The necessity of incorporating non-genetic risk factors into polygenic risk score models.

The growing public interest in genetic risk scores for various health conditions can be harnessed to inspire preventive health action. However, current commercially available genetic risk scores can be deceiving as they do not consider other, easily attainable risk factors, such as sex, BMI, age, smoking habits, parental disease status and physical activity. Recent scientific literature shows that adding these factors can improve PGS based predictions significantly. However, implementation of existing PGS based models that also consider these factors requires reference data based on a specific genotyping chip, which is not always available. In this paper, we offer a method naïve to the genotyping chip used. We train these models using the UK Biobank data and test these externally in the Lifelines cohort. We show improved performance at identifying the 10% most at-risk individuals for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coronary artery disease (CAD) by including common risk factors. Incidence in the highest risk group increases from 3.0- and 4.0-fold to 5.8 for T2D, when comparing the genetics-based model, common risk factor-based model and combined model, respectively. Similarly, we observe an increase from 2.4- and 3.0-fold to 4.7-fold risk for CAD. As such, we conclude that it is paramount that these additional variables are considered when reporting risk, unlike current practice with current available genetic tests.

Comparison of Machine Learning Models Including Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Data and Mortality After Cardiac Surgery.

Importance: A variety of perioperative risk factors are associated with postoperative mortality risk. However, the relative contribution of routinely collected intraoperative clinical parameters to short-term and long-term mortality remains understudied. Objective: To examine the performance of multiple machine learning models with data from different perioperative periods to predict 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality and investigate factors that contribute to these predictions. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study using prospectively collected data, risk prediction models were developed for short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac surgery. Included participants were adult patients undergoing a first-time valve operation, coronary artery bypass grafting, or a combination of both between 1997 and 2017 in a single center, the University Medical Centre Groningen in the Netherlands. Mortality data were obtained in November 2017. Data analysis took place between February 2020 and August 2021. Exposure: Cardiac surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postoperative mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were the primary outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess discrimination. The contribution of all preoperative, intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature, and postoperative factors to mortality was investigated using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values. Results: Data from 9415 patients who underwent cardiac surgery (median [IQR] age, 68 [60-74] years; 2554 [27.1%] women) were included. Overall mortality rates at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years were 268 patients (2.8%), 420 patients (4.5%), and 612 patients (6.5%), respectively. Models including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data achieved AUROC values of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.86), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84) for 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality, respectively. Models including only postoperative data performed similarly (30 days: 0.78 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]; 1 year: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]; 5 years: 0.77 [95% CI, 0.73-0.82]). However, models based on all perioperative data provided less clinically usable predictions, with lower detection rates; for example, postoperative models identified a high-risk group with a 2.8-fold increase in risk for 5-year mortality (4.1 [95% CI, 3.3-5.1]) vs an increase of 11.3 (95% CI, 6.8-18.7) for the high-risk group identified by the full perioperative model. Postoperative markers associated with metabolic dysfunction and decreased kidney function were the main factors contributing to mortality risk. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that the addition of continuous intraoperative hemodynamic and temperature data to postoperative data was not associated with improved machine learning-based identification of patients at increased risk of short-term and long-term mortality after cardiac operations.

Ensemble machine learning prediction and variable importance analysis of 5-year mortality after cardiac valve and CABG operations.

Despite having a similar post-operative complication profile, cardiac valve operations are associated with a higher mortality rate compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations. For long-term mortality, few predictors are known. In this study, we applied an ensemble machine learning (ML) algorithm to 88 routinely collected peri-operative variables to predict 5-year mortality after different types of cardiac operations. The Super Learner algorithm was trained using prospectively collected peri-operative data from 8241 patients who underwent cardiac valve, CABG and combined operations. Model performance and calibration were determined for all models, and variable importance analysis was conducted for all peri-operative parameters. Results showed that the predictive accuracy was the highest for solitary mitral (0.846 [95% CI 0.812-0.880]) and solitary aortic (0.838 [0.813-0.864]) valve operations, confirming that ensemble ML using routine data collected perioperatively can predict 5-year mortality after cardiac operations with high accuracy. Additionally, post-operative urea was identified as a novel and strong predictor of mortality for several types of operation, having a seemingly additive effect to better known risk factors such as age and postoperative creatinine.