Improvement in quality of life and sexual function in patients affected by vulvar lichen sclerosus treated with combined autologous platelet-rich plasma and fat grafting.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) severely impairs patients' quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a combined application of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and fat grafting as treatment for vulvar LS on patient quality of life. MATERIALS & METHODS: We reviewed the clinical charts of 72 patients affected by LS, who underwent regenerative surgery. The patients' quality of life was assessed using: the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), the Skindex-29, the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the patient-administered - Clinical Scoring System (CSS). RESULTS: After reconstructive surgery, all scores improved: Skindex-29 (-31.8 [IQR: 42.1, -21.8] points; p<0.001), FSFI (7.6 [IQR: 2.7, 14.7)] points; p<0.001), Patient-administered CSS (-24 [IQR: -30, -15] points; p<0.001), DLQI (-9 [IQR: -17, -7] points; p<0.001), Physician-administered CSS (-5 [IQR: -7, -5] points; p<0.001), and IGA (median ΔIGA: -4, IQR: -4, -3; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Combined treatment with PRP and fat grafting proved to be effective in improving the quality of life of patients with vulvar LS.

International Expert Panel Consensus on Fat Grafting of the Breast.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting has broad applications in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery as a natural filler and for its regenerative purposes. Despite the widespread use of fat grafting, there remains no shared consensus on what constitutes the optimal fat grafting technique and its oncological safety. For this reason, the authors of this study have organized a Survey and an International Consensus Conference that was held at the Aesthetic Breast Meeting in Milan (December 15, 2018). METHODS: All studies on fat grafting, both for breast aesthetic and reconstructive purposes, were electronically screened. The literature review led to 17 "key questions" that were used for the Survey. The authors prepared a set of 10 "key statements" that have been discussed in a dedicated face-to-face session during the meeting. RESULTS: The 10 key statements addressed all the most debated topics on fat grafting of the breast. Levels of evidence for the key statements ranged from III to IV with 2 statements (20%) supported by a level of evidence III and 6 statements (60%) by level of evidence IV. Overall consensus was reached for 2 statements (20%) with >75% agreement reached for 7 statements. CONCLUSIONS: The survey demonstrated a diversity of opinion and attitude among the panelists with regard to technique. Clear recommendations for evidence-based clinical practice for fat grafting use both in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery could not be defined due to the scarcity of level 1 or 2 studies.