Dienogest alone or dienogest combined with estrogens in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, that is the question. A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: to compare the effects of Dienogest 2 mg (D) alone or combined with estrogens (D + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg, D + EE; D + estradiol valerate 1-3 mg, D + EV) in terms of symptoms and endometriotic lesions variations. METHODS: This retrospective study included symptomatic patients in reproductive age with ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas. Medical therapy for at least 12 months with D, D + EE or D + EV was required. Women were evaluated at baseline visit (V1) and after 6 (V2) and 12 months (V3) of therapy. RESULTS: 297 patients were enrolled (156 in the D group, 58 in the D + EE group, 83 in the D + EV group). Medical treatment leaded to a significant reduction in size of endometriomas after 12 months, with no differences between the three groups. When comparing D and D + EE/D + EV groups, a significant decrease of dysmenorrhea was detected in the D group than in D + EE/D + EV group. Conversely, the reduction of dysuria was more significative in the D + EE/D + EV groups rather than in the D group. Regarding tolerability, treatment associated side effects were reported by 16.2% patients. The most frequent one was uterine bleeding/spotting, significantly higher in the D + EV group. CONCLUSION: Dienogest alone or associated with estrogens (EE/EV) seems to be equally effective in reducing endometriotic lesions mean diameter. The reduction of dysmenorrhea was more significative when D was administered alone, while dysuria seems to improve more when D is associated with estrogens.

Postmenopausal hormone therapy in BRCA gene mutation carriers: to whom and which?

INTRODUCTION: Risk-reducing-salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) inevitably leads BRCA mutation carriers to premature menopause. AREAS COVERED: To evaluate the existing evidence for use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) in BRCAmc, after RRSO or menopause occurring naturally, for both breast cancer (BC) survivors and those without BC. EXPERT OPINION: All BC survivors are excluded from any HT treatment: in other BRCAmc, before 51 years of age the benefits of HT overcome the risks after RRSO and/or premature ovarian insufficiency (POF). After 51 years of age, it is important to treat only women with important vasomotor symptoms, after the failure of alternative therapies. Estrogens-only therapy plays a key role in hysterectomized women (HW). In the case of an intact uterus (UW), associations with the lowest dose of progestins/natural progesterone derivatives have to be preferred, as progestins has been shown to play an important role in BC transformation, especially in BRCA1mc. No studies have been performed in BRCAmc with regard to 'progestin-free' HT, in particular the old tibolone (both in HW and UW) and the new tissue-selective estrogen complex (in UW). However, preliminary data obtained from the general population are reassuring about the use of these 'progestin-free' preparations and BC safety.

Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) in a BRIP-1 mutation carrier: the first case report.

Some hereditary ovarian cancer cases can be associated with a mutation of a gene involved in the DNA double-strand break repair system other than BRCA, such as BRIP1. This mutation is an emerging indication for prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO): however, anomalous tubal pathologic lesions have not yet been reported during RRSO performed for this specific indication (BRIP1), as largely reported for BRCA mutation carriers. An asymptomatic 64-year-old woman with a family history of ovarian and breast cancer agreed to undergo RRSO for a pathogenic variant of the BRIP1 gene (heterozygous NM_032043.2: c.124delT, p. Cys42Valfs) with normal BRCA genes. Histological examination showed the presence of high-grade serous carcinoma of the fimbria of the right tube of a maximum diameter of 0.4 cm (final FIGO stage IIB). The pathogenic mechanism that leads to the development of high-grade serous ovarian/fallopian tube cancer in patients with mutations of BRIP1 should be the same as for patients with mutations of BRCA1 and 2. Our case confirms to consider BRIP1 mutation to be sufficient to justify RRSO at 45-50 years old.