity. Resources aimed at mitigating complications in this patient population are needed. Level of Evidence: III.

What Is the Fate of Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Who Are Asked to Quit Smoking Prior to Surgery?

Background: Smoking is a known risk factor for complications following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Little is known regarding the fate of patients who are asked to quit smoking before surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of smoking cessation prior to primary TJA and the impact of smoking cessation on perioperative outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who presented between 2008 and 2020 to a single academic medical center with a documented smoking history and were asked to quit smoking prior to receiving a date for primary TJA. The cohort was surveyed about smoking cessation, smoking history, use of quit aids, seeking surgery elsewhere due to the cessation policy, and postoperative complications. Descriptive statistics evaluated the relationship between demographics, smoking cessation, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 101 patients completed the survey with an overall response rate of 48%. Sixty-two percent of patients quit smoking before surgery, and 51% of these patients reported remaining smoke-free at 6 months postoperatively. The average time to quit before TJA was 45 days (range: 1-365 days), and 62% quit without quit aids. The wound complication/infection rate was significantly higher for patients who did not stop smoking prior to TJA (4 of 16; 27%) than for those who did quit prior to surgery (3 of 63; 5%; P = .02). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that most patients (62%) will stop smoking, if required, prior to primary TJA. Furthermore, 51% of patients reported abstinence from smoking at 6 months following TJA. TJA appears to be an effective motivator for smoking cessation. Level of Evidence: III (retrospective cohort study).

Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Utilization among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part-II Database.

An updated understanding of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) utilization is needed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in volume and utilization of UKA among early-career surgeons and to examine the influence of fellowship training status on utilization of UKA. The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part-II database was queried from 2010 to 2019 to identify candidates who reported ≥1 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or UKA. Self-reported history of fellowship training experiences was recorded. "High-volume" surgeons were defined as performing ≥7 UKA over the ABOS Part-II collection period. Trends were evaluated with the Cochrane-Armitage test and generalized linear models. From 2010 to 2019, a total of 2,045 candidates (28.1%) reported ≥1 TKA, while 585 candidates (8.0%) reported ≥1 UKA. The number of candidates reporting ≥1 UKA significantly increased (p = 0.001). An increase in UKA volume was observed over the study period (p < 0.001). Rates of utilization of UKA relative to TKA did not change significantly over the study period (p = 0.11). Sixty-three (2.4%) candidates met the study definition for high-volume UKA utilization. UKA procedure volume increased among ABOS Part-II candidates over the study period; however, rates of UKA utilization relative to TKA volume remained unchanged. Increasing volume of UKA performed by early-career surgeons is likely secondary to an increased number of surgeons trained in adult reconstruction. Only 2.4% of candidates who reported performing at least one knee arthroplasty procedure met the threshold for a high-volume UKA practice. Early-career surgeons should remain conscientious of UKA volume in their practice.

Analysis of New Orthopaedic Technologies in Large Database Research.

ABSTRACT: Improvements in orthopaedic surgery go hand in hand with technological advances. The present article outlines the historical and current uses of large databases and registries for the evaluation of new orthopaedic technologies, providing insights for future utilization, with robotic-assisted surgery as the example technology.

Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance With Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Background: There is increased interest and utilization of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) following primary and revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The purpose of this study was to look for potential associations between EOAP and differential rates of antimicrobial resistance or epidemiology of organisms causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary and aseptic revision THAs/TKAs. Methods: Patients who developed PJI following a primary or aseptic revision TKA/THA at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received at least 7 days of EOAP following the surgery were noted. Rates of antimicrobial resistance were compared between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts using the Fisher's exact test. Results: One hundred twenty-eight cultures were obtained from 119 patients with PJI. Fourty-four cases (37%) developed PJI after EOAP. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism (30% of all cultures; 78% were methicillin-sensitive). Rates of antimicrobial resistance were similar between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts in all but 2 instances: Increased resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was observed in coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates in the EOAP cohort (89% vs 21%, P < .01; 44% vs 0%, P = .02). An increased frequency of gram-negative organisms was observed in the EOAP group (22% vs 8%, P = .03). Conclusions: Rates of antimicrobial resistance were not significantly different between EOAP and standard antibiotic prophylaxis cohorts except in coagulase-negative Staphylococci. The increased frequency of gram-negative infections was present in the EOAP cohort. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to better understand the impact of EOAP on antimicrobial resistance and PJI epidemiology. Level of Evidence: Level III; retrospective cohort study.

Operative Time and Risk of Surgical Site Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the association between operative time and peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched for relevant articles dating 2000-2020. Relationship of operative time and PJI rate in primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) was evaluated by pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. Results: Six studies were identified for meta-analysis. TJA lasting greater than 120 minutes had greater odds of PJI (OR, 1.63 [1.00-2.66], p=0.048). Similarly, there were greater odds of PJI for TJA procedures lasting greater than 90 minutes (OR, 1.65 [1.27-2.14]; p<0.001). Separate analyses of TKA (OR, 2.01 [0.76-5.30]) and THA (OR, 1.06 [0.80-1.39]) demonstrated no difference in rates of PJI in cases of operative time ≥ 120 minutes versus cases < 120 minutes (p>0.05 for all). Using any surgical site infection (SSI) as an endpoint, both TJA (OR, 1.47 [1.181.83], p<0.001) and TKA (OR, 1.50 [1.08-2.08]; p=0.016) procedures lasting more versus less than 120 minutes demonstrated significantly higher odds of SSI. Conclusion: Following TJA, rates of SSI and PJI are significantly greater in procedures ≥120 minutes in duration relative to those < 120 minutes. When analyzing TKA separately, higher rates of SSI were observed in procedures ≥ 120 minutes in duration relative to those <120 minutes. Rates of PJI in TKA or THA procedures alone were not significantly impacted by operative time. Level of Evidence: V.

Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database.

Background: Rotational ankle fractures are common injuries associated with high rates of intra-articular injury. Traditional ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) techniques provide limited capacity for evaluation of intra-articular pathology. Ankle arthroscopy represents a minimally invasive technique to directly visualize the articular cartilage and syndesmosis while aiding with reduction and allowing joint debridement, loose body removal, and treatment of chondral injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy during ankle fracture ORIF surgery amongst early-career orthopaedic surgeons while examining the influence of subspecialty fellowship training on utilization. Methods: The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Oral Examination database was queried to identify all candidates performing at least one ankle fracture ORIF from examination years 2010 to 2019. All ORIF cases were examined to identify those that carried a concomitant CPT code for ankle arthroscopy. Concomitant ankle arthroscopy cases were categorized by candidates self-reported fellowship training status and examination year. Descriptive statistics were performed to report relevant data and linear regression analyses were utilized to assess temporal trends in concomitant ankle arthroscopy with ORIF for ankle fractures. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. Results: During the study period, there were 36,113 cases of ankle fracture ORIF performed of which 388 cases (1.1%) were performed with concomitant ankle arthroscopy. Ankle fracture ORIF was most frequently performed by trauma fellowship trained ABOS Part II candidates (n=8,888; 24.6%), followed by sports medicine (n=7,493; 20.8%) and foot and ankle (n=6,563; 18.2%). Arthroscopy was most frequently utilized by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons (293/6,270 cases; 4.5%) followed by sports medicine (29/7,464 cases; 0.4%) and trauma (4/8,884 cases; 0.1%). With respect to arthroscopic cases, 293 cases (75.5%) were performed by foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons, 29 (7.5%) sports medicine, and 4 (1.0%) trauma. Ankle arthroscopy utilization significantly increased from 3.65 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2010 to 13.91 cases per 1,000 ankle fractures in 2019 (p=0.010). Specifically, foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons demonstrated a significant increase in arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF over time (p<0.001; OR: 1.101; CI: 1.054-1.151). Conclusion: Ankle arthroscopy utilization during ankle fracture ORIF has increased over the past decade. Foot and ankle fellowship trained surgeons contribute most significantly to this trend. Level of Evidence: IV.

Not all Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Are the Same: What Are the Implications in Large Database Studies?

BACKGROUND: The use of claims databases for research after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA) has increased exponentially. These studies rely on accurate coding, and inadvertent inclusion of patients with nonroutine indications may influence results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the complexity of THA and TKA captured by CPT code and determine if complication rates vary based on the indication. METHODS: The NSQIP database was queried using CPT codes 21730 and 27447 to identify patients undergoing THA and TKA from 2018 to 2019. The surgical indication was classified based on the ICD-10 diagnosis code as routine primary, complex primary, inflammatory, fracture, oncologic, revision, infection, or indeterminant. Patient factors and 30-day complications, readmission, reoperation, and wound complications were compared. RESULTS: A total of 86,009 THA patients had 703 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 91.4% were routine primary indications. Complication rates were: routine primary 7.4%, complex primary 11.3%, inflammatory 12.5%, fracture 23.9%, oncologic 32.4%, revision 26.9%, infection 38.7%, and indeterminant 10.3% (P < .0001). 137,500 TKA patients had 552 ICD-10 diagnosis codes and 96.1% were routine primary cases. Complication rates were: routine primary 5.9%, complex primary 8.0%, inflammatory 7.2%, fracture 38.9%, oncologic 32.7%, revision 13.3%, infection 37.7%, and indeterminant 9.6% (P < .0001). Routine primary arthroplasty had significantly lower rates of reoperation, readmission, and wound complications. CONCLUSION: Using CPT code alone captures 10% of THA and 4% of TKA patients with procedures for nonroutine primary indications. It is essential to recognize identification of patients simply by CPT code has the potential to inadvertently introduce bias, and surgeons should critically assess methods used to define the study populations.

What Is the Impact of Body Mass Index Cutoffs on Total Hip Arthroplasty Complications?

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) cutoffs are commonly utilized to decide whether to offer obese patients elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, weight loss goals may be unachievable for many, and some patients are thereby denied complication-free surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of varying BMI cutoffs on the rates of complication-free surgery after THA. METHODS: Patients undergoing THA between 2015 and 2018 were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database using Common Procedural Terminology code 27130. BMI and rates of 30-day complications were collected. BMI cutoffs of 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 kg/m2 were applied to model the incidence of complications if THA would have been allowed to proceed based on BMI. RESULTS: A total of 192,394 patients underwent THA, and 13,970 (7%) of them had a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. With a BMI cutoff of 40 kg/m2, 178,424 (92.7%) patients would have proceeded with THA. From this set, 170,296 (95.4%) would experience complication-free surgery, and 11.8% of complications would be prevented. THA would proceed for 191,217 (99.3%) patients at a BMI cutoff of 50 kg/m2, of which 182,123 (95.2%) would not experience a complication, and 1.3% of complications would be prevented. Using 35 kg/m2 as the BMI cutoff would prevent 28.6% of complications and permit 75.9% of complication-free surgeries to proceed. CONCLUSION: Lower BMI cutoffs for THA can result in fewer complications although they will consequentially limit access to complication-free THA. Consideration of risks of obesity in THA may be best considered as part of a holistic assessment and shared decision-making when deciding on goals for weight reduction.

Are Body Mass Index Cutoffs Creating Racial, Ethnic, and Gender Disparities in Eligibility for Primary Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Unabated increases in the prevalence of obesity among American adults have disproportionately affected women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate for disparity in rates of patient eligibility for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on race and ethnicity and gender by applying commonly used body mass index (BMI) eligibility criteria to two large national databases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database for the years 2015-2019 for primary THA and TKA and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2011-2018. Designations of race and ethnicity were standardized between cohorts. BMI cutoffs of <50 kg/m2, <45 kg/m2, <40 kg/m2, and <35 kg/m2 were then applied. Rates of eligibility for surgery were examined for each respective BMI cutoff and stratified by age, race and ethnicity, and gender. RESULTS: 143,973 NSQIP THA patients, 242,518 NSQIP TKA patients, and 13,255 NHANES participants were analyzed. Female patients were more likely to be ineligible for surgery across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .001 for all). Black patients had relatively lower rates of eligibility across all cohorts for all modeled BMI cutoffs (P < .0001 for all). Hispanic patients had disproportionately lower rates of eligibility only at a BMI cutoff of <35 kg/m2. CONCLUSION: Using BMI cutoffs alone to determine the eligibility for primary THA and TKA may disproportionally exclude women, Black persons, and Hispanic persons. These data raise concerns regarding further disparity and restriction of arthroplasty care to vulnerable populations that are already marginalized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study, Level III.

Who Is Still Receiving Blood Transfusions After Primary and Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Incidence of blood transfusions after primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty (primary total hip arthroplasty [pTHA], revision THA [rTHA], primary total knee arthroplasty [pTKA], and revision TKA [rTKA]) has been decreasing for a multitude of reasons. The purpose of this study was to assess whether transfusion rates have continued to decline and evaluate patient factors associated with transfusions. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried to identify patients undergoing pTHA, pTKA, rTHA, and rTKA between 2011 and 2019. Patients undergoing bilateral procedures and arthroplasty for fracture, infection, or tumor were excluded. Trends in blood transfusions were assessed. Patient factor association with blood transfusions was evaluated using 2018 and 2019 data. RESULTS: Transfusion rates decreased from 21.4% in 2011 to 2.5% in 2019 for pTHA (P < .0001). For pTKA, transfusion rates declined from 17.6% to 0.7% (P < .0001). In rTHA, the transfusion rate decreased from 33.5% to 12.0% from 2011 to 2019 (P < .0001). Transfusion rates declined from 19.4% to 2.6% for rTKA during the study period (P < .0001). Transfusions were more frequent in patients who were older, female, with more comorbidities, with lower hematocrit, receiving nonspinal anesthesia, and with longer operative time. Lower preoperative hematocrit, history of bleeding disorders, and preoperative transfusion were associated with greater odds for postoperative transfusion after multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Transfusions after both primary and revision total joint arthroplasty have continued to decrease. Studies of arthroplasty complications should account for decreasing transfusions when assessing overall complication rates. Future studies should consider interventions to further reduce transfusions in revision arthroplasty.

Increased Risk of Short-Term Complications in Smokers Undergoing Primary Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

The effects of smoking on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of smoking on short-term outcomes following primary UKA. A query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) database was used to identify cases of primary UKA performed during years 2006 to 2017. Patient demographics, operative times, and postoperative complications were compared between smoking and nonsmoking cohorts. Descriptive statistics, univariate analyses, and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the effects of smoking on primary UKA. A total of 10,593 cases of UKA were identified; 1,046 of these patients were smokers. Univariate analysis demonstrated smokers to have higher rates of any complication (4.6 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.031), any wound complication (1.82 vs. 0.94%, p = 0.008), deep wound infection (0.57 vs. 0.13%, p = 0.006), and reoperation (1.34 vs. 0.68%, p = 0.018) relative to nonsmokers. Multivariate analysis demonstrated smokers to have higher rates of any wound complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-2.95) and reoperation (OR = 2.11; 95% CI: 1.12-3.97). Smokers undergoing primary UKA are at higher risk for any wound complication and reoperation relative to nonsmokers in the first 30 days postoperatively. Further studies evaluating the long-term effects of smoking on outcome following UKA, as well as the impact of smoking cessation on outcomes following UKA, are needed.

Patient Resilience Influences Opioid Consumption in Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

Background: Resilience and depression may influence opioid consumption in patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty (TJA); however, data evaluating these relationships are limited. Methods: We retrospectively identified 119 patients undergoing TJA who completed preoperative questionnaires to measure resilience (Brief Resilience Scale) and depression (PHQ-9) from 2017 to 2018 at a single institution. Patients were stratified into high, normal, and low resilience groups as well as no, mild, and major depression groups. Opioid use was recorded in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Nonparametric statistical testing was performed with significance level at P < 0.05. Results: Higher levels of resilience correlated with less postoperative inpatient opioid use (P = 0.003). Patients with high resilience were less likely to use preoperative opioids compared to those with low resilience (OR = 6.08, 95% CI [1.230.5]). There was no difference in postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions between resilience groups. Lower levels of depression correlated with less postoperative inpatient opioid use, though this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.058). Additionally, there was no significant difference in preoperative opioid use or postoperative outpatient opioid prescriptions between depression groups. Conclusion: Patients with higher levels of resilience are less likely to use opioids before TJA and utilize lower amounts of opioids while inpatient following surgery. Depression correlated with higher postoperative inpatient opioid use; however, the present findings regarding this relationship are inconclusive. Resilience is a psychological trait that may impact opioid use in patients undergoing TJA and should be viewed as a modifiable risk factor. Level of Evidence: III.