A six-week antibiotic treatment of endocarditis with spondylodiscitis is not associated with increased risk of relapse: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the relapse rate at 1 year in patients with vertebral osteomyelitis with or without associated endocarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were patients hospitalized in the infectious disease, rheumatology, cardiology, cardiovascular surgery and two internal medicine units for vertebral osteomyelitis (blood culture and/or disco-vertebral biopsy) and compatible imaging, between 2014 and 2017. We compared patients with associated endocarditis (VO-EI group) and without endocarditis (VO group) using logistic regression to determine the factors associated with relapse and EI. The main outcome was the relapse rate at 1 year. RESULTS: Out of the 207 eligible patients, 62 were included (35 in the VO group and 27 in the VO-EI group). Four patients presented with a new VO during follow-up, one (2.86%) patient in VO group and three (11.11%) in VO-EI group (P=0.68). There were more men in the VO-EI group than in the VO group (74.07% vs. 48.57%, P=0.04), valvulopathies (13/27 vs. 8/35, P=0.06), vertebral localization (1.22±0.50 vs. 1.03±0.17, P=0.04) and septic kidney embolism (5/27 vs. 0/35, P=0.01). Control blood cultures were more often positive in the VO-EI group (12/27 vs. 8/35, P=0.04). In 45% of patients, the germ was a staphylococcus, 29% streptococci, 10% enterococci, 10% gram-negative bacillus (GNB). There were more streptococci and enterococci in the VO-EI group than in the VO group (44.44% vs. 17.14% and 18.52% vs. 8.57%, respectively). Antibiotic safety was good and comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: In a relatively small population, we did not find significantly more relapse in the endocarditis group.

Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis (OP) is a major public health concern, but still OP care does not meet guidelines. Interventions have been developed to improve appropriate OP management. The objective of the present study was to systematically review the current literature to ascertain the efficacy of interventions to improve OP care and characterize interventions taking into account elements related to their potential cost and feasibility. Studies published from 2003 to 2018 were retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Wiley Online Library databases. Screening of references and quality assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. We classified interventions into three types according to the target of the intervention: health system (structural interventions), healthcare professional (HCP), and patient. Meta-analysis was performed by type of intervention and their effect on two outcomes: prescription of BMD measurement and prescription of OP therapy. A total of 4268 records were screened; 32 studies were included in the qualitative analysis and 29 studies in the quantitative analysis. Structural interventions strongly and significantly improved prescription of BMD measurement (OR = 9.99, 95% CI 2.05; 48.59) and treatment prescription (OR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.16; 6.75). The impact of HCP-centered interventions on BMD measurement prescription did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 0.84; 5.73) but significantly improved treatment prescription (OR = 3.82, 95% CI 2.16; 6.75). Interventions involving patients significantly improved the prescription of BMD measurement (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.62; 2.89) and treatment prescription (OR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.35; 2.14). Interventions to improve OP management had a significant positive impact on prescription of BMD measurement but a more limited impact on treatment prescription.