Unmet needs and barriers in venous thromboembolism education and awareness among people living with cancer: a global survey.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in subjects with cancer. A global appraisal of cancer-associated VTE education and awareness is not available. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate VTE-related education, awareness, and unmet needs from the perspective of people living with cancer using a quantitative and qualitative approach. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from an online-based survey covering multidimensional domains of cancer-associated VTE. Data are presented descriptively. Potential differences across participant subgroups were explored. RESULTS: Among 2262 patients with cancer from 42 countries worldwide, 55.3% received no VTE education throughout their cancer journey, and an additional 8.2% received education at the time of VTE diagnosis only, leading to 63.5% receiving no or inappropriately delayed education. When education was delivered, only 67.8% received instructions to seek medical attention in case of VTE suspicion, and 36.9% reported scarce understanding. One-third of participants (32.4%) felt psychologically distressed when becoming aware of the potential risks and implications connected with cancer-associated VTE. Most responders (78.8%) deemed VTE awareness highly relevant, but almost half expressed concerns about the quality of education received. While overall consistent, findings in selected survey domains appeared to numerically differ across age group, ethnicity, continent of residence, educational level, metastatic status, and VTE history. CONCLUSION: This study involving a large and diverse population of individuals living with cancer identifies important unmet needs in VTE-related education, awareness, and support across healthcare systems globally. These findings unveil multilevel opportunities to expedite patient-centered care in cancer-associated VTE prevention and management.

Effect of PCC on Thrombin Generation among Patients on Factor Xa Inhibitors with Major Bleeding or Needing Urgent Surgery (GAUGE): Design and Rationale.

Background Direct factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) account for most oral anticoagulant use and FXaI-associated bleeding events are common. Clinicians have variable national and regional access to specific FXaI reversal agents such as andexanet alfa. Many centers have adopted the use of prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) as hemostatic therapy for FXaI-associated major bleeding events. PCC does not impact circulating FXaI levels and its mechanism of action to achieve hemostasis in FXaI-associated bleeding is uncertain. While PCC increases quantitative thrombin generation assay (TGA) parameters, it does not correct FXaI-altered thrombin generation kinetics, nor does it normalize thrombin generation. Clinical data supporting the use of PCC are based on cohort studies reporting clinical hemostatic efficacy, which is difficult to measure. The benefits of PCC for FXaI-associated bleeding beyond supportive care are uncertain. Objective GAUGE is a prospective observational study designed to measure the effects of four-factor PCC administration (Octaplex) on TGA parameters among patients with FXaI-associated bleeding or needing urgent surgery. Methods Laboratory outcomes will include the mean paired change in TGA parameters from pre- to post-PCC administration and the proportion of participants whose post-PCC TGA values fall within a defined reference range. Clinical outcomes will include hemostatic efficacy, thromboembolic complications, and all-cause death at 30 days post-PCC. Conclusion Development of a viable and universally accessible FXaI bleed management strategy is crucial. GAUGE will provide in vivo data on the effects of PCC among patients with FXaI-associated bleeding.

Prognostic Factors Associated With Development of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors for the development of venous thromboembolism in the ICU. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to March 1, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: We included English-language studies describing prognostic factors associated with the development of venous thromboembolism among critically ill patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors performed data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment. We pooled adjusted odds ratios and adjusted hazard ratios for prognostic factors using random-effects model. We assessed risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 39 observational cohort studies involving 729,477 patients. Patient factors with high or moderate certainty of association with increased odds of venous thromboembolism include older age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.02-1.29 per 10 yr), obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18-1.32), active malignancy (adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44), history of venous thromboembolism (adjusted odds ratio, 4.77; 95% CI, 3.42-6.65), and history of recent surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.26-2.47). ICU-specific factors with high or moderate certainty of association with increased risk of venous thromboembolism include sepsis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78), lack of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.14-2.84), central venous catheter (adjusted odds ratio, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.98-4.34), invasive mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.36-2.24), and use of vasoactive medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.23-2.81). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis provides quantitative summaries of the association between patient-specific and ICU-related prognostic factors and the risk of venous thromboembolism in the ICU. These findings provide the foundation for the development of a venous thromboembolism risk stratification tool for critically ill patients.

Efficacy of primary prevention of venous thromboembolism among subgroups of cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A post- hoc analysis of the AVERT trial.

BACKGROUND: Apixaban has been shown to significantly decrease the rate of VTE among intermediate-to-high risk patients starting chemotherapy compared to placebo. This investigation sought to determine the impact of apixaban among different subgroups of patients with cancer. METHODS: This is a pre-planned post-hoc analysis of the AVERT randomized controlled trial which compared apixaban to placebo for the primary prevention of VTE in ambulatory patients initiating chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different baseline characteristics. The primary efficacy outcome was objectively documented major VTE. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model to compare the treatment effect accounting for clustering at study center level. RESULTS: During the study period, major VTE events occurred in 4.2% and 10.2% of the apixaban and placebo groups, respectively (HR 0.41; 95%CI, 0.26-0.65). Characteristics associated with decreased risk of major VTE among patients on apixaban included: male sex (HR 0.25, 95%CI 0.12-0.48); weight > 90Kg (HR 0.18, 95%CI, 0.06-0.52); no prior history of VTE (HR 0.41, 95%CI 0.26-0.64); solid cancers (HR 0.30; 95%CI, 0.19-0.47); metastatic disease (HR 0.45; 95%CI, 0.26-0.78); and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy (HR 0.18, 95%CI 0.10-0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In the AVERT trial, while apixaban thromboprophylaxis reduced the risk of major VTE in most patients, patients with weight > 90 kg, solid cancers, or concurrent antiplatelet therapy experienced the greatest benefits.

Development and implementation of common data elements for venous thromboembolism research: on behalf of SSC Subcommittee on official Communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Clinical research in venous thromboembolism (VTE) is hindered by variability in the collection and reporting of data and outcomes. A consistent data language facilitates efficiencies, leads to higher quality data, and permits between-study comparisons and evidence synthesis. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) launched an international task force of more than 50 researchers to develop common data elements for clinical research in venous thromboembolism. The project was organized in seven working groups, each focusing on a topic area: General Core Data Elements; Anticoagulation and Other Therapies; Chronic VTE and Functional Outcomes; Diagnosis of VTE; Malignancy; Perioperative; and Predictors of VTE. The groups met via teleconference to collaboratively identify key data elements and develop definitions and data standards that were structured in a project-specific taxonomy. A Steering Committee met by teleconference and in-person to determine the overall scope of the project and resolve questions arising from the working groups. ISTH held an open public comment period to enable broader stakeholder involvement and feedback. The common data elements were then refined by the working groups to create a set of 512 unique data elements that are publicly available at http://isth.breakthrough.healthcare. The ISTH VTE Common Data Elements are intended to be a living project with ongoing curation, future expansion, and adaptation to meet the needs of the thrombosis and hemostasis research community.

Pulmonary embolism: update on management and controversies.

Pulmonary embolism is a common and potentially fatal cardiovascular disorder that must be promptly diagnosed and treated. The diagnosis, risk assessment, and management of pulmonary embolism have evolved with a better understanding of efficient use of diagnostic and therapeutic options. The use of either clinical probability adjusted or age adjusted D-dimer interpretation has led to a reduction in diagnostic imaging to exclude pulmonary embolism. Direct oral anticoagulation therapies are safe, effective, and convenient treatments for most patients with acute venous thromboembolism, with a lower risk of bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. These oral therapeutic options have opened up opportunities for safe outpatient management of pulmonary embolism in selected patients. Recent clinical trials exploring the use of systemic thrombolysis in intermediate to high risk pulmonary embolism suggest that this therapy should be reserved for patients with evidence of hemodynamic compromise. The role of low dose systemic or catheter directed thrombolysis in other patient subgroups is uncertain. After a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, all patients should be assessed for risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism to guide duration of anticoagulation. Patients with a venous thromboembolism associated with a strong, transient, provoking risk factor can safely discontinue anticoagulation after three months of treatment. Patients with an ongoing strong risk factor, such as cancer, or unprovoked events are at increased risk of recurrent events and should be considered for extended treatment. The use of a risk prediction score can help to identify patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism who can benefit from extended duration therapy. Despite major advances in the management of pulmonary embolism, up to half of patients report chronic functional limitations. Such patients should be screened for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, but only a small proportion will have this as the explanation of their symptoms. In the remaining patients, future studies are needed to understand the pathophysiology and explore interventions to improve quality of life.

Activated prothrombin complex concentrates for direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding or urgent surgery: Hemostatic and thrombotic outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Studies evaluating the use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCCs) for DOAC-associated bleeding are sparse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving aPCC for DOAC-associated bleeding or for pre-operative optimization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery. The primary efficacy outcome was hemostatic efficacy, the primary safety outcome was the 30-day thromboembolic complication rate. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were included in the analysis; 14 patients on dabigatran, 39 patients on rivaroxaban and 29 patients on apixaban. Fifty-four patients received aPCC for major bleeding and 28 patients prior to urgent surgery. Mean aPCC dosing was 2974 IU (SD ± 857 IU). Hemostasis was deemed effective by ISTH criteria in 50% of cases and "Good" or "Moderate" by Sarode criteria in 45.2% and 14.3% of cases, respectively. Surgical hemostasis was rated as "Normal" in 84% of cases pre-operative administration. Median pre-aPCC INR was 1.6 (IQR 0.5) and median post-aPCC INR was 1.2 (IQR 0.2) (p < 0.00001). Median pre-aPCC aPTT was 36 s (IQR 12.8), median post-aPCC aPTT was 29 s (IQR 9.8) (p = 0.0001). The 30-day thromboembolic event rate was 6.1%. CONCLUSION: Further study is needed to characterize the hemostatic effects and thromboembolic risk of aPCC among patients with DOAC-associated bleeding or for attempted normalization of hemostasis prior to urgent surgery.

Outcomes of hospitalized hematologic oncology patients receiving rapid response system activation for acute deterioration.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies who are admitted to hospital are at increased risk of deterioration and death. Rapid response systems (RRSs) respond to hospitalized patients who clinically deteriorate. We sought to describe the characteristics and outcomes of hematologic oncology inpatients requiring rapid response system (RRS) activation, and to determine the prognostic accuracy of the SIRS and qSOFA criteria for in-hospital mortality of hematologic oncology patients with suspected infection. METHODS: We used registry data from two hospitals within The Ottawa Hospital network, between 2012 and 2016. Consecutive hematologic oncology inpatients who experienced activation of the RRS were included in the study. Data was gathered at the time of RRS activation and assessment. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistical regression was used to evaluate for predictors of in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: We included 401 patients during the study period. In-hospital mortality for all included patients was 41.9% (168 patients), and 145 patients (45%) were admitted to ICU following RRS activation. Among patients with suspected infection at the time of RRS activation, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria had a sensitivity of 86.9% (95% CI 80.9-91.6) and a specificity of 38.2% (95% CI 31.9-44.8) for predicting in-hospital mortality, while Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria had a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI 54.1-69.3) and a specificity of 91.4% (95% CI 87.1-94.7). Factors associated with increased in-hospital mortality included transfer to ICU after RRS activation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.56, 95% CI 2.12-5.97) and a higher number of RRS activations (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.63-3.69). Factors associated with improved survival included active malignancy treatment at the time of RRS activation (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86) and longer hospital length of stay (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Hematologic oncology inpatients requiring RRS activation have high rates of subsequent ICU admission and mortality. ICU admission and higher number of RRS activations are associated with increased risk of death, while active cancer treatment and longer hospital stay are associated with lower risk of mortality. Clinicians should consider these factors in risk-stratifying these patients during RRS assessment.

It's time for head-to-head trials with direct oral anticoagulants.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become the recommended first choice anticoagulant agent for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in non-cancer patients and are increasingly prescribed worldwide. They have not only intrinsic advantages, such as rapid onset of action and wide therapeutic windows, but also a lower risk of major, intracranial and fatal bleeding in VTE patients compared to vitamin K antagonists. Even though DOACs are often referred to as uniform drug class, there is growing evidence that each DOAC has a specific risk profile. Indirect comparisons and retrospective cohort studies suggest that apixaban may be associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than other DOACs, but there are no head-to-head trials with DOACs. Therefore, current guidelines do not recommend one DOAC over another and the choice of a specific DOAC is mainly based on physician and patient preferences, reimbursement and availability. Retrospective cohort studies and VTE registries are important to identify potential differences in efficacy and safety between DOACs; but they are methodologically too limited to inform the optimal choice of oral anticoagulant agent. Randomized controlled trials are crucial to inform sound treatment recommendations, because proper randomization is the key to unprejudiced treatment allocation and minimization of unmeasured and unknown confounding. Given increasing evidence of differences in safety profiles of DOACs from indirect comparisons and observational studies, it's time for head-to-head trials with DOACs.