Health Disparities Curricula in General Surgery Residency Programs: A Critical Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: In 2021, the structural determinants of health (SDOH) were added to the Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education common program requirements for all accredited residency programs, including general surgery. In this study, we sought to explore the current scope of, and concepts used in, health disparities curricula for general surgery residents, specifically investigating how general surgery residents learn about health disparities and the SDOH. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Education Research Complete (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science Core Collection using keywords related to health disparities and the SDOH. Inclusion criteria consisted of all studies published after 2005 that discussed health disparities curricula for Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery residency programs. Five thousand three hundred seventeen articles were screened using a two-phase process. Data extraction and analysis was performed using critical review methods. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were identified. Within these articles, seven unique health disparities curricula were found. All seven of the identified curricula employed cultural frameworks as methods to mitigate health disparities. Three curricula, all published after 2011, included education on the SDOH. A wide variety of educational methods were utilized; in-person didactics was the most common. CONCLUSIONS: In the current literature, culture continues to play a large role in health disparities training for general surgery residents. Though further efforts are needed to understand the methods used in programs that have not published scholarly work, it is imperative to ensure that residents are provided with the sociopolitical perspective needed to understand the SDOH and serve all patients, including those affected by health disparities.

Perceived Pager Burden Among Trainees Across Medical Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The experiences of pager use among trainees across medical specialties is underexplored. The aim of this study was to assess experiences of pager burden and communication preferences among trainees in different specialties. METHODS: An online survey was developed to assess perceived pager burden (eg, pager volume, mistake pages, sleep, and off-time interruptions) and communication preferences at a tertiary center in the United States. All residents and fellows were eligible to participate. Responses were grouped by specialty: General surgery [GS], Surgical subspecialty [SS], Medicine, Anesthesiology, and Psychiatry. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess factors associated with pager burden. Free text responses were analyzed using open coding methods. RESULTS: Of the total 306 responses, the majority were female (58.8%), 30-39 years (59.2%), and White (70.6%). Specialty breakdown was: Medicine (40.2%), Psychiatry (10.8%), SS (18.0%), GS (5.6%), and Anesthesiology (3.6%). GS respondents reported receiving more mistake pages (P < .001), spending more time redirecting mistake pages (P = .003), and having the highest sleep time disruptions (P < .001). For urgent communications, surgical trainees preferred physical pagers, while nonsurgical trainees preferred smartphone pagers (P = .001). "Receive fewer nonurgent pages" was the most common change respondents desired. DISCUSSION: In this single center study, subjective experiences of pager burden were disproportionately high among GS trainees. Reducing nonurgent and mistake pages are potential targets for improving trainee communication experiences. Hospitals should consider incorporating trainee preferences into paging systems. Additional studies are warranted to increase the sample size, assess generalizability of the findings, and contextualize trainee experiences with objective hospital-level paging data.

Gender differences in autonomy and performance assessments in a national cohort of vascular surgery trainees.

OBJECTIVE: Gender disparities in surgical training and assessment are described in the general surgery literature. Assessment disparities have not been explored in vascular surgery. We sought to investigate gender disparities in operative assessment in a national cohort of vascular surgery integrated residents (VIRs) and fellows (VSFs). METHODS: Operative performance and autonomy ratings from the Society for Improving Medical Professional Learning (SIMPL) application database were collected for all vascular surgery participating institutions from 2018 to 2023. Logistic generalized linear mixed models were conducted to examine the association of faculty and trainee gender on faculty and self-assessment of autonomy and performance. Data were adjusted for post-graduate year and case complexity. Random effects were included to account for clustering effects due to participant, program, and procedure. RESULTS: One hundred three trainees (n = 63 VIRs; n = 40 VSFs; 63.1% men) and 99 faculty (73.7% men) from 17 institutions (n = 12 VIR and n = 13 VSF programs) contributed 4951 total assessments (44.4% by faculty, 55.6% by trainees) across 235 unique procedures. Faculty and trainee gender were not associated with faculty ratings of performance (faculty gender: odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27-2.29; trainee gender: OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.43) or autonomy (faculty gender: OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.41-2.39; trainee gender: OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.62-2.45) of trainees. All trainees self-assessed at lower performance and autonomy ratings as compared with faculty assessments. However, women trainees rated themselves significantly lower than men for both autonomy (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.43-0.74) and performance (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.30-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Although gender was not associated with differences in faculty assessment of performance or autonomy among vascular surgery trainees, women trainees perceive themselves as performing with lower competency and less autonomy than their male colleagues. These findings suggest utility for exploring gender differences in real-time feedback delivered to and received by trainees and targeted interventions to align trainee self-perception with actual operative performance and autonomy to optimize surgical skill acquisition.

Healthcare Disparity Education for Surgical Residents: Progress Made, More Needed.

BACKGROUND: Healthcare disparities are an important determinant of patient outcomes yet are not standardized within surgical resident education. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and design of current healthcare disparities curricula for surgical residents and included a resident-based needs assessment at a single institution. STUDY DESIGN: A national survey evaluating the presence and design of healthcare disparities curricula was distributed to general surgery program directors via the Association of Program Directors in Surgery Listserv. A related survey was administered to all general surgery residents at a single academic institution. RESULTS: One hundred forty-six program directors completed the survey, with 68 (47%) reporting an active curriculum. The most frequently taught topic is regarding patient race as a healthcare disparity, found in 63 (93%) of existing curricula. Fifty-two (76%) of the curricula were implemented within the last 3 years. Of the 78 (53%) programs without a curriculum, 8 (10%) program directors stated that their program would not benefit from one. Thirty-four (45%) of the programs without a curriculum cited institutional support and time as the most common barriers to implementation. Of the 23 residents who completed the survey, 100% desired learning practical knowledge regarding healthcare disparities relating to how race and socioeconomic status affect the clinical outcomes of surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS: Less than half of general surgery training programs have implemented healthcare disparities curricula. Resident preferences for the format and content of curricula may help inform program leaders and lead to comprehensive national standards.

Does acral lentiginous melanoma subtype account for differences in patterns of care in Black patients?

BACKGROUND: Melanoma-specific outcomes for Black patients are worse when compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) patients. We sought to evaluate whether acral lentiginous melanoma, seen more commonly in Black patients, was associated with racial disparities in outcomes METHODS: The National Cancer Database was analyzed for major subtypes of stage I-IV melanoma diagnosed from 2004 to 2016. The association between Black race and (Siegel et al., Jan) 1 acral melanoma diagnosis and (Bradford et al., Apr) 2 receipt of major amputation for surgical management of melanoma was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 251,864 patients were included (1453 Black). Black patients had increased odds of acral melanoma (odds ratio [OR] = 27.6, 95% CI]: 24.4, 31.2) compared to NHW patients. Black patients still had higher odds ratios of major amputation across all stages after adjusting for acral histology and other potential confounders CONCLUSIONS: Increased prevalence of acral melanoma in Black patients does not fully account for increased receipt of major amputation.