RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prehabilitation describes interventions that are undertaken prior to a major surgical or medical intervention with the objective of improving functional capability with the goal of improving candidacy for therapy, bolstering one's ability to withstand treatment-associated toxicity, functional decline, and facilitating accelerated recovery. The objective of this review is to detail the key tenets of prehabilitation, synthesize contemporary advances in prehabilitation science within Urologic Oncology, and discuss key methodologic trial design considerations salient to future prehabilitation investigations. RECENT FINDINGS: Contemporary prehabilitation clinical trials have primarily evaluated unimodal interventions aiming to improve functional capacity across the domains of physical exercise, nutrition, and cognition with heightened interest in evaluating multimodal interventions addressing two or more domains. Recent investigations have have demonstrated variable improvements in strength, balance, physical function, and quality of life with preoperative exercise. Although presurgical immunonutrition showed promise in other fields, initial results in uro-oncology have not demonstrated reductions in complications nor improvements in early survival. Emerging data supports the potential of multimodal prehabilitation programs to offer more comprehensive benefits, improving functional outcomes, reducing length of stay, and supporting improved recovery. SUMMARY: To date, early prehabilitation studies in patients undergoing surgery for genitourinary malignancies have demonstrated variable ability to facilitate gains in functional capacity and perioperative outcomes. Key issues have arisen including the need to ensure that interventions are pragmatic, scalable, feasible, and acceptable in these populations that often also have a high prevalence of coincident multimorbidity, frailty, and mental health concerns that can increase risk of adverse outcomes after surgery. The integration of personalized prehabilitation strategies as extensions of perioperative enhanced recovery after surgery protocols, supportive care and survivorship paradigms offers of promise to further engage patients in their care, enhance patient resilience and outcomes, while reducing treatment burden in urologic oncology.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is the most common urologic disease in aging males, affecting 50% of men over 50 and up to 80% of men over 80 years old. Its negative impact on health-related quality of life implores further investigation into its risk factors and strategies for effective management. Although the exact molecular mechanisms underlying pathophysiological onset of BPH are poorly defined, the current hypothesized contributors to BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) include aging, inflammation, metabolic syndrome, and hormonal changes. These processes are indirectly influenced by circadian rhythm disruption. In this article, we review the recent evidence on the potential association of light changes/circadian rhythm disruption and the onset of BPH and impact on treatment. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify supporting evidence. The articles referenced ranged from 1975 to 2023. RESULTS: A clear relationship between BPH/LUTS and circadian rhythm disruption is yet to be established. However, common mediators influence both diseases, including proinflammatory states, metabolic syndrome, and hormonal regulation that can be asserted to circadian disruption. Some studies have identified a possible relationship between general LUTS and sleep disturbance, but little research has been done on the medical management of these diseases and how circadian rhythm disruption further affects treatment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to implicate a relationship between BPH/LUTS and circadian rhythm disruptions. However, there is scarce literature on potential specific link in medical management of the disease and treatment outcomes with circadian rhythm disruption. Further study is warranted to provide BPH patients with insights into circadian rhythm directed appropriate interventions.