Outcomes and variables that impact pneumatic retinopexies.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of pneumatic retinopexy (PR) in patients undergoing PR as primary treatment for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and analyze the factors associated with success and failure in the studied population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was done of patients with RRD treated with PR as primary management method treated at New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai between January 2017 and December 2021. Primary outcome measured success or failure of PR. Secondary outcome measured best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after PR. A separate risk analysis was done to identify and stratify risks associated with success and failure of PR. RESULTS: A total of 179 eyes from 179 patients were included for final analysis. The 83 patients (46.37%) achieved anatomical reattachment of the retina after primary PR with no need for additional surgery. The 96 patients (53.63%) had a failed primary PR and required a PPV and 6 of them required pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with scleral buckle (SB). In total, 19 cases (10.61%) were done as temporizing pneumatics, 18 (94.74%) underwent PPV, and 1 (5.26%) did not require further intervention. The visual acuities at postoperative month 1 (POM1) for patients who underwent primary PR successfully and for those that underwent PPV after, were 0.58 (20/80) and 1.03 (20/200) respectively. Patients who met Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria had a statistically significant decreased risk of primary PR failing (hazard ratio 0.29, P=0.00). Majority of missed or new breaks were found superotemporally. CONCLUSION: PR is a good treatment option for treating RRDs in patients that meet PIVOT criteria and can be conducted as a temporizing measure. PIVOT criteria and fovea on status decrease the risk of PR failure.

Imaging of Macrophage-Like Cells in Living Human Retina Using Clinical OCT.

Purpose: To image retinal macrophages at the vitreoretinal interface in the living human retina using a clinical optical coherence tomography (OCT) device. Methods: Eighteen healthy controls and three patients with retinopathies were imaged using a clinical spectral-domain OCT. In controls, 10 sequential scans were collected at three different locations: (1) ∼9 degrees temporal to the fovea, (2) the macula, and (3) the optic nerve head (ONH). Intervisit repeatability was evaluated by imaging the temporal retina twice on the same day and 3 days later. Only 10 scans at the temporal retina were obtained from each patient. A 3-µm OCT reflectance (OCT-R) slab located above the inner limiting membrane (ILM) surface was averaged. Results: In controls, ramified macrophage-like cells with regular spatial separation were visualized in the temporal and ONH OCT-R images; however, cell structures were not resolvable at the macula. Interim changes in cell position suggestive of cell translocation were observed between images collected on the same day and those collected 3 days later. There was considerable variation in cell density and nearest-neighbor distance (NND) across controls. Mean ± SD cell densities measured at the temporal and ONH were 78 ± 23 cells/mm2 and 57 ± 16 cells/mm2, respectively. Similarly, mean ± SD NNDs measured at the temporal and ONH were 74.3 ± 13.3 µm and 93.3 ± 20.0 µm, respectively. Nonuniform spatial distribution and altered morphology of the cells were identified in patients with retinopathies. Conclusions: Our findings showed regular spatial separation and ramified morphology of macrophage-like cells on the ILM surface with cell translocation over time in controls. Their distribution and morphology suggest an origin of macrophage-like cells such as microglia or hyalocytes.

Late intraocular Lens dislocation following scleral depression: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The case describes a rare entity. Most cases of IOL dislocation are associated with surgical trauma or preexisting zonulopathy. This patient presents IOL dislocation following routine exam, suggesting the need of careful evaluation of zonular integrity on pseudopahkic patients. METHODS: Patient is a 65 year old who presented with sudden loss of vision and pain following retinal examination using scleral depression. Patient was diagnosed with late intraocular lens dislocation, which was subsequently for proper repositioning of IOL. CONCLUSION: Pseduophakic eyes should be approached with caution when scleral indentation is attempted due to the possibility of zonular dehiscence and subsequent intraocular lens dislocation.