The Relationship Between Anti-Cell Division Cycle and Apoptosis Regulator 1 Autoantibodies, Anti-Sp4 Autoantibodies, and Cancer in Anti-Transcription Intermediary Factor 1γ-Positive Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the frequency, co-occurrence, and cancer association of anti-cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator 1 (anti-CCAR1) and anti-Sp4 in two large independent adult dermatomyositis (DM) cohorts. METHODS: Anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ (anti-TIF1γ)-positive patients with DM from two independent cohorts were studied to determine the serologic overlap of anti-CCAR1 and anti-Sp4 autoantibodies measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Associations between cancer-associated myositis (CAM) and antibody-defined subgroups within anti-TIF1γ-positive patients with DM were determined. RESULTS: A total of 305 anti-TIF1γ-positive patients with DM were studied: 169 patients from Johns Hopkins and 136 patients from Stanford. In each cohort, approximately one-third of anti-TIF1γ-positive patients with DM were anti-Sp4 positive, one-third were anti-CCAR1 positive, 20% were positive for both, and half of patients were negative for both. There was a strong association with CAM in patients lacking both these antibodies (Johns Hopkins, odds ratio [OR] 12.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-89.5]; Stanford, OR 4.5 [95% CI 1.8-13.2]). The strongest negative association with CAM was found in patients with anti-Sp4 or anti-CCAR1 (Johns Hopkins, OR 0.07 [95% CI 0.01-0.27]; Stanford, OR 0.22 [95% CI 0.07-0.55]). CONCLUSION: Both anti-Sp4 and anti-CCAR1 autoantibody subgroups are negatively associated with CAM. Although the magnitude of this association is substantial, cancer occasionally occurs in patients positive for either specificity. Conversely, approximately half of anti-TIF1γ-positive patients with DM are negative for both antibodies (anti-Sp4/anti-CCAR1 negative), and thus this subgroup may warrant more intensive cancer surveillance.

SOX-5 Transcription Factor: a Novel Psoriatic Autoantigen Preferentially Found in Women.

OBJECTIVE: Adaptive immunity mediates psoriatic disease pathogenesis. We aimed to identify novel psoriatic autoantigens and their phenotypic associations in deeply characterized patient cohorts. METHODS: Sera from psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients were used for autoantibody discovery. Immunoprecipitations performed with cell lysates were on-bead digested, and autoantigens were identified by mass spectrometry. Prevalence and clinical features associated with anti-SRY-Box transcription factor-D (SOX-D) antibodies were determined by screening discovery cohorts of patients with PsA (n = 135), patients with psoriasis without PsA (n = 24), and healthy controls (n = 41). A PsA validation cohort (n = 325) and disease control samples of individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 66) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, n = 66) were assayed for anti-SOX5 antibodies. Disease characteristics were compared by antibody status. Longitudinal data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with patient-specific intercept to ascertain associations. We also tested PsA sera for the recently described anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibody in PsA. RESULTS: The novel autoantigens identified were SOX-D transcription factors, with SOX-5 being the focus of this analysis. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were present in 8.9% (12 of 135) and 4.3% (14 of 323) of patients in the PsA discovery and validation cohorts, respectively, 12.5% of patients (3 of 24) in the psoriasis group, 2.4% (1 of 41) of healthy controls, and 7.6% (5 of 66) each of patients in the RA and SLE groups. Anti-SOX5 were associated with female sex in both PsA cohorts (discovery: 15.7% women, 2.6% men, P = 0.006; validation: 6.3% women, 1.4% men, P = 0.049). In a longitudinal analysis adjusted for sex, anti-SOX5 associated with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment (95% vs 61%; P = 0.001; n = 96) and with differences in estimated treatment effects by mechanism of action. Anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies were identified in 8 of 124 patients (6.5%) in the PsA group. CONCLUSION: SOX-D transcription factors are novel psoriatic autoantigens. Anti-SOX5 antibodies were preferentially found in women with PsA and associated with specific clinical and treatment characteristics, suggesting that anti-SOX5 antibodies may identify mechanistic subgroups. We independently validated anti-ADAMTS-L5 autoantibodies in PsA.

Comparing anti-tumor and anti-self immunity in a patient with melanoma receiving immune checkpoint blockade.

BACKGROUND: Tumor regression following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is often associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs), marked by inflammation in non-cancerous tissues. This study was undertaken to investigate the functional relationship between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity, to facilitate irAE management while promoting anti-tumor immunity. METHODS: Multiple biopsies from tumor and inflamed tissues were collected from a patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB, who underwent rapid autopsy. Immune cells infiltrating melanoma lesions and inflamed normal tissues were subjected to gene expression profiling with multiplex qRT-PCR for 122 candidate genes. Subsequently, immunohistochemistry was conducted to assess the expression of 14 candidate markers of immune cell subsets and checkpoints. TCR-beta sequencing was used to explore T cell clonal repertoires across specimens. RESULTS: While genes involved in MHC I/II antigen presentation, IFN signaling, innate immunity and immunosuppression were abundantly expressed across specimens, irAE tissues over-expressed certain genes associated with immunosuppression (CSF1R, IL10RA, IL27/EBI3, FOXP3, KLRG1, SOCS1, TGFB1), including those in the COX-2/PGE2 pathway (IL1B, PTGER1/EP1 and PTGER4/EP4). Immunohistochemistry revealed similar proportions of immunosuppressive cell subsets and checkpoint molecules across samples. TCRseq did not indicate common TCR repertoires across tumor and inflammation sites, arguing against shared antigen recognition between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity in this patient. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive study of a single patient with melanoma experiencing both tumor regression and irAEs on ICB explores the immune landscape across these tissues, revealing similarities between anti-tumor and anti-self immunity. Further, it highlights expression of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway, which is known to be immunosuppressive and potentially mediates ICB resistance. Ongoing clinical trials of COX-2/PGE2 pathway inhibitors targeting the major COX-2 inducer IL-1B, COX-2 itself, or the PGE2 receptors EP2 and EP4 present new opportunities to promote anti-tumor activity, but may also have the potential to enhance the severity of ICB-induced irAEs.

Clinical Features and Immunogenetic Risk Factors Associated With Additional Autoantibodies in Anti-Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 1γ Juvenile-Onset Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: Novel autoantibody specificities including anti-CCAR1 were recently discovered in adult patients with anti-transcriptional intermediary factor (TIF1)-positive dermatomyositis (DM) and were associated with attenuated cancer emergence. The aims of the present study were to examine whether these autoantibodies occur in patients with juvenile-onset DM (JDM) and to determine their associated features. METHODS: Sera from 150 patients with anti-TIF1γ autoantibody-positive JDM in a cross-sectional cohort and 90 juvenile healthy controls were assayed for anti-CCAR1, anti-C1Z1, anti-IMMT, anti-TBL1XR1, and anti-Sp4 autoantibodies. Demographics, myositis autoantibodies, clinical features, medications, outcomes, and HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQA1 alleles were compared between those with and without these autoantibodies. RESULTS: Any one of the anti-TIF1γ-associated autoantibodies was present in 44 patients (29%) overall, including 25 (17%) with anti-Sp4, 22 (15%) with anti-TBL1XR1, 14 (9%) with anti-CCAR1, 2 (1%) with anti-C1Z1, and 2 (1%) with anti-IMMT autoantibodies. These anti-TIF1γ-associated autoantibodies frequently co-occurred. Patients with any of the anti-TIF1γ-associated autoantibodies had less frequent falling (34% [15] vs. 53% [56], P = 0.032) and lower peak muscle enzymes. None of the patients had cancer. Among White patients, HLA-DRB1*03 was protective against an anti-TIF1γ-associated autoantibody (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.52). CONCLUSION: Autoantibodies associated with anti-TIF1γ were found in isolation and in combination among a subset of patients with JDM. Patients with these autoantibodies had less severe muscle disease and were not enriched for HLA-DRB1*03. Additional autoantibodies among patients with positive anti-TIF1γ with JDM likely contribute to the heterogeneity of the anti-TIF1γ serologic subgroup.

Distinct Scleroderma Autoantibody Profiles Stratify Patients for Cancer Risk at Scleroderma Onset and During the Disease Course.

OBJECTIVES: We examined whether an array of scleroderma autoantibodies associates with risk of cancer and could be useful tools for risk stratification. METHODS: Scleroderma cancer cases and scleroderma controls without cancer from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center and the University of Pittsburgh Scleroderma Center were studied. Sera were assayed by Lineblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for autoantibodies against centromere, topoisomerase 1, RNA polymerase (POLR) 3, PM/Scl, Th/To, NOR90, U3 RNP, Ku, Ro52, U1RNP, and RNPC3. Logistic regression models were constructed to examine whether distinct autoantibodies associated with overall cancer at any time and cancer-associated scleroderma (cancer occurring three years before and after scleroderma onset). The effects of having more than one autoantibody on cancer were further examined using random forest analysis. RESULTS: A total of 676 cases and 687 controls were studied. After adjusting for relevant covariates, anti-POLR3 (odds ratio [OR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-2.11) and monospecific anti-Ro52 (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.29-3.74) were associated with an increased overall cancer risk, whereas anticentromere (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.93) and anti-U1RNP (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.93) were associated with lower risk. When examining risk of cancer-associated scleroderma, these immune responses remained associated with increased or decreased risk: anti-POLR3 (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.33-3.91), monospecific anti-Ro52 (OR 2.58, 95% CI 1.05-6.30), anticentromere (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.74), and anti-U1RNP (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11-0.93). Anti-Ro52 plus anti-U1RNP or anti-Th/To was associated with decreased cancer risk compared with anti-Ro52 alone. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that five distinct scleroderma immune responses, alone or in combination, may be useful tools to stratify the risk of cancer for scleroderma patients. Further study examining cancer risk in autoantibody subgroups relative to the general population is warranted.

The Type I Interferon Signature Reflects Multiple Phenotypic and Activity Measures in Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: The type 1 interferon (IFN) pathway is up-regulated in dermatomyositis (DM). We sought to define how organ-specific disease activity as well as autoantibodies and other clinical factors are independently associated with systemic type I IFN activity in adult patients with DM. METHODS: RNA sequencing was performed on 355 whole blood samples collected from 202 well-phenotyped DM patients followed up during the course of their clinical care. A previously defined 13-gene type I IFN score was modeled as a function of demographic, serologic, and clinical variables using both cross-sectional and longitudinal data. RESULTS: The pattern of type I IFN-driven transcriptional response was stereotyped across samples with a sequential modular activation pattern strikingly similar to systemic lupus erythematosus. The median type I IFN score was higher or lower in patients with anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA-5) or anti-Mi-2 antibodies, respectively, compared to patients without these antibodies. Absolute type I IFN score was independently associated with muscle and skin disease activity, interstitial lung disease, and anti-MDA-5 antibodies. Changes in the type I IFN score over time were significantly associated with changes in skin or muscle disease activity. Stratified analysis accounting for heterogeneity in organ involvement and antibody class revealed high correlation between changes in the type I IFN score and skin disease activity (Spearman's ρ = 0.84-0.95). CONCLUSION: The type I IFN score is independently associated with skin and muscle disease activity as well as certain clinical and serologic features in DM. Accounting for the effect of muscle disease and anti-MDA-5 status revealed that the type I IFN score is strongly correlated with skin disease activity, providing support for type I IFN blockade as a therapeutic strategy for DM.

Diagnostic Yield of Computed Tomography for Cancer Detection in a Tertiary Referral Population of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To inform guidance for cancer detection in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), we evaluated the diagnostic yield of computed tomography (CT) imaging for cancer screening/surveillance within distinct IIM subtypes and myositis-specific autoantibody strata. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study in IIM patients. Overall diagnostic yield (number of cancers diagnosed/number of tests performed), percentage of false positives (number of biopsies performed not leading to cancer diagnosis/number of tests performed), and test characteristics were determined on CT of the chest and abdomen/pelvis. RESULTS: Within the first 3 years since IIM symptom onset, a total of 9 of 1,011 (0.9%) chest CT scans and 12 of 657 (1.8%) abdomen/pelvis CT scans detected cancer. Diagnostic yields for both CT of the chest and CT of the abdomen/pelvis were highest in dermatomyositis, specifically anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ (2.9% and 2.4% for CT of the chest and abdomen/pelvis, respectively). The highest percentage of false positives was in patients with antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) (4.4%) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (4.4%) on CT of the chest, and ASyS (3.8%) on CT of the abdomen/pelvis. Patients ages <40 years old at IIM onset had both low diagnostic yields (0% and 0.5%) and high false-positive rates (1.9% and 4.4%) for CT of the chest and abdomen/pelvis, respectively. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary referral cohort of IIM patients, CT imaging has a wide range of diagnostic yield and frequency of false positives for contemporaneous cancer. These findings suggest that cancer detection strategies targeted according to IIM subtype, autoantibody positivity, and age may maximize cancer detection while minimizing the harms and costs of over-screening.

Anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis and remission in a single referral centre population.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a single-centre North American adult cohort of anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis patients, with emphasis on drug-free long-term remission. METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of anti-MDA5-positive DM patients. All consented patients seen in the Johns Hopkins Myositis Centre from 2003-2020 with suspected muscle disease were routinely screened for myositis-specific autoantibodies. All sera were screened for anti-MDA5 autoantibodies by line blot; positives were verified by enzyme-linked immunoassay. Patients whose sera were anti-MDA5 positive by both assays (n=52) were followed longitudinally. If clinical status was unavailable, structured telephone interviews were conducted. Clinical remission was defined as being off all immunosuppression >1 year while remaining asymptomatic. RESULTS: 38/52 (73%) of the patients were women with a median age at disease-onset of 47 (IQR 40-54). Twenty-five of the patients (48%) were White, 16 (30%) were Black and 3 (6%) were Asian. Most patients (42/52, 80%) had interstitial lung disease, defined by inflammatory or fibrotic changes on high resolution computed tomography (HRCT). 18/52 (35%) of patients required pulse-dose methylprednisolone, 4/52 (8%) experienced spontaneous pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum, 6/52 (12%) required intubation, and 5/52 (10%) died. Over longitudinal follow-up (median 3.5 years), 9 (18%) patients achieved clinical remission. The median time from symptom onset to clinical remission was 4 years, and the median duration of sustained remission was 3.5 years (range 1.4-7.8). No demographic or disease characteristics were significantly associated with remission. CONCLUSIONS: In this single centre, tertiary referral population of anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis, ~20% of patients experienced long-term drug-free remission after a median disease duration of 4 years. No clinical or biologic factors were associated with clinical remission.

Association of Anti-CCAR1 Autoantibodies With Decreased Cancer Risk Relative to the General Population in Patients With Anti-Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 1γ-Positive Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the disease specificity, clinical phenotype, and risk of cancer in dermatomyositis (DM) patients with autoantibodies against cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator protein 1 (anti-CCAR1). METHODS: The frequency of anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in the serum of DM patients from 2 independent cohorts (Johns Hopkins and Stanford), with patients with several other rheumatic diseases and healthy controls used as comparators. Clinical features and the risk of cancer incidence relative to that in the general population were determined in anti-CCAR1-positive DM patients. RESULTS: Anti-CCAR1 antibodies were significantly associated with anti-transcriptional intermediary factor 1γ (anti-TIF1γ) antibodies present in the serum of patients with DM: 80 (32%) of 252 anti-TIF1γ-positive DM patients versus 14 (8%) of 186 anti-TIF1γ-negative DM patients were positive for anti-CCAR1 antibodies (P < 0.001). Anti-CCAR1 antibodies were not detected in any of the 32 serum samples from healthy controls, and were present at very low frequencies in the sera of patients with other rheumatic diseases: 1 (2.3%) of 44 patients with anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-positive necrotizing myopathy, 1 (2.3%) of 44 patients with inclusion body myositis, and 3 (6.5%) of 46 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus were positive for anti-CCAR1 antibodies. Upon examining data on occurrence of cancer from the onset of DM onward, the observed number of cancers diagnosed in anti-TIF-1γ-positive DM patients was significantly greater than expected in both cohorts, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 3.49 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.39-4.92) in the Johns Hopkins cohort and a SIR of 4.54 (95% CI 3.04-6.52) in the Stanford cohort (each P < 0.001). DM patients who were both anti-TIF1γ positive and anti-CCAR1 positive had lower SIRs for cancer, with a SIR of 1.78 (95% CI 0.77-3.51) (P = 0.172) in the Johns Hopkins cohort and a SIR of 1.61 (95% CI 0.44-4.13) (P = 0.48) in the Stanford cohort. CONCLUSION: Anti-CCAR1 autoantibodies are specific for anti-TIF1γ-positive DM. Their presence in anti-TIF1γ-positive patients attenuates the risk of cancer to a level comparable to that seen in the general population.

Association between anti-SSSCA1 antibodies and cancer in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To define the clinical phenotype of SSc patients with antibodies against Sjogren's syndrome (SS)/scleroderma autoantigen 1 (SSSCA1), and to examine the association between these antibodies and cancer in SSc patients. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study using data from 209 patients with SSc and cancer, and 205 SSc patients without cancer. All were randomly selected from the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry. Antibodies against SSSCA1 were assayed by immunoprecipitation of 35S-methionine-labelled protein generated by in vitro transcription and translation. We performed logistic regression analysis to examine the relationship between anti-SSSCA1 antibodies and cancer. RESULTS: Among the 414 study patients, 31 (7%) were anti-SSSCA1 antibody positive. Antibody-positive patients were more likely to have severe RP, a lower minimum ejection fraction, a trend towards more severe heart involvement and a lower baseline diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide percent predicted than anti-SSSCA1-negative patients. Patients with cancer were significantly more likely to be anti-SSSCA1 positive compared with those without cancer [22/209 (11%) vs 9/205 (4%), respectively; P = 0.018]. Among patients with cancer, there was a trend towards longer cancer-SSc interval in anti-SSSCA1-positive patients compared with anti-SSSCA1-negative patients. Patients with anti-SSSCA1 antibodies had an increased adjusted risk of cancer (odds ratio 2.46, 95% CI 1.06, 5.70) compared with anti-SSSCA1-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest anti-SSSCA1 antibody status may be of utility as a cancer biomarker in SSc. Anti-SSSCA1-positive patients with SSc may be more likely to have severe Raynaud's and cardiac involvement.

Subsets of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis Enriched for Contemporaneous Cancer Relative to the General Population.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates cancer risk in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) relative to the general population. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of IIM patients and malignancy. Myositis-specific and -associated autoantibodies were determined by Euroimmun line blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunoprecipitation. We calculated standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs) and adjusted for calendar year, age, sex, race, and ethnicity by comparing observed cancers in IIM patients versus expected cancers in the general population using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry. RESULTS: Of 1,172 IIM patients, 203 (17%) patients with a cancer history were studied. Over a median follow-up of 5.2 years, the observed number of IIM patients diagnosed with cancer was increased 1.43-fold (SPR 1.43 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.15-1.77]; P = 0.002). Within 3 years of IIM symptom onset, an increased SPR was observed for anti-transcription intermediary factor 1γ (anti-TIF1γ)-positive patients for ovarian and breast cancer (ovarian SPR 18.39 [95% CI 5.01-47.08], P < 0.001; breast SPR 3.84 [95% CI 1.99-6.71], P < 0.001). As expected, anti-TIF1γ positivity was associated with a significantly elevated SPR; however, only 55% (36 of 66) of all cancers within 3 years of dermatomyositis onset were observed in anti-TIF1γ-positive patients. Other myositis-specific autoantibodies, including anti-Mi-2, anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier activating enzyme (SAE), and anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 (NXP-2), accounted for 26% (17 of 66) of cancers diagnosed within 3 years of dermatomyositis onset. No cancer association, positive or negative, was observed for patients with antisynthetase, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA-5), or anti-hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti-HMGCR) antibodies. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary referral center population, anti-TIF1γ was most strongly associated with breast and ovarian cancer. Patients with antisynthetase, anti-MDA-5, or anti-HMGCR antibodies had the same cancer risk as the general population.

Cessation of Immunomodulatory Medication Use in Dermatomyositis: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency with which adults with dermatomyositis (DM) are able to discontinue systemic immunomodulatory therapy and factors associated with medication cessation. METHODS: We studied a cohort of adult DM patients seen in a rheumatology/dermatology clinic between 2013 and 2020. All patients had exposure to at least 1 systemic immunomodulatory medication for a minimum of 3 months and were followed until medications were discontinued for at least 12 months. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank analyses, and multivariate analysis was done using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: A total of 246 DM patients were followed up for a median time of ∼7 years (47-134 months). Forty-seven patients (19%) discontinued all immunomodulatory medications with a median follow-up of ∼3 years (interquartile range 22-108 months) following DM onset. Log-rank analysis demonstrated that those with anti-MDA5 autoantibodies discontinued medications faster compared with those without autoantibodies (P = 0.03). Multivariate modeling showed that clinically amyopathic patients were 2.7-fold (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.34-5.59) more likely to discontinue medications than those with muscle disease. Those with anti-MDA5, anti-NXP2, and anti-SAE1 antibodies had increased likelihood of medication cessation with hazard ratios of 9.83 (95% CI 2.00-48.2), 8.92 (95% CI 1.69-47.0), and 10.8 (95% CI 2.06-56.6), respectively, when compared with the autoantibody-negative group. CONCLUSION: Approximately 20% of adult DM patients discontinued immunomodulatory medications over a median 7-year follow-up. Those with clinically amyopathic disease, anti-MDA5, anti-NXP2, and anti-SAE1 antibodies have a higher likelihood of medication cessation.

Cumulative disease damage and anti-PM/Scl antibodies are associated with a heavy burden of calcinosis in systemic sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Ectopic calcification (calcinosis) is a common complication of SSc, but a subset of SSc patients has a heavy burden of calcinosis. We examined whether there are unique risk factors for a heavy burden of calcinosis, as compared with a light burden or no calcinosis. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients in the Johns Hopkins Scleroderma Center Research Registry with calcinosis to quantify calcinosis burden using pre-specified definitions. We performed latent class analysis to identify SSc phenotypic classes. We used multinomial logistic regression to determine whether latent phenotypic classes and autoantibodies were independent risk factors for calcinosis burden. RESULTS: Of all patients, 29.4% (997/3388) had calcinosis, and 13.5% (130/963) of those with calcinosis had a heavy burden. The latent phenotypic class with predominantly diffuse skin disease and higher disease severity (characterized by pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, cardiomyopathy, severe RP, gastrointestinal involvement, renal crisis, myopathy and/or tendon friction rubs) was associated with an increased risk of both a heavy burden [odds ratio (OR) 6.92, 95% CI 3.66, 13.08; P < 0.001] and a light burden (OR 2.88, 95% CI 2.11, 3.95; P < 0.001) of calcinosis compared with the phenotypic class with predominantly limited skin disease. Autoantibodies to PM/Scl were strongly associated with a heavy burden of calcinosis (OR 17.31, 95% CI 7.72, 38.81; P < 0.001) and to a lesser degree a light burden of calcinosis (OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.84, 7.00; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Calcinosis burden is associated with cumulative SSc-related tissue damage. Independent of disease severity, autoantibodies to PM/Scl are also associated with a heavy burden of calcinosis.

Autoantibodies and Cancer Association: the Case of Systemic Sclerosis and Dermatomyositis.

Several rheumatic diseases have a perplexing association with cancer. Unraveling this mysterious connection is likely to provide deeper understanding regarding mechanisms governing the onset of both autoimmunity and cancer immunity, in addition to providing clinicians much needed guidance around whom and when to screen for occult malignancy. Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) and dermatomyositis are two diseases in which the association with internal malignancy is well-described and can be considered as models from which to gain important insights that likely have broader applicability. The past 15 years have witnessed a striking acceleration in understanding how these two diseases are related to cancer emergence-an important crack in this inscrutable armor has been the discovery and characterization of disease-specific autoantigens that are closely tied with risk of cancer emergence. The best-described examples of this are antibodies against anti-RNA polymerase III (anti-POL3) and transcription intermediary factor 1-gamma (anti-TIF1γ). Patients with systemic sclerosis and cancer that are diagnosed within a short time interval of each other frequently have anti-POL3 antibodies. Antibodies against the minor spliceosome protein RNA-Binding Region Containing 3 (RNPC3) are also associated with increased cancer incidence in systemic sclerosis. Similarly, in the dermatomyositis spectrum, the majority of anti-TIF1γ-associated cancers are detected around the time of DM onset (most often within 1 year). Antibodies against Nuclear Matrix Protein 2 are also potentially associated with increased cancer emergence in dermatomyositis. The systemic sclerosis/anti-POL3 connection with close cancer onset led to the first experiments directly supporting the concept that rheumatic disease may in fact be a manifestation of cancer. It is now clear that studying these diseases through the lens of autoantibodies can reveal relationships and insights that would otherwise remain obscured. Extending these studies, new findings show that antibodies against RNA polymerase I large subunit are associated with protection against short interval cancers in anti-POL3-positive systemic sclerosis patients. These insights highlight the fact that autoantigen discovery related to cancer emergence remains an important priority; such new tools will enable the testing of specific hypotheses regarding mechanisms governing disease emergence and development of effective anti-tumor responses. Autoantibody phenotype will likely play an important role in the development of cancer screening guidelines that are critically needed by clinicians taking care of these patients. In this review, we will summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the different ways in which autoantibodies are connected with systemic sclerosis/dermatomyositis and malignancy and highlight potential paths forward.

The DNA sensors AIM2 and IFI16 are SLE autoantigens that bind neutrophil extracellular traps.

Background: Nucleic acid binding proteins are frequently targeted as autoantigens in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other interferon (IFN)-linked rheumatic diseases. The AIM-like receptors (ALRs) are IFN-inducible innate sensors that form supramolecular assemblies along double-stranded (ds)DNA of various origins. Here, we investigate the ALR absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) as a novel autoantigen in SLE, with similar properties to the established ALR autoantigen interferon-inducible protein 16 (IFI16). We examined neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) as DNA scaffolds on which these antigens might interact in a pro-immune context. Methods: AIM2 autoantibodies were measured by immunoprecipitation in SLE and control subjects. Neutrophil extracellular traps were induced in control neutrophils and combined with purified ALR proteins in immunofluorescence and DNase protection assays. SLE renal tissues were examined for ALR-containing NETs by confocal microscopy. Results: AIM2 autoantibodies were detected in 41/131 (31.3%) SLE patients and 2/49 (4.1%) controls. Our SLE cohort revealed a frequent co-occurrence of anti-AIM2, anti-IFI16, and anti-DNA antibodies, and higher clinical measures of disease activity in patients positive for antibodies against these ALRs. We found that both ALRs bind NETs in vitro and in SLE renal tissues. We demonstrate that ALR binding causes NETs to resist degradation by DNase I, suggesting a mechanism whereby extracellular ALR-NET interactions may promote sustained IFN signaling. Conclusions: Our work suggests that extracellular ALRs bind NETs, leading to DNase resistant nucleoprotein fibers that are targeted as autoantigens in SLE. Funding: These studies were funded by NIH R01 DE12354 (AR), P30 AR070254, R01 GM 129342 (JS), K23AR075898 (CM), K08AR077100 (BA), the Jerome L. Greene Foundation and the Rheumatology Research Foundation. Dr. Antiochos and Dr. Mecoli are Jerome L. Greene Scholars. The Hopkins Lupus Cohort is supported by NIH grant R01 AR069572. Confocal imaging performed at the Johns Hopkins Microscopy Facility was supported by NIH Grant S10 OD016374.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE or lupus for short) is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks healthy tissue in organs across the body. The cause is unknown, but people with the illness make antibodies that stick to proteins that are normally found inside the cell nucleus, where DNA is stored. To make these antibodies, the immune system must first 'see' these proteins and mistakenly recognise them as a threat. But how does the immune system recognise proteins that are normally hidden inside cells? During infection, a type of immune cell called a neutrophil releases DNA from its nucleus to form structures called neutrophil extracellular traps, or NETs for short. The role of these NETs is to capture and kill pathogens, but they also expose the neutrophil's DNA and the proteins attached to it to other immune cells. It is therefore possible that other immune cells interacting with NETs during infection may contribute to the development of lupus. Two proteins of interest are AIM2 and IFI16. These proteins form large, shield-like structures around strands of DNA, and previous work has shown that some people with lupus make antibodies against IFI16. Antiochos et al. wondered whether IFI16 and AIM2 might stick to NETs, exposing themselves to the immune system. Examining the blood of people with lupus revealed that one in three of them made antibodies that could stick to AIM2. Those people were also more likely to have antibodies that could stick to IFI16 and to strands of DNA. Using microscopy, Antiochos et al. also found AIM2 and IFI16 on NETs in the kidneys of some people with lupus. Further investigation showed that the presence of AIM2 and IFI16 prevents NETs from breaking down. If proteins like AIM2 and IFI16 can stop NETs from breaking down, they could allow the immune system more time to develop antibodies against them. Further investigation could reveal whether this is one of the causes of lupus. A clearer understanding of the antibodies could also boost research into diagnosis and treatment.

Presence and Implications of Anti-Angiotensin Converting Enzyme-2 Immunoglobulin M Antibodies in Anti-Melanoma-Differentiation-Associated 5 Dermatomyositis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with anti-melanoma-differentiation-associated 5 (anti-MDA5)-positive dermatomyositis (DM) share several striking similarities to patients with SARS-CoV-2. Our objective was to assess the prevalence of anti-angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies, found in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2, in two independent anti-MDA5-positive DM cohorts. METHODS: Anti-ACE2 IgM antibodies were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in two anti-MDA5-positive DM cohorts: a predominantly outpatient North American cohort (n = 52) and a Japanese cohort enriched for new-onset disease (n = 32). Additionally, 118 patients with SARS-CoV-2 with a spectrum of clinical severity were tested for anti-MDA5 antibodies by ELISA. RESULTS: Five of fifty-two (9.6%) North American patients and five of thirty-two (15%) Japanese patients were positive for anti-ACE2 IgM. In the North American cohort, all five patients with anti-ACE2 IgM antibodies had proximal muscle weakness, had interstitial lung disease, were significantly more likely to receive pulse dose methylprednisolone (80% vs 30%, P = 0.043), and had worse forced vital capacity (median 59% predicted vs 78%, P = 0.056) compared with the anti-ACE2-IgM-negative group. In the Japanese cohort, all five anti-ACE2-IgM-positive patients also required pulse dose methylprednisolone, and three of five (60%) patients died. Japanese patients with anti-ACE2 IgM had significantly worse oxygenation, as defined by a lower partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio (233 vs 390, P = 0.021), and a higher alveolar-arterial oxygenation gradient (91 vs 23 mm Hg, P = 0.024) than the IgM-negative group. CONCLUSION: We describe anti-ACE2 IgM autoantibodies in two independent cohorts with anti-MDA5-positive DM. These autoantibodies may be biomarkers for severe disease and provide insight into disease pathogenesis.

Immune responses to CCAR1 and other dermatomyositis autoantigens are associated with attenuated cancer emergence.

BACKGROUNDThe temporal clustering of a cancer diagnosis with dermatomyositis (DM) onset is strikingly associated with autoantibodies against transcriptional intermediary factor 1-γ (TIF1-γ). Nevertheless, many patients with anti-TIF1-γ antibodies never develop cancer. We investigated whether additional autoantibodies are found in anti-TIF1-γ-positive patients without cancer.METHODSUsing a proteomic approach, we defined 10 previously undescribed autoantibody specificities in 5 index anti-TIF1-γ-positive DM patients without cancer. These were subsequently examined in discovery (n = 110) and validation (n = 142) cohorts of DM patients with anti-TIF1-γ autoantibodies.RESULTSWe identified 10 potentially novel autoantibodies in anti-TIF1-γ-positive DM patients, 6 with frequencies ranging from 3% to 32% in 2 independent DM cohorts. Autoantibodies recognizing cell division cycle and apoptosis regulator protein 1 (CCAR1) were the most frequent, and were significantly negatively associated with contemporaneous cancer (discovery cohort OR 0.27 [95% CI 0.7-1.00], P = 0.050; validation cohort OR 0.13 [95% CI 0.03-0.59], P = 0.008). When cancer did emerge, it occurred significantly later in anti-CCAR1-positive compared with anti-CCAR1-negative patients (median time from DM onset 4.3 vs. 0.85 years, respectively; P = 0.006). Cancers that emerged were more likely to be localized (89% of anti-CCAR1-positive cancers presenting at stage 0 or 1 compared with 42% of patients without anti-CCAR1 antibodies, P = 0.02). As the number of additional autoantibody specificities increased in anti-TIF1-γ-positive DM patients, the frequency of cancer decreased (P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONAs the diversity of immune responses in anti-TIF1-γ DM patients increases, the likelihood of cancer emerging decreases. Our findings have important relevance for cancer risk stratification in DM patients and for understanding natural immune regulation of cancer in humans.TRIAL REGISTRATIONNot applicable.FUNDING SOURCESThe NIH, the Donald B. and Dorothy L. Stabler Foundation, and the Huayi and Siuling Zhang Discovery Fund.

Advances at the Interface of Cancer and Systemic Sclerosis.

The interface between systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer has offered valuable insights into our understanding of SSc disease pathogenesis. Defining SSc subgroups both temporally and serologically has been instrumental in stratifying cancer risk, with autoantibodies to RNA polymerase 3 (RNApol3), RNA polymerase I large subunit (RPA194), RNA Binding Region Containing 3 (RNPC3), and centromere identifying subgroups at increased or decreased risk of cancer. Clinically, improved subgrouping of SSc patients provides the opportunity to detect cancer at earlier stages of disease while increasing our efficiency of cancer assessment. Additional studies are needed to define the optimal approach to cancer screening in SSc, and validation studies in different cohorts will be needed to confirm all findings.

A North American Cohort of Anti-SAE Dermatomyositis: Clinical Phenotype, Testing, and Review of Cases.

OBJECTIVE: Antibodies against the small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) activating enzyme (SAE) are one of the rarer specificities associated with dermatomyositis (DM). The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with anti-SAE autoantibodies in a North American cohort and to ascertain cancer prevalence. We also describe the performance characteristics of the line blotting (Euroimmun) method for antibody detection compared with an immunoprecipitation-based assay. METHODS: Sera from 2127 patients suspected of having myositis were assayed for myositis-specific autoantibodies using the Euroimmun platform. Those positive for SAE autoantibodies were assayed by a second method (immunoprecipitation) for confirmation. Only those cases positive by both methods were taken as definite cases of anti-SAE-positive DM. Chart reviews of these patients were completed to obtain information on clinical characteristics, cancer history, and treatment. RESULTS: Forty-three of 2127 sera were anti-SAE autoantibody positive by Euroimmun (≥15 units, +); of these, only 19 were confirmed positive by immunoprecipitation. All 19 cases had skin involvement and varying presentations of muscle, lung, and joint disease. Cancer occurred coincident with DM in two patients, and cancers were detected more than 5 years from symptom onset in three patients. In a population of suspected inflammatory myositis, a higher cutoff on line blot testing (≥36 units, ++) yielded better agreement with immunoprecipitation methods. CONCLUSION: SAE autoantibodies associate with a clinical phenotype of DM, which most commonly presents with a rash first, followed by muscle involvement and varying extramuscular involvement. As coincident cancer was seen in anti-SAE-positive DM, judicious malignancy screening may be warranted.