The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: A patient survey.

PURPOSE: Despite limited evidence supporting its effectiveness, most guidelines recommend long-term, routinely scheduled in-person surveillance of patients with early breast cancer (EBC). The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased use of virtual care. This survey evaluated patient perspectives on follow-up care. METHODS: Patients with EBC undergoing surveillance were surveyed about follow-up protocols, perceptions, and interest in clinical trials assessing different follow-up strategies. RESULTS: Of 402 approached patients 270 completed the survey (response rate 67%). Median age 62.5 years (range 25-86) and median time since breast cancer diagnosis was 3.8 years (range < 1-33 years). Most (n = 148/244, 60%) were followed by more than one provider. Routine follow-ups with breast examination were mostly conducted by medical/radiation oncologists every 6 months (n = 110/236, 46%) or annually (n = 106/236, 44%). Participants felt routine follow-up was useful to monitor for recurrence, manage side effects of cancer treatment and to provide support/reassurance. Most participants felt regular follow-up care would detect recurrent cancer earlier (n = 214/255, 96%) and increase survival (n = 218/249, 88%). The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the number of in-person visits for 54% of patients (n = 63/117). Patients were concerned this reduction of in-person visits would lead to later detection of both local (n = 29/63, 46%) and distant recurrences (n = 25/63, 40%). While many felt their medical and radiation oncologists were the most suited to provide follow-up care, 55% felt comfortable having their primary care provider (PCP) conduct surveillance. When presented with a scenario where follow-up has no effect on earlier detection or survival, 70% of patients still wanted routine in-person follow-up for reassurance (63%) with the goal of earlier recurrence detection (56%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limited evidence of effectiveness of routine in-person assessment, patients continue to place importance on regularly scheduled in-person follow-up.

De-escalating adjuvant therapies in older patients with lower risk estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) and endocrine therapy (ET) are standard treatments for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). However, many older patients are at greater risk of treatment-related toxicities and non-cancer related death, and less likely to benefit from these standard treatments. A systematic review was performed evaluating outcomes of omitting RT or ET in older patients aged ≥50 treated with BCS for lower-risk breast cancer. METHODS: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were queried from 1980 to April 30th, 2020 for randomized controlled studies (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PCSs) evaluating omission of RT and/or ET compared to RT plus ET in patients. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models with findings reported as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: From 3860 citations, 10 prospective studies met eligibility criteria. Omission of RT alone was evaluated in 7 RCTs (n = 4604) and one PCS (n = 667); omission of ET alone was assessed in 1 PCS (n = 271); and omission of either ET or RT was compared to ET plus RT in 1 RCT (n = 495). Adjuvant RT compared to no RT reduced 5- and 10-year in-breast tumor recurrence [5-year: RR 0.16, 95 %CI 0.09-0.27 l 10-year: 0.28, 95 %CI 0.16-0.5], but had no effect on survival [5-year: RR 0.94, 95 %CI 0.77-1.15; 10-year: 1.01, 95 %CI 0.9-1.12]. CONCLUSION: The current body of evidence suggests that RT can be omitted in older patients with lower-risk disease. However, more trials on the omission of ET are required to better inform treatment decisions.

Can we rely on surgical clips placed during oncoplastic breast surgery to accurately delineate the tumor bed for targeted breast radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is gaining popularity among surgeons for breast-conserving surgery treatments. OBS relies on complex relocation and deformation of breast tissue involving the tumor bed (TB). In this study, we investigate the validity of using surgical clips with OBS for accurate TB delineation in adjuvant, targeted breast radiotherapy. METHODS: Different OBS techniques were simulated on realistic breast phantoms. Surgical clips were used to demarcate the TB. Following tumor resection and closure, the true TB (TBTrue) was extracted. Each phantom was CT imaged at several phases of surgery in order to record pre- and post-OBS closure surgical clip displacements. Two senior radiation oncologists (ROs) were asked to delineate TBs on CTs by relying on surgical clips placed as per standard protocol, and by referring to operative notes. Their original contours, as well as those expanded using 5-15 mm margins, were compared with the accurate TBTrue using the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and over- and under-contoured volumes. Inter- and intra-RO contour agreements were also evaluated. RESULTS: Post-OBS surgical clips were significantly displaced outside the original breast quadrant. Inter- and Intra-RO TB contours were consistent, yet systematically differed from TBTrue (DSC values range = 0.38 to 0.69, and maximum HD range = 17.8 mm to 38.0 mm). Using expansion margins did not improve contour congruence and caused significant over-contoured volumes. CONCLUSION: Following OBS, surgical clips alone are not reliable radiographic surrogates of TB locations and accurate TB delineation is challenging. For complex OBS cases, indication of any type of partial breast irradiation is very questionable.

Dose-sparing effect of deep inspiration breath hold technique on coronary artery and left ventricle segments in treatment of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The risk of radiation-induced cardiac injury remains a challenging problem in the treatment of breast cancer. Certain cardiac structures receive higher doses than others, which results in variable frequencies of radiation-induced injuries across these structures. Radiation dose can be reduced using the deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) technique. We aimed to investigate the dose reductions from DIBH in individual cardiac segments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dosimetric analysis was performed on left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and whole breast irradiation. Radiation doses to the cardiac structures were compared between the DIBH and free-breathing (FB) techniques and the dose reductions with DIBH were correlated to the lung expansion. RESULTS: For the 75 patients included in our study, DIBH effectively reduced doses to the heart, left lung, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and left ventricle (LV), but the degree of dose reductions was variable across different structures. The absolute dose reductions were greatest in the distal LAD (14.4 Gy) and apical LV (12.1 Gy) segments, compared with the other LAD (middle 9.7 Gy, proximal 1.6 Gy) and LV (anterior 5.3 Gy, lateral 2.9 Gy, septal 2.0 Gy, inferior 0.2 Gy) segments. Left lung expansion was significantly correlated with the dose reductions in the LAD (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, ρ, 0.304) and LV (ρ, 0.420) segments. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the dose-sparing effects of DIBH in various cardiac structures, especially the distal LAD and apical LV segments. The large dose reductions seen in the distal LAD and apical LV segments could potentially translate into clinical benefit of reduced cardiac toxicity, as these structures have been previously shown to receive the highest doses and are associated with radiation-induced injury.

Radiological, dosimetric and mechanical properties of a deformable breast phantom for radiation therapy and surgical applications.

The displacement of tumor bed walls during oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) decreases the accuracy of using surgical clips as the sole surrogate for tumor bed location. This highlights the need for better communication of OBS techniques to radiation oncologists. To facilitate OBS practice and investigate clip placement reliability, a realistic silicone-based breast phantom was constructed with components emulating a breast parenchyma, epidermis, areola, nipple, chest wall, and a tumor. OBS was performed on the phantom and surgical clips were placed to mark the tumor bed. The phantom was imaged with CT, MRI, and ultrasound (US). The parenchyma's signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and clips to parenchyma's contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. The phantom's CT Hounsfield Unit (HU), relative electron density (RED), and mass density were determined. 6 and 10 MV photon beam attenuation measurements were performed in phantom material. The Young's Modulus and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) of the phantom parenchyma and epidermis were measured. Results showed that the breast phantom components were visible on all imaging modalities with adequate SNR and CNR. The phantom's HU is 130 ± 10. The RED is 0.983. Its mass density is 1.01 ± 0.01 g cm-3. Photon attenuation measurements in phantom material were within 1% of those in water. The Young's Moduli were 13.4 ± 4.2 kPa (mechanical) and 30.2 ± 4.1 kPa (US elastography) for the phantom parenchyma. The UTS' were 0.05 ± 0.01 MPa (parenchyma) and 0.23 ± 0.12 MPa (epidermis). We conclude that the phantom's imaging characteristics resemble a fibroglandular breast's and allow clear visualization of high-density markers used in radiation therapy. The phantom material is suitable for dose measurements in MV photon beams. Mechanical results confirmed the phantom's similarity to breast tissue. The phantom enables investigation of surgical clip displacements pre- and post-OBS, and is useful for radiation therapy quality assurance applications.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients: from early stages disease to local palliation for unresectable disease.

There is a lack of clear guidelines on optimal radiotherapy dose regimen for elderly breast cancer patients. This review summarizes the current evidence on role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly breast cancer. Also, suggestions have been provided on the best fractionation approaches based on current evidence. Hypofractionated radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated in elderly breast cancer patients with both early and locally advanced disease. Ultra-hypofractionated regimen seem appropriate for palliation of unresectable primary breast disease and could become a safe approach for adjuvant treatments. Hypofractionated radiotherapy should be considered for treatment of elderly breast cancer for curative intent, as well as for palliation.

Physician Survey of Timing of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Relative to Radiotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients can start endocrine therapy before, concurrently with, or sequentially after radiotherapy. The optimal timing of starting adjuvant endocrine therapy is unknown. This survey was performed to evaluate physician recommendations. METHODS: Canadian oncologists were surveyed to evaluate institutional and personal practices regarding the prescription of adjuvant endocrine therapy and radiotherapy. Perspectives regarding the design of a clinical trial to compare concurrent versus sequential therapy, and the optimum end points for such a trial, were also sought. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 30% (65/220), with responses mainly from medical (35/65, 54%) and radiation (28/65, 43%) oncologists. Eighty-four percent of respondents reported an absence of institutional protocols. The majority of physicians (57%, 36/65) identified endocrine therapy provided after radiotherapy as the preferred sequence of treatments. Twenty-two percent (14/65) had no preference, while 21%, (14/65) started endocrine therapy either before or concurrent with radiotherapy. Practice patterns were largely based on the physician's own clinical experience. Thirty-two percent of physicians (21/65) had concerns regarding concurrent endocrine therapy and radiotherapy, including increased adverse effects with endocrine therapy (13/21, 62%), reduced efficacy of radiotherapy (4/21, 19%), reduced compliance with endocrine therapy (3/21, 14%), and increased radiation toxicity (1/21, 5%). Most thought a pragmatic clinical trial addressing this question would help standardize and improve patient care. CONCLUSION: Decisions around the timing of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy are largely being made on the basis of physicians' personal choices. In the absence of data to support these decisions, appropriately powered trials are needed.

Surgical Scar Recurrence of Bone Metastases to the Femur: A Case Report.

We report the case of a woman who presented with breast cancer metastases to the femur causing pathologic fracture of the femoral neck requiring surgery. She received adjuvant radiotherapy to the femur at that time that did not include the surgical scar tract. Almost four years after her surgery she presented with biopsy proven skin recurrence of breast cancer on the skin overlying her incision from her femoral surgery. Further imaging confirmed significant soft-tissue disease involving the underlying surgical scar tract. This case provides important information about the possibility of surgical scar recurrence after surgery for bone metastases which could indicate the need to include the area of the surgical scar tract and the entire prosthetic material in the post-operative radiotherapy volume.

Comparison of four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy: Dosimetric and efficiency analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare the dosimetric differences between four techniques for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): CyberKnife (CK), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and helical tomotherapy (HT) with dynamic jaws (HT-D) and fixed jaws (HT-F). MATERIALS/METHODS: Data from 10 patients were utilized. All patients were planned for 24 Gy in two fractions, with the primary objectives being: (a) restricting the maximum dose to the cord to ≤ 17 Gy and/or cauda equina to ≤ 20 Gy, and (b) to maximize the clinical target volume (CTV) to receive the prescribed dose. Treatment plans were generated by separate dosimetrists and then compared using velocity AI. Parameters of comparison include target volume coverage, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), homogeneity index (HI), treatment time (TT) per fraction, and monitor units (MU) per fraction. RESULTS: PTV D2 and D5 were significantly higher for CK compared to VMAT, HT-F, and HT-D (P < 0.001). The average volume of CTV receiving the prescription dose (CTV D95) was significantly less for VMAT compared to CK, HT-F and HT-D (P = 0.036). CI improved for CK (0.69), HT-F (0.66), and HT-D (0.67) compared to VMAT (0.52) (P = 0.013). CK (41.86) had the largest HI compared to VMAT (26.99), HT-F (20.69), and HT-D (21.17) (P < 0.001). GI was significantly less for CK (3.96) compared to VMAT (6.76) (P = 0.001). Likewise, CK (62.4 min, 14059 MU) had the longest treatment time and MU per fraction compared to VMAT (8.5 min, 9764 MU), HT-F (13 min, 10822 MU), and HT-D (13.5 min, 11418 MU) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both CK and HT plans achieved conformal target coverage while respecting cord tolerance. Dose heterogeneity was significantly larger in CK. VMAT required the least treatment time and MU output, but had the least steep GI, CI, and target coverage.

Hypofractionation Is an Acceptable Alternative to Conventional Fractionation in the Treatment of Postlumpectomy Ductal Carcinoma In Situ With Radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The standard dose of postlumpectomy radiotherapy (RT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is 50 Gy in 25 fractions using conventional fractionation (CF). However, in invasive carcinoma, hypofractionation (HF) with 40 to 42.6 Gy in 15 to 16 fractions has largely become a standard of care. The purpose of this study was to review the management of postlumpectomy DCIS in terms of RT dose-fractionation and its impact on local recurrence (LR), in one of the largest Canadian academic centers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2003 and 2008, a total of 348 women with DCIS were treated with postlumpectomy RT. Patient characteristics, histopathology, dose-fractionation, use of endocrine therapy, local, regional, contralateral breast recurrences, and cause of death were collected. Local recurrence-free survival was determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for LR. RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 59 years. Two hundred two (58%) patients received CF and 146 (42%) HF. Initially, the yearly proportion of HF was 34%, but increased up to 68% since 2007. Estrogen receptor was positive in 195 patients, and 43% of those received endocrine therapy. With a median follow-up of 64.8 months, 36 LRs were detected. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 94% for the HF group versus 91% for the CF group (P = .80). On multivariate analysis, only the use of endocrine therapy showed a trend towards decreasing LR (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.08; P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of HF for DCIS postlumpectomy has increased over time and is a valid option as it results in similar rates of local control.

Optimal Management of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis in Breast Cancer Patients-A Systematic Review.

The incidence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer patients (LC-BC) is increasing. Despite significantly affecting patient quality of life (QoL) and overall survival (OS), little is known about its optimal management. A systematic review of treatment strategies for LC-BC was performed. EMBASE, Ovid Medline, Pubmed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1946 to 2015 for trials reporting on treatments for LC-BC. All treatment modalities and study types were considered. The outcome measures of interest included OS, time to neurologic progression (TTNP), QoL, and treatment toxicity. Of 718 unique citations, 173 studies met the prespecified eligibility criteria. Most were not specific to LC-BC patients. Of 4 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 was specific to LC-BC patients and compared systemic therapy and involved-field radiotherapy with or without intrathecal (IT) methotrexate (35 patients), and the remaining 3 had compared different IT chemotherapy regimens (58 of 157 with LC-BC). Of the remaining studies, 19 were nonrandomized interventional studies (225 LC-BC patients), 148 were observational studies (3230 LC-BC patients), and 2 systematic reviews. Minimal prospective data were available on OS, TTNP, QoL, and toxicity. Owing to study heterogeneity, meta-analyses of the endpoint data could not be performed. Limited high-quality evidence exists regarding optimal treatment of LC-BC. The identified studies were heterogeneous and often methodologically poor. The only RCT that specifically assessed the role of IT chemotherapy showed no benefit, and, if anything, harm. Further prospective, tumor-specific trials with improved interstudy methodologic consistency and transparently reported data on OS, TTNP, QoL, and toxicity are urgently needed.

Evidence-based guideline recommendations on treatment strategies for localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: (1) To provide recommendations regarding the choice of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), or the combination of surgery plus RT in patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (2) To determine the appropriate surgical planning imaging (pre-chemotherapy magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or post-chemotherapy MRI) to identify optimal resection margins in patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma who undergo surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (1999 to February 2015), main guideline websites, and relevant annual meeting abstracts (2012 to January 2015) were searched. Internal and external reviews were conducted. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Recommendation (1) - In patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: (a) Surgery alone or RT alone are two reasonable treatment options; the combination of surgery plus RT is not recommended as an initial treatment option. (b) The local treatment for an individual patient should be decided by a multidisciplinary tumour board together with the patient after consideration of the following: (1) patient characteristics (e.g., age, tumour location, tumour size, response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and existing comorbidities), (2) the potential benefit weighed against the potential complications from surgery and/or toxicities associated with RT, and (3) patient preferences. 2. Recommendation (2) - In patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma who will undergo surgery: (a) Both pre-chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy MRI scans should be taken into consideration for surgical planning. In certain anatomic locations with good chemotherapy response, the post-chemotherapy MRI may be the appropriate imaging modality to plan surgical resection margins.

A systematic review of optimal treatment strategies for localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to investigate the optimal treatment strategy among the options of surgery alone, radiotherapy (RT) alone, and the combination of RT plus surgery in the management of localized Ewing's sarcoma of bone following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE (1999 to February 2015), the Cochrane Library, and relevant conferences were searched. RESULTS: Two systematic reviews and eight full texts met the pre-planned study selection criteria. When RT was compared with surgery, a meta-analysis combining two papers showed that surgery resulted in a higher event-free survival (EFS) than RT in any location (HR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-2.00; p = 0.007). However another paper did not find a statistically significant difference in patients with pelvic disease, and no papers identified a significant difference in overall survival. When surgery plus RT was compared with surgery alone, a meta-analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference for EFS between the two groups (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 0.90-1.63). Both surgical morbidities and radiation toxicities were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The existing evidence is based on very low aggregate quality as assessed by the GRADE approach. In patients with localized Ewing's sarcoma, either surgery alone (if complete surgical excision with clear margin can be achieved) or RT alone may be a reasonable treatment option. The optimal local treatment for an individual patient should be decided through consideration of patient characteristics, the potential benefit and harm of the treatment options, and patient preference.

Successful Salvage Radiotherapy for a Chemo-refractory, Non-resectable, Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma Lung Metastasis with Pericardial Involvement: A Case Report.

We report a case of an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in a 73-year-old female, with a solitary lung metastasis involving the pericardium that progressed on first-line chemotherapy. Partial removal of the lesion was achieved after lingular segmentectomy, which required en-bloc pericardial resection due to deep pericardial invasion. However, the residual disease significantly grew despite second-line chemotherapy, and the tumor became unresectable due to near encasement of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Therefore, we opted for a salvage radical dose of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (60Gy in 25 fractions) to the pericardial lesion. No acute side effects were observed, and after three years of follow-up, good local control has been achieved with no significant late effects observed. This case suggests that radical radiotherapy using IMRT could be considered to treat sarcomatous pericardial lesions in patients who do not respond to chemotherapy and who are inoperable or non-resectable.

Report on the Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Breast Seed Implant for Early-Stage Breast Cancers.

PURPOSE: Permanent breast seed implant is an accelerated partial breast irradiation technique realizing the insertion of (103)Pd seeds in the seroma after lumpectomy. We report the 5-year efficacy and tolerance for a cohort, pooling patients from 3 clinical trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The trials accrued postmenopausal patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ ≤3 cm and clear surgical margins, who were node negative, and had a planning target volume <120 cm(3). The outcomes included overall and disease-free survival and local and contralateral recurrence at 5 years. The true local recurrence rate was compared using 2-tailed paired t tests for estimates calculated using the Tufts University ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence and Memorial Sloan Kettering ductal carcinoma in situ nomograms. RESULTS: The cohort included 134 patients, and the observed local recurrence rate at a median follow-up period of 63 months was 1.2% ± 1.2%, similar to the estimate for whole breast irradiation (P=.23), significantly better than for surgery alone (relative risk 0.27; P<.001), and significantly lower than contralateral recurrence (relative risk 0.33; P<.001). The 5-year overall survival rate was 97.4% ± 1.9%, and the disease-free survival rate was 96.4% ± 2.1%. At 2 months, 42% of the patients had erythema, 20% induration, and 16% moist desquamation. The rate of mainly grade 1 telangiectasia was 22.4% at 2 years and 24% at 5 years. The rate of asymptomatic induration was 23% at 2 years and 40% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year data suggest that permanent breast seed implantation is a safe accelerated partial breast irradiation option after lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer with a tolerance profile similar to that of whole breast irradiation.

Treatment choices for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer: a doctor survey.

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has distinct features that present challenges for management. We surveyed doctors regarding management approaches, opinions on quality of evidence supporting their practice, and future research needs. METHODS: An online questionnaire was developed and circulated to breast cancer surgical, radiation and medical oncologists. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 88/428 doctors (20.6%); 22/56 (39.3%) surgeons, 21/64 (32.8%) radiation oncologists and 45/308 (14.6%) medical oncologists. The majority (65%) of surgeons were comfortable treating ILC patients using the same surgical management as patients with invasive ductal cancers (IDC). Furthermore, 25% would perform a similar surgery but would obtain larger gross margins. There was equipoise for radiation oncologists regarding whether or not ILC was an independent risk factor for local-regional recurrence after either breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy. Of those radiation oncologists who believe ILC is an independent risk factor for recurrence after mastectomy, 44.4% would offer radiation in the absence of usual indications. Medical oncologists approached systemic therapy for ILC patients similarly to those with comparable IDCs. Areas identified as most controversial and requiring future research were preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, radiotherapy post-mastectomy and the responsiveness of ILC to adjuvant chemotherapy compared with endocrine therapy. CONCLUSIONS: There is a variation in doctors' beliefs, management and opinions regarding the quality of evidence for the management of ILC. Clinical trials specifically assessing the management of ILC are required to guide clinical practice.

Imaging for metastatic disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: are doctor's perceptions in keeping with the guidelines?

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Despite multiple guidelines advocating against routine radiological evaluation for metastases in women with early stage breast cancer, imaging is still frequently overused. The objective of this study was to assess doctor's views on imaging guidelines, and an attempt to establish why personal and local clinical practice patterns regarding imaging may differ from current guidelines. METHODS: Canadian doctors who treat breast cancer were invited by email to complete an online survey developed by members of the research team. RESULTS: Responses were received from 173 physicians (26% response rate). Most (82%) indicated awareness of at least one published imaging guideline. Sixty per cent indicated that they had read the recommendations of the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology 'Top 5' list for choosing wisely in oncology imaging and, of those, 81% agreed with it. However, most indicated that this recommendation has not influenced them to order less imaging. Over 95% of doctors identified suspicious history, physical examination findings and inflammatory breast cancer as important factors for performing imaging. The majority did not feel that patient demand, fear of litigation or ease of access to imaging influenced their ordering for imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of breast cancer doctors are aware of and generally agree that guidelines pertaining to staging imaging for early breast cancer are reflective of evidence. Despite this, adherence is variable and factors such as local practice patterns and disease biology may play a role. Alternative strategies, beyond simply publishing recommendations, are therefore required if there is to be a sustained change in doctor behaviour.

IMRT sparing of normal tissues in locoregional treatment of breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This clinical study was designed to prospectively evaluate the acute and moderately-late cardiac and lung toxicities of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by helical tomotherapy (IMRT-HT) for locoregional breast radiation treatment including the internal mammary nodes (IMN). MATERIAL/METHODS: 30 patients with stage III breast cancers have been accrued in this study. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Target volumes were defined as follows: the PTV included breast/chest wall, axillary level II, III, infra/supraclavicular, IM nodes CTVs plus 3 mm margins. The heart with subunits and the lungs were defined as critical organs. Dose to PTV was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Acute toxicities were assessed every week and 2 weeks post treatment using the CTCAE v3.0.scale. The moderately-late toxicities were assessed clinically plus by cardiac myoview perfusion tests scheduled at baseline, 3 and 12-month follow-up, as well a CT chest at the 6 month follow-up. The data analysis is descriptive. RESULTS: All participants completed the 5-week course of radiation without interruption. Skin erythema was modest and mainly grade 1-2 between the 3rd and the 5th week of radiation treatment. Only 4/30 patients experienced grade 3 skin reactions, mostly seen 2 weeks post radiation. Only 5 patients demonstrated grade 1 or 2 dyspnea, but 3 of them already had symptoms pre-radiation treatment. With a median follow-up of 58 (24-76) months, there have been infrequent moderately-late side effects. Most were grade 1 and were sometimes present at the baseline assessment. Cardiac myoview tests done at baseline and 1-year follow-up for 15 out of 18 left sided breast cancers did not show any abnormalities related to radiation. The 6-month follow-up chest CT-scans done for 25 out of 30 patients showed minimal anterior lung fibrosis for 7 patients and were completely normal for the other 18. No locoregional recurrence has been recorded and the 5-year survival is 78% (95% CI: 70-97%). CONCLUSION: IMRT-HT for locoregional breast radiation is very well tolerated with minimal acute or moderately-late side effects. Cardiac and respiratory tests did not show any strong evidence of significant treatment related abnormalities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: http://NCT00508352.

Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The probability of detecting radiologically evident metastatic disease in asymptomatic women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer is low. Despite the recommendations of most practice guidelines imaging is still frequently performed. Relatively little is known about what patients believe is important when it comes to radiologic staging. METHODS: Patients with early stage breast cancer who had completed their definitive breast surgery were surveyed about their personal experiences, perceptions, and expectations on the issue of perioperative imaging for distant metastatic disease. RESULTS: Over a 3 month period, 245 women with primary operable breast cancer completed the questionnaire (87.0% response rate) and 80.8% indicated having had at least one imaging test for distant metastatic disease. These were either of the thorax (72.2%), abdomen (55.9%) or skeleton (65.3%) with a total of 701 imaging tests (average of 3.5 tests per patient imaged) performed. Overall, 57.1% indicated that they would want imaging done if the chance of detecting metastases was ≤10%. Although 80.0% of patients indicated that, "doing whatever their doctor recommended" was important to them, 70.4% also noted that they would be uncomfortable if their physician did not order imaging, even if this was in keeping with practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with early stage breast cancer recall having imaging tests for distant metastases. Given the choice, most would prefer having imaging performed, even if this is not in line with current guidelines. If patient expectations are, in part, driving excessive imaging, new strategies addressing this are required.

A dose verification tool for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy treatment planning in accelerated partial breast irradiation.

PURPOSE: To develop a dose verification tool for high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy treatment planning in accelerated partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We have developed a software tool for interstitial brachytherapy treatment planning assessment. The software contains a database of seven (192)Ir source models and is able to estimate the dose distribution using the Task Group 43 and the Sievert integral algorithms. Dose-volume histogram analysis and dose quality assurance (QA) criteria including conformity (COnformal INdex [COIN] and conformation number [CN]), homogeneity (homogeneity index [HI]) parameters were implemented in the software to evaluate and to compare between the doses estimated by the two algorithms and a dose extracted from an external treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS: The tool was evaluated and validated on four clinical cases treated by high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy. The doses provided by the Task Group 43 and the Sievert integral algorithms were evaluated by establishing the dose-volume histogram analysis and then by calculating the QA criteria. The algorithms were validated by comparing the dose at different anatomic points with their corresponding dose points provided from TPS. The differences were considered in good agreement (within 5%). CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment dose verification is an important step in the QA of brachytherapy accelerated partial breast irradiation. A simple, fast, and accurate method of dose verification is therefore needed. The software proposed in this study could fulfill these requirements. In addition, it is freely available for using by anyone wishing to do a QA on any TPS.