Assessing Laryngectomy Patient Education on YouTube: Investigating Quality and Reliability.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the quality of laryngectomy-related patient education on YouTube and understand factors impacting video content quality. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort analysis. Setting: Laryngectomy-related videos on YouTube. Methods: YouTube was anonymously queried for various laryngectomy procedure search terms. Video quality was evaluated using the validated DISCERN instrument which assesses treatment-related information quality. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize our cohort. Univariate and multivariable linear regression were used to assess factors associated with increased DISCERN score. Significance was set at P < .05. Results: Our 78-video cohort exhibited moderate levels of engagement, averaging 13,028.40 views (SD = 24,246.93), 69.79 likes (SD = 163.75), and 5.27 comments (SD = 18.81). Videos were most frequently uploaded to accounts belonging to physicians (43.59%) or health care groups (41.03%) and showcased operations (52.56%) or physician-led education (20.51%). Otolaryngologists were featured in most videos (85.90%), and most videos originated outside the United States (67.95%). Laryngectomy videos demonstrated poor reliability (mean = 2.35, SD = 0.77), quality of treatment information (mean = 1.92, SD = 0.86), and overall video quality (mean = 1.97, SD = 1.12). In multivariable linear regression, operative videos were associated with lower video quality relative to nonoperative videos (ß = -1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-2.03 to -1.24], P < .001); the opposite was true for videos from accounts with higher subscriber counts (ß = 0.02, 95% CI = [0.01-0.03], P = .005). Conclusion: The quality and quantity of YouTube's laryngectomy educational content is limited. There is an acute need to increase the quantity and quality of online laryngectomy-related content to better support patients and caregivers as they cope with their diagnosis, prepare for, and recover from surgery.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of PET-CT Surveillance After Treatment of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of surveillance imaging with PET/CT scan among patients with human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis. SETTING: Oncologic care centers in the United States with head and neck oncologic surgeons and physicians. METHODS: We compared the cost-effectiveness of 2 posttreatment surveillance strategies: clinical surveillance with the addition of PET/CT scan versus clinical surveillance alone in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. We constructed a Markov decision model which was analyzed from a third-party payer's perspective using 1-year Markov cycles and a 30-year time horizon. Values for transition probabilities, costs, health care utilities, and their studied ranges were derived from the literature. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PET/CT with clinical surveillance versus clinical surveillance alone was $89,850 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Flexible fiberoptic scope exams during clinical surveillance would have to be over 51% sensitive or PET/CT scan cost would have to exceed $1678 for clinical surveillance alone to be more cost-effective. The willingness-to-pay threshold at which imaging surveillance was equally cost-effective to clinical surveillance was approximately $80,000/QALY. CONCLUSION: Despite lower recurrence rates of human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer, a single PET/CT scan within 6 months after primary treatment remains a cost-effective tool for routine surveillance when its cost does not exceed $1678. The cost-effectiveness of this strategy is also dependent on the clinical surveillance sensitivity (flexible fiberoptic pharyngoscopy), and willingness-to-pay thresholds which vary by country.

Differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes among minority head and neck cancer patient groups in Los Angeles County.

IMPORTANCE: While minorities represent around 20 % of all HNC patients, these demographics are largely understudied. Furthermore, trends in national studies may not always be fully replicated in locoregional populations, indicating a need for more nuanced study. OBJECTIVE: To better understand our patient population, we sought to understand differences in presentation, management, and outcome between Caucasians and minority groups with HNC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the Los Angeles County Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. SETTING: Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in Los Angeles County diagnosed with cancer of the head and neck from January 1, 1988 to December 31, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome in our study was significant differences between racial and ethnic groups in age of diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic quintile, insurance status, stage at diagnosis, treatment modality, time to first treatment, and cancer-specific cause of death. RESULTS: Our 18,510-patient cohort was largely male (64.35 %), white (69.57 %), and were on average 62.84 years old (SD = 20.07). When stratifying patients by race and ethnicity, significant differences were found in average age at diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic quintile, insurance status, and stage at diagnosis, treatment modalities utilized, and time to first treatment (all p < 0.001). Relative to all other head and neck patients, minority groups were significantly younger, had lower proportions of male patients, were less likely to pursue surgery, were more likely to pursue chemotherapy or radiation, and endorsed longer time to first treatment (all p < 0.001). The distribution of socioeconomic quintile (all p < 0.001), insurance status (all p < 0.001), and stage at diagnosis (all p < 0.05) also significantly varied between minority and reference groups. Only African Americans exhibited significantly higher rates of cancer-specific cause of death relative to non-African Americans (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pervasive socioeconomic disparities between Caucasian HNC patients and those of other minority racial and ethnic groups in Los Angeles County that likely and significantly impact the diagnosis and management of HNC and its resultant outcomes. We encourage others to similarly examine their local populations to tailor the quality of care provided to patients.

An Exploratory Analysis of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Online Support Community.

Objective: To characterize the users of the largest chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) online support communities (OSCs), describe the perceived benefits of OSCs for their users, and understand how patient medical decision making is affected by membership in OSCs. Study Design: Cross-sectional online survey. Setting: Online. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was adapted from the existing literature on patient support groups and modified for CRS patients. The survey was posted on multiple Facebook/Reddit groups aimed at providing support toward patients with CRS. Survey data was collected over 3 months and analyzed thereafter. Results: There were 127 total participants. The majority were female (65.35%), white (76.98%), and the median age was 38 years. Just under half of patients had nasal polyps (48.67%) and 54.54% had undergone surgery. Many participants (69.42%) reported engaging in the OSC at least multiple times per month. The most common reason for joining an OSC was to learn tips on how to manage CRS (89.7%) and the most achieved goal from membership was hearing from others undergoing a similar experience (79.5%). Involvement in an OSC impacted knowledge of CRS in 87.41% of participants. Most users (81.1%) would recommend membership in an OSC and 54.33% reported the OSC influenced their medical decision-making. Conclusion: A majority of patients with CRS who frequently engage in an OSC for CRS have a positive experience. OSCs are a resource that CRS patients utilize to manage their disease.

Free Flap Outcomes for Head and Neck Surgery in Patients with COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects the vascular system, subjecting patients to a hypercoagulable state. This is of particular concern for the success of microvascular free flap reconstruction. This study aims to report head and neck free flap complications in patients with COVID-19 during the perioperative period. We believe these patients are more likely to experience flap complications given the hypercoagulable state. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective case series of patients infected with COVID-19 during the perioperative period for head and neck free flap reconstruction from March 2020 to January 2022. RESULTS: Data was collected on 40 patients from 14 institutions. Twenty-one patients (52.5%) had a positive COVID-19 test within 10 days before surgery and 7 days after surgery. The remaining patients had a positive test earlier than 10 days before surgery. A positive test caused a delay in surgery for 16 patients (40.0%) with an average delay of 44.7 days (9-198 days). Two free flap complications (5.0%) occurred with no free flap deaths. Four patients (10.0%) had surgical complications and 10 patients had medical complications (25.0%). Five patients (12.5%) suffered from postoperative COVID-19 pneumonia. Three deaths were COVID-19-related and one from cancer recurrence during the study period. CONCLUSION: Despite the heightened risk of coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients, head and neck free flap reconstructions in patients with COVID-19 are not at higher risk for free flap complications. However, these patients are at increased risk of medical complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 2023.

Opioid Sparing Multimodal Analgesia for Transoral Robotic Surgery: Improved Analgesia and Narcotic Use Reduction.

Objective: To compare postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in patients after transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Study Design: Single institution retrospective cohort study. Setting: TORS was performed at a single academic tertiary care center. Methods: This study compared traditional opioid-based and opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia (MMA) regimens in patients with oropharyngeal and supraglottic malignancy after TORS. Data were obtained from the electronic health records from August 2016 to December 2021. The average postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents were calculated for postoperative days (PODs) 0 to 3. The secondary objectives were to quantify and characterize opioid prescriptions upon hospital discharge. Results: A total of 114 patients were identified for this study, 58 patients in the non-MMA cohort and 56 in the MMA cohort. Postoperative pain levels in the MMA cohort were statistically lower on POD 0 (p = 0.001), POD 1 (p = 0.001), and POD 3 (p = 0.004). Postoperative opioid consumption decreased significantly in the MMA cohort from 37.7 to 10.8 mg on POD 0 (p = 0.002), 65.9 to 19.9 mg on POD 1 (p < 0.001), 36.0 to 19.3 mg on POD 2 (p = 0.02), and 45.4 to 13.8 mg on POD 3 (p = 0.02). The number of patients discharged from the hospital with a prescription for narcotics was significantly lower in the MMA cohort (71.4%) compared with the non-MMA cohort (98.3%) (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Implementation of our MMA pain protocol reduced pain levels and narcotic consumption in the immediate postoperative period.