Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
Ann Ital Chir ; 86(4): 371-7, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26344494

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Body packing is a way to deliver packages of drugs hidden in body cavities. In Europe, as noted the latest report coming from the Brussels observatory, there are 74 million drugs consumers. Italy is in pole position and Perugia was considered as a "capital city" in the drug market. Body packers usually swallow the drug packets, although their insertion into the rectum and vagina has also been reported. The management depends on whether or not the patient becomes symptomatic. Surgery is indicated in presence of repeated bouts of drug toxicity not controlled by medical treatment, radiological evidence of packet retention in the stomach, intestinal obstruction or perforation. It is also important to emphasize that, in a multidisciplinary context, the patient's management before reaching the operating theater if symptomatic, is aimed to stabilization and is usually demanded to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) physicians. We present our center recent experience with body packers, managed both with surgical and conservative treatments. KEY WORDS: Body packers, Drugs, Emergency surgery, Foreign bodies.


Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador , Tráfico de Drogas , Corpos Estranhos/terapia , Obstrução Intestinal/terapia , Cocaína , Feminino , Corpos Estranhos/cirurgia , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Itália , Reto
2.
Int J Surg ; 21 Suppl 1: S40-3, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26118603

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Spleen-preserving left pancreatectomy (SPDP) with splenic vessels preservation (SVP) or without (Warshaw technique, WT) has been described with robotic, laparoscopy and open surgery. Nevertheless, significant data on medium- and long-term follow-up are still not available, since data in literature are scarce and the level of evidence is low. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we describe and compare short and medium term results of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in eight patients. RESULTS: In WT group the duration and the intraoperative bleeding was superior than SVP group. The incidence of perigastric collateral vessels and presence of submucosal varices evidenced at CT scan was 66% in WT group, while only one case occurred in SVP group. DISCUSSION: The limit of laparoscopic approach is the fact that it needs advanced laparoscopic skills, which might result in intraoperative bleeding and splenectomy. The most of literature considered salvage WT intraoperatively performed in case of classical SVP and not only elective WT. The consequence is that there is no difference in immediate postoperative results (operative time, intraoperative bleeding, hospital stay) that are in favour of SVP because WT is performed only in case of failure in preserving the splenic vessels. In fact when this intervention is performed electively, the procedure time is reduced as well as the intraoperative bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: WT is safe and feasible, even if there are not definitive evidences that demonstrate it is superior to classic SVP. RCTs are needed to determine advantages and disadvantages of WT compared to the classic SVP.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Baço/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
World J Surg Oncol ; 12: 372, 2014 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25475024

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is rarely performed, and it has not been particularly successful due to its technical complexity. The objective of this study is to highlight how robotic surgery could improve a minimally invasive approach and to expose the usefulness of robotic surgery even in complex surgical procedures. CASE PRESENTATION: The surgical technique employed in our center to perform a pancreaticoduodenectomy, which was by means of the da Vinci™ robotic system in order to remove a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor, is reported. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic technology has improved significantly over the traditional laparoscopic approach, representing an evolution of minimally invasive techniques, allowing procedures to be safely performed that are still considered to be scarcely feasible or reproducible.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Idoso , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologia , Feminino , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Humanos , Laparoscopia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão , Prognóstico , Piloro
4.
World J Surg Oncol ; 12: 295, 2014 Sep 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25248464

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is a surgical procedure performed to remove the pancreatic tail jointly with a variable part of the pancreatic body and including a spleen resection in the case of conventional distal pancreatectomy or not in the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: In this article, we describe a standardized operative technique for fully robotic distal pancreatectomy. RESULTS: In the last decade, the use of robotic systems has become increasingly common as an approach for benign and malignant pancreatic disease treatment. Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy (RDP) is an emerging technology for which sufficient data to draw definitive conclusions in surgical oncology are still not available because the follow-up period after surgery is too short (less than 2 years). CONCLUSIONS: RDP is an emerging technology for which sufficient data to draw definitive conclusions of value in surgical oncology are still not available, however this techniques is safe and reproducible by surgeons that possess adequate skills.


Assuntos
Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/métodos , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Robótica/métodos , Baço/cirurgia , Humanos , Prognóstico
5.
Ann Ital Chir ; 85(4): 397-403, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25264076

RESUMO

AIM: To describe three cases of solitary cecal diverticulum, and trying to evaluate the better method of diagnosis and treatment with analysis of the literature. MATERIAL OF STUDY: Description of three cases of solitary cecal diverticulum's perforation admitted in the Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, during the period January 2011 - January 2012. RESULTS: In all patients the clinical presentation was very similar to that of acute appendicitis. Preoperative diagnosis was achieved in one case through abdominal CT scan, other two cases were identified at final pathology. At one year from the treatment all patient are still alive. DISCUSSION: Cecal diverticulum is a rare condition, often diagnosed either casually or because of inflammatory or perforative complications. The highest incidence is found in Western population. Because of the clinical presentation, very similar to the appendicitis, and the inflammatory reaction involving the colon and its surrounding tissues, the pre- and intra-operative diagnosis are very difficult. The diagnosis is almost always histological. The treatment may vary from simple expectant medical management, carried out with bowel rest, parenteral support and antibiotics as for left-sided diverticulitis, to surgical approach, performed through simple diverticulectomy or by classical right hemicolectomy. CONCLUSION: Pre-surgical and, also intra-operative, diagnosis of perforated solitary cecal diverticulum is clearly difficult. CT scan represents the gold standard for the differential diagnosis. Right hemicolectomy is an effective and safe approach, allowing accurate control, preventing complications and recurrences, and it represents the optimal management of the disease.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ceco/complicações , Divertículo/complicações , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Adulto , Apendicite/diagnóstico , Doenças do Ceco/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Divertículo/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
World J Surg Oncol ; 12: 144, 2014 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24884768

RESUMO

Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is the most common congenital anomaly of the gastrointestinal tract and is caused by incomplete obliteration of the vitelline duct during intrauterine life. MD affects less than 2% of the population. In most cases, MD is asymptomatic and the estimated average complication risk of MD carriers, which is inversely proportional to age, ranges between 2% and 4%. The most common MD-related complications are gastrointestinal bleeding, intestinal obstruction and acute phlogosis. Excision is mandatory in the case of symptomatic diverticula regardless of age, while surgical treatment for asymptomatic diverticula remains controversial. According to the majority of studies, the incidental finding of MD in children is an indication for surgical resection, while the management of adults is not yet unanimous. In this case report, we describe the prophylactic resection of an incidentally detected MD, which led to the removal of an occult mucosal carcinoid tumor. In literature, the association of MD and carcinoid tumor is reported as a rare finding. Even though the strategy for adult patients of an incidental finding of MD during surgery performed for other reasons divides the experts, we recommend prophylactic excision in order to avoid any further risk.


Assuntos
Tumor Carcinoide/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Divertículo Ileal/complicações , Adulto , Tumor Carcinoide/etiologia , Tumor Carcinoide/cirurgia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/etiologia , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/cirurgia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Masculino , Divertículo Ileal/cirurgia , Prognóstico
7.
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg ; 20(2): 91-6, 2014 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24740333

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The spleen is the most easily injured organ in abdominal trauma. The conservative, operative approach has been challenged by several reports of successful non-operative management aided by the power of modern diagnostic imaging. The aim of our retrospective study was to compare non-operative management with surgery for cases of splenic injury. METHODS: We compared seven patients who were treated with non-operative management (NOM) between 2007 and 2011 to six patients with similar pre-operative characteristics who underwent operative management (OM). RESULTS: The average hospital stay was lower in the NOM group than in the OM group, although the difference was not statistically significant. The NOM group required significantly fewer transfusions, and no patients in the NOM group required admission to the intensive care unit. In contrast 83% of patients in the OM group were admitted to the intensive care unity. The failure rate of NOM was 14.3% in our experience. CONCLUSION: In our experience, NOM is the treatment of choice for grade I, II and III blunt splenic injuries. NOM is slightly less than surgery, but this is an unadjusted comparison and the 95% confidence interval is extremely wide - from 0.04 to 16.99. Splenectomy was the chosen technique in patients who met exclusion criteria for NOM, as well as for patients with grade IV and V injury.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais/epidemiologia , Baço/lesões , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Traumatismos Abdominais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Itália/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
8.
Surg Oncol ; 23(2): 92-8, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726745

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pancreatic or duodenal invasion by locally advanced right colon cancer is an unusual event whose management still represents a surgical challenge. This review aims to compare results of limited vs. extended resection in case of primary right colon cancer invading pancreas and/or duodenum. METHODS: A systematic search in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was performed. All trials describing the surgical treatment of right colon cancer invading pancreas and/or duodenum were considered. A data extraction sheet was developed, based on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's data extraction template. RESULTS: 5-years overall survival was 52% after en bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy plus right hemicolectomy vs. 0 and 25% in case of duodenal resection with correction by direct suture or pedicled ileal flap, respectively. 30-day postoperative morbidity rate was slightly higher after en block resections (12.8%) with respect to duodenal local resection and direct suture or pedicled ileal flap repair (0 and 12.2%, respectively). After extended resection the rate of pancreatico-jejunal anastomotic leakage was 7.7%. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with right colon cancer extended to the pancreas and/or duodenum surgical multivisceral resection is suggested when complete tumour removal (R0) is achievable. Even though no significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality have been shown, 5 y OS has improved in extended resections as compared to duodenal local resection with defect repair either by direct suture or by a pedicled ileal flap.


Assuntos
Colectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Duodenais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Neoplasias do Colo/patologia , Neoplasias Duodenais/patologia , Humanos , Invasividade Neoplásica , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Prognóstico
9.
In Vivo ; 27(6): 827-33, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24292589

RESUMO

Currently melanoma has the fastest growing incidence of all cancers in men and the second in women (after lung cancer) in Western countries. Since prognosis of skin melanoma is excellent in early stages but dramatically worsens in advanced stages, an early diagnosis is fundamental in granting patients a favorable outcome. Sentinel node (SN) biopsy represents the gold standard for accurately staging melanoma, but other tests are commonly endorsed both in the initial staging work-up and in the follow-up, such as ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT)-scan and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT. PET-CT, among others, has high sensitivity and specificity for the study of distant metastases, the assessment of soft tissues and lymph node involvement, and for the guidance of surgical biopsies. Ultrasonography (US) is a non-invasive procedure whose use has recently expanded in our service, both preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively, thanks to its wide availability, low costs and easy and fast reproducibility; ultrasonography even surpassed the reliability of PET-CT or CT-scan in the seven cases presented herein. US is operator-dependent, and this is probably the major limitation of the procedure, together with lack of prospective studies validating its strength, but our preliminary study demonstrates that ultrasound can assume an important role in melanoma, both for staging and the follow-up of patients, especially with lymph nodal or subcutaneous involvement.


Assuntos
Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Melanoma/secundário , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/secundário , Ultrassonografia
10.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 12(3): 270-7, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23742772

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common type of primary liver tumor and its incidence is increasing worldwide. The study aimed to compare patients subjected to liver resection or radiofrequency ablation. METHODS: One hundred and forty cirrhotic patients in stage A or B of Child-Pugh with single nodular or multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 87 underwent surgical resection, and 53 underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Patient characteristics, survival, and recurrence-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Recurrence-free survival was longer in the resection group in comparison to the radiofrequency group with a median recurrence-free time of 36 versus 26 months, respectively (P=0.01, HR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.25). In the resection group, median survival was 46 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 89.7%, 72.4% and 40.2%. In the radiofrequency group, median survival was 32 months, with the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of 83.0%, 43.4% and 22.6% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection improves the overall survival and recurrence-free survival in comparison with radiofrequency ablation. New evidences are needed to define the real role of the percutaneous technique as an alternative to surgery.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter , Hepatectomia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Cateter/mortalidade , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Hepatectomia/efeitos adversos , Hepatectomia/mortalidade , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrose Hepática/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
In Vivo ; 27(3): 383-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23606695

RESUMO

Patients undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer have to face a long and elaborated therapeutic path, very often burdened by reoperation to replace the temporary expander, used to enlarge the submuscular pouch, with a definitive implant. Postoperative planning represents a critical moment of care, as it requires the integration of multiple treatments (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonotherapy) each with a specific deadline. We believe that in such a complex multidisciplinary approach, coordination among the different therapeutic phases should be the key to success. The aim of the Breast Unit is to manage rapidly the ad hoc paths set out for each patient in order to guarantee compliance with adequate therapeutic timing. With this purpose in mind we tested the advantage of immediate reconstruction with definitive implants, by using a polypropylene mesh which, prolonging the inferolateral profile of the pectoralis major muscle (PMM), allows for direct accommodation of the desired implant volume. This leads to a single-step surgical approach, guaranteeing at the same time reduced interference with adjuvant therapies and good aesthetic results. We applied this technique to 4 patients, one of which was bilateral and, in spite of the restricted number of cases, our results seem to be promising.


Assuntos
Implante Mamário , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia , Idoso , Implantes de Mama , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
In Vivo ; 27(3): 387-94, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23606696

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) is the current surgical alternative to conventional techniques, when mastectomy is required. This less invasive procedure safeguards the integrity of the nipple areola complex (NAC), whose removal is recognized as a factor that exacerbates the patient's feeling of mutilation, however ensuring oncological radicality for women with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2003 to January 2011, 77 patients underwent Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM). Patients were carefully selected according to specific criteria. When requested, postoperative radiotherapy on the residual glandular tissue was performed within 6 months of surgery. Patients were on close clinical and instrumental follow-up every 4 months for 2 years and every 6 months for the remaining 3 years. RESULTS: Of the 77 patients who underwent NSM, 10 suffering from bilateral cancer were subjected to bilateral procedure, for a total of 87 performed procedures. Furthermore, in the same group, 13 NSMs were carried out for preventive purposes. The average diameter of resected tumors was 13.5 mm, with a range of 2 to 25 mm. During the follow-up (range 23-115 months, mean 50.33 months) 2 locoregional recurrences in the NAC were observed, identified through instrumental check, and surgically treated by NAC removal after 33 and 37 months respectively. CONCLUSION: According to the litterature data and confirmed by our experience, we consider NSM as an oncologically safe technique that, in the respect of inclusion criteria may be performed in any patient with indication to mastectomy. A careful selection of patients by a multidisciplinary team according to strict criteria is the key in determining feasibility as well as oncological safety and should lead the general acceptance and widespread use of such surgical technique.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Mastectomia , Mamilos/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Onco Targets Ther ; 6: 267-72, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23569390

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In asymptomatic patients with Stage IV colorectal cancer, the debate continues over the efficacy of primary resection compared to chemotherapy alone. The aim of this study was to define the optimal management for asymptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and unresectable liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving elective surgery (n = 17) were compared to patients receiving chemotherapy only (n = 31). Data concerning patients' demographics, location of primary tumor, comorbidities, performance status, Child-Pugh score, extension of liver metastases, size of primary, and other secondary locations were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality after chemotherapy was lower than that after surgical resection (19.3% versus 29.4%; not significant). In patients with >75% hepatic involvement, mortality at 1 month was higher after receiving surgical treatment than after chemotherapy alone (50% versus 25%). In patients with <75% hepatic involvement, 30-day mortality was similar in both groups (not significant). Thirty-day mortality in patients with Stage T3 was lower in those receiving chemotherapy (16.7% versus 30%; not significant). Overall survival was similar in both groups. The risk of all-cause death after elective surgery (2.1) was significantly higher than in patients receiving chemotherapy only (P = 0.035). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that in palliative treatment of asymptomatic unresectable Stage IV colorectal cancer, the overall risk of death was significantly higher after elective surgery compared to patients receiving chemotherapy alone. However, in the literature, there is no substantial difference between these treatments. New studies are required to better evaluate outcomes.

14.
World J Surg Oncol ; 10: 155, 2012 Jul 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22846499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib are a new family of biological drugs, recently available to treat metastatic malignant melanoma. METHODS: We present the case of a 38-year-old man affected by metastatic melanoma who had been under treatment with vemurafenib for a few days. The patient suffered from sudden onset of abdominal pain due to intra-abdominal hemorrhage with profuse hemoperitoneum. An emergency abdominal sonography confirmed the clinical suspicion of a splenic rupture. RESULTS: The intraoperative finding was hemoperitoneum due to splenic two-step rupture and splenectomy was therefore performed. Histopathology confirmed splenic hematoma and capsule laceration, in the absence of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the occurrence of a previously unreported adverse event in a patient with stage IV melanoma receiving vemurafenib.


Assuntos
Indóis/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/antagonistas & inibidores , Ruptura Esplênica/etiologia , Sulfonamidas/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/secundário , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Ruptura Espontânea , Esplenectomia , Ruptura Esplênica/cirurgia , Vemurafenib
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA