Ancestry-specific hereditary cancer panel yields: Moving toward more personalized risk assessment.

Healthcare disparities in genomic medicine are well described. Despite some improvements, we continue to see fewer individuals of African American, Asian, and Hispanic ancestry undergo genetic counseling and testing compared to those of European ancestry. It is well established that variant of uncertain significance (VUS) rates are higher among non-European ancestral groups undergoing multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing. However, pathogenic variant (PV) yields, and genomic data in general, are often reported in aggregate and derived from cohorts largely comprised of individuals of European ancestry. We performed a retrospective review of clinical and ancestral data for individuals undergoing multi-gene hereditary cancer panel testing to determine ancestry-specific PV and VUS rates. An ancestry other than European was reported in 29,042/104,851 (27.7%) of individuals. Compared to Europeans (9.4%), individuals of Middle Eastern ancestry were more likely to test positive for one or more pathogenic variants (12.1%, p = .0025), while African Americans were less likely (7.9%, p < .0001). Asian and Middle Eastern individuals were most likely (34.8% and 33.2%, respectively) to receive a report with an overall classification of VUS, while individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish and European ancestry were least likely (17.1% and 20.4%, respectively). These data suggest that in addition to higher VUS rates, there may be ancestry-specific PV yields. Providing aggregate data derived from cohorts saturated with European individuals does not adequately reflect genetic testing outcomes in minority groups, and interrogation of ancestry-specific data is a step toward a more personalized risk assessment.

Age-adjusted association of homologous recombination genes with ovarian cancer using clinical exomes as controls.

BACKGROUND: Genes in the homologous recombination pathway have shown varying results in the literature regarding ovarian cancer (OC) association. Recent case-control studies have used allele counts alone to quantify genetic associations with cancer. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed on 6,182 women with OC referred for hereditary cancer multi-gene panel testing (cases) and 4,690 mothers from trios who were referred for whole-exome sequencing (controls). We present age-adjusted odds ratios (ORAdj) to determine association of OC with pathogenic variants (PVs) in homologous recombination genes. RESULTS: Significant associations with OC were observed in BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C and RAD51D. Other homologous recombination genes, BARD1, NBN, and PALB2, were not significantly associated with OC. ATM and CHEK2 were only significantly associated with OC by crude odds ratio (ORCrude) or by ORAdj, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between ORCrude and ORAdj for these two genes. The significant association of PVs in BRIP1 by ORCrude (2.05, CI = 1.11 to 3.94, P = 0.03) was not observed by ORAdj (0.87, CI = 0.41 to 1.93, P = 0.73). Interestingly, the confidence intervals of the two effect sizes were significantly different (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The lack of association of PVs in BRIP1 with OC by ORAdj is inconsistent with some previous literature and current management recommendations, highlighted by the significantly older age of OC onset for BRIP1 PV carriers compared to non-carriers. By reporting ORAdj, this study presents associations that reflect more informed genetic contributions to OC when compared to traditional count-based methods.

Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility sequencing panels.

PURPOSE: Several genes on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility test panels have not been systematically examined for strength of association with disease. We employed the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) clinical validity framework to assess the strength of evidence between selected genes and breast or ovarian cancer. METHODS: Thirty-one genes offered on cancer panel testing were selected for evaluation. The strength of gene-disease relationship was systematically evaluated and a clinical validity classification of either Definitive, Strong, Moderate, Limited, Refuted, Disputed, or No Reported Evidence was assigned. RESULTS: Definitive clinical validity classifications were made for 10/31 and 10/32 gene-disease pairs for breast and ovarian cancer respectively. Two genes had a Moderate classification whereas, 6/31 and 6/32 genes had Limited classifications for breast and ovarian cancer respectively. Contradictory evidence resulted in Disputed or Refuted assertions for 9/31 genes for breast and 4/32 genes for ovarian cancer. No Reported Evidence of disease association was asserted for 5/31 genes for breast and 11/32 for ovarian cancer. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of gene-disease association using the ClinGen clinical validity framework revealed a wide range of classifications. This information should aid laboratories in tailoring appropriate gene panels and assist health-care providers in interpreting results from panel testing.

Germline pathogenic variants identified in women with ovarian tumors.

OBJECTIVE: The recognition of genes implicated in ovarian cancer risk beyond BRCA1, BRCA2, and the Lynch syndrome genes has increased the variety of testing options available to providers and patients. We report the frequency of pathogenic variants identified among individuals with ovarian cancer undergoing clinical genetic testing via a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel. METHODS: Genetic testing of up to 32 genes using a hereditary cancer panel was performed on 4439 ovarian cancer cases, and results were analyzed for frequency of pathogenic variants. Statistical comparisons were made using t-tests and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: The positive yield was 13.2%. While BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants were most frequent, one third (33.7%) of positive findings were in other homologous recombination genes, and accounted for over 40.0% of findings in endometrioid and clear cell cases. Women with a personal history of breast cancer (22.1%), who reported a family history of ovarian cancer (17.7%), and/or serous histology (14.7%) were most likely to harbor a pathogenic variant. Those with very early onset (<30 years) and late onset (≥70 years) ovarian cancer had low positive yields. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the genetic heterogeneity of ovarian cancer, showing that a large proportion of cases are not due to BRCA1/2 and the Lynch syndrome genes, but still have an identifiable hereditary basis. These findings substantiate the utility of multi-gene panel testing in ovarian cancer care regardless of age at diagnosis, family history, or histologic subtype, providing evidence for testing beyond BRCA1/2 and the Lynch syndrome genes.

Synchronous Bilateral Tubal Serous Carcinomas in a Patient With Exon 13 Duplication and Loss of Function of BRCA1.

We report the first case of distinct, synchronous serous carcinomas of the adnexa arising in a patient with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer and a germline loss of function mutation in BRCA1. Illustrating an exceedingly rare phenomenon of synchronous high-grade carcinomas with distinct histomorphologic, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic features, the case serves as a point of departure for the discussion of phenotypic patterns of carcinomas arising in BRCA1 mutation carriers. We also review patient management, including the importance of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with deleterious BRCA1 mutations, as well as the potential need for an intraoperative pathologic assessment to find occult, high-grade carcinomas in this setting.

Male breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: pathology data from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and, more commonly, BRCA2 mutations are associated with increased risk of male breast cancer (MBC). However, only a paucity of data exists on the pathology of breast cancers (BCs) in men with BRCA1/2 mutations. Using the largest available dataset, we determined whether MBCs arising in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers display specific pathologic features and whether these features differ from those of BRCA1/2 female BCs (FBCs). METHODS: We characterised the pathologic features of 419 BRCA1/2 MBCs and, using logistic regression analysis, contrasted those with data from 9675 BRCA1/2 FBCs and with population-based data from 6351 MBCs in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. RESULTS: Among BRCA2 MBCs, grade significantly decreased with increasing age at diagnosis (P = 0.005). Compared with BRCA2 FBCs, BRCA2 MBCs were of significantly higher stage (P for trend = 2 × 10(-5)) and higher grade (P for trend = 0.005) and were more likely to be oestrogen receptor-positive [odds ratio (OR) 10.59; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 5.15-21.80] and progesterone receptor-positive (OR 5.04; 95 % CI 3.17-8.04). With the exception of grade, similar patterns of associations emerged when we compared BRCA1 MBCs and FBCs. BRCA2 MBCs also presented with higher grade than MBCs from the SEER database (P for trend = 4 × 10(-12)). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the largest series analysed to date, our results show that BRCA1/2 MBCs display distinct pathologic characteristics compared with BRCA1/2 FBCs, and we identified a specific BRCA2-associated MBC phenotype characterised by a variable suggesting greater biological aggressiveness (i.e., high histologic grade). These findings could lead to the development of gender-specific risk prediction models and guide clinical strategies appropriate for MBC management.

Degarelix: a review of its use in patients with prostate cancer.

Degarelix (Firmagon(®); Gonax(®)) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist that is approved for the treatment of advanced (hormone-dependent) prostate cancer in the US and EU and the treatment of prostate cancer in Japan. In a pivotal randomized, controlled, 12-month phase III study, degarelix (initial subcutaneous dose of 240 mg followed by monthly dosages of 80 mg) was noninferior to leuprolide (monthly intramuscular dosages of 7.5 mg) in patients with prostate cancer of any stage for which endocrine treatment was indicated (except neoadjuvant hormonal therapy) with regard to suppression of testosterone to castration levels (i.e. ≤0.5 ng/mL). Suppression of testosterone and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels was faster with degarelix than with leuprolide, and no testosterone surges or microsurges were seen in degarelix recipients. Suppression of testosterone and PSA levels was maintained for the 12-month study duration and continued for up to 5 years in an extension to the main trial (including in patients switching from leuprolide to degarelix in the extension). The drug was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Injection-site reactions and events reflecting the expected effects of testosterone suppression (e.g. hot flushes, weight increase) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. Thus, degarelix is a useful option for the treatment of prostate cancer in patients for whom endocrine treatment is indicated.

Regorafenib: a review of its use in previously treated patients with progressive metastatic colorectal cancer.

Regorafenib (Stivarga) is an inhibitor of multiple protein kinases, including those involved in oncogenesis, tumour angiogenesis and maintenance of the tumour microenvironment. The drug is approved as monotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in patients who have previously received all standard systemic anticancer treatments (US, EU and Canada) or in patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer (Japan). In the randomized, controlled COloRectal cancer treated with REgorafenib or plaCebo after failure of standard Therapy (CORRECT) trial, regorafenib 160 mg once daily for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle plus best supportive care (BSC) was associated with a significantly longer median overall survival than placebo plus BSC in patients with previously treated, progressive mCRC. The drug was also associated with significantly longer progression-free survival and better disease control rates than placebo, although objective response rates were similar in both treatment groups. Regorafenib did not appear to compromise health-related quality of life over the study duration and had a generally acceptable tolerability profile. The introduction of regorafenib expands the currently limited range of effective treatment options in patients with previously treated, progressive mCRC.

Pirfenidone: in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Pirfenidone is an orally administered pyridine that has orphan designation for the treatment of mild to moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in the EU. Pirfenidone 2403 mg/day for 72 weeks administered to patients with IPF was associated with a significantly lower mean decline in the percent predicted forced vital capacity than placebo (primary endpoint) according to data from one of two randomized, double-blind, multinational trials (studies 004 and 006 [also known as the CAPACITY trials]), and data from a pooled analysis of both trials. In another randomized, double-blind, multicentre Japanese trial, the adjusted mean in the change in vital capacity from baseline to week 52 was significantly lower in patients with IPF who received pirfenidone 1800 mg/day (considered to be comparable to the 2403 mg/day dose in studies 004 and 006 on a weight-normalized basis) than in those who received placebo (primary endpoint). Pirfenidone had an acceptable tolerability profile in clinical trials, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity.

Glatiramer acetate: a review of its use in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and in delaying the onset of clinically definite multiple sclerosis.

Glatiramer acetate is a synthetic analogue of the multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated antigen, myelin basic protein. It is indicated in the EU, US and many other countries to reduce the frequency of relapses in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), and for the treatment of patients who have experienced a well defined first clinical episode and are at high risk of developing clinically definite MS or have features of MS on MRI. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in patients with RRMS has been shown in two randomized, double-blind, multicentre phase III trials. In one trial, glatiramer acetate was associated with a significantly lower mean relapse rate than placebo after 24 months' treatment (primary endpoint). In an ongoing open-label extension to this trial, glatiramer acetate was associated with a sustained reduction in the relapse rate at the 6-, 8- and 15-year follow-ups. In the other trial, the mean cumulative number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions on T1-weighted MRI images was significantly lower in glatiramer acetate versus placebo recipients after 9 months' treatment (primary endpoint). Glatiramer acetate also had generally similar efficacy to subcutaneous interferon (IFN)-beta-1a or IFNbeta-1b in two large randomized, open-label, multicentre phase III trials conducted over 96 weeks or >or=2 years. These data were supported by those from a smaller randomized, open-label phase IV trial that utilized a unique imaging protocol to evaluate the efficacy of glatiramer acetate versus that of IFNbeta-1b over >or=2 years. In these trials, there was no significant difference between glatiramer acetate and IFNbeta recipients in any of the clinical endpoints at study end (e.g. time to first relapse [primary endpoint of the REGARD trial] or risk of relapse [primary endpoint of the BEYOND trial]). Moreover, there was no significant difference between glatiramer acetate and IFNbeta-1b recipients in the median number of combined active lesions per patient per monthly MRI scan during the first 12 months of treatment (primary endpoint of the BECOME trial). In general, there was no significant between-group difference in the majority of other MRI-assessed endpoints in any of the trials. The efficacy of glatiramer acetate in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) was established in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre phase III trial (the PreCISe trial). In this study, glatiramer acetate was associated with a significantly longer time to conversion to clinically definite MS than placebo (primary endpoint). Glatiramer acetate was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity. Injection site-related reactions and immediate post-injection systemic reactions were the most frequently observed adverse events associated with glatiramer acetate in clinical studies. In conclusion, glatiramer acetate is a valuable first-line option in the treatment of RRMS, as well as being an option in the treatment of CIS.

OROS hydromorphone prolonged release: a review of its use in the management of chronic, moderate to severe pain.

OROS hydromorphone prolonged release (OROS hydromorphone) [Jurnista] is a once-daily formulation of the opioid agonist hydromorphone that utilizes OROS (osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system) technology to deliver the drug at a near constant rate, thereby providing consistent analgesia over a 24-hour period. It is indicated for use in patients with severe pain and contraindicated in those with acute or post-operative pain. In several, randomized, multicentre, phase III trials, oral OROS hydromorphone administered once daily for up to 52 weeks was generally effective in the treatment of patients with chronic, moderate to severe cancer or nonmalignant/noncancer pain with regard to improvements from baseline to endpoint in patient-assessed measures of pain intensity, pain relief and/or functional impairment. Pharmacoeconomic analyses suggest that OROS hydromorphone provides greater cost utility than other opioids in this patient population. In addition, OROS hydromorphone was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, with most adverse events being mild to moderate in severity and similar to those seen with other opioids. Thus, OROS hydromorphone is an effective and useful alternative to other opioids for the treatment of patients with severe pain.

Trabectedin: a review of its use in soft tissue sarcoma and ovarian cancer.

Trabectedin (Yondelis) is a tetrahydroisoquinoline molecule that was originally derived from a marine organism. It is indicated in the EU and many other countries for use in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) who have progressed despite receiving previous treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide or in those who are unable to receive these agents. It is also approved in the EU in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for the treatment of platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. In addition, trabectedin holds orphan drug status for the treatment of advanced, recurrent STS in the US, Switzerland and Korea, and for the treatment of advanced, recurrent ovarian cancer in the US and Switzerland. Clinical trials showed that intravenous trabectedin was effective in chemotherapy-experienced patients with advanced, recurrent liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, and results from a retrospective analysis suggest that the drug may be particularly effective in patients with advanced myxoid liposarcoma. In addition, coadministration of trabectedin with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was associated with a significantly longer progression-free survival (6 weeks) than pegylated liposomal doxorubicin monotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy. The tolerability profile of trabectedin was manageable in clinical trials, and the tolerability profile of concomitant trabectedin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was generally consistent with that of each agent alone. Results to date indicate that trabectedin is a valuable addition to the group of second-line antineoplastic agents available for the treatment of advanced, recurrent STS, and that it is a beneficial treatment for recurrent ovarian cancer after failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy when administered in conjunction with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin.

Micafungin: a review of its use in the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive Candida infections in pediatric patients.

Intravenous micafungin (Mycamine; Funguard) is an echinocandin indicated in Japan and the EU for the treatment of pediatric patients (including neonates) with invasive candidiasis and as prophylaxis against Candida infection in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the EU, micafungin is also indicated in pediatric patients who are expected to have neutropenia for >/=10 days. In Japan, children may also receive micafungin for the treatment of, or as prophylaxis against, invasive Aspergillus infection. Micafungin is not currently approved for use in pediatric patients in the US. Micafungin has very good antifungal activity against a wide range of Candida spp. in vitro. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile allowing for once-daily administration, has few drug-drug interactions, and reports of resistance are rare. The results of pediatric substudies indicate that intravenous micafungin is effective in a majority of patients for the treatment of candidemia and other types of invasive candidiasis, and provides effective prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT. The tolerability profile of micafungin in pediatric patients was generally acceptable. In the EU, micafungin is indicated for use when other antifungal medications are not appropriate. Therefore, micafungin provides an alternative to other antifungal agents used in the management of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in pediatric patients, or as prophylaxis against fungal infections in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT.

Bendamustine: a review of its use in the management of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Bendamustine (Treanda, Ribomustin) is a bifunctional alkylating agent that also has potential antimetabolite properties, and only partial cross-resistance occurs between bendamustine and other alkylators. In patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), bendamustine monotherapy achieved high objective response rates in those with rituximab-refractory disease in a pivotal noncomparative trial and a similarly designed smaller phase II study. Many of these heavily treated patients were also refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens. Several phase II trials demonstrated good response rates with single-agent bendamustine, or bendamustine in combination with rituximab, in patients with indolent NHL whose disease relapsed after (or was refractory to) chemotherapy. Phase III studies comparing combination regimens as first-line therapy in patients with indolent NHL showed no significant differences in response rates between bendamustine-containing regimens and standard regimens included in treatment guidelines. Bendamustine has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials and has a low propensity to induce alopecia. Results of ongoing trials will help to clarify the optimal role of bendamustine in indolent NHL. Available data indicate that it may be a particularly useful treatment option as monotherapy in patients with indolent NHL whose disease progressed during or following rituximab-based therapy, many of whom are also refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens.

Trabectedin : a review of its use in the management of soft tissue sarcoma and ovarian cancer.

Trabectedin (Yondelis); ET-743) is an antineoplastic agent that was originally derived from the Caribbean marine tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata and is now produced synthetically. It binds to the minor groove of DNA, disrupting the cell cycle and inhibiting cell proliferation. Intravenous trabectedin administered once every 3 weeks is approved as monotherapy in Europe for use in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) after failure of standard therapy with anthracyclines or ifosfamide, or who are unsuited to receive these agents. It also has orphan drug status in STS in the US and in ovarian cancer in the US and Europe, and is under investigation as combination therapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. In clinical trials, trabectedin showed efficacy in the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic STS, especially those with leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma, as well as in women with platinum-sensitive advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer. In addition, its tolerability profile was generally manageable. The introduction of trabectedin expands the currently limited range of effective treatment options for patients with advanced or metastatic STS; trabectedin also has the potential to be a beneficial treatment for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer.