Management of Peripheral Arthritis in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: An Updated Literature Review Informing the 2021 GRAPPA Treatment Recommendations.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compile evidence for the efficacy and safety of therapeutic options for the peripheral arthritis domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) for the revised 2021 Group in Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations. METHODS: A working group consisting of clinicians and patient research partners was convened. We reviewed the evidence from new randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for PsA treatment from February 19, 2013, to August 28, 2020. We used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)-informed approach to derive evidence for the classes of therapeutic options for 3 patient groups: (1) naïve to treatment, (2) inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs), and (3) inadequate response to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Recommendations were derived through consensus meetings. RESULTS: The evidence review included 69 RCTs. We derived GRADE evidence for each class of therapeutic options and achieved consensus for the recommendations. For patients naïve to treatment, the working group strongly recommends csDMARDs (methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide) and phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors, and emphasizes regular assessment and early escalation to achieve treatment target. bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi], interleukin 17 inhibitors [IL-17i], IL-12/23i, IL-23i) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) are also strongly recommended. For patients with inadequate response to csDMARDs, we strongly recommend TNFi, IL-17i, IL-12/23i, IL-23i, and JAKi. For those who had prior experience with bDMARDs, we strongly recommend a second TNFi, IL-17i, IL-23i, and JAKi. The evidence supporting nonpharmacological interventions was very low. An expert panel conditionally recommends adequate physical activity, smoking cessation, and diet to control weight gain. CONCLUSION: Evidence supporting optimal therapy for the peripheral arthritis domain of PsA was compiled for the revised 2021 GRAPPA treatment recommendations.

In vivo peripheral blood proinflammatory T cells in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: Previous reports have shown an increase in peripheral blood mononuclear cells' (PBMC) Th17 cell subpopulation and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) secretion after in vitro stimulation with anti-CD3/CD28 or phorbol myristate acetate/ionomycin in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of our study was to determine whether there is a Th17 polarization not subjected to in vitro stimulation in patients with AS. METHODS: Nonstimulated PBMC were analyzed from 46 patients with AS, including 7 (15.2%) receiving tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, 20 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and 25 healthy controls. The surface phenotype of freshly isolated PBMC was determined by flow cytometry. Th1, Th2, Th17, and Treg subsets were defined as CD3+CD4+IFN-γ+, CD3+CD4+IL-4+, CD3+CD4+IL-17A+, and CD3+CD4+FoxP3+, respectively. Serum cytokines and interleukin 8 (IL-8) levels were quantified by Luminex technology. RESULTS: The percentages of Th17 and Th1 cells in AS were higher than in healthy controls (7.4% ± 1.8% vs 0.7% ± 0.2% and 4.0% ± 1.3% vs 1.1% ± 0.3%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Th17 and Th1 cell subsets in patients taking TNF-α inhibitors were lower than in those naive to such therapeutics and similar to healthy controls. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-17A, TNF-α, and IL-8 were significantly higher in patients with AS compared to controls. CONCLUSION: The percentages of Th17 and Th1 cells in PBMC without in vitro stimulation, as well as cytokine and IL-8 levels, were significantly increased in patients with AS compared with healthy controls. These T cell subsets and cytokine profiles of patients with AS taking TNF-α inhibitors were similar to those of healthy controls.

Prevalence of back pain in the community. A COPCORD-based study in the Mexican population.

OBJECTIVE: Back pain (BP) is frequent in the community; its prevalence in México is 6%. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of BP in Mexican communities and determine its most important characteristics. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of individuals aged > 18 years was conducted in Mexico City and in urban communities in the state of Nuevo León. Sampling in Mexico City was based on community census and in Nuevo León, on stratified, balanced, and random sampling. Procedures included a door-to-door survey, using the Community Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases, to identify individuals with BP > 1 on a visual analog scale in the last 7 days. General practitioners/rheumatology fellows confirmed and characterized BP symptoms. RESULTS: In all, 8159 individuals (mean age 43.7 yrs, two-thirds female) were surveyed and 1219 had BP. The prevalence of nontraumatic BP in the last 7 days was 8.0% (95% CI 7.5-8.7). The mean age of these individuals was 42.7 years, and 61.9% were female. Thirty-seven percent had inflammatory BP [prevalence of 3.0% (95% CI 2.7-3.4)]. Compared with the state of Nuevo Léon, the characteristics and consequences of BP in Mexico City were more severe. In logistic regression analysis, living in Mexico City, having a paid job, any kind of musculoskeletal pain, high pain intensity, and obesity among other variables were associated with BP. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of nontraumatic BP in the last 7 days in urban communities in México is 8.0%. However, clinical features and consequences differed among the communities studied, suggesting a role for local factors in BP.

El costo de las principales enfermedades reumáticas inflamatorias desde la perspectiva del paciente en México / Social costs of the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases in Mexico from the patient's perspective

Objetivo: Estimar el costo de la artritis reumatoide (AR), la espondilitis anquilosante (EA) y la gota, desde la perspectiva del paciente. Métodos: Análisis transversal de los costos y utilización de recursos de 690 pacientes con AR, EA y gota, de 10 departamentos de centros hospitalarios y consultorios privados de cinco ciudades del país, al momento de ser incluidos en una cohorte dinámica. Se incluye una estimación de los gastos de bolsillo, los costos médicos directos institucionales y el costo médico directo real. Resultados: El gasto de bolsillo promedio (SD) anual (en dólares) en pacientes con AR ascendió a $610.0 ($302.2), en EA a $578.6 ($220.5) y en gota a $245.3 ($124.0), lo que equivalió a 15, 9.6 y 2.5% del ingreso familiar, respectivamente. El gasto de bolsillo representó 26.1% del costo total anual por paciente con AR, 25.3% con EA y 24.4% con gota. Los costos directos institucionales esperados por paciente/año con AR fueron de $1724.2, con EA de $1710.8 y con gota de $760.7. El costo total anual por paciente con AR fue de $2334.3, con EA de $2289.4 y con gota de $1006.1. Los componentes del gasto de bolsillo de mayor cuantía fueron los medicamentos, exámenes de laboratorio y gabinete y las terapias alternativas. Conclusiones: Se concluye que desde la perspectiva del paciente, el costo de la AR, EA y gota equivale a la cuarta parte del costo médico directo. La AR es la enfermedad que mayor gasto implica.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the social costs of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and gout from the patient's perspective. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of the cost and resource utilization of 690 RA, AS, and gout patients from 10 medical centers and private facilities in five cities of Mexico. The information was obtained from the baseline of a dynamic cohort. We estimated out-of-pocket expenses, institutional direct costs, and direct medical costs. RESULTS: The mean (SD) annual out-of-pocket expense (USD) was $610.0 ($302.2) for RA, $578.6 ($220.5) for AS, and $245.3 ($124.0) for gout. Figures correspond to 15%, 9.6%, and 2.5% of the family income. They also represented 26.1%, 25.3%, and 24.4% of the total annual cost per RA, AS, and gout patients, respectively. The expected direct institutional patient/year costs were 1,724.2 for RA, $1,710.8 for AS, and $760.7 for gout. The total patient annual costs were $2,334.3 for RA, $2,289.4 for AS, and $1,006.1 for gout. Most out-of-pocket expenses were used to purchase drugs, pay for laboratory tests, imaging studies, and alternative therapies. CONCLUSIONS: From the patient's perspective, the cost of RA, AS, and gout represents 25% of direct medical costs. The cost of RA is higher than that for AS and gout.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha promoter polymorphisms in Mexican patients with spondyloarthritis.

To evaluate the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) gene as susceptibility marker for spondyloarthritis (SpA), two polymorphisms (-238 and -308 positions) were analyzed in 229 patients with SpA (113 with ankylosing spondylitis [AS], 92 with undifferentiated SpA [U-SpA], 24 with reactive arthritis), and 169 ethnically matched healthy control subjects. The HLA-B alleles were detected by PCR-SSP technique and the TNF-alpha polymorphism by PCR-RFLP. In comparison with healthy control subjects, the frequencies of TNF-238 in SpA were similar. In contrast, the analysis of -308 polymorphism showed increased frequencies of the T2(A) allele in the whole SpA group (p < 0.05, pC = NS, OR = 1.83) as well as the T2(A) allele (pC < 0.05, OR = 2.4) and T1T2(AG) genotype (p < 0.05, pC = NS, OR = 2.25) in U-SpA patients. Comparison of B27-negative patients and healthy control subjects yielded similar results. There was no significant correlation between TNF genotypes and clinical data. The present study demonstrates that TNF-alpha -308 polymorphism appears to be associated with the genetic susceptibility U-SpA. The association seems independent of the susceptibility conferred by the HLA-B27 in this group of patients.

[Complementary and alternative medicine in patients attending a rheumatology department for the first time. Analysis of 800 patients]. / Frecuencia de uso de medicinas complementarias y alternativas en sujetos que acuden por primera vez al servicio de reumatología. Análisis de 800 casos.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in patients attending a rheumatology department in a general hospital for the first time. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We included consecutive patients attending our rheumatology department for the first time. All the patients completed a self-administered questionnaire containing items on demographic data, and prior diagnosis. The patients were also given a list of 22 different CAM and marked those they had previously used. RESULTS: Eight hundred patients were studied. Eighty percent were women. The mean age was 44.8±14.9 years and the mean number of years of education was 7±4. The main diagnoses were osteoarthritis (29.4%), rheumatoid arthritis (22.3%), and fibromyalgia (6.5%). Seventy-one percent had previously used CAM, with a median of two (0-14) different types. The most common were vitamin supplements (38%), arnica (18%), Aloe vera (15%) and homeopathy (15%). No significant differences were found in sex, age, educational level, or diagnosis. The use of CAM was more frequent in patients with longer disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of use of CAM is high in patient with rheumatologic manifestations.