Multidisciplinary management of head and neck cancer: First expert consensus using Delphi methodology from the Spanish Society for Head and Neck Cancer (part 2).

Head and neck cancer is one of the most frequent malignances worldwide. Despite the site-specific multimodality therapy, up to half of the patients will develop recurrence. Treatment selection based on a multidisciplinary tumor board represents the cornerstone of head and neck cancer, as it is essential for achieving the best results, not only in terms of outcome, but also in terms of organ-function preservation and quality of life. Evidence-based international and national clinical practice guidelines for head and neck cancer not always provide answers in terms of decision-making that specialists have to deal with in their daily practice. This is the first Expert Consensus on the Multidisciplinary Approach for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) elaborated by the Spanish Society for Head and Neck Cancer and based on a Delphi methodology. It offers a number of specific recommendations based on the available evidence and the expertise of our specialists to facilitate decision-making of all health-care specialists involved.

Factors influencing the collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and non-myeloid malignancies.

Factors influencing the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) were studied in 182 mobilization procedures performed on 145 consecutive patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML; n=67) and with various non-myeloid malignancies (NMM; n=78). PBSC were collected following mobilization with chemotherapy, treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. Fewer colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophages (CFU-GMs) were collected from patients with AML than from patients with NMM (P<0.0001), although there were no differences in the numbers of CD34+ cells collected between both groups. Multiple regression analysis showed that chemotherapy alone was predictive of a low CD34+ yield in patients with NMM (regression coefficient (RC)=-2.1; P=0.003). In addition, the interactions "diagnosis mutliple myeloma (MM)xmobilization with chemotherapy" (RC=2.9; P=0.004) and "diagnosis MMxmobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF" (RC=2.1; P=0.04) also remained in the model, both showing a favorable influence. In AML, mobilization with chemotherapy plus G-CSF was associated with higher CD34+ yields (P=0.003). In this subgroup of patients, multiple regression analysis identified the number of cycles of previous chemotherapy (< or =2 cycles; RC=1.3; P=0.03) and peripheral blood counts (WBC > or =1.5 x 10(9)/l and monocytes >20%; RC=0.8; P=0.02) as the factors most predictive of CD34+ cell yield. These findings emphasize the need to optimize harvesting technique to enhance safety and minimize morbidity and costs of this valuable procedure.

Factors influencing hematopoietic recovery after autologous blood stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia and with non-myeloid malignancies.

Factors influencing hematopoietic recovery (HR) after autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) were analyzed in 73 patients with various non-myeloid malignancies (NMM), and in 58 patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). Peripheral blood stem cells were collected following mobilization with chemotherapy, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), or chemotherapy plus G-CSF. The conditioning regimen used consisted of either chemotherapy alone (112 cases) or chemotherapy plus total body irradiation (19 cases). The median number of colony-forming units granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) was similar in both groups of patients, with the median number of CD34(+) cells infused being higher in the AML group (5.4 vs 4 x 10(6)/kg; P = 0.03). Median time neutrophils >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 13 days in both groups, and median time to a platelet count >20 x 10(9)/l was longer in AML patients (14 vs 12 days; P = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the only factors affecting neutrophil recovery in the NMM group were the CD34+ cell number (continuous model) and the CFU-GM dose (categorized model) infused, whereas for platelet recovery, previous chemotherapy also remained significant. In the AML group, the only factors significantly affecting the speed of neutrophil recovery were dose of CD34+ cells administered and the patient's age. As for platelet recovery, only the progenitor dose administered remained significant. In the NMM group, the most discriminating cut-off values for a rapid neutrophil and platelet recovery were 1.5 x 10(6) and 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively, and for AML patients these figures were 1.5 x 10(6) and 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. Our results confirm the slower HR after ABSCT in AML, and highlight the importance of progenitor cell dose in accelerating HR after ABSCT.

Autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia in relapse after autologous blood stem cell transplantation.

Leukemic relapse remains the most frequent reason for treatment failure in patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) treated with autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible role of autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) in patients with AML who relapse after ABSCT. Eighteen consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. At ABMT, 17 patients were in untreated relapse and one was in third complete remission (CR). The preparative regimen was BAVC, and consisted of BCNU 800 mg/m2 on day -6, M-AMSA 150 mg/m2/day on days -5 to -3, VP-16 150 mg/m2/day on days -5 to -3 and Ara-C 300 mg/m2/day on days -5 to -3. There were two regimen-related deaths (11%). Thirteen out of 17 patients in untreated relapse before ABMT achieved CR (76%). The cumulative risk of relapse was 58 +/- 13% at 3 years. Seven patients are in CR between 7+ and 53+ months, with a disease-free survival (DFS) probability of 36 +/- 12% at 3 years. The probability of DFS after ABMT was clearly higher in those patients relapsing later than 7 months after the first autograft (52%) than in patients relapsing earlier (20%)(P = 0.02). In a significant proportion of patients, remission duration was clearly longer after ABMT than ABSCT. We conclude that BAVC conditioning followed by ABMT is associated with a low treatment-related toxicity and results in prolonged DFS in a substantial number of AML patients who relapse after ABSCT. Until better therapeutic options become available, ABMT in untreated relapse is a useful alternative in this group of very poor-risk patients.

Successful treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in a peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant patient with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS).

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after BMT. Although treatment of VOD is primarily supportive, some success has been obtained recently with fibrinolytic therapy. However, for critically ill patients liver transplantation may be the only therapeutic option. Nevertheless, this procedure is associated with high mortality and can only be performed in a minority of cases. The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) is a non-surgical, side-to-side shunt consisting of an intraparenchymal duct between a main branch of the portal vein and a hepatic vein. In this report we describe a patient who underwent TIPS placement for severe VOD following autologous PBPC transplant. No complications developed and gradual improvement in clinical status and liver function was observed early after this therapy. Nine months after TIPS, the patient is asymptomatic with normal liver function. TIPS provides an interesting alternative to invasive therapies for patients with severe VOD after bone marrow or PBPC transplants.

Filgrastim for the treatment of leukemia relapse after bone marrow transplantation.

The absence of an effective therapy for most patients with leukemia who relapse after allogeneic BMT has generated interest in new strategies. We present our experience on the use of filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg/day s.c., in four patients with leukemia (three with AML and one with CLL) who relapsed after allogeneic transplantation. One patient with AML achieved CR after 55 days of treatment. No response was observed in the remaining three. The patient who responded developed extensive chronic GVHD but relapsed 10 months later. In one of the unresponsive patients a dramatic increase in bone marrow infiltration and WBC count followed administration of filgrastim. We conclude that filgrastim can occasionally induce CR in leukemic patients who relapse after BMT.

Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cells mobilized by G-CSF (filgrastim) for a second transplant in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia in relapse.

A 25-year-old man with AML, who relapsed 21 months after his first allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT), underwent a second transplant with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) obtained from his HLA-identical sibling. The donor cells were collected through four aphereses after G-CSF mobilization with 5 micrograms/kg/d for 5 days. The patient received BAVC conditioning regimen followed by non-T cell-depleted PBPC. Successful engraftment occurred with rapid hematopoietic recovery (time to reach 0.5 x 10(9)/L neutrophils and 50 x 10(9) platelets/L was 15 and 19 days, respectively). A bone marrow aspirate on day +19 showed trilineage engraftment. Erythrocyte phenotype showed that erythropoiesis was of donor origin. The patient developed grade II acute GVHD that responded to prednisone. Seven months after PBPC transplantation he remains in complete remission, alive and well, with just limited chronic GVHD. Allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation may be considered a suitable alternative to marrow transplant.